Bringing them alive

References

• Backhouse, Roger E. 1992. “How Should We Approach the History of Economic Thought, Fact, Fiction, or Moral Tale?” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 14 (1): 18–35. doi:10.1017/S1053837200004375.
   Google Scholar
• Blaug, Mark. 1962. Economic Theory in Retrospect [1st edition], Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blaug, Mark. 1990. “On the Historiography of Economics.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 12 (1): 27–37. doi:10.1017/S1053837200006088.
   Google Scholar
• Blaug, Mark. 1997. Economic Theory in Retrospect [5th edition], Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blaug, Mark. 2001. “No History of Ideas, Please, We’re Economists.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 15 (1): 145–164. doi:10.1257/jep.15.1.145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bréban, Laurie, and Muriel Gilardone. 2018. “A Missing Touch of Adam Smith in Amartya Sen’s Public Reasoning: The Man within for the Man Without.” Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Butterfield, Herbert. (1931) 1965. The Whig Interpretation of History. New York: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Cannan, Edwin. 1892. “The Origin of the Law of Diminishing Returns.” The Economic Journal 2 (5): 53–69. doi:10.2307/2955940.
   Google Scholar
• Cesarano, Filippo. 1983. “On the Role of the History of Economic Analysis.” History of Political Economy 15 (1): 63–82. doi:10.1215/00182702-15-1-63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso, José Luís. 2015. “Liberalism and Enlightened Political Economy.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22 (6): 934–948. doi:10.1080/09672567.2015.1088878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, John B. 2013. “Mark Blaug on the Historiography of Economics.” Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 6 (3): 43–63. doi:10.23941/ejpe.v6i3.150.
   Google Scholar
• Dockès, Pierre, and Jean-Michel Servet. 1992. “Les Lecteurs de L’Armée Morte - Note Sur Les Méthodes en Histoire de la Pensée Economique.” Revue Européenne Des Sciences Sociales 30: 341–364.
   Google Scholar
• Ege, Ragip, Herrade Igersheim, and Charlotte Le Chapelain. 2016. “Transcendental vs Comparative Approaches to Justice: A Reappraisal of Sen’s Dichotomy.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 23 (4): 521–543. doi:10.1080/09672567.2014.916734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagemann, Harald. 2011. “European Émigrés and the ‘Americanization’ of Economics.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 18 (5): 643–671. doi:10.1080/09672567.2011.629056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander, Samuel. 1987. Classical Economics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Econometrica 47 (2): 263–291. doi:10.2307/1914185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalil, Elias. 1995. “Has Economics Progressed? Rectilinear, Historicist, Universalist, and Evolutionary Historiographies.” History of Political Economy 27 (1): 43–87. doi:10.1215/00182702-27-1-43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurz, Heinz. 2006. “Whither the History of Economic Thought? Going Nowhere Rather Slowly?” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 13 (4): 463–488. doi:10.1080/09672560601063929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurz, Heinz, and Neri Salvadori. 1995. Theory of Production. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lapidus, André. 1996. “Introduction à Une Histoire de la Pensée Economique Qui ne Verra Jamais le Jour.” Revue Économique 47 (4): 867–892. doi:10.2307/3502652.
   Google Scholar
• Lapidus, André. 2016. “Почему история экономической мысли отличается от других историй?” [Why Is History of Economic Thought Different from All Other Histories?], In экономическая теория в историческом развитии [Economic Theory in a Historical Perspective], edited by A. G. Khudokormov and A. Lapidus, 6–30.4. Moscow: Infra-M.
   Google Scholar
• Leijonhufvud, Axel. 1968. On Keynesian Economics and the Economics of Keynes: A Study in Monetary Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maas, Harro. 2014. “A 2×2 = 4 Hobbyhorse: Mark Blaug on Rational and Historical Reconstructions.” Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 6 (3), Winter: 64–86. doi:10.23941/ejpe.v6i3.151.
   Google Scholar
• Marcuzzo, Maria-Cristina. 2008. “Is History of Economic Thought a “Serious” Subject?” Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 1 (1): 107–123. doi:10.23941/ejpe.v1i1.10.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Wesley C. 1967–1969. Types of Economic Theory (2 Vol.). New York: Augustus Kelley.
   Google Scholar
• Morishima, Michio. 1973. Marx’s Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morishima, Michio. 1974. “Marx in the Light of Modern Economic Theory.” Econometrica 42 (4): 611–632. doi:10.2307/1913933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negishi, Takashi. 1989. History of Economic Theory. Amsterdam/New York/Oxford/Tokyo: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Okishio, Nuobo. 1963. “A Mathematical Note on Marxian Theorems.” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 91 (2): 287–299. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40436843
   Google Scholar
• Pribram, Karl. 1983. A History of Economic Reasoning. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ricardo, David. (1815) 1966. “An Essay on the Influence of a Low Price of Corn on the Profits of Stock.” In The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, edited by P. Sraffa and M. Dobb, vol. 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Romer, Paul M. 1987. “Growth Based on Increasing Returns Due to Specialization.” American Economic Review 77: 56–62. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1805429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothschild, Emma. 2001. Economic Sentiments: Adam Smith, Condorcet, and the Enlightenment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothschild, Emma, and Amartya Sen. 2006. “Adam Smith’s Economics.” In The Cambridge Companion to Adam Smith, edited by K. Haakonssen, 319–365. New-York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, Richard. 1984. “On the Historiography of Philosophy: Four Genres.” In Philosophy in History: Essays on the Historiography of Philosophy, edited by R. Rorty, J.B. Schneewind, Q. Skinner, 49–75. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, Richard, Jerome B. Schneewind, and Quentin Skinner. 1984. “Introduction.” In Philosophy in History: Essays on the Historiography of Philosophy, edited by R. Rorty, J.B. Schneewind, Q. Skinner, 1–14. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Rosselli, Annalisa. 2013. “Economic History and History of Economics: In Praise of an Old Relationship.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 20 (6): 865–881. doi:10.1080/09672567.2013.838979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson, Paul A., Don Patinkin, and Mark Blaug. 1991. “On the Historiography of Economics: A Correspondence.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 13 (2): 144–158. doi:10.1017/S1053837200003539.
   Google Scholar
• Say, Jean-Baptiste. (1828) 2009. Cours Complet D’Economie Politique Pratique, edited by E. Blanc, J.-P. Potier and P.-H. Goutte (2 Vol.). Paris: Economica.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. London: Allen and Unwin. doi:10.1086/ahr/60.1.62-a.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya K. 1986. “Adam Smith’s Prudence.” In Theory and Reality in Development: Essays in Honour of Paul Streeten, edited by S. Lall, and F. Stewart, 28–37. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya K. 1987. On Ethics and Economics. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya K. 2002. “Open and Closed Impartiality.” The Journal of Philosophy 99 (9): 445–469. doi:10.2307/3655683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya K. 2009. The Idea of Justice. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya K. 2010a. “Adam Smith and the Contemporary World.” Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 3 (1): 50–67. doi:10.23941/ejpe.v3i1.39.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya K. 2010b. Introduction to A. Smith, Theory of Moral Sentiments [1759]. New York: Penguin
   Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya K. 2011. “Uses and Abuses of Adam Smith.” History of Political Economy 43 (2): 257–271. doi:10.1215/00182702-1257388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shionoya, Yuichi. 2009. “The History of Economics as Economics?” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 16 (4): 575–597. doi:10.1080/09672560903201243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, Quentin. 1969. “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas.” History and Theory 8 (1): 3–53. doi:10.2307/2504188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Adam. (1759) 1982. The Theory of Moral Sentiments, edited by D.D. Raphael and A.L. Macfie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sraffa, Piero. 1951. “Introduction.” In The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, edited by P. Sraffa and M. Dobb, vol. 1, xiii–lxii. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sraffa, Piero. 1960. Production of commodities by Means of Commodities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stigler, George. 1971. “Smith’s Travel on the Ship of State.” History of Political Economy 3 (2): 265–277. doi:10.1215/00182702-3-2-265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trautwein, Hans-Michael. 2017. “The Last Generalists.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 24 (6): 1143–1166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weintraub, E. Roy. (ed.), 2002. The Future of the History of Economics. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar