The paradox of value in the teaching of the Church Fathers

References

• Annas, Julia, and Jonathan Barnes. 1985. The Modes of Scepticism. Ancient Texts and Modern Interpretations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle, vol. 2. Edited by Jonathan Barnes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Augustine 1952. “The City of God.” Books VIII–XVI. Translated by Gerald G. Walsh and Grace Monahan. Washington: The Catholic University of America Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowley, Marian. 1973. “The Development of Value Theory in the Seventeenth Century.” In Studies in the History of Economic Theory before 1870. London/Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Chrysostom, John. 1842. The Homilies on the Statues, or to the People of Antioch. Oxford: John Henry Parker.
   Google Scholar
• Chrysostom, John. 1963. Baptismal Instructions. Edited by Johannes Quasten and Walter J. Burghardt. Mahwah: Paulist Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clement of Alexandria. 1954. Christ the Educator. Translated by Simon P. Wood. Washington: The Catholic University of America Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dempsey, Bernard W. 1935. “Just Price in a Functional Economy.” The American Economic Review 25 (3): 471–486.
   Google Scholar
• de Roover, Raymond. 1957. “Joseph A. Schumpeter and Scholastic Economics.” Kyklos 10 (2): 115–146. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1957.tb02127.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekelund, Robert B., and Mark Thornton. 2011. “Galileo, Smith and the Paradox of Value: The ‘Connection’ of Art and Science.” History of Economic Ideas 19 (1): 85–101.
   Google Scholar
• Epicurus 1994. “The Epicurean Reader.” In Selected Writings and Testimonia, translated and edited by Brad Inwood and L. P. Gerson. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Erasmus, Desiderius. 2006. “Collected Works of Erasmus.” In Adages IV III 1 to V II 51. Vol. 36, edited by John N. Grant and Betty I. Knot. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eusebius, Pamphilus. 1845. Ecclesiastical History. The Life of the Blessed Emperor Constantine. London: Samuel Bagster.
   Google Scholar
• Farber, Lianna. 2006. An Anatomy of Trade in Medieval Writing. Value, Consent, and Community. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giordani, Igino. 1944. The Social Message of the Early Church Fathers. Paterson: St. Anthony Guild Press.
   Google Scholar
• Julian 1913. The Works of the Emperor Julian. Vol. 2. Translated by Wilmer Cave Wright. London: William Heinemann/Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Karayiannis, Anastassios D. 1994. “The Eastern Christian Fathers (A.D. 350–400) on the Redistribution of Wealth.” History of Political Economy 26 (1): 39–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-26-1-39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karayiannis, Anastassios D., and Sarah Drakopoulou Dodd. 1998. “The Greek Christian Fathers.” In Ancient and Medieval Economic Ideas and Concepts of Social Justice, edited by S. Todd Lowry and Barry Gordon, 163–208. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Kauder, Emil. 1953. “Genesis of the Marginal Utility Theory. From Aristotle to the End of the Eighteenth Century.” The Economic Journal 63 (251): 638–650. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2226451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauder, Emil. 1965. A History of Marginal Utility Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaulla, Rudolf. 1906. Die geschichtliche Entwicklung der modernen Werttheorien. Tübingen: H. Laupp.
   Google Scholar
• Langholm, Odd Inge. 1979. “Price and Value in the Aristotelian Tradition.” In A Study in Scholastic Economic Sources. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Langholm, Odd. 2009. “Olivi to Hutcheson: Tracing an Early Tradition in Value Theory.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 31 (2): 131–141. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1053837209090154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maital, Shlomo, and Lynda Peach. 1973. “Galileo and the Paradox of Value.” History of Economic Thought Newsletter 11: 20.
   Google Scholar
• Maximus of Turin. 1989. The Sermons of St. Maximus of Turin. Edited and translated by Boniface Ramsey. New York: Newman Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Margareth. 2004. “Silver Chamber Pots and Other Goods Which Are Not Good: John Chrysostom’s Discourse against Wealth and Possessions.” In Having. Property and Possession in Religious and Social Life, William Schweiker and Charles Mathewes, 91–99. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans.
   Google Scholar
• Mitsis, Philip. 2020. “Hellenistic Philosophy and the Origins of Modern Economic Thought.” In The Routledge Handbook of Hellenistic Philosophy, edited by Kelly Arenson, 432–442. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Musinius, Rufus. 2011. Lectures & Sayings. Translated by Cynthia King and edited by William B. Irvine. Lexington, KY: CreateSpace.
   Google Scholar
• Philo 1941. Philo in Ten Volumes. Vol. 9. Translated by F. H. Colson. Cambridge: Harvard University Press/William Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Pindar 1997. Olympian Odes. Pythian Odes. Edited and translated by William H. Race. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plato 1997. Complete Works. Edited by John M. Cooper. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Race, William H. 1981. “Pindar’s ‘Best is Water’: Best of What?” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 22 (2): 119–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, H.M., and W.L. Taylor. 1957. “Adam Smith's Approach to the Theory of Value.” The Economic Journal 67 (266): 181–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, Joseph. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. London: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Sewall, Hannah Robie. 1901. The Theory of Value and Price Before Adam Smith. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sextus, Empiricus. 2000. Outlines of Scepticism. Edited by Julia Annas and Jonathan Barnes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skousen, Mark, and Kenna C. Taylor. 1997. Puzzles and Paradoxes in Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Adam. 1976. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Adam. 1982. Lectures on Jurisprudence, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Swales, John M. 1993. “The Paradox of Value: Six Treatments in Search of the Reader.” In Economics and Language, edited by Willie Henderson, Tony Dudley-Evans, and Roger Backhouse, 223–239. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tertullian 1959. Disciplinary, Moral, and Ascetical Works. Translated by Rudolph Arbesmann, Emily Joseph Daly, and Edwin A. Quain. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.
   Google Scholar
• Viner, Jacob. 1972. The Role of Providence in the Social Order. An Essay in Intellectual History. Philadelphia, PA: American Philosophical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Viner, Jacob. 1978. “The Economic Doctrines of the Scholastics.” History of Political Economy 10 (1): 46–113. doi:https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-10-1-46.
   Google Scholar
• Vitruvius 1970. On Architecture. Vol. 2. Translated by Frank Granger. Cambridge: Harvard University Press/William Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• White, Michael V. 2002. “Doctoring Adam Smith: The Fable of the Diamonds and Water Paradox.” History of Political Economy 34 (4): 659–683. doi:https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-34-4-659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, Katharina M. 1982. “An Affront to Gold and Silver: Tertullian’s De cultu feminarum and More’s Utopia.” Moreana 19 (73): 69–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.3366/more.1982.19.1.16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winfrey, John C. 1993. “Derailing Value Theory: Adam Smith and the Aristotelian Tradition.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 15 (2): 301–319. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1053837200000997.
   Google Scholar