Chester Barnard’s systems-theoretic approach to organisation theory: a reconstruction

References

• Barnard, C. I. 1938. The Functions of the Executive. 1968 ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnard, C. I. 1945. “Education for Executives.” Journal of Business 18 (4): 175–182.
   Google Scholar
• Barnard, C. I. 1948. Organization and Management: Selected Papers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnard, C. I. 1958. “Elementary Conditions of Business Morals.” California Management Review 1 (1) : 1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/41165329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berle, A. A., and G. C. Means. 1932. The modern corporation and private property. New Brunswick. NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Caminati, M. 2010. “Function, Mind and Novelty: Organismic Concepts and Richard M. Goodwin Formation at Harvard, 1932 to 1934.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 17 (2): 255–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chia, R. 2017. “A Process-Philosophical Understanding of Organizational Learning as “Wayfinding” Process, Practices and Sensitivity to Environmental Affordances.” The Learning Organization 24 (2): 107–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-11-2016-0083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, J. B. 2007. “Person-in-Community: Whiteheadian Insights into Community and Institution.” Organization Studies 28 (4): 567–588. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607075268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commons, J. R. 1934. Institutional Economics. Its Place in Political Economy. New Brunswick: Transactions Publishers (Reprinted in 1990).
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. B. 2019. “Specialization, Fragmentation, and Pluralism in Economics.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 26 (2): 271–293. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2018.1555604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabor, A., and J. T. Mahoney. 2013. “Chester Barnard and the Systems Approach to Nurturing Organizations.” In Oxford Handbook of Management Theorists, edited by M. Witzel and M. Warner, 134–151. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Godfrey, P. C., and J. T. Mahoney. 2014. “The Functions of the Executive at 75: An Invitation to Reconsider a Timeless Classic.” Journal of Management Inquiry 23 (4): 360–372. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492614530042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernes, T. 2008. Understanding Organization as Process: Theory for a Tangled World. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse, J. O. 2012. “The ‘Americanisation’of West German Economics after the Second World War: Success, Failure, or Something Completely Different?” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 19 (1): 67–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2010.487283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loasby, B. J. 2009. “Knowledge, Coordination and the Firm: Historical Perspectives.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 16 (4): 539–558. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09672560903201227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. 1989. Ecological Communication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. 1992. “The Code of the Moral.” Cardozo Law Review 14 (1): 995–1009.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. 1999. Zweckbegriff und Systemrationalität. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. 2013. Introduction to Systems Theory. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. 2019. Schriften zur Organisation. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J. T., A. S. Huff, and J. O. Huff. 1994. “Toward a New Social Contract Theory in Organization Science.” Journal of Management Inquiry 3 (2): 153–168. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/105649269432005.
   Google Scholar
• McMahon, D., and J. Carr. 1999. “The Contributions of Chester Barnard to Strategic Management Theory.” Journal of Management History (Archive) 5 (5): 228–240. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/13552529910282222.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. R., and W. G. Scott. 1988. “The Barnard-Simon Contribution: A Vanished Legacy.” Public Administration Quarterly 12 (3): 348–368.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, R. C. 1991. Process Philosophy and Political Ideology. The Social and Political Thought of Alfred North Whitehead and Charles Hartshorne. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nayak, A., R. Chia, and J. I. Canales. 2020. “Non-Cognitive Microfoundations: Understanding Dynamic Capabilities as Idiosyncratically Refined Sensitivities and Predispositions.” Academy of Management Review 45 (2): 280–303. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2016.0253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortmann, G. 2012. “Luhmann und die Organisationssoziologie.” In Luhmann Handbuch: Leben – Werk – Wirkung, edited by O. Jahraus, A. Nassehi, M. Grizelj, I. Saake, C. Kirchmeier, and J. Müller, 23–28. Stuttgart : Verlag J.B.Metzler.
   Google Scholar
• Perrow, C. 1986. Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay. New York.: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, K. 2003. “A Functioning Executive: Chester Barnard and the Modern Manager.” Canadian Public Administration/Administration publique du Canada 46 (4): 520–526. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.2003.tb01591.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, S. 2019. The open theory and its enemy: Implicit moralisation as epistemological obstacle for general systems theory. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 36 (3): 281–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, S., and Valentinov, V. 2020. East of nature. Accounting for the environments of social sciences. Ecological Economics 176, 106734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. G. 1992. Chester I. Barnard and the Guardians of the Managerial State. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. 1995. “Symbols and Organizations: From Barnard to the Institutionalists.” In Organization Theory: From Chester Barnard to the Present and Beyond, edited by O. E. Williamson, 38–55. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. 2003. Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Seidl, D., and H. Mormann. 2014. “Niklas Luhmann as Organization Theorist.” In The Oxford Handbook of Sociology, Social Theory, and Organization Studies: Contemporary Currents, 125–157. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 1962. “The Architecture of Complexity.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 106 (6): 467–482.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 1991. “Organizations and Markets.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (2): 25–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.2.25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J. 2012. “Dynamic Capabilities: Routines Versus Entrepreneurial Action.” Journal of Management Studies 49 (8): 1395–1401. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01080.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, S. 2015. “Towards a Social Theory of the Firm: Worker Cooperatives Reconsidered.” Journal of Co-Operative Organization and Management 3 (1): 3–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcom.2015.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, S., and V. Valentinov. 2017. “The Neglect of Society in the Theory of the Firm: A Systems-Theory Perspective.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 41 (4): 1061–1085. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bew072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentinov, V. 2014. “The Complexity–Sustainability Trade‐off in Niklas Luhmann’s Social Systems Theory.” Systems Research and Behavioral Science 31 (1): 14–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentinov, V., and M. Pérez-Valls, 2020. A conception of moral wayfinding for business managers: The obligation for a sustainable corporation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 124771.
   Google Scholar
• van Assche, K., and G. Verschraegen. 2008. “The Limits of Planning: Niklas Luhmann’s Systems Theory and the Analysis of Planning and Planning Ambitions.” Planning Theory 7 (3): 263–283. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095208094824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Bertalanffy, Ludwig. 1968. General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. New York: George Braziller.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, A., and M. Brady. 2019a. “Chester Barnard Revisited: Spontaneous Orders and the Firm.” Journal of Institutional Economics 15 (6): 951–962. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137419000365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, A., and M. Brady. 2019b. “Intra-Firm Coordination Through Rule-Following and the Emergence of Hierarchy.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 22 (3): 357–382. doi:https://doi.org/10.35297/qjae.010026.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, A. N. 1925. Science and the Modern World. New York: Pelican Mentor Book.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, A. N. 1978. Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkens, U., and H. Minssen. 2010. “Interdependence Between People and Organization.” Zeitschrift für Personalforschung 24 (2): 101–107.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (Ed.). 1995a. Organization Theory: From Chester Barnard to the Present and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. 1995b. “Introduction.” In Organization Theory: From Chester Barnard to the Present and Beyond, edited by O. E. Williamson, 3–10. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. 1996. The Mechanisms of Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, W. B. 1995. “Facts and Fictions regarding Chester I. Barnard: A Review of William G. Scott's Chester I. Barnard and the Guardians of the Managerial State.” International Journal of Public Administration 18 (12): 1859–1904. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01900699508525079.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, W. B. 1974. The Basic Barnard: An Introduction to Chester I. Barnard and His Theories of Organization and Management. Ithaca: Humphrey Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wren, D. A. 1994. The Evolution of Management Thought. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar