On the Samuelson–Etula Master Function and the capital controversy

References

• Dantzig, G.B., 1951. Maximization of a linear function of variables subject to linear inequalities. In: T.C. Koopmans, ed. Activity analysis of production and allocation. New York, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Etula, E., 2008. The two-sector von Thünen original marginal productivity model of capital; and beyond. Metroeconomica, 59 (1), 85–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fratini, S.M., 2007. Reswitching of techniques in an intertemporal equilibrium model with overlapping generations. Contributions to political economy, 26 (1), 43–59.
   Google Scholar
• Fratini, S.M., 2010. Reswitching and decreasing demand for capital. Metroeconomica, 61 (4), 676–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fratini, S.M. 2013a. Real Wicksell effect, demand for capital and stability. Metroeconomica, 64 (2), 346–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fratini, S.M. 2013b. Malinvaud on Wicksell's legacy to capital theory: some critical remarks. In: E.S. Levrero, A. Stirati and A. Palumbo, eds. Sraffa and the reconstruction of economic theory, Vol. 1. London: McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Garegnani, P., 1984. On some illusory instances of marginal products. Metroeconomica, 36, 143–60.
   Google Scholar
• Garegnani, P., 2003. Savings, investment and capital in a system of general intertemporal equilibrium. In F. Hahn and F. Petri, eds. General equilibrium. Problem and prospects. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Garegnani, P., 2007. Samuelson's misses: a rejoinder. The European journal of the history of economic thought, 14 (3), 573–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, F., 1975. Revival of political economy: the wrong issues at the wrong argument. Economic record, 51, 360–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatta, T., 1976. The paradox in capital theory and complementarity of inputs. The review of economic studies, 43 (1), 127–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, J.R., 1932. Marginal productivity and the principle of variation. Economica, 35, 79–88.
   Google Scholar
• Kurz, H.D. and Salvadori, N., 1992. Morishima on Ricardo. Cambridge journal of economics, 16 (2), 227–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurz, H.D. and Salvadori, N., 1995. Theory of production. A long-period analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malinvaud, E., 1953. Capital accumulation and efficient allocation of resources. Econometrica, 21 (2), 233–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1909 [1867–1894]. Capital. Vol. 3. Chicago: Charles H. Herr.
   Google Scholar
• Opocher, A., 2008. The two-sector Von Thünen original marginal productivity model of capital; and beyond: comment. Metroeconomica, 57 (2), 105–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasinetti, L., 1960. A mathematical reformulation of the Ricardian system. The review of economic studies, 27 (2), 78–98.
   Google Scholar
• Pasinetti, L., 1969. Switches of technique and the “rate of return” in capital theory. The economic journal, 79 (315), 508–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petri, F., 2011. On the likelihood and relevance of reswitching and reverse capital deepening. In: C. Gehrke and N. Salvadori, eds. Keynes, Sraffa and the criticism of neoclassical theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey, F.P., 1928. A mathematical theory of savings. The economic journal, 38 (152), 543–59
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, D., 1931. Wage wrumbles. In: D.H. Robertson, ed. Economic fragments. London: P.S. King & Son.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P.A., 1959. A modern treatment of the Ricardian economy: the pricing of goods and of labour and land services. Quarterly journal of economics, 73 (1), 1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P.A., 1962. Parable and realism in capital theory: the surrogate production function. The review of economic studies, 29 (3), 193–206.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P.A., 1966. A summing-up. The quarterly journal of economics, 80 (4), 568–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P.A., 2007. Classical and neoclassical harmonies and dissonances. The European journal of the history of economic thought, 14 (2), 243–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P.A. and Etula, E., 2006. Complete work-up of the one-sector scalar-capital theory of interest rate: third installment auditing Sraffa's never-completed “Critique of Modern Economic Theory”. Japan and the World economy, 18, 331–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sraffa, P., 1960. Production of commodities by means of commodities. Prelude to a critique of economic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swan, T.W., 1956. Economic growth and capital accumulation. Economic record, 32, 334–61.
   Google Scholar
• Trabucchi, P., 2011. Capital as a single magnitude and the orthodox theory of distribution in some writings of the early 1930s. Review of political economy, 23 (2), 169–88.
   Google Scholar
• Wicksell, K., 1934 [1901]. Lectures on political economy. 2 Vols. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zambelli, S., 2004. The 40% neoclassical aggregate theory of production. Cambridge journal of economics, 28 (1), 99–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar