Menger and the continental epistemology of uncertainty

References

• Alter, Max. 1982. “Carl Menger and Homo Oeconomicus: Some Thoughts on Austrian Theory and Methodology.” Journal of Economic Issues 16 (1): 149–160. doi:10.1080/00213624.1982.11503966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arena, Richard, and Sandye Gloria-Palermo. 2008. “Evolutionary Themes in the Austrian Tradition: Menger, Wieser and Schumpeter on Institutions and Rationality.” In The Evolution of Economic Institutions: A Critical Reader, edited by G. Hodgson, 198–210. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Barnouw, Jeffrey 1980. “Vico and the Continuity of Science: The Relation of His Epistemology to Bacon and Hobbes.” ISIS 71 (4): 609–620.
   Google Scholar
• Becchio, Giandomenica 2010. “Carl Menger and the Second Edition of His Principles.” Paper presented at the 11th Summer Institute for the History of Economic Thought. University of Richmond, Jepson School of Leadership Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Becchio, Giandomenica 2014. “Social Needs, Social Goods, and Human Associations in the Second Edition of Carl Menger’s Principles.” History of Political Economy 46 (2): 247–280. doi:10.1215/00182702-2647495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becchio, Giandomenica 2022. “Introduction: Carl Menger and Classical Liberalism.” Cosmos + Taxis 10 (5 and 6): 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Boettke, Peter J. 2002. “Information and Knowledge: Austrian Economics in Search of Its Uniqueness.” The Review of Austrian Economics 15 (4): 263–274. doi:10.1023/A:1021190719156.
   Google Scholar
• Boettke, Peter J., Don Lavoie, and Virgil H. Storr. 2004. “The Subjectivist Methodology of Austrian Economics and Dewey’s Theory of Inquiry.” In Pragmatism and Economic Methodology, edited by Elias Khalil, 327–356. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Böhm-Bawerk, E. 1890. “The Historical vs. the Deductive Method in Political Economy.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 1: 244–271.
   Google Scholar
• Böhm-Bawerk, E. 1891. “The Austrian Economists.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 1: 361–384.
   Google Scholar
• Botturi, Francesco. 1996. Tempo, Linguaggio e Azione. Le Strutture Vichiane della ‘Storia Ideale Eterna.’ Naples: A. Guida.
   Google Scholar
• Campagnolo, Gilles. 2008a. “Menger: From the Works Published in Vienna to His Nachlass.” In Carl Menger. Neu erörtert unter Einbeziehung nachgelassener Texte, edited by G. Campagnolo, 31–58. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Campagnolo, Gilles. 2008b. “Was the Austrian School a ‘Psychological School in the Realm of Economics in Carl Menger’s View.” In Carl Menger. Neu erörtert unter Einbeziehung nachgelassener Texte, edited by G. Campagnolo, 165–186. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Campagnolo, Gilles. 2009. “Origin of Menger’s Thought in French Liberal Economists.” The Review of Austrian Economics 22 (1): 53–79. doi:10.1007/s11138-008-0055-3.
   Google Scholar
• Campagnolo, Gilles. 2010. Criticisms of Classical Political Economy. Menger, Austrian Economics and the German Historical School. Abingdon, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Campagnolo, Gilles 2022. “Was Menger Aristotelian? A Rejoinder and Clarification.” Cosmos + Taxis 10 (5 and 6): 88–99.
   Google Scholar
• Capograssi, Giuseppe 1925. “Dominio, Libertà e Tutela nel ‘De Uno.’ Per il Secondo Centenario della ‘Scienza Nuova’ di G.B. Vico (1725–1925).” Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia del Diritto V (3): 437–452.
   Google Scholar
• Cattaneo, Carlo 1859. Psicologia delle Menti Associate. Rome: Editori Riuniti.
   Google Scholar
• Cerchiai, Geri 2020. “Il principio di varietà e l’etica della relazione. Pagine di letteratura Cattanea su Vico.” In Vico e la Filosofia Civile in Lombardia, edited by G. Cerchiai, 195–210. Milan: Franco Angeli.
   Google Scholar
• Chamilall, Neelkant S., and Elisabeth Krecké. 2002. “Professor Kirzner on Carl Menger: To What Extent Was Carl Menger Subjectivist?” Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines 12 (2): 299–342. doi:10.2202/1145-6396.1064.
   Google Scholar
• Condillac, Étienne Bonnot de 1746. Essai sur l’Origine des Connaissances Humaines, 2 vol. Amsterdam: Pierre Mortier.
   Google Scholar
• Condillac, Étienne Bonnot de 1776. Le commerce et le Gouvernement. Amsterdam, Paris: Jombert & Cellot.
   Google Scholar
• Constant, Benjamin 1822–1824. Commentaire sur l'ouvrage de Filangieri. Paris: Dufart.
   Google Scholar
• Coratelli, Giorgio 2014. “La langue de la science économique était à faire. L’analisi economica ne Le commerce et le gouvernement di Condillac.” Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio SFL 0: 111–123.
   Google Scholar
• Cowen, Tyler 2003. “Entrepreneurship, Austrian Economics, and the Quarrel Between Philosophy and Poetry.” The Review of Austrian Economics 16 (1): 5–23. doi:10.1023/A:1022958406273.
   Google Scholar
• Crespo, Ricardo 2003. “Three Arguments Against Menger's Suggested Aristotelianism.” Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines 13 (1): 1–21. doi:10.2202/1145-6396.1083.
   Google Scholar
• Crespo, Ricardo 2020. The Nature and Method of Economic Sciences. Evidence, Causality, and Ends. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cubeddu, Raimondo, and Marco Menon. 2022. “Carl Menger, a Public Engaged Intellectual, and Five Translations of His Newspaper Articles.” Cosmos + Taxis 10 (5 and 6): 7–23.
   Google Scholar
• Dekker, Erwin 2016. The Viennese Students of Civilization. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delorme, Robert 2010. Deep Complexity and the Social Sciences. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Faccarello, Gilbert, and Philippe Steiner. 2008. “Interest, Sensationism and the Science of the Legislator: French ‘philosophie économique’, 1695–1830.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 15 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1080/09672560701858608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festré, Agnès 2012. “Carl Menger and Friedrich von Wieser on the Role of Knowledge and Beliefs.” In Handbook of Knowledge and Economics, edited by Richard Arena, Agnès Festré and Nathalie Lazaric, 73–98. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Fumaroli, Marc 2001. Les Abeilles et les Araignées. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Galiani, Ferdinando 1751–1780. Della Moneta, Libri Cinque. 2nd ed. Napoli: Di Simone.
   Google Scholar
• Gangemi, Giuseppe 2008. “Continuità e discontinuità nel pensiero di Vico.” Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia del Diritto 85 (4): 577–611.
   Google Scholar
• Gloria, Sandye 2018. “Menger contre Walras.” Revue Économique 69: 593–613.
   Google Scholar
• Gloria, Sandye 2021. “The Modernity of Carl Menger: Austrian Economics and Complexity Economics.” In Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology: Including a Symposium on Carl Menger at the Centenary of His Death (Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, Vol. 39B), edited by L. Fiorito, S. Scheall, and C. E. Suprinyak, 57–73. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Haller, Markus 2000. “Carl Menger’s Theory of Invisible-Hand Explanations.” Social Science Information 39 (4): 529–565. doi:10.1177/053901800039004002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayek, Friederich A. 1934. “Carl Menger.” Economica 1 (4): 393–420.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, Friederich A. 1937. “Economics and Knowledge.” Economica 3: 33–54.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, Friederich A. 1945. “The Use of Knowledge in Society.” American Economic Review 35 (4): 519–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayek, Friederich A. 1952. The Sensory Order. London: Routledge & Keegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Hermann, Friedrich B. W. 1832. Staatswirthschaftliche Untersuchungen über Vermögen, Wirthschaft, Productivität der Arbeiter, Kapital, Preis, Gewinn, Einkommen und Verbrauch. Munich: A. Weber.
   Google Scholar
• Horwitz, Steven 1992. “Monetary Exchange as an Extra-Linguistic Social Communication Process.” Review of Social Economy 50 (2): 193–214. doi:10.1080/759368614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horwitz, Steven 2001. “From Smith to Menger to Hayek. Liberalism in the Spontaneous-Order Tradition.” The Independent Review VI (1): 81–97.
   Google Scholar
• Hufeland, Gottlieb 1815. Neue Grundlegung der Staatswirtschaft. Wien: Bauer.
   Google Scholar
• Ikeda, Yukihiro 2010. “Carl Menger's Liberalism Revisited.” In Austrian Economics in Transition: From Carl Menger to Friedrich Hayek, edited by H. Hagemann, T. Nishizawa, and Y. Ikeda, 223–249. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ikeda, Yukihiro 2013. “Reception of Smithian Economics in German-Speaking Areas: Carl Menger and Bruno Hildebrand.” Kejo Economic Studies 49: 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Kauder, E. 1958. “Intellectual and Political Roots of the Older Austrian School.” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 17/ (4): 411–425. doi:10.1007/BF01318563.
   Google Scholar
• Kolev, Stefan 2019. “The Puzzles of a Triumvir: Friedrich von Wieser as Political Economist and Sociologist.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 26 (5): 942–972. doi:10.1080/09672567.2019.1634749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lifschitz, Avi S. 2004. “Language as a Key to the Epistemological Labyrinth.” Historiographia Linguistica 31 (2–3): 345–365. doi:10.1075/hl.31.2.07lif.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livet, Pierre 2008. “Cardinality and Ordinality in Menger’s Framework.” In Carl Menger. Neu erörtert unter Einbeziehung nachgelassener Texte, edited by G. Campagnolo, 187–200. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, John. (1690–1975). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, edited by P. H. Nidditch [Oxford Electronic Text Library]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Magliulo, Antonio 2009. “Economia e felicità. La teoria austriaca dei Beni relazionali da Menger a Robbins.” History of Economic Thought and Policy 2 (2): 5–35. doi:10.3280/SPE2008-002001.
   Google Scholar
• Mäki, Uskali. 1997. “Universals and the Methodenstreit: A Re-Examination of Carl Menger's Conception of Economics as an Exact Science.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 28 (3): 475–495. doi:10.1016/S0039-3681(96)00011-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menger, Carl. 1871. Grundsätze der Volkswirtschaftslehre, trad. it. Principi Fondamentali di Economia. Soveria Mannelli: Rubettino.
   Google Scholar
• Menger, Carl. 1871 (2020). Principes d’Economie Politique, edited by Gilles Campagnolo with original notes of Menger. Paris: Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Menger, Carl. 1883 (1985). Investigations into the Method of the Social Sciences with Special Reference to Economics. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Menger, Carl. 1883 (2011). Recherches sur la Méthode, edited by Gilles Campagnolo, with original notes of Menger. Paris: EHESS.
   Google Scholar
• Menger, Carl. 1892. “On the Origin of Money.” The Economic Journal 2 (6): 239–255.
   Google Scholar
• Menudo, José Manuel. 2016. Das Turgot Problem. The Method of Economics. Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Working Paper ECON 16.03, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2729184 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2729184.
   Google Scholar
• Milford, Karl. 2008. “Inductivism and Anti-essentialism in Menger’s Work.” In Carl Menger. Neu erörtert unter Einbeziehung nachgelassener Texte, edited by G. Campagnolo, 59–86. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Milford, Karl. 2012. “The Empirical and Inductivist Economics of Professor Menger.” In Handbook of the History of Economic Thought. Insights on the Founders of Modern Economics, edited by J. B. Backhaus, 415–436. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Monceri, Flavia. 2017. La Filosofia Sociale Austriaca, 1871–1936. Soveria Mannelli: Rubettino.
   Google Scholar
• Orain, Arnaud. 2011. “Preferring That Which You Desire Less’: A Condillacian Approach to Choice under Uncertainty.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 18 (3): 321–352. doi:10.1080/09672560903318153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orain, Arnaud. 2012. “The Moral Theory of Condillac: A Path Towards Utilitarianism.” Revue de Philosophie Économique 13 (2): 93–117.
   Google Scholar
• Priddat, Birger. 1998. “Theory of Subjective Value in German National Economics.” International Journal of Social Economics 25 (10): 1509–1519. doi:10.1108/03068299810214061.
   Google Scholar
• Rau, Karl H. 1826. (ed. 1844). Lehrbuch der politischen Ökonomie. Heidelberg: Verlagebuchhandlung.
   Google Scholar
• Rau, Karl H. 1826. (ed. 1863). Lehrbuch der politischen Ökonomie. Leipzig: Winter’sche Verlagshandlung.
   Google Scholar
• Rau, Karl H. 1855. Grundsätze der Volkswirtschaftslehre. 6th ed. Leipzig: Winter.
   Google Scholar
• Roscher, Wilhelm. 1865–1868. Die Grundlagen der Nationalökonomie. 4th–7th eds. Stuttgart: Gottascher.
   Google Scholar
• Schäffle, Albert E. F. 1861. Die Nationalökonomie oder Allgemeine Wirtschaftslehre. Leipzig: Otto Spamer.
   Google Scholar
• Solari, Stefano. 2019. “Practical Reason, ‘Civil Prudence’ and the Law: Vico’s Epistemology and Economic Action.” TCRS Teoria e Critica della Regolazione Sociale 2 (19): 35–52. doi:10.7413/19705476003.
   Google Scholar
• Streissler, Erich W. 2001. “Rau, Hermann and Roscher: Contributions of German Economics Around the Middle of the Nineteenth Century.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 8 (3): 311–331. doi:10.1080/09672560110062951.
   Google Scholar
• Tagliacozzo, Giorgio. 1968. “Economic Vichism.” PSL Quarterly Review 21 (85): 247–272.
   Google Scholar
• Turgot, Anne Robert Jaques. 1766/1959. Reflections on the Formation and Distribution of Riches. New York: Augustus M. Kelley (online from LibertyFund).
   Google Scholar
• Vico, Giambattista. 1709. De Nostri Temporis Studiorum Ratione. Florence: L. S. Olschki, ed. 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Vico, Giambattista. 1710. De Antiquissima Italorum Sapientia. Rome: Edizioni di storia e letteratura, ed. 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Vico, Giambattista. 1732. “De Mente Heroica. Transl. On the Heroic Mind, ed. Elizabeth Sewell and Anthony C. Sirignano.” Social Research 43 (1976): 886–903.
   Google Scholar
• Vico, Giambattista. 1744/1948. The New Science of Giambattista Vico. Translated by T. Goddard Bergin and M. H. Fisch. Ithaca: Cornell UP.
   Google Scholar
• Wieser, Friedrich V. 1891. “The Austrian School and the Theory of Value.” The Economic Journal 1 (1): 108–121. doi:10.2307/2955844.
   Google Scholar
• Wieser, Friedrich V. 1926. Das Gesetz der Macht. Wien: Springer.
   Google Scholar