Why the kinked demand curve may still be useful

References

• Alchian, A. 1950. “Uncertainty, Evolution, and Economic Theory.” Journal of Political Economy 58 (3): 211–221. doi:10.1086/256940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awh, R., and W. Primeaux. 1992. “A More General Theory of Kinked Demand Curve: Theory and Empirical Test.” Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 32: 99–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlin, E. 1933. The Theory of Monopolistic Competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J. M. 1914. “A Contribution to the Theory of Competitive Price.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 37: 747–771.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J. M. 1923. Studies in the Economics of Overhead Costs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J. M. 1924. “The Socializing of Theoretical Economics.” In The Trend of Economics, edited by Rexford Tugwell, 75. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J. M. 1927. “The Relationship between Statics and Dynamics.” In Economic Essays in Honor of John Bates Clark, J. Hollander, 46–70. New York: Macmillan. Reprinted in Clark, J.M. 1936. Preface to Social Economics, Farrar and Rinehart, New York, pp. 196–228.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J. M. 1936. “Past Accomplishments and Present Prospects of American Economics.” American Economic Review 26: 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J. M. 1938. “Basing Point Methods of Price Quoting.” The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 4 (4): 477–489. doi:10.2307/136613.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J. M. 1940. “Toward a Concept of Workable Competition.” American Economic Review 30: 241–256.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J. M. 1943. “Imperfect Competition Theory and Basing-Point Problems.” American Economic Review 33: 283–300.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J. M. 1946. “Realism and Relevance in the Theory of Demand.” Journal of Political Economy 54 (4): 347–353. doi:10.1086/256377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, J. M. 1947. “Some Current Cleavages among Economists.” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 37: 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, J. M. 1948. “Competition and Security.” In Alternative to Serfdom, 61–90. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J. M. 1949a. Clark letter to Ray B. Westerfield, 20 December, 1949, in J. M. Clark Papers.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J. M. 1949b. “The Law and Economics of Basing Points: Appraisal and Proposals.” American Economic Review 39: 430–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, J. M. 1955. “Competition: Static Models and Dynamic Aspects.” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 45: 450–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, J. M. 1958. “The Uses of Diversity: Competitive Bearings of Diversities in Cost and Demand Functions.” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 48: 74–82.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J. M. 1961. Competition as a Dynamic Process. Washington, DC: Brookings.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J. B., and J. M. Clark. 1914. The Control of Trusts. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J. M., M. Sharp, R. Shannon, and B. Ansell. 1934. Report of the National Recovery Administration on the Operation of the Basing Point System in the Iron and Steel Industry. Washington, D C: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Colander, David. 2013. Microeconomics. 10th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Dorfman, Joseph. 1969. The Economic Mind in American Civilization, Volume V, 438–463. New York: Augustus M. Kelley, Chapter XV.
   Google Scholar
• Efroymson, C. 1943. “A Note on Kinked Demand Curves.” American Economic Review 33: 98–109.
   Google Scholar
• Efroymson, C. 1955. “The Kinky Oligopoly Demand Curve Reconsidered.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 69: 19–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, Craig. 2005. “Power without Glory—George Stigler’s Market Leviathan.” History of Economics Review 41: 19–48.
   Google Scholar
• Galles, Gary. 1988. “Essays on Competition in Imperfect Spatial Markets.” UCLA PhD diss. University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Gruchy, Allan G. 1947. Modern Economic Thought: The American Contribution, 337–402. New York, NY: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Ch. 5.
   Google Scholar
• Gruchy, Allen G. 1972. Contemporary Economic Thought: The American Contribution, 55–62. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R., and C. Hitch. 1939. “Price Theory and Business Behavior.” Oxford Economic Papers 2: 12–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayek, Friedrich. 1948. “The Meaning of Competition.” In Individualism and Economic Order, 92–106. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hickman, Charles. 1975. J.M. Clark. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, T. W. 1953. A Review of Economic Doctrines, 1870–1929. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, Lowell. 2019. “Robinson, Andrews and Marshall: A Case of Arguing at Cross Purposes?” History of Economics Review 72 (1): 35–58. doi:10.1080/10370196.2019.1620136.
   Google Scholar
• Markham, Jesse. 2008. “Clark, John Maurice.” Encyclopedia.com.
   Google Scholar
• Mayhew, Anne. 1997. “Review of Laurence Shute, John Maurice Clark: A Social Economics for the Twenty-First Century.” EH-Net: 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, Campbell, Stanley Brue, and Flynn Sean. 2016. Microeconomics. 19th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• McNulty, Paul. 1967. “A Note on the History of Perfect Competition.” Journal of Political Economy 75 (4, Part 1): 395–399. doi:10.1086/259295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNulty, Paul. 1968. “Economic Theory and the Meaning of Competition.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 82: 302–312. Reprinted in Breit, Hochman and Saueracker (eds.), Readings in Microeconomics, Times Mirror, 1986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niehans, Jurg. 1998. “John Maurice Clark.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 5 (2): 396–398. doi:10.1080/10427719800000039.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, Joan. 1933. The Economics of Imperfect Competition. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, Malcom. 1997. American Institutionalism in the History of Economics. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 19: 178–195.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, Malcom. 2000. “Understanding Institutional Economics, 1918–1929.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22 (3): 277–308.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, Malcom. 2001. “Institutional Economics: Then and Now.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 15 (3): 173–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutherford, Malcom. 2003. “Chicago Economics and Institutionalism.” University of Victoria Working Paper, Victoria, May, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, Malcom. 2013. “J.M. Clark and Institutional Economics: Remarks on the Receipt of the Veblen-Commons Award.” Journal of Economic Issues 47 (2): 295–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shute, Laurence. 1997. John Maurice Clark. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Spengler, Joseph. 1965. “Kinked Demand Curves: By Whom First Used?” Southern Economics Journal 32: 81–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigler, George. 1947. “The Kinky Oligopoly Demand Curve and Rigid Prices.” Journal of Political Economy 55 (5): 432–449. doi:10.1086/256581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigler, George. 1957. “Perfect Competition, Historically Contemplated.” Journal of Political Economy 65 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1086/257878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigler, George. 1978. “The Literature of Economics: The Case of the Kinked Oligopoly Demand Curve.” Economic Inquiry 16 (2): 185–204. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.1978.tb00281.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweezy, P. 1939. “Demand under Conditions of Oligopoly.” Journal of Political Economy 47 (4): 568–573. doi:10.1086/255420.
   Google Scholar