The part played by general equilibrium in the liquidity preference vs loanable funds episode (1936–1956)

References

• Arrow, K., and M. D. Intriligator. 1982. Handbook of Mathematical Economics. 2 vols. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Baumol, W. J. 1962. “Stocks, Flows and Monetary Theory.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 76 (1): 46–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1891130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besomi, D. 1999. The Making of Harrod’s Dynamics. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bibow, J. 2000. “The Loanable Funds Fallacy in Retrospect.” History of Political Economy 32 (4): 789–831. doi:https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-32-4-789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bibow, J. 2005. “Liquidity Preference Theory Revisited—To Ditch or to Build on It?” The Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, Working Paper N° 427.
   Google Scholar
• Boianovsky, M. 2018. “Cambridge Anticipations of the Natural Rate Hypothesis? Robertson and Champernowne Revisited.” History of Economic Ideas 26 (3): 15–50.
   Google Scholar
• Boianovsky, M., and J. R. Presley. 2009. “The Robertson Connection between the Natural Rates of Interest and Unemployment.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 20 (2): 136–150. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2009.03.001.
   Google Scholar
• Bridel, P. 1987. Cambridge Monetary Thought. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bridel, P. 1997. Money and General Equilibrium Theory. From Walras to Pareto (1870–1923). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bridel, P. 2002. “Patinkin, Walras and the ‘Money-in-the-Utility-Function' Tradition.” In Patinkin and the Development of Modern Economic Theory, edited by Pascal Bridel and Michel de Vroey. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Special Issue, 9: 268–292.
   Google Scholar
• Bridel, P. 2017. “The (Somewhat?) Shaky Theoretical Foundations of Modern Macroeconomics.” History of Economic Ideas XXV: 249–253.
   Google Scholar
• Clower, R. W. 1954. “Productivity, Thrift and the Rate of Interest.” The Economic Journal 64 (253): 107–115. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2227094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vroey, M. 2000. “Is-LM à la Hicks versus is-LM à la Modigliani.” History of Political Economy 32 (2): 293–316. doi:https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-32-2-293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vroey, M. 2004. Involuntary Unemployment. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Vroey, M. 2006. “The Temporary Equilibrium Method: Hicks against Hicks.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 13 (2): 259–278. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09672560600708318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vroey, M. 2016. A History of Macroeconomics from Keynes to Lucas and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Debreu, G. 1959. Theory of Value: An Axiomatic Analysis of Economic Equilibrium. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fantacci, L., E. Sanfilippo, et al. 2020. “The Original Meaning of 'Liquidity Trap' in the Early Discussions between Robertson and Keynes.” In New Perspectives on Political Economy and Its History, edited by M. C. Marcuzzo, 343–364. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fantacci, L., M. C. Marcuzzo, and E. Sanfilippo. 2014. “A Note on the Notions of Risk-Premium and Liquidity-Premium in Hicks’s and Keynes’s Analyses of the Term Structure of Interest Rates.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 21 (6): 1102–1108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2014.972637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellner, W., and H. M. Somers. 1941. “Alternative Monetary Approaches to Interest Theory.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 23 (1): 43–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1928398.
   Google Scholar
• Foley, D. 1975. “On Two Specifications of Asset Equilibrium in Macroeconomic Models.” Journal of Political Economy 83 (2): 303–324. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/260324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. 1949. “The Marshallian Demand Curve.” Journal of Political Economy, 57 as in M. Friedman, Essays in Positive Economics, 47–99. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1953.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, F. H. 1955. “The Rate of Interest and General Equilibrium Analysis.” The Economic Journal 65 (257): 52–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2227442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, F. H. 1982. “Stability.” In Handbook of Mathematical Economics, edited by K. Arrow and M. D. Intriligator, 2 vols, vol. 1, 745–93. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, F. H. 1985. “In Praise of Economic Theory.” In Money, Growth and Stability, 10–28. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, F. H., and R. Solow. 1995. A Critical Essay on Modern Macroeconomic Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haley, B. F. 1948. “Value and Distribution.” In A Survey of Contemporary Economics, Vol. 1, edited by H.S. Ellis, 1–48. Philadelphia: Blakiston.
   Google Scholar
• Harrod, R. F. 1936. The Trade Cycle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harrod, R. F. 1937. Mr Keynes and Traditional Theory, Econometrica, 5, Reprinted in the New Economics. Keynes’ Influence on Theory and Public Policy. Edited by S. E. Harris, 591–605. London: Dobson.
   Google Scholar
• Harrod, R. F. 1951. The Life of John Maynard Keynes. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Harrod, R. F. 1956. “Walras: A Re-appraisal.”, Economic Journal, 66, as in Bridel, P. (1996). Le chêne et l’architecte: un siècle de comptes rendus bibliographiques des Eléments d’économie politique pure de Léon Walras, 543–551. Paris–Genève: Droz.
   Google Scholar
• Harrod, R. F. 1969. Money. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Harrod, R. F. 1970. “Reassessment of Keynes’s Views on Money.” Journal of Political Economy 78 (4, Part 1): 617–625. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/259659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrod, R. F. 2003. The Collected Interwar Papers and Correspondence of Roy Harrod. Edited by by Daniele Besomi. 3 vols. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hawtrey, R. 1913. Good and Bad Trade. London: Longmans.
   Google Scholar
• Hawtrey, R. 1937a. Capital and Employment. New York: Longmans Green.
   Google Scholar
• Hawtrey, R. 1937b. “Alternative Theories of the Rate of Interest. A Rejoinder.” Economic Journal 47: 436–443.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, M. G. 2010. “The Loanable Funds Fallacy: saving, Finance and Equilibrium.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 34 (4): 807–820. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bep073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, J. R. 1935. “A Suggestion for Simplifying the Theory of Money.” In Critical Essays in Monetary Theory, edited by J. R. Hicks, 61–82. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2549103.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, J. R. 1936. “Keynes’ Theory of Employment.” The Economic Journal 46 (182): 238–253. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2225227.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, J. R. 1937. “Mr Keynes and the Classics: A Suggested Interpretation.” Econometrica 5 (2): 142–147. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1907242.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, J. R. 1939. Value and Capital. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, J. R. 1964. “A Memoir – Sir Dennis Robertson.” In Sir Dennis Robertson. Essays in Money and Interest, edited by John Hicks, 9–22. Manchester: Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, J. R. 1967. Critical Essays in Monetary Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, J. R. 1977. “Recollections and Documents.” In Economic Perspectives. Further Essays on Money and Growth, 134–148. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ingrao, B., and G. Israel. 1990. The Invisible Hand. Economic Equilibrium in the History of Science. London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, H. 1951. “Some Cambridge Controversies in Monetary Theory.” The Review of Economic Studies 19 (2): 90–104. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2295737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, H. 1962. “Monetary Theory and Policy.” American Economic Review 52: 335–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, H., and E. Johnson. 1978. The Shadow of Keynes. Understanding Keynes, Cambridge and Keynesian Economics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, R. 1954. “Some Notes on Liquidity Preference.” Manchester School, 8, as in Kahn, R.F., Selected Essays on Employment and Growth, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1972: 72–96.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, R. F. 1984. The Making of Keynes'General Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. M. 1921. Treatise on Probability, the Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Vol. VIII. London: Macmillan, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. M. 1930. A Treatise on Money, the Applied Theory of Money, 2 Vols, the Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Vol. V and VI. London: Macmillan, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. M. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, the Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Vol. VII. London: Macmillan, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. M. 1937. “Alternative Theories of the Rate of Interest.” Economic Journal, 47 as in Keynes, 1973 XIV: 201–223.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. M. 1972. Essays in Biography, the Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Vol. X. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. M. 1973. The General Theory and after – Part I Preparation, the Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Vol. XIII. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. M. 1973. The General Theory and after – Part II Defence and Development, the Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Vol. XIV. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, L. 1966. The Keynesian Revolution. 2nd ed. 1st ed. 1948. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, L. R., W. Fellner, H. M. Somers, and K. Brunner. 1950. “Stock and Flow Analysis in Economics.” Econometrica 18 (3): 236–252. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1905795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, O. 1938. The Rate of Interest and the Optimum Propensity to Consume’, Economica, 5, as in Readings in Business Cycle Theory. Edited by G. Haberler, 169–192. Philadelphia: Blakiston.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, O. 1945. Price Flexibility and Employment. San Antonio: Principia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawlor, M. S. 1997. “The Classical Theory of the Rate of Interest.” In A ‘Second Edition’ of the General Theory, edited by G. C. Harcourt and P. A. Riach, vol. 1, 343–367. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leijonhufvud, A. 1968. On Keynesian Economics and the Economics of Keynes. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leijonhufvud, A. 1981. “The Wicksell Connection: Variations on a Theme.” In Information and Coordination. Essays in Macroeconomic Theory, 131–202. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leontieff, W. 1947. “Postulates: Keynes’ General Theory and the Classicists.” In The New Economics. Keynes’ Influence on Theory and Public Policy, edited by S.E. Harris, 232–242. London: Dobson.
   Google Scholar
• Leontieff, W. 1971. “Theoretical Assumptions and Nonobserved Facts.” American Economic Review 61: 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, A. 1938. “Alternative Formulations of the Theory of Interest.” Economic Journal, 48, as in A. Lerner, Essays in Economic Analysis, London, Macmillan, 1953: 277–304.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, A. 1941. “Alternative Monetary Approaches to Interest Theory.” Review of Economic Studies 23: 43–48.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, A. 1944. “Interest Theory – Supply and Demand for Loans or Supply and Demand for Cash?” In The New Economics. Keynes’ Influence on Theory and Public Policy, edited by S. E. Harris, 655–661. London: Dobson.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, R. E. Jr. 1972. “Expectations and the Neutrality of Money.” Journal of Economic Theory 4: 103–24.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. 1890. Principles of Economics. Edited by C.W. Guillebaud. 2 vols. London: Macmillan, 1961.
   Google Scholar
• Milgate, M. 1982. Capital and Employment. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mizen, P., and J. R. Presley. 1995. “Robertson and Persistent Negative Reactions to Keynes’s General Theory: Some New Evidence.” History of Political Economy 27 (4): 639–651. doi:https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-27-4-639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizen, P., and J. R. Presley. 1998. “Keynes, Hicks, and the Cambridge School?” History of Political Economy 30 (1): 1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-30-1-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modigliani, F. 1944. Liquidity Preference and the Theory of Interest and Money’ Econometrica, 12, as in Readings in Monetary Theory, 186–239. London: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Myrdal, G. 1939. Monetary Equilibrium. London: Hodge.
   Google Scholar
• Ohlin, B. 1937. “Some Notes on the Stockholm theory of Savings and Investment.” Economic Journal, 47, as in Readings in Business Cycle Theory, edited by G. Haberler, 87–130. Philadelphia: Blakiston, 1944.
   Google Scholar
• Patinkin, D. 1958. “Liquidity Preference and Loanable Funds: Stock and Flow Analysis.” Economica 25: 300–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patinkin, D. 1965. Money, Interest and Prices. 1st ed., 1956. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Pigou, A. C. 1936. “Mr. J.M. Keynes’ General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money.” Economica 3 (10): 115–132. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2549064.
   Google Scholar
• Pigou, A. C. 1950. Keynes’s General Theory. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Presley, J. R. 1979. Robertsonian Economics. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Reddaway, W. B. 1937. “General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money.” Economic Record 12 (1–2): 28–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.1937.tb02999.x.
   Google Scholar
• Rivot, S. 2013. “Gentlemen Prefer Liquidity: Evidence from Keynes.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 35 (3): 397–422. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1053837213000230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, D. H. 1926. Banking Policy and the Price Level. London: King.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, D. H. 1933. ‘Saving and Hoarding’, Economic Journal, 43, as in Essays in Monetary Theory, 65–82. London: Staples, 1940.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, D. H. 1936. “Some Notes on Mr Keynes’s General Theory of Employment.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 51 (1): 168–191. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1882506.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, D. H. 1937. “Alternative Theories of the Rate of Interest. Rejoinder.” Economic Journal 47: 428–436.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, D. H. 1938. “Mr Keynes and ‘Finance.’ The Economic Journal 48 (191): 555, 314–318 and 56. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2225463.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, D. H. 1940. Essays in Monetary Theory. London: Staples Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, D. H. 1951. “Comments on Mr. Johnson’s Notes.” The Review of Economic Studies 19 (2): 105–110. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2295738.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, D. H. 1953. “More Notes on the Rate of Interest.” The Review of Economic Studies 21 (2): 136–141. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2296005.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, D. H. 1959. Lectures on Economic Principles, Vol. 3. London: Staples Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, D. H. ∼1933–1959. Unpublished correspondence Friedman, Hicks, Lange, Lundbergh, Meade, Ohlin, Patinkin, Pigou, Samuelson, Tsiang, Trinity College Archives, Wren Library, Cambridge, Robertson Papers, Professional Correspondence, 1910–1967, RBTN/C files.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. 1951. ‘The Rate of Interest’, Econometrica, 19, as in Robinson, J., The Rate of Interest and Other Essays, 3–30. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. 1956. The Accumulation of Capital. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. 1978. History versus Equilibrium’ in Contributions to Modern Economics, 126–136. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. A. 1947. Foundations of Economic Analysis. New York: Athenaeum.
   Google Scholar
• Scitovszky, T. 1940. “A Study of Interest and Capital.” Econometrica 7: 293–317.
   Google Scholar
• Shackle, G. L. S. 1961. “Recent Theories concerning the Nature and Role of Interest.” The Economic Journal 71 (282): 209–254. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2228764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, E. S. 1938. “False Issue in the Interest-Theory Controversy.” Journal of Political Economy 46 (6): 838–856. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/255318.
   Google Scholar
• Snowden, B. and Vane, H. W. 1998, “Transforming macroeconomics: an interview with Robert E. Lucas Jr.”. Journal of Economic Methodology. 5:1: 115–146.
   Google Scholar
• Sraffa, P. 1960. Production of commodities by Means of Commodities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, H. 1937. “Liquidity-Premium and the Theory of Value.” Economic Journal 47: 157–169.
   Google Scholar
• Tsiang, S. C. 1956. “Liquidity Preference and Loanable Funds Theories, Multiplier and Velocity Analyses: A Synthesis.” American Economic Review 46: 539–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walras, L. 1954. Elements of Pure Economics. Homewood: R. D. Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Weintraub, E. R. 1985. General Equilibrium Analysis; Studies in Appraisal. London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, W. 1987. Interpreting Mr Keynes. The is-LM Enigma. London: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar