Transcendental vs. comparative approaches to justice: a reappraisal of Sen's dichotomy

References

• Arrow, K.J., 1951. Social choice and individual values. 1st ed. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Audard, C., 1988. Principes de justice et principes du libéralisme: la ‘neutralité’ de la théorie de Rawls. In: C. Audard, J.-P. Dupuy, and R. Sève, eds. Individu et Justice Sociale: Autour de John Rawls. Paris: Editions du Seuil, 158–189.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, K.M., 1975. Condorcet: from natural philosophy to social mathematics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black D., 1958. The theory of committees and elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bru, B. and Crépel, P., 1994. Condorcet. Arithmétique Politique. Textes Rares ou Inédits (1767–1789). Paris: INED.
   Google Scholar
• Condorcet, 1785 [1994]. An essay on the application of probability theory to plurality decision-making. In: Condorcet, I. McLean, and F. Hewitt, eds. and trans. Foundations of social choice and political theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Condorcet, 1787 [1847–1849]. Lettres d'un bourgeois de New-Haven à un citoyen de Virginie. In: F. Arago and A. O'Connor, eds. Œuvres de Condorcet. Paris: Firmin Didot, vol. IX, 1–93.
   Google Scholar
• Condorcet, 1791–92 [1847–1849]. Mémoires sur l'instruction publique. In: F. Arago and A. O'Connor, eds. Œuvres de Condorcet. Paris: Firmin Didot, vol. VII, 167–437.
   Google Scholar
• Condorcet, 1792 [1847–1849]. De la nature des pouvoirs politiques dans une nation libre. In: F. Arago and A. O'Connor, eds. Œuvres de Condorcet. Firmin Didot, vol. X, 587–613.
   Google Scholar
• Condorcet, 1792–93 [1847–1849]. Rapport et projet de décret sur l'organisation générale de l'instruction publique. In: F. Arago and A. O'Connor, eds. Œuvres de Condorcet. Firmin Didot, vol. VII, 449–573.
   Google Scholar
• Ege, R., 2012. History of economic thought as text analysis: Some methodological considerations. History of economic ideas, 20, 37–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ege, R. and Igersheim, H., 2008. Rawls with Hegel: The concept of liberalism of freedom. The European journal of the history of economic thought, 15, 23–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ege, R. and Igersheim, H., 2010. Rawls's theory of justice and its relations to the concept of ‘merit goods’. The European journal of the history of economic thought, 17, 1001–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ege, R. and Igersheim, H., 2011. Introduction and overview. In: R. Ege and H. Igersheim, eds. Freedom and happiness in economic thought and philosophy. Routledge, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Ege, R., Igersheim, H. and Le Chapelain, C., 2013. Par-delà le transcendantal et le comparatif. Deux arguments. Revue Française d'Economie, 27, 185–212.
   Google Scholar
• Faccarello, G., 1990. Le legs de Turgot: aspects de l'économie politique sensualiste de Condorcet à Roederer. In: G. Faccarello and P. Steiner, eds. La Pensée Économique Pendant la RévolutionFrançaise. Grenoble: P. U. G., 67–107.
   Google Scholar
• Faccarello, G., 1992. Turgot et l'économie politique sensualiste. In: A. Béraud and G. Faccarello, eds. Nouvelle Histoire de la pensée économique, Des scolastiques aux classiques. Paris: Editions La Découverte, vol. 1, 254–288.
   Google Scholar
• Gamel, C., 2010. Que faire de l'approche par les capacités? Pour une lecture rawlsienne de l'apport de Sen. Working paper GREQAM n°2010-30.
   Google Scholar
• Gilardone, M., forthcoming. Rawls's influence and counter-influence on Sen: Post-welfarism and impartiality. The European journal of the history of economic thought, 22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodin, R.E., 1986. Laundering preferences. In: J. Elster and A. Hylland, eds. Foundations of social choice theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 75–101.
   Google Scholar
• Grofman, B. and Feld, S.L., 1988. Rousseau's general will: A condorcetian perspective. American political science review, 82, 567–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilbaud, G.T., 1952. Les théorie de l'intérêt général et le problème logique de l'agrégation. Economie Appliquée, 5, 501–84.
   Google Scholar
• Höffe, O., 1988. L'Etat et la Justice. John Rawls et Robert Nozick. Les problèmes éthiques et politiques dans la philosophie anglo-saxonne. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.
   Google Scholar
• Igersheim, H., 2013. Une analyse des concepts rawlsien et senien de liberté. Cahiers d'Economie Politique, 64, 157–96.
   Google Scholar
• Kandil, F., 2010. Idéale ou comparative: Quelle approche pour la justice sociale?. Revue economique, 61, 213–36.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, E., 1785 [1949]. Fundamental principles of the metaphysic of morals. Indianapolis, IN and New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Le Chapelain, C., 2010. L'instruction publique de Condorcet. Progrès économique et réflexions sur la notion de capital humain. Revue economique, 61, 281–98.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M., 2003. Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Feminist economics, 9, 33–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawls, J., 1971. A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J., 1985. Justice as fairness: Political, not metaphysical. Philosophy and public affairs, 14, 223–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawls, J., 1993. Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. 2001. Justice as Fairness. A Restatement, ed. E. Kelly. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rieucau, J.N., 1997. Nature et diffusion du savoir dans la pensée économique de Condorcet. Thesis (PhD). University of Paris I.
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns, I., 2012. Are transcendental theories of justice redundant?. Journal of economic methodology, 19, 159–63.
   Google Scholar
• Rothschild E., 2001. Economic sentiments Adam Smith, Condorcet and the enlightenment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A.K., 1970. Collective choice and social welfare. San Francisco: Holden Day.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A.K., 1974. Choice, orderings and morality. In: S. Körner, ed. Practical reason. Oxford: Blackwell, 54–67.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A.K., 1976. Liberty, unanimity and rights. Economica, 43, 217–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A.K., 1977, 1982. Rational fools: A critique of the behavioural foundations of economic theory. In: Sen, A.K., ed. Choice, welfare and measurement. Oxford: Blackwell, 84–106.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A.K., 2006. What do we want from a theory of justice?. The journal of philosophy, 103, 215–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A.K., 2009. The idea of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A.K., 2012. Values and justice. Journal of economic methodology, 19, 101–8.
   Google Scholar
• Valentini, L., 2011. A paradigm shift in theorizing about justice? A critique of Sen. Economics and philosophy, 27, 297–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar