Robert Torrens’ model of trade and growth: genesis and implications for the discovery of comparative advantage

References

• [Anon.] 1814. Considerations on the Importation of Foreign Corn. London: [Printed for the Author].
   Google Scholar
• Aldrich, John. 2004. “The Discovery of Comparative Advantage.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 26 (3): 379–399. doi:10.1080/1042771042000263858.
   Google Scholar
• Arthmar, Rogério. 2014. “Torrens and Malthus’ Challenge.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 36 (1): 67–82. doi:10.1017/S1053837214000030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaug, Mark. 1985. Economic Theory in Retrospect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, Arthur I. 1975. “Adam Smith and the Theory of International Trade.” In Essays on Adam Smith, edited by A. S. Skinner and T. Wilson, 455–481. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, Anthony. 1985. “Trade with Fixed Real Wages and Mobile Capital.” Journal of International Economics 18 (1–2): 177–186. doi:10.1016/0022-1996(85)90012-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chipman, John S. 1965. “A Survey of the Theory of International Trade: Part 1, The Classical Theory.” Econometrica 33 (3): 477–519. doi:10.2307/1911748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobbett, William. [1807] 1835. “Perish Commerce.” In Selections from Cobbett’s Political Works: Being a Complete Abridgement of the 100 Volumes which Comprise the Writings of “Porcupine” and the “Weekly Political Register.” With Notes, Historical and Explanatory, vol. II, edited by J. M. Cobbett and J. P. Cobbett, 343–396. London: Cobbett.
   Google Scholar
• De Vivo, Giancarlo. 1986. “Torrens on Value and Distribution.” Contributions to Political Economy 5 (1): 23–36. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.cpe.a035703.
   Google Scholar
• De Vivo, Giancarlo. 2000. “Introduction.” In Collected Works of Robert Torrens, vol. II, edited by G. de Vivo. Bristol and Tokyo: Thoemmes and Kyokuto Shoten.
   Google Scholar
• De Vivo, Giancarlo. 2010. “Robert Torrens as a ‘Neglected Economist.” In English, Irish and Subversives among the Dismal Scientists, edited by N. Allington and N. W. Thompson, 89–110. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Findlay, Ronald. 1984. “Growth and Development in Trade Models.” In Handbook of International Economics, vol. 1, edited by R. W. Jones and P. B. Kenen, 185–236. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Freni, Giuseppe, Neri Salvadori, and Rodolfo Signorino. 2019. “Back to Agriculture? Malthus, Torrens, and Ricardo on International Trade and Structural Change.” History of Political Economy 51 (5): 935–955.
   Google Scholar
• Gandolfo, Giancarlo. 2014. International Trade Theory and Policy. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gehrke, Christian. 2015. “Ricardo’s Discovery of Comparative Advantage Revisited: A Critique of Ruffin’s Account.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22 (5): 791–817. doi:10.1080/09672567.2015.1074714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes, Leonard. 1987. Foreign Trade and the National Economy: Mercantilist and Classical Perspectives. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grančay, Martin, and Nóra Grančay. 2015. “Considerations on the Importation of Foreign Corn (1814) and the Principle of Comparative Advantage.” History of Economics Review 61 (1): 69–77. doi:10.1080/18386318.2015.11681275.
   Google Scholar
• Grančay, Martin, and Nora Szikorova. 2013. “History of the Principle of Comparative Advantage Revisited: What Makes a Satisfactory Definition?” History of Economic Ideas 21 (3): 43–68.
   Google Scholar
• Hisamatsu, Taro. 2009. “Robert Torrens’ Theory of Profit Reconsidered.” History of Economics Review 49 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1080/18386318.2009.11682138.
   Google Scholar
• Hisamatsu, Taro. 2018. “Robert Torrens and the Ricardian Model of Dynamic Equilibrium Growth.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 25 (2): 203–226. doi:10.1080/09672567.2018.1425467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, Sai-Wing P. 1996. “Reappraising Torrens’s Contributions to the Analysis of Trade, Growth, and Colonisation.” Contributions to Political Economy 15 (1): 1–31. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.cpe.a014043.
   Google Scholar
• Hont, Istvan. 2005. Jealousy of Trade: International Competition and the Nation-State in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hollander, Jacob. 1911. “Ricardo and Torrens.” The Economic Journal 21 (83): 455–468. doi:10.2307/2222348.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Ronald W. 2000. Globalization and the Theory of Input Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karayiannis, Anastassios D. 2000. “Robert Torrens on Technological Progress.” History of Economic Ideas 8 (2): 63–94.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, Murray C., and Masayuki Okawa. 2006. “The Torrens–Ricardo Principle of Comparative Advantage: an Extension.” Review of International Economics 14 (3): 466–477. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9396.2006.00625.x.
   Google Scholar
• Kurz, Heinz D., and Neri Salvadori. 1995. Theory of Production. A Long-Period Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langer, Gary F. 1982. “Further Evidence for Sraffa’s Interpretation of Ricardo.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 6 (4): 397–400. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson, Lars. 2004. The Tradition of Free Trade. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maneschi, Andrea. 1983. “Dynamic Aspects of Ricardo’s International Trade Theory.” Oxford Economic Papers 35 (1): 67–80. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maneschi, Andrea. 1992. “Ricardo’s International Trade Theory: Beyond the Comparative Cost Example.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 16 (4): 421–437. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maneschi, Andrea. 1998. Comparative Advantage in International Trade. A Historical Perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Maneschi, Andrea. 2017. “David Ricardo’s Trade Theory: Anticipations and Later Developments.” In Ricardo and International Trade, edited by S. Senga, M. Fujimoto, and T. Tabuchi, 33–47. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maneschi, Andrea. 2004. “The True Meaning of David Ricardo’s Four Magic Numbers.” Journal of International Economics 62 (2): 433–443. doi:10.1016/S0022-1996(03)00008-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mill, James. 1808. Commerce Defended. An Answer to the Arguments by which Mr. Spence, Mr. Cobbett, and Others, have Attempted to Prove that Commerce is not a Source of National Wealth. London: Printed for C. and R. Baldwin.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, John S. [1848–71] 1965. “Principles of Political Economy, with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy.” In Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vols. II and III, edited by J. M. Robson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, Denis P. 1970. J. R. McCulloch. A Study in Classical Economics. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, Denis P. 1975. The Classical Economists. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parrinello, Sergio. 2010. “The Notion of National Competitiveness in a Global Economy.” In Economic Theory and Economic Thought: Essays in Honour of Ian Steedman, edited by J. Vint, 49–68. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peach, Terry. 2001. “Hollander, de Vivo and the ‘Further Evidence’ for the Corn Model Interpretation of Ricardo: A Conspiracy of Silence?” Cambridge Journal of Economics 25 (5): 685–692. doi:10.1093/cje/25.5.685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rassekh, Farhad. 2015. “Comparative Advantage in Smith’s Wealth of Nations and Ricardo’s Principles: A Brief History of its Early Development.” History of Economic Ideas 23 (1): 59–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricardo, David. 1951–73. The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, 11 vols., edited by P. Sraffa with the collaboration of M. H. Dobb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, Lionel. 1958. Robert Torrens and the Evolution of Classical Economics. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosell, Olivier. 2017. “Wages, Competition and the Surplus of Labour: A Classical Contribution to Explaining Profit.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 41 (1): 63–80. doi:10.1093/cje/bew005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosell, Olivier. 2018. “The Contribution of Robert Torrens to Ricardo’s Theory of Natural Wage.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 40 (2): 201–215. doi:10.1017/S1053837217000049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruffin, Roy. 2002. “David Ricardo’s Discovery of Comparative Advantage.” History of Political Economy 34 (4): 727–748. doi:10.1215/00182702-34-4-727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruffin, Roy. 2005. “Debunking a Myth: Torrens on Comparative Advantage.” History of Political Economy 37 (4): 711–722. doi:10.1215/00182702-37-4-711.
   Google Scholar
• Salvatore, Dominick. 2013. International Economics. Hoboken: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Seligman, Edwin R. A. 1903. “On Some Neglected British Economists.” The Economic Journal 13 (51): 335–363. doi:10.2307/2221519.
   Google Scholar
• Seligman, Edwin R. A. 1911. “Ricardo and Torrens.” The Economic Journal 21 (83): 448–455. doi:10.2307/2222348.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Adam. [1776] 1976. “An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations.” In The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith, vol. II, edited by R. H. Campbell and A. S. Skinner. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, William. 1807. Britain Independent of Commerce; Or, Proofs, Deduced from an Investigation into the True Causes of the Wealth of Nations, that our Riches, Prosperity, and Power, are Derived from Resources Inherent in Ourselves, and would not be Affected, even though our Commerce were Annihilated. London: T. Cadell and W. Davies.
   Google Scholar
• Torrens, Robert. [1808]1993. “The Economists Refuted.” In The Economists Refuted and Other Early Economic Writings, edited by P. D. Groenewegen, 1–76. Fairfield: Augustus M. Kelley.
   Google Scholar
• Torrens, Robert. [1819]1993. “Mr. Owen’s Plan for Relieving the National Distress.” In The Economists Refuted and Other Early Economic Writings, edited by P. D. Groenewegen, 83–103. Fairfield: Augustus M. Kelley.
   Google Scholar
• Torrens, Robert. 1815. An Essay on the External Corn Trade. 1st ed. London: J. Hatchard.
   Google Scholar
• Torrens, Robert. 1816. A Letter to the Right Hon. the Earl of Liverpool, on the State of the Agriculture of the United Kingdom, and on the Means of Relieving the Present Distress of the Farmer, and of Securing Him Against the Recurrence of Similar Embarrassment. London: J. Hatchard.
   Google Scholar
• Torrens, Robert. 1820a. An Essay on the Influence of the External Corn Trade Upon the Production and Distribution of National Wealth. 2nd ed. London: J. Hatchard.
   Google Scholar
• Torrens, Robert. 1820b. “Mr. Malthus’s New Work on the Principles of Political Economy, with Observations on Free Trade.” The Traveller, April 26.
   Google Scholar
• Torrens, Robert. 1821. An Essay on the Production of Wealth. London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Torrens, Robert. 1826. An Essay on the External Corn Trade. 3rd ed. London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, and Green.
   Google Scholar
• Torrens, Robert. 1827. An Essay on the External Corn Trade. 4th ed. London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, and Green.
   Google Scholar
• Torrens, Robert. 1829. An Essay on the External Corn Trade. With an Appendix on the Means of Improving the Condition of the Labouring Classes. A New Edition. 5th ed. London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, and Green.
   Google Scholar
• Torrens, Robert. 1833. Letters on Commercial Policy. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Torrens, Robert. 1835. Colonization of South Australia. London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green, and Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Torrens, Robert. 1844. The Budget. On Commercial and Colonial Policy. London: Smith and Elder.
   Google Scholar
• Vasudevan, Ramaa. 2012. “Terms of Trade, Competitive Advantage, and Trade Patterns.” Review of Political Economy 24 (2): 183–202. doi:10.1080/09538259.2012.664324.
   Google Scholar
• Viner, Jacob. [1937] 1965. Studies in the Theory of International Trade. New York: Harper and Brothers.
   Google Scholar