784
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Introduction

Rethinking Early Modern Philosophy

&

References

  • Anstey, P. R. 2005. “Experimental versus Speculative Natural Philosophy.” In The Science of Nature in the Seventeenth Century: Patterns of Changes in Early Modern Natural Philosophy, edited by P. R. Anstey and J. Schuster, 215–242. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3703-1_9.
  • Anstey, P., and A. Vanzo. 2012. “The Origins of Early Modern Experimental Philosophy.” Intellectual History Review 22 (4): 499–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496977.2012.695167.
  • Anstey, P., and A. Vanzo. 2023. Experimental Philosophy and the Origins of Empiricism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Astell, M. 2002. A Serious Proposal to the Ladies. Edited by Patricia Springborg. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press.
  • Ayers, M. 2005. “Was Berkeley an Empiricist or a Rationalist?” In The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley, edited by K. P. Winkler, 34–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bennett, J. 2001. Learning from Six Philosophers: Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, Hume. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Broad, J. 2014. “Women on Liberty in Early Modern England.” Philosophy Compass 9 (2): 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12106.
  • Broad, J. 2015. The Philosophy of Mary Astell: An Early Modern Theory of Virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Broad, J. 2019. “Selfhood and Self-Government in Women’s Religious Writings of the Early Modern Period.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 27 (5): 713–730. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2019.1663234.
  • Clarke, D. M., ed. 2013. The Equality of the Sexes: Three Feminist Texts of the Seventeenth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Dea, S., J. Walsh, and M. L. Thomas. 2018. “Continental Rationalism.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta, Winter 2018 edition. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/continental-rationalism/.
  • Descartes, R. 1964–76. Oeuvres de Descartes. Edited by C. Adam and P. Tannery, 12 vols. Paris: J. Vrin.
  • Descartes, R. 1984–91. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Edited by J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, D. Murdoch, and A. Kenny, 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107340824
  • Detlefsen, K., and L. Shapiro. 2023. The Routledge Handbook of Women and Early Modern European Philosophy. New York and Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Hume, D. 1978[1739–40]. A Treatise of Human Nature. Edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge and P. H. Nidditch, 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Hume, D. 2007[1739–40]. A Treatise of Human Nature. Edited by D. F. Norton and M. J. Norton. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Hutton, S. 2017. “Liberty of the Mind: Women Philosophers and the Freedom to Philosophize.” In Women and Liberty, 1600–1800: Philosophical Essays, edited by J. Broad and K. Detlefsen, 123–137. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Laerke, M., J. E. Smith, and E. Schliesser 2013. Philosophy and Its History: Aims and Methods in the Study of Early Modern Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199857142.001.0001.
  • Loeb, L. 1981. From Descartes to Hume: Continental Metaphysics and the Development of Modern Philosophy. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
  • Markie, P., and M. Folescu. 2023. Rationalism vs. Empiricism. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta. Spring 2023 edition. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/rationalism-empiricism/.
  • Masham, D. 1705. Occasional Thoughts in Reference to a Vertuous or Christian Life. London: Printed for A. and J. Churchil at the Black-Swan in Paternoster-Row.
  • Mercer, C. 2019. “The Contextualist Revolution in Early Modern Philosophy.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 57 (3): 529–548. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2019.0057.
  • Nelson, A. 2013. “Philosophical Systems and Their History.” In Philosophy and Its History: Aims and Methods in the Study of Early Modern Philosophy, edited by M. Laerke, J. E. H. Smith, and E. Schliesser, 236–257. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • O’Neill, E. 1998. “Disappearing Ink: Early Modern Women Philosophers and Their Fate in History.” In Philosophy in a Feminist Voice, edited by J. A. Kourany, 17–62. Princteon: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400822324.17.
  • O’Neill, E., and M. P. Lascano. 2019. Feminist History of Philosophy: The Recovery and Evaluation of Women’s Philosophical Thought. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18118-5.
  • Phemister, P. 2006. The Rationalists: Descartes, Spinoza and Leibniz. Malden, MA: Polity.
  • Shapiro, L. 2016. “Revisiting the Early Modern Philosophical Canon.” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 2 (3): 365–383. https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2016.27.
  • Shapiro, L. 2021. “Elisabeth, Princess of Bohemia.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta. Fall 2021 edition. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/elisabeth-bohemia/.
  • Shapiro, L. 2023. “Canon, Gender, and Historiography.” In The Routledge Handbook of Women and Early Modern European Philosophy, edited by K. Detlefsen and L. Shapiro, 29–40. New York and Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315450001-4.
  • Vanzo, A. 2016. “Empiricism and Rationalism in Nineteenth-Century Histories of Philosophy.” Journal of the History of Ideas 77 (2): 253–282. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2016.0017.
  • Waldow, A. 2020. Experience Embodied: Early Modern Accounts of the Human Place in Nature. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Watkins, M. 2019. The Philosophical Progress of Hume’s Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wilson, A. B. 2016. Peirce’s Empiricism: Its Roots and Its Originality. Lanham: Lexington Books.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.