216
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Menger and contemporary Austrian economics: knowledge, institutions and liberalism

References

  • Boettke, P. 2011. “How Can we Avoid Close-Ended and Single Exit Theories in Economics and Political Economy.” Studies in Emergent Order 4: 149–155.
  • Boettke, P. 2018. F. A. Hayek: Economics, Political Economy and Social Philosophy. New York, NY: Palgrave/Macmillan.
  • Boettke, P, and Rosolino Candela. 2020. “Productive Specialization, Peaceful Cooperation, and the Problem of the Predatory State.” Public Choice 182 (3–4): 331–352. doi:10.1007/s11127-019-00657-9.
  • Boettke, P, and Rosolino Candela. 2021. “The Positive Political Economy of Analytical Anarchism.” In Routledge Handbook of Anarchy and Anarchist Thought, edited by Gary Chartier, 222–234. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Boulding, Kenneth. 1971. “After Samuelson Who Needs Smith?” History of Political Economy 3 (2): 225–237. doi:10.1215/00182702-3-2-225.
  • Buchanan, James M. 1964. “What Should Economists Do?” Southern Economic Journal 30 (3): 213–222. doi:10.2307/1055931.
  • Caldwell, B. 2005. Hayek’s Challenge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Dekker, E. 2016a. The Viennese Students of Civilization. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dekker, E. 2016b. “Left Luggage: Finding the Relevant Context of Austrian Economics.” The Review of Austrian Economics 29 (2): 103–119. doi:10.1007/s11138-014-0295-3.
  • Endres, A. M. 1997. Neoclassical Microeconomic Theory: The Founding Austrian Version. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Hayek, F. A. 1937. “Economics and Knowledge.” Economica 4 (13): 33–54.
  • Kolev, S, and Erwin Dekker. Forthcoming. “Carl Menger’s Smithian Contribution to German Political Economy.” Review of Austrian Economics.
  • Menger, C. 1871 [1981]. Principles of Economics. New York, NY: New York University Press.
  • Menger, C. 1883 [1983]. Investigations into the Method of the Social Sciences. New York, NY: New York University Press.
  • Menger, C. 1890 [2016]. “The Social Theories of Classical Political Economy and Modern Economic Policy.” Econ Journal Watch 13 (3): 473–489.
  • Mises, L. 1919 [2006]. Nation, State and Economy. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
  • Mises, L. 1941 [2013]. Notes and Recollections. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
  • Mises, L. 1944. Omnipotent Government. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Mises, L. 1949. Human Action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • O’Driscoll, G, and Mario Rizzo. 1985. The Economics of Time & Ignorance. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
  • Rizzo, M, and Glenn Whitman. 2021. Escaping Paternalism. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Smith, A. 1776 [1982]. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
  • Smith, V. 2003. “Constructivist and Ecological Rationality.” American Economic Review 93 (3): 465–508. doi:10.1257/000282803322156954.
  • Vaughn, K. 1994. Austrian Economics in America. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wagner, Richard. 2010. Mind, Society and Human Action. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Weingast, Barry. 2016. “Exposing the Neoclassical Fallacy: McCloskey on Ideas and the Great Enrichment.” Scandinavian Economic History Review 64 (3): 189–201. doi:10.1080/03585522.2016.1233134.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.