Making Room for the Solution: A Critical and Applied Phenomenology of Conflict Space

References

• Anderson, E. 2015. “The White Space.” Sociology of Race & Ethnicity 1 (1): 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649214561306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. 1998. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arisaka, Y. 1995. “Heidegger’s Theory of Space: A Critique of Dreyfus.” Inquiry 38 (4): 455–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201749508602400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, P. B., and T. Luckmann. 1967. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Bertinetto, A., and G. W. Bertram. 2020. “We Make Up the Rules as We Go Along: Improvisation as an Essential Aspect of Human Practices?” Open Philosophy 3 (1): 202–221. https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2020-0012.
   Google Scholar
• Björkdahl, A., and S. Buckley-Zistel, eds. 2016. Spatializing Peace and Conflict. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137550484.
   Google Scholar
• Björkdahl, A., and S. Kappler. 2017. Peacebuilding and Spatial Transformation: Peace, Space and Place. Studies in Conflict, Development and Peacebuilding. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blattner, W. 2019. “Care (Sorge).” In The Cambridge Heidegger Lexicon, edited by M. A. Wrathall, 137–144. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brigg, M., and N. George. 2020. “Emplacing the Spatial Turn in Peace and Conflict Studies.” Cooperation and Conflict 55 (4): 409–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836720954488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burch, M. 2021. “Make Applied Phenomenology What It Needs to Be: An Interdisciplinary Research Program.” Continental Philosophy Review 54 (2): 275–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-021-09532-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carman, T. 2003. Heidegger’s Analytic: Interpretation, Discourse, and Authenticity in Being and Time. Modern European Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cerbone, D. R. 2013. “Heidegger on Space and Spatiality.” In The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger’s Being and Time, Cambridge Companions to Philosophy, edited by M. A. Wrathall, 129–144. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ceva, E. 2016. Interactive Justice: A Proceduralist Approach to Value Conflict in Politics. 1st ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Crowell, S. G. 2003. “Facticity and Transcendental Philosophy.” In From Kant to Davidson: Philosophy and the Idea of the Transcendental, edited by J. Malpas, 100–121. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crowell, S. G. 2013. Normativity and Phenomenology in Husserl and Heidegger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crowell, S. G. 2015. “Responsibility, Autonomy, Affectivity. A Heideggerian Approach.” In Heidegger, Authenticity, and the Self: Themes from Division Two of Being and Time, edited by D. McManus, 215–242. 1st ed. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Crowell, S. G. 2017. “Exemplary Necessity: Heidegger, Pragmatism and Reason.” In Pragmatic Perspectives in Phenomenology, edited by O. Švec and J. Čapek, 242–256. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, D. H. 2020. “The Phenomenological Method.” In 50 Concepts for a Critical Phenomenology, edited by G. Weiss, A. V. Murphy, and G. Salamon, 3–9. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Depraz, N. 2022. “Critical Phenomenology and Micro-Phenomenology: The First-Person Experience of the “Collective”.” In Phenomenology as Critique: Why Method Matters, edited by A. S. Aldea, D. Carr, and S. Heinämaa, 138–151. New York: Routledge Research in Phenomenology.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H. L. 1991. Being-In-The-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division I. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ekdahl, D., and S. Ravn. 2022. “Social Bodies in Virtual Worlds: Intercorporeality in Esports.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 21 (2): 293–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-021-09734-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frodeman, R. 1992. “Being and Space: A Re-Reading of Existential Spatiality in Being and Time.” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 23 (1): 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.1992.11006965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S., and D. Zahavi. 2010. The Phenomenological Mind: An Introduction to Philosophy of Mind and Cognitive Science. Repr. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Garland-Thomson, R. 2011. “Misfits: A Feminist Materialist Disability Concept.” Hypatia 26 (3): 591–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01206.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginev, D. 2012. “Conflicting Scenarios Regarding Existential Spatiality in Being and Time.” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 43 (3): 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2012.11006777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giorgi, A. 2021. “The Necessity of the Epochē and Reduction for a Husserlian Phenomenological Science of Psychology.” Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 52 (1): 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691624-12341382.
   Google Scholar
• Guenther, L. 2021. “Six Senses of Critique for Critical Phenomenology.” Puncta 4 (2): 5–23. https://doi.org/10.5399/PJCP.v4i2.2.
   Google Scholar
• Guenther, L. 2022. “Abolish the World as We Know It: Notes for a Praxis of Phenomenology Beyond Critique.” Puncta 5 (2): 28–44. https://doi.org/10.5399/pjcp.v5i2.3.
   Google Scholar
• Haugeland, J., 2013. Dasein Disclosed: John Haugeland’s Heidegger. Edited by Joseph Rouse. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. (1927) 1996. “Being and Time”. SUNY Series in Contemporary Continental Philosophy, edited by J. Stambaugh. Albany: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. (1927) 2006. Sein und Zeit. 19th ed. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. (1951) 2001. “Building Dwelling Thinking.” In Poetry, Language, Thought, 141–159. New York: Perennial Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. (1975) 1988. The Basic Problems of Phenomenology. Revised edition, First Midland Book edition. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Høffding, S., and K. Martiny. 2016. “Framing a Phenomenological Interview: What, Why and How.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 15 (4): 539–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-015-9433-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Høffding, S., K. Martiny, and A. Roepstorff. 2022. “Can We Trust the Phenomenological Interview? Metaphysical, Epistemological, and Methodological Objections.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 21 (1): 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-021-09744-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, F. 2021. “Relief and the Structure of Intentions in Late Palaeolithic Cave Art.” The Journal of Aesthetics & Art Criticism 79 (3): 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaac/kpab022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husserl, E., [1956] 2012. Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie: Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie. Edited by Elisabeth Ströker. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.
   Google Scholar
• Køster, A., and A. Vincent Fernandez. 2023. “Investigating Modes of Being in the World: An Introduction to Phenomenologically Grounded Qualitative Research.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 22 (1): 149–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-020-09723-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. 2007. Doing Interviews. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Löw, M. 2008. “The Constitution of Space: The Structuration of Spaces Through the Simultaneity of Effect and Perception.” European Journal of Social Theory 11 (1): 25–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431007085286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malpas, J. 2006. Heidegger’s Topology: Being, Place, World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• McMullin, I. 2013. Time and the Shared World: Heidegger on Social Relations. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mensch, J. 2007. “Public Space.” Continental Philosophy Review 40 (1): 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-006-9038-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mensch, J. 2012. “Public Space and Embodiment.” Studia Phaenomenologica 12:211–226. https://doi.org/10.7761/SP.12.211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945) 2012. Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mulhall, S. 2005. Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Heidegger and Being and Time. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Oksala, J. 2022. “The Method of Critical Phenomenology: Simone de Beauvoir as a Phenomenologist.” European Journal of Philosophy 31 (1): 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osler, L. 2021. “Taking Empathy Online.” Inquiry 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2021.1899045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osler, L., and J. Krueger. 2022. “Taking Watsuji Online: Betweenness and Expression in Online Spaces.” Continental Philosophy Review 55 (1): 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-021-09548-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rautenberg, N. 2023. “Ta-Nehisi Coates’s Between the World and Me: A Phenomenology of Racialized Conflict.” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2022.41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schutz, A. 1967. The Phenomenology of the Social World. 1st paperback ed. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A. 2018. ““Yes It is Phenomenological”: A Reply to Max Van Manen’s Critique of Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.” Qualitative Health Research 28 (12): 1955–1958. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318799577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Manen, M. 2018. “Rebuttal Rejoinder: Present IPA for What It Is—Interpretative Psychological Analysis.” Qualitative Health Research 28 (12): 1959–1968. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318795474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Manen, M. 2019. “Rebuttal: Doing Phenomenology on the Things.” Qualitative Health Research 29 (6): 908–925. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732319827293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldenfels, B. 2011. Phenomenology of the Alien: Basic Concepts. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wieseler, C. 2019. “Challenging Conceptions of the “Normal” Subject in Phenomenology.” In Race as Phenomena: Between Phenomenology and Philosophy of Race, edited by E. S. Lee, 69–86. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Withy, K. 2011. “Situation and Limitation: Making Sense of Heidegger on Thrownness: Making Sense of Heidegger on Thrownness.” European Journal of Philosophy 22 (1): 61–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0378.2011.00471.x.
   Google Scholar
• Wrathall, M. A. 2005. How to Read Heidegger. London: Granta Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wrathall, M. A. 2017. ““I” “Here” and “You” “There”: Heidegger on Existential Spatiality and the “Volatilized” Self.” Yearbook for Eastern and Western Philosophy 2017 (2): 223–234. https://doi.org/10.1515/yewph-2017-0017.
   Google Scholar
• Wrathall, M. A., and M. Murphey. 2013. “An Overview of Being and Time.” In The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger’s Being and Time, edited by M. A. Wrathall, 1–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zahavi, D. 2019. “Getting It Quite Wrong: Van Manen and Smith on Phenomenology.” Qualitative Health Research 29 (6): 900–907. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318817547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahavi, D. 2021. “Applied Phenomenology: Why It is Safe to Ignore the Epoché.” Continental Philosophy Review 54 (2): 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-019-09463-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar