On some ‘Austrian’ misreadings of Cantillon's notions of intrinsic value and market price

References

• Aspromourgos, T. (1989). The theory of production and distribution in Cantillon's Essai. Oxford Economic Papers, 41: 356–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aspromourgos, T. (1996). On the Origins of Classical Economics: Distribution and Value from William Petty to Adam Smith. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aspromourgos, T. (1997). Cantillon on real wages and employment: A rational reconstruction of the significance of land utilization. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 4(3): 417–43.
   Google Scholar
• Aspromourgos, T. (2009). The Science of Wealth: Adam Smith and the Framing of Political Economy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blaug, M. (Ed.). (1991). Richard Cantillon (1680–1734), Jacques Turgot (1727–1781). Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Brems, H. (1978). Cantillon versus Marx: The land theory and the labor theory of value. History of Political Economy, 10 (4): 669–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, A. (1988). Cantillon and the land theory of value. History of Political Economy, 20 (1): 1–14. Reproduced in: M. Blaug (Ed.). (1991). Richard Cantillon (1680–1734) and Jacques Turgot (1727–1781). Aldershot: Edward Elgar. pp. 268–81.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, A. (1992). Richard Cantillon. Pioneer of Economic Theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cantillon, R. (1931a [1755]). In H. Higgs (Ed.), Essai sur la Nature du Commerce en General. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cantillon, R. (1931b). In F.A. Hayek (Ed.), Abhandlung über die Natur des Handels im allgemeinen. Jena: Verlag Gustav Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Cantillon, R. (1974 [1955]). In S. Cotta and A. Giolitti (Eds.), Saggio sulla natura del commercio in generale, Introduction by Einaudi L. Giulio Einaudi Editore.
   Google Scholar
• Cantillon, R. (1979). In T. Tsuda (Ed.), Essay de la Nature du Commerce en General: Texte Manuscrit de la Bibliothèque Municipal du Rouen, avec le Texte de l’édition Originale de 1755.: Hitotsubashi University.
   Google Scholar
• Cantillon, R. (1997). In INED (Ed.), Essai sur la Nature du Commerce en General. Paris: INED.
   Google Scholar
• Cantillon, R. (2010). In M. Thornton (Ed.): An Essay on Economic Theory. An English translation of Richard Cantillon's Essai sur la Nature du Commerce en Général. Translation by Saucier C. Auburn. Ludwig Mises Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Groenewegen, P. (2012). A new English translation of Cantillon: Modern improvement or anachronistic redention into North American English? History of Economics Review, 55: 80–9. Winter.
   Google Scholar
• Hébert, R.F. (1985). Was Richard Cantillon an Austrian economist? The Journal of Libertarian Studies, VII(2). 269–279. Fall.
   Google Scholar
• Holcombe, R.G. (Ed.). (1999). Fifteen Great Austrian Economists. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hull C.H. (Ed.). (1899). The Economic Writings of Sir William Petty, 2 Vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hülsmann, J.G. (2001). More on Cantillon as a Proto-Austrian. Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, A Bilingual Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 693–703. XI(4).
   Google Scholar
• Marx K. (1967). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. III Vol. Edited by F. Engels. New York: International Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Meek, R.L. (1958). Studies in the Labour Theory of Value. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, A.E. (1986). Richard Cantillon – Entrepreneur and Economist. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, A.E. (2009). The Genesis of Macroeconomics – New Ideas from Sir William Petty to Henry Thornton. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Mahony's, D. (1985). Richard Cantillon – a man of his time: A comment on Tarascio. The Journal of Libertarian Studies, 259–267. VII(2).
   Google Scholar
• Prendergast R. (1991). Cantillon and the emergence of the theory of profit. History of Political Economy, 23(3): 419–429.
   Google Scholar
• Ricardo, D. (1951–1973). The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, edited by Piero Sraffa with the collaboration of Maurice H. Dobb, 11 vols [cited as Works, followed by volume number]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothbard, M.N. (1995). Economic Thought Before Adam Smith: An Austrian Perspective on the History of Economic Thought. Volume I. Auburn, Alabama: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (1976 [1776]). R.H. Campbell, A.S. Skinner and W.B. Todd (Eds.), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nation, 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sraffa, P. (1960). Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities: Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarascio, V.J. (1981). Cantillon's theory of population size and distribution. Atlantic Economic Journal, 9(2), 12–8. Reproduced in: Blaug M. (Ed.). (1991). Richard Cantillon (1680–1734) and Jacques Turgot (1727–1781). Edward Elgar, pp. 163–169.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, M. (2007a). Richard Cantillon and the discovery of opportunity cost. History of Political Economy, 39(1): 97–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, M. (2007b). Cantillon, Hume, and the rise of Antimercantilism. History of Political Economy, 39(3): 453–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, M. (2007c). Was Richard Cantillon a Mercantilist. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 29(4): 417–35.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, M. (2009). Cantillon and the invisible hand. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 12(2): 27–46.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Berg, R. (2012). ‘Something wonderful and incomprehensible in their oeconomy’: The English versions of Richard Cantillon's essay on the nature of trade in general. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 19(6): 868–907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, V. and Gram, H. (1980). Classical and Neoclassical Theories of General Equilibrium. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar