603
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Adam Smith and Alexis de Tocqueville on the division of labour*

References

  • Álvarez, Andrés, and Jimena Hurtado. 2015. “Out of Sight, Out of Mind’: Social Interactions and Smith’s Asymmetrical Sympathy.” Iberian Journal of the History of Economic Thought 2 (1): 1–20. doi:10.5209/rev_IJHE.2015.v2.n1.49769.
  • Aguilar, Enrique. 2008. Alexis de Tocqueville. Una lectura introductoria. Buenos Aires: Editorial Suramericana.
  • Aspromourgos, Tony. 2009. The Science of Wealth: Adam Smith and the Framing of Political Economy. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Bowles, Samuel, and Herbert Gintis. 1978. “The Invisible Fist: Have Capitalism and Democracy Reached a Parting of the Ways?” American Economic Review, 68 (2): 358–363.
  • de Tocqueville, Alexis. 1866. Études économiques, politiques et littéraires par Alexis de Tocqueville. Paris: Michel Lévy Frères, Libraires éditeurs.
  • de Tocqueville, Alexis. 2007. Sur le paupérisme. Paris: Editions Alia.
  • de Tocqueville, Alexis. 2009 [1835]. Democracy in America: Historical Critical Edition. De la Démocratie en Amérique Bilingual Edition; edited by Eduardo Nolla; translated by James T. Schleifer, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
  • de Tocqueville, Alexis. 2010 [1840]. Democracy in America: Historical Critical Edition. De la Démocratie en Amérique Bilingual Edition; edited by Eduardo Nolla; translated by James T. Schleifer, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
  • Ferraton, Cyrille. 2004. “L’idée D’association Chez Alexis de Tocqueville.” Cahiers d Économie Politique 46: 45–65. doi:10.3917/cep.046.0045.
  • Gilbert, Geoffrey. 1997. “Adam Smith on the Nature and Causes of Poverty.” Review of Social Economics 55 (3): 273–291. doi:10.1080/00346769700000001.
  • Goldberg, ChadAlan. 2001. “Social Citizenship and a Reconstructed Tocqueville.” American Sociological Review 66 (2): 289–315. doi:10.2307/2657419.
  • Hamowy, Ronald. 1968. “Adam Smith, Adam Ferguson, and the Division of Labour.” Economica 35 (139): 249–259. doi:10.2307/2552301.
  • Hanley, Ryan Patrick. 2009. Adam Smith and the Character of Virtue. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Harpham, Edward J. 2000. “The Problem of Liberty in the Thought of Adam Smith.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22 (2): 217–237. doi:10.1080/10427710050025420.
  • Hearn, Jonathan. 2018. “How to Read the Wealth of Nations (or Why the Division of Labour Is More Important than Competition in Adam Smith).” Sociological Theory 36 (2): 162–184. doi:10.1177/0735275118777010.
  • Heilbroner, RobertL. 1973. “The Paradox of Progress: Decline and Decay in the Wealth of Nations.” Journal of the History of Ideas 34 (2): 243–262. doi:10.2307/2708728.
  • Hill, Lisa. 2007. “Adam Smith, Adam Ferguson and Karl Marx on the Division of Labour.” Journal of Classical Sociology 7 (3): 339–366. doi:10.1177/1468795X07082086.
  • Hurtado, Jimena. 2010. “L’inégalité aux temps de l’égalité: démocratie; industrialisation et paupérisme chez Alexis de Tocqueville.” Cahiers d’économie politique/Papers in Political Economy 59: 89–117. doi:10.3917/cep.059.0089.
  • Hurtado, Jimena. 2011. “Tocqueville on Poverty in Industrial Democracies”. Documento CEDE 3, Bogotá, D.C.: Universidad de los Andes - Facultad de Economia, CEDE. Available at www.economia.uniandes.edu.co/components/com_booklibrary/ebooks/dcede2011-03.pdf
  • Hurtado, Jimena. 2017. “Alexis de Tocqueville on Pauperism or the Unfulfilled Promises of the Democratic Revolution”, Documento CEDE 40, Bogotá, D.C.: Universidad de los Andes - Facultad de Economia, CEDE. Available at www.economia.uniandes.edu.co/components/com_booklibrary/ebooks/dcede2017-40.pdf
  • Kahan, AlanS. 2015. Tocqueville, Democracy, and Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Keslassy, Eric. 2000. Le libéralisme de Tocqueville à l’épreuve du paupérisme. Paris: L’Harmattan.
  • Keslassy, Eric. 2001. “Tocqueville, ou la proposition d’un nouvel État, Alternatives Économiques.” LÉconomie Politique 11: 99–106. doi:10.3917/leco.011.0099.
  • Lewis, ThomasJ. 2000. “Persuasion, Domination and Exchange: Adam Smith on the Political Consequences of Markets.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 33 (2): 273–289. doi:10.1017/S000842390000010X.
  • Marx, Karl. 1887. Capital. A Critique of Political Economy. Moscow: Progress Publishers. Transcribed 1995–1996, last proofed 2015. Available at: www.marxists.org/archive/Marx/works/download/pdf/Capital-Volume-I.pdf
  • McNulty, PaulJ. 1973. “Adam Smith’s Concept of Labour.” Journal of the History of Ideas 34 (3): 345–366. doi:10.2307/2708957.
  • Muller, JerryZ. 1993. Adam Smith in His Times and Ours. Designing the Decent Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. doi:10.1086/ahr/99.3.868.
  • Quinn, Kevin. 2013. “Adam Smith on Education.” Critical Review 25 (1): 120–129. doi:10.1080/08913811.2013.823764.
  • Rosenberg, Nathan. 1965. “Adam Smith on the Division of Labour: Two Views or One?” Economica 32 (126): 127–480. doi:10.2307/2552544.
  • Say, Jean-Baptiste. 2011 [1803]. Traité d’Economie Politique ou Simple Exposition de la maníère dont se forment, se distribuent et se consomment les richesses. Paris: Institut Coppet. Available at https://www.institutcoppet.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Traite-deconomie-politique-Jean-Baptiste-Say.pdf#page57
  • Swedberg, Richard. 2009. Tocqueville’s Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Smith, Adam. 1982 [1759]. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
  • Smith, Adam. 1981 [1776]. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. 2 vols. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
  • Smith, Adam. 1982a. Lectures on Jurisprudence. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
  • Smith, Adam. 1982b. “Early Draft of Part of the Wealth of Nations.” In Lectures on Jurisprudence, edited by A. Smith, 562–581. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
  • West, EdwinG. 1964. “Adam Smith’s Two Views on the Division of Labour.” Economica 31 (121): 23–32. doi:10.2307/2550924.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.