The Sympathy of Sophie de Grouchy, translator and critic of Adam Smith

References

• Albertone, Manuela. 1980. “I Condorcet e i Necker: morale, politica e economia nel pensiero di due coppie del XVIII secolo.” Annali della Fondazione Luigi Einaudi. Vol. XIV: 157–239.
   Google Scholar
• Arvor, Gabrielle (d’). 1897. Les femmes illustres de la France: Madame de Condorcet, 1764–1822. Paris: P. Boulinier, Librairie Moderne.
   Google Scholar
• Bergès, Sandrine. 2018. “Family, Gender and Progress: Sophie de Grouchy and Her Exclusion in the Publication of Condorcet’s Sketch of Human Progress.” Journal of the History of Ideas 79 (2): 267–283. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2018.0016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergès, Sandrine. 2015. “Is Motherhood Compatible with Political Participation? Sophie de Grouchy’s Care-Based Republicanism.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (1): 47–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernier, Marc-Andre, and Deidre Dawson. 2010. Les Lettres sur la Sympathie (1798) de Sophie de Grouchy: philosophie morale et réforme sociale. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Becchio, Giandomenica. 2020. A History of Feminist and Gender Economics. London; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bergès, Sandrine and Eric Schliesser. 2019. Introduction of Sophie de Grouchy’s Letters on Sympathy. A Critical Engagement with Adam Smith’s the Theory of Moral Sentiments, edited by Sandrine Bergès and Eric Schliesser, 3–53. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bettio, Francesca, and Alina Verashchagina. 2008. Frontiers in the Economics of Gender. Abingdon; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boissel, Thierry. 1988. Sophie de Condorcet, femme des Lumières, 1764–1822. Paris: Presses de la Renaissance.
   Google Scholar
• Bréban, Laurie, and Jean Dellemotte. 2016. “From one form of sympathy to another: Sophie de Grouchy’s translation of and commentary on Adam Smith’s Theory of Moral Sentiments.” Hal-01435828 (archives-ouvertes.fr). https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01435828/document
   Google Scholar
• Britton, Jeanne. 2009. “Translating Sympathy by the Letter: Henry Mackenzie, Sophie de Condorcet, and Adam Smith.” Eighteenth-Century Fiction 22 (1): 71–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.3138/ecf.22.1.71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broad, Jacqueline, and Karen Detlefsen, eds. 2018. Women and Liberty: 1600–1800. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Karin. 2008. “The Philosophy of Sophie de Grouchy.” In Letters on Sympathy (1798). A critical edition, edited by Karin Brown and James E. McClellan, III, 1–97. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Karin, and James E. McClellan, III. 2008. Letters on Sympathy (1798). A critical edition. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Casini, Paolo. 1980. Introduzione all’illuminismo. Vol. II L’“Enciclopedia e le riforme. Bari: Editori Laterza.
   Google Scholar
• Condorcet, Marie-Jean-Antoine-Nicolas (de). [1786] 1847. “Vie de M. Turgot.” In OEuvres de Condorcet, edited by Arthur O’Connor and François Arago. Vol. V. Paris: Firmin Didot Frères.
   Google Scholar
• Condorcet, Marie-Jean-Antoine-Nicolas (de). [1795] 1995. Saggio di un quadro storico dei progressi dello spirito umano, edited by Guido Calvi. Roma: Editori riuniti.
   Google Scholar
• Criscenti, Antonia. 2015. “Il contributo di Sophie de Grouchy e Olympe de Gouges agli intenti inclusivi della Grande Rivoluzione con il testo della Declaration des droits de la femme et de la citoyenne (France 1791).” Special issue, Quaderni del Dipartimento Jonico 1, 287–309. edited by Riccardo Pagano e Francesco Mastroberti.
   Google Scholar
• Criscenti, Antonia. 2019. “Il fondamento empatico della morale sociale. Rileggendo le “Lettres sur la sympathie” di Sophie de Grouchy (1798).” In Emozione, ragione e sentimento. Prospettive pedagogiche per educare all’affettività, edited by Tiziana Iaquinta, 56–83. Aprilia: Novalogos.
   Google Scholar
• Dieckmann, Herbert. 1965. Introduction of Denis Diderot, Supplément au Voyage de Bougainville, lxxiii–lxxciv. Genève: Droz.
   Google Scholar
• Dimand Robert, and Kirsten W. Madden, eds. 2019. The Routledge Handbook of the History of Women’s Economic Thought. Abingdon; London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dimand, Robert W., Mary A. Dimand, and Evelyn L. Forget. 2000. A Biographical Dictionary of Women Economists. Cheltenham; Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Einaudi, Mario. 1979. Il primo Rousseau. Torino: Piccola Biblioteca Einaudi.
   Google Scholar
• Faccarello, Gilbert, and Philippe Steiner. 2002. “The Diffusion of the Work of Adam Smith in the French Language: An Outline History.” In A Critical Bibliography of Adam Smith, edited by Keith Tribe, 61–119. London: Pickering and Chatto.
   Google Scholar
• Farinetti, Giuseppe. 2003. “Condorcet, Sophie de Grouchy e la compassione: una vicenda moderna.” La società degli individui 18: 39–56.
   Google Scholar
• Fleischacker, Samuel. 2004. On Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations. A Philosophical Companion. Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forget, Evelyn L. 2001. “Cultivating Sympathy: Sophie Condorcet’s Letters on Sympathy.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 23 (3): 319–337. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10427710120073609.
   Google Scholar
• Frazer, Michael L. 2010. The Enlightenment of Sympathy. Justice and the Moral Sentiments in the Eighteenth Century and Today. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fricke, Christel. 2019. “The Role of Interpersonal Comparisons in Moral Learning and the Sources of Recognition Respect: Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s amour-propre and Adam Smith’s Sympathy.” In Adam Smith and Rousseau. Ethics, Politics, Economics, edited by Maria Pia Paganelli, Dennis C. Rasmussen, and Craig Smith, 55–79. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gioia, Vitantonio. 2016. “Economia politica e Socialismo: homo oeconomicus e ‘coscienza sociale’. Durkheim interprete di Saint-Simon.” In La passione per il sociale. Scritti per Marcello Strazzeri, edited by Mariano Longo-Ferdinando Spina, 23–36. Lecce: Pensa MultiMedia.
   Google Scholar
• Gioia, Vitantonio. 2018. “L’Io degli economisti tra esigenze epistemologiche e percorsi ideologici: la resistibile ascesa dell’homo oeconomicus.” In Rapporti di potere e soggettività. Identità autonomia territori, edited by Luca Benvenga-Emiliano Bevilacqua, 80–109. Aprilia: Novalogos.
   Google Scholar
• Gioia, Vitantonio. 2020. “From “Prudent Man” to homo oeconomicus. Does Historicity Matter for the Category of Individualism?” International Review of Economics 67 (1): 47–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-019-00331-y.
   Google Scholar
• Gouhier, Henri. 1970. Les meditations metaphysiques de J. J. Rousseau. Paris: Vrin.
   Google Scholar
• Griswold, Charles L. 2018. Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Adam Smith. A Philosophical Encounter. London; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Griswold, Charles L. 2019. “Being and Appearing: Self-Falsification, Exchange and Freedom in Rousseau and Adam Smith.” In Adam Smith and Rousseau. Ethics, Politics, Economics, edited by Maria Pia Paganelli, Dennis C. Rasmussen, and Craig Smith, 185–213. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grouchy (de), Sophie. [1798] 1995. Sulla simpatia, edited by Maria Alberta Sarti. Palermo: Sellerio.
   Google Scholar
• Guillois, Antoine. 1897. La Marquise de Condorcet, Sa Famille, Sa Salon, Ses Amis 1764–1822. Paris: Paul Ollendorff.
   Google Scholar
• Hanley, Ryan P. 2008. “Commerce and Corruption Rousseau’s Diagnosis and Adam Smith’s Cure.” European Journal of Political Theory 7 (2): 137–158. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885107086445.
   Google Scholar
• Hanley, Ryan P. 2015. “The Eighteenth-Century Context of Sympathy from Spinoza to Kant.” In Sympathy. A History, edited by Erich Schliesser, 171–198. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, Julie Candler. 2005. “The French Theater of Sympathy.” In Sympathy. A History, edited by Erich Schliesser, 199–207. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hulliung, Mark. 2019. “Rousseau and the Scottish Enlightenment: Connections and Disconnections.” In Adam Smith and Rousseau. Ethics, Politics, Economics, edited by Maria Pia Paganelli, Dennis C. Rasmussen, and Craig Smith, 32–50. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hurtado Simó, Ricardo. 2013. La filosofía de Sophie de Grouchy. Gnoseología, ética, política y feminismo. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales.
   Google Scholar
• Ignatieff, Michael. 1984. The Needs of Strangers. New York: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. Maynard. [1930] 1963. “Economic Possibilities for Our Grandchildr.” In Id., Essays in Persuasion, 358–373. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Lecaldano, Eugenio. 2009. “Introduzione.” In Teoria dei Sentimenti Morali, edited by Adam Smith, 5–58. Milano: BUR.
   Google Scholar
• McHugh, John. 2019. “Pursuing Sympathy Without Vanity: Interpreting Smith’s Critique of Rousseau Through Smith’s Critique of Mandeville.” In Adam Smith and Rousseau. Ethics, Politics, Economics, edited by Maria Pia Paganelli, Dennis C. Rasmussen, and Craig Smith, 109–123. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Michael, Colette. 1991. An Encyclopedia of Continental Women Writers, s.v. “Sophie de Grouchy de Condorcet,” 495–496. New York and London: Garland Publishing Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Michelet, Jules. 1855. Les femmes de la Révolution. Paris: Adolphe Delahays Libraire-Éditeur.
   Google Scholar
• Montesquieu, Charles-Louis de Secondat (de). [1748] 2005. Lo spirito delle leggi, edited by Sergio Cotta. Vol. I. Torino: Utet.
   Google Scholar
• Neuhouser, Frederick. 2008. Rousseau’s Theodicy of Self-Love. Evil, Rationality, and the Drive for Recognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, Eileen. 1998. “Disappearing Ink: Early Modern Women Philosophers and Their Fate in History.” In Philosophy in a Feminist Voice. Critiques and Reconstructions, edited by Janet A. Kourany, 17–62. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, Eileen. 2005. “Early Modern Women Philosophers and the History of Philosophy.” Hypatia 20 (3): 18–197.
   Google Scholar
• Outram, Dorinda. 2019. The Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pack, Spencer J. 1991. Capitalism as a Moral System. Adam Smith’s Critique of the Free Market Economy. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Pagden, Anthony. 2015. The Enlightenment and Why It Still Matters. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pisanelli, Simona. 2015. “Adam Smith and the Marquis de Condorcet. Did They Really Meet?” Iberian Journal of History of Economic Thought II (1): 21–35.
   Google Scholar
• Pisanelli, Simona. 2018. Condorcet et Adam Smith: Réformes économiques et progrès social au siècle des Lumières. Paris: Classiques Garnier.
   Google Scholar
• Pisanelli, Simona. 2019. “James Steuart. Slavery and Commercial Society in His Principles of Political Economy.” In The Economic Thought of Sir James Steuart. First Economist of the Scottish Enlightenment, edited by José Manuel Menudo, 32–49. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pisanelli, Simona. 2020. “James Steuart and Karl Marx: slavery and Capitalistic Accumulation.” In Percorsi di Storia del Pensiero Economico e del Pensiero Sociologico. Atti in onore di Vitantonio Gioia, edited by Simona Pisanelli and Guglielmo Forges Davanzati, 73–88. Macerata: Edizioni Università Macerata.
   Google Scholar
• Pisanelli, Simona. 2022. “A New análisis of Martínez de Irujo’s Compendio de la Riqueza de las Naciones and the Role of Marquis de Condorcet.” In Adam Smith in Spain, edited by Jesús Astigarrara and Juan Zabalza, 41–56. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, Jean Jacques. [1755] 1992. “Discourse on the Origin and Foundations of Inequality among Men.” In The Collected Writings of Rousseau, edited by Roger D. Masters and Christopher Kelly, vol. 3, 1–95. Hanover; London: University Press of New England.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, Jean Jacques. [1762a] 1994. “On the Social Contract.” In The Collected Writings of Rousseau, edited by Roger D. Masters and Christopher Kelly, Vol. 4, 127–224. Hanover; London: University Press of New England.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, Jean Jacques. [1762b] 2010. “Emile.” In The Collected Writings of Rousseau, edited by Roger D. Masters and Christopher Kelly, Vol. 13, 3–678. Hanover; London: University Press of New England.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, Jean Jacques. [1782] 2000. “The Reveries of the Solitary Walker.” In The Collected Writings of Rousseau, edited by Christopher Kelly, Vol. 8, 3–90. Hanover; London: University Press of New England.
   Google Scholar
• Sagar, Paul. 2018. “Smith and Rousseau, After Hume and Mandeville.” Political Theory 46 (1): 29–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591716656459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarti, Maria Alberta. 1995. “La morale nuova di Sophie de Condorcet, 9–44.” In Sulla simpatia, edited by Maria Alberta Sarti. Palermo: Sellerio.
   Google Scholar
• Schleeter, Michael. 2019. “Adam Smith and Jean-Jacques Rousseau on the Vices of the Marketplace.” In Adam Smith and Rousseau. Ethics, Politics, Economics, edited by Maria Pia Paganelli, Dennis C. Rasmussen, and Craig Smith, 127–142. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schliesser, Eric. 2018. “Sophie de Grouchy: The Tradition(s) of Two Liberties, and the Missing Mother(s) of Liberalism.” In Women and Liberty: 1600–1800, edited by Jacqueline Broad and Karen Detlefsen, 109–122. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schoene, Adam. 2019. “Sentimental Conviction: Rousseau’s Apologia and the Impartial Spectator.” In Adam Smith and Rousseau. Ethics, Politics, Economics, edited by Maria Pia Paganelli, Dennis C. Rasmussen, and Craig Smith, 166–182. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seth, Catriona. 2014. “Sophie de Grouchy-Condorcet’s Translation of Adam Smith’s Theory of Moral Sentiments.” In The Adam Smith Review. Vol. 7, edited by Fonna Forman, 18–23. London; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Simmel, Georg. [1977] 2004. The Philosophy of Money, edited by David Frisby. London; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Adam. [1756] 1980. “A Letter to the Authors of the Edinburgh Review.” In Essay on Philosophical Subjects, edited by Ian Simpson Ross, 242–256. Oxford; New York: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Adam. [1776] 1979. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, vol. I. Oxford; New York: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Adam. [1762–1763] 1978. Lectures on Jurisprudence, edited by Ronald L. Meek, David D. Raphael, and Peter G. Stein. Oxford; New York: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Adam. 1977. The Correspondence of Adam Smith, edited by Ernest Campbell Mossner and Ian Simpson Ross. Oxford; New York: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Adam. [1759] 1976. Theory of Moral Sentiments, edited by David D. Raphael and Alec L. Macfie. Oxford; New York: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Starobinski, Jean. 1988. Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Transparency and Obstruction. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tegos, Spyridon. 2014. “Friendship in Commercial Society Revisited: Adam Smith on Commercial Friendship.” In New Studies on the Philosophy of Adam Smith, edited by David F. Hardwick and Leslie Marsh, 37–53. London; New York: Palgrave-Macmillian.
   Google Scholar
• Vivenza, Gloria. 1996. “Virtù aristocratiche ed etica commerciale.” Nuova Economia e Storia. Rivista trimestrale II (1–2): 33–58.
   Google Scholar
• Winch, Donald. 1978. Adam Smith’s Politics. An Essay in Historiographic Revision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zanini, Adelino. 2014. Adam Smith. Morale, Jurisprudence, Economia Politica. Macerata: Liberilibri.
   Google Scholar
• Zanini, Adelino. 1993. “The Individual and Society. On the Concept of “Middle Conformation” in A. Smith’s Theory of Moral Sentiments.” History of Economic Ideas I (2): 1–19.
   Google Scholar