https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1030-2016
References
- Beiser, F. C. 1992. Enlightenment, Revolution, and Romanticism: The Genesis of Modern German Political Thought, 1790-1800. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
- Berlin, I. 2013. “Herder and the Enlightenment.” In Three Critics of the Enlightenment: Vico, Hamann, Herder, edited by H. Hardy, 208–300. 2nd Edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt46n3vv.
- Faulkner, W. 1953. Requiem for a Nun. 2nd ed. London: Chatto & Windus.
- Lestition, S. 2007. “Countering, Transposing, or Negating the Enlightenment? A Response to Robert Norton.” Journal of the History of Ideas 68 (4): 659–681. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2007.0034.
- Markworth, T. 2022. “Herder Bibliography.” Tinomarkworth.Com (Blog). December 2022. https://tinomarkworth.com/herder-bibliography/.
- Norton, R. E. 2007. “The Myth of the Counter-Enlightenment.” Journal of the History of Ideas 68 (4): 635–658. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2007.0040.
- Norton, R. E. 2008. “Isaiah Berlin’s ‘Expressionism,’ Or: ‘Ha! du Bist Das Blökende!’’’. Journal of the History of Ideas 69 (2): 339–347. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2008.0012.
- Sikka, S. 2011. Herder on Humanity and Cultural Difference: Enlightened Relativism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511783012.
- Sternhell, Z. 2010. The Anti-Enlightenment Tradition. Translated by David Maisel. New Haven: Yale University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt5vm23x.
- Taylor, C. 2016. The Language Animal: The Full Shape of the Human Linguistic Capacity. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674970250.
- Waldow, A. 2020. Experience Embodied: Early Modern Accounts of the Human Place in Nature. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Williams, B. 2014. Descartes: The Project of Pure Enquiry. Abingdon and New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315747439.
- Zammito, J. H., K. Menges, and E. A. Menze. 2010. “Johann Gottfried Herder Revisited: The Revolution in Scholarship in the Last Quarter Century.” Journal of the History of Ideas 71 (4): 661–684. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2010.0006.