A history of statistical methods in experimental economics

References

• Angner, E. 2016. A Course in Behavioral Economics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Angrist, J. D. and J.-S. Pischke. 2010. “The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics: How Better Research Design is Taking the Con out of Econometrics.” The Journal of economic perspectives 24 (2): 3–30. doi:10.1257/jep.24.2.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backhouse, R. E., & Cherrier, B. 2017. “‘It’s Computers, Stupid!’ The Spread of Computers and the Changing Roles of Theoretical and Applied Economics.” History of Political Economy 49: 103–126. doi:10.1215/00182702-4166287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakan, D. 1966. “The Test of Significance in Psychological Research.” Psychological Bulletin 66 (6): 423. doi:10.1037/h0020412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardsley, N. 2010. Experimental Economics: Rethinking the Rules. New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G. M., M. H. DeGroot, and J. Marschak. 1963a. “An Experimental Study of Some Stochastic Models for Wagers.” Behavioral Science 8 (3): 199–202.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G. M., M. H. Degroot, and J. Marschak. 1963b. “Probabilities of Choices Among Very Similar Objects: An Experiment to Decide Between Two Models.” Systems Research and Behavioral Science 8 (4): 306–311.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, S. W. and F. O. Brownson. 1964. “What Price Ambiguity? or the Role of Ambiguity in Decision-Making.” Journal of Political Economy 72 (1): 62–73. doi:10.1086/258854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellemare, C., L. Bissonnette, and S. Kroger. 2016. “Simulating Power of Economic Experiments: The Powerbbk Package.” Journal of the Economic Science Association 2 (2): 157–168. doi:10.1007/s40881-016-0028-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddle, J. E., and D. S. Hamermesh. 2017. “Theory and Measurement: Emergence, Consolidation, and Erosion of a Consensus.” History of Political Economy 49: 34–57 doi:10.1215/00182702-4166251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddle, J. 2017. “2016 Hes Presidential Address: Statistical Inference in Economics, 1920-1965: Changes in Meaning and Practice.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 39 (2): 149–173. doi:10.1017/S1053837216001164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boumans, M., and A. Dupont-Kieffer 2011. “A History of the Histories of Econometrics.” History of political economy 43 (1): 5–31. doi:10.1215/00182702-1158781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bower, J. L. 1965. “The Role of Conflict in Economic Decision-Making Groups: Some Empirical Results.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 79 (2): 263–277. doi:10.2307/1880631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, J. K. 1972. “On the Power of Statistical Tests in the American Educational Research Journal 1.” American Educational Research Journal 9 (3): 391–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camerer, C. 2003. Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction. New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, E. 2014. Behavioral Economics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlin, E. H. 1948. “An Experimental Imperfect Market.” Journal of Political Economy 56 (2): 95–108. doi:10.1086/256654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri, A. 2011. “Sustaining Cooperation in Laboratory Public Goods Experiments: A Selective Survey of the Literature.” Experimental Economics 14 (1): 47–83. doi:10.1007/s10683-010-9257-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1962. “The Statistical Power of Abnormal-Social Psychological Re-Search: A Review.” The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 65 (3): 145. doi:10.1037/h0045186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contini, B. 1968. “The Value of Time in Bargaining Negotiations: Some Experimental Evidence.” The American Economic Review 58 (3): 374–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coursey, D. L., J. L. Hovis, and W. D. Schulze. 1987. “The Disparity Between Willingness to Accept and Willingness to Pay Measures of Value.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 102 (3): 679–690. doi:10.2307/1884223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cot, A. and S. Ferey. 2016. “La construction de “faits” Économiques D'un Nouveau Type: Eléments Pour Une Histoire de L'économie Comportementale.” L'Actualité Économique 92 (1-2): 11–47. doi:10.7202/1039871ar
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, D. and J. Marschak. 1959. “Experimental Tests of a Stochastic Decision Theory.” Measurement: Definitions and Theories, 17: 233–269.
   Google Scholar
• Dolbear, F. T., L. B. Lave, G. Bowman, A. Lieberman, E. Prescott, F. Rueter, and R. Sherman. 1968. “Collusion in Oligopoly: An Experiment on the Effect of Numbers and Information.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 82 (2): 240–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durham, Y., J. Hirshleifer, and V. L. Smith. 1998. “Do the Rich Get Richer and the Poor Poorer? Experimental Tests of a Model of Power.” The American Economic Review 88 (4): 970–983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, W., H. Lindman, and L. J. Savage. 1963. “Bayesian Statistical Inference for Psychological Research.” Psychological review 70 (3): 193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, R. J. 1987. A History of Econometrics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, R. and C. W. Greenbaum. 1995. “Significance Tests Die Hard: The Amazing Persistence of a Probabilistic Misconception.” Theory & Psychology 5 (1): 75–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellner, W. 1961. “Distortion of Subjective Probabilities as a Reaction to Uncertainty.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 75 (4): 670–689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischbacher, U. and S. Gächter. 2010. “Social Preferences, Beliefs, and the Dynamics of Free Riding in Public Goods Experiments.” The American Economic Review 100 (1): 541–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flood, M. M. 1958. “Some Experimental Games.” Management Science 5 (1): 5–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, D. 1992. “Theory and Misbehavior of First-Price Auctions: Comment.” The American Economic Review 82: 1374–1378.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, A. 2005. “Analysis of variance–why it is more important than ever.” The annals of statistics 33 (1): 1–53.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, C. L. and Qin, D. 2006, “The First Fifty Years of Modern Econometrics.” In Palgrave Handbook of Econometrics. Volume 1: Econometric Theory edited by Hassani H., et al. Basingstoke, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Goeree, J. K., C. Holt and T. Palfrey. 2016 Quantal Response Equilibrium: A Stochastic Theory of Games. New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guala, F. 2005. The Methodology of Experimental Economics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Güth, W. and M. G. Kocher. 2014. “More Than Thirty Years of Ultimatum Bar-Gaining Experiments: Motives, Variations, and a Survey of the Recent Literature.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 108: 396–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, G. W. 1989. “Theory and Misbehavior of First-Price Auctions.” The American Economic Review 79 (4): 749–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, G. W. 1992. “Theory and Misbehavior of First-Price Auctions: Reply.” The American Economic Review 82 (5): 1426–1443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heukelom, F. 2014. Behavioral Economics: A history. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, E., K. McCabe, and V. L. Smith. 1996. “Social Distance and Other-Regarding Behavior in Dictator Games.” The American Economic Review 86 (3): 653–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoggatt, A. C. 1967. “Measuring the Cooperativeness of Behavior in Quantity Variation Duopoly Games.” Behavioral Science 12 (2): 109–121.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoover, K. 2006. “The Methodology of Econometrics.” In Hassani H., et al. Palgrave Handbook of Econometrics. Volume 1: Econometric Theory. Basingstoke, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kagel, J. and A. Roth. (Eds.). 2015. The Handbook of Experimental Economics, Volume 2. New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kagel, J. and D. Levin. 2015. “Auctions: A survey of experimental research.” In The Handbook of Experimental Economics, edited by Kagel, J. and A. Roth. (Eds.) Vol. 2, 563–637. New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kagel, J. H. and A. E. Roth. 1995. The Handbook of Experimental Economics. New Jersey, USA: Princeton university press.
   Google Scholar
• Katzer, J. and J. Sodt. 1973. “An Analysis of the Use of Statistical Testing in Communication Research.” Journal of Communication 23 (3): 251–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, L. B. 1962. “An Empirical Approach to the Prisoners’ Dilemma Game.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 76 (3): 424–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. S. and P. Mirowski. 2007. “The Energy Behind Vernon Smith's Experimental Economics.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 32 (2): 257–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewenstein, G. 1987. “Anticipation and the Valuation of Delayed Consumption.” The Economic Journal 97 (387): 666–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCrimmon, K. R. 1968. “Descriptive and Normative Implications of the Decision-Theory Postulates.” Risk and Uncertainty 3, 32.
   Google Scholar
• Maschler, M. 1965. Playing an N-Person Game, an Experiment. Princeton University, Econometric Research Program. New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• May, K. O. 1954. “Intransitivity, Utility, and the Aggregation of Preference Patterns.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 22 (1): 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCloskey, D. 1998, The Rhetoric of Economics. Second edition. Wisconsin, USA: The University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKelvey, R. D., and T. R. Palfrey. (1995). “Quantal Response Equilibria for Normal Form Games.” Games and Economic Behavior 10 (1): 6–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffatt, P. G. 2015. Experimetrics: Econometrics for Experimental Economics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, M. 1990, The History of Econometric Ideas, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moscati, I. 2007. “Early Experiments in Consumer Demand Theory: 1930–1970.” History of Political Economy 39 (3): 359–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosteller, F. and P. Nogee. 1951. “An Experimental Measurement of Utility.” Journal of Political Economy 59 (5): 371–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noussair, C. N. and S. Tucker. 2013. “Experimental Research on Asset Pricing.” Journal of Economic Surveys 27 (3): 554–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakes, M. W. 1986. Statistical Inference: A Commentary for the Social and Behavioural Sciences. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Panhans, M. T. and J. D. Singleton. 2017. “The Empirical Economist's Toolkit: From Models to Methods.” History of Political Economy, 49 (Supplement): 127–157.
   Google Scholar
• Potters, J. and S. Suetens. 2013. “Oligopoly Experiments in the Current Millennium.” Journal of Economic Surveys 27 (3): 439–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasnikar, V. and A. E. Roth. 1992. “Considerations of Fairness and Strategy: Experimental Data from Sequential Games.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 107 (3): 865–888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, D. 2013. A History of Econometrics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Qin, D. 1993. The Formation of Econometrics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Rapoport, A. and N. S. Cole. 1968. “Experimental Studies of Interdependent Mixed-Motive Games.” Behavioral Science 13 (3): 189.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rice, D. B. and V. L. Smith. 1964. “Nature, the Experimental Laboratory, and the Credibility of Hypotheses.” Systems Research and Behavioral Science 9 (3): 239–246.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R. and J. Gaito. 1963. “The interpretation of Levels of Significance by Psychological Researchers.” The Journal of Psychology 55 (1), 33–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, D. and H. Kincaid. 2009. Introduction: The New Philosophy of Economics. In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Economics, edited by D. Ross and H. Kincaid. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Roth, A. E. 1995. “Introduction to Experimental Economics.” In Handbook of Experimental Economics, edited by J. Kagel and A. E. Roth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseas, S. W. and A. G. Hart. 1951. “Experimental Verification of a Composite Indifference Map.” Journal of Political Economy 59 (4): 288–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozeboom, W. W. 1960. “The Fallacy of the Null-Hypothesis Significance Test.” Psychological Bulletin 57 (5): 416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rucci, A. J. and R. D. Tweney. 1980. “Analysis of Variance and the ‘Second Discipline’ of Scientific Psychology: A Historical Account.” Psychological Bulletin 87 (1): 166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, A. G. and A. D. Ball .1981. “Statistical Power and Effect Size in Marketing Research.” Journal of Marketing Research 18 (3): 275–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedlmeier, P. and G. Gigerenzer. 1989. “Do Studies of Statistical Power Have an Effect on the Power of Studies?” Psychological Bulletin 105 (2): 309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serra, D. 2012. “Un Aperçu Historique de L'économie Expérimentale: Des Origines au Évolutions Récentes.” Revue d'Economie Politique 122 (5): 749–786.
   Google Scholar
• Shubik, M. 1962. “Some Experimental Non-Zero Sum Games with Lack of Information About the Rules.” Management Science 8 (2): 215–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, V. L. 1962. “An Experimental Study of Competitive Market Behavior.” Journal of Political Economy 70 (2): 111–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, V. L. 1964. “Effect of Market Organization on Competitive Equilibrium.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 78 (2): 181–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, V. L., A. W. Williams, W. K. Bratton, and M. G. Vannoni. 1982. “Competitive market institutions: Double auctions vs. sealed bid-offer auctions.” The American Economic Review 72 (1), 58–77.
   Google Scholar
• Spanos, A. 2006, “Econometrics in Retrospect and Prospect.” In Palgrave Handbook of Econometrics. Volume 1: Econometric Theory, edited by H. Hassani, et al. Basingstoke, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Svorenčík, A. 2015. “The Experimental Turn in Economics: A History of Experimental Economics. PhD Diss, University of Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Thurstone, L. L. 1931. “The Indifference Function.” The Journal of Social Psychology 2 (2): 139–167.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman. 1971. “Belief in the Law of Small Numbers.” Psychological Bulletin 76 (2): 105.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., P. Slovic, and D. Kahneman. 1990. “The Causes of Preference Reversal.” The American Economic Review 80 (1): 204–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. and A. Ortmann. 2013. “Exploring the Meaning of Significance in Experimental Economics.” Discussion Papers 2013–32, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
   Google Scholar