Rupture and continuity in the original divide between microdynamics and macrodynamics

References

• Amoroso, Luigi. 1929. “Le Equazioni Differenziali Della Dinamica Economica.” Giornale Degli Economisti e Rivista Di Statistica 69(Anno 44) (2): 68–79.
   Google Scholar
• Andvig, Jens Christopher. 1981. “Ragnar Frisch and Business Cycle Research during the Interwar Years.” History of Political Economy 13 (4): 695–725. doi:10.1215/00182702-13-4-695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andvig, Jens Christopher. 1988. “From Macrodynamics to Macroeconomic Planning: A Basic Shift in Ragnar Frisch’s Thinking?” European Economic Review 32 (2–3): 495–502. doi:10.1016/0014-2921(88)90196-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assous, Michaël, and Vincent Carret. 2020. Jan Tinbergen’s Early Contribution to Macrodynamics (1932-1936): Multiple Equilibria, Complete Collapse and the Great Depression. HAL: halshs-03087375.
   Google Scholar
• Assous, Michaël, and Vincent Carret. 2022a. Modeling Economic Instability: A History of Early Macroeconomics. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Assous, Michaël, and Vincent Carret. 2022b. “The Importance of Multiple Equilibria for Economic Policy in Jan Tinbergen’s Early Works.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 3 (29): 455–479. doi:10.1080/09672567.2021.2019294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjerkholt, Olav. 2007. “Ragnar Frisch’s Business Cycle Approach: The Genesis of the Propagation and Impulse Model.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 14 (3): 449–486. doi:10.1080/09672560701570351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boianovsky, Mauro, and Hans-Michael Trautwein. 2007. “Johan Åkerman vs. Ragnar Frisch on Quantitative Business Cycle Analysis.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 14 (3): 487–517. doi:10.1080/09672560701570369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boianovsky, Mauro. 2013. “Before Macroeconomics: Pareto and the Dynamics of the Economic Aggregate.” Revue européenne des sciences sociales 51 (2): 103–131. doi:10.4000/ress.2544.
   Google Scholar
• Boumans, Marcel. 1993. “Paul Ehrenfest and Jan Tinbergen: A Case of Limited Physics Transfer.” History of Political Economy 25 (suppl_1): 131–156. doi:10.1215/00182702-1993-suppl_1019.
   Google Scholar
• Boumans, Marcel. 2004. How Economists Model the World into Numbers. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boumans, Marcel, and R. L. Millstein. 2013. “The Regrettable Loss of Mathematical Molding in Econometrics.” In Mechanism and Causality in Biology and Economics, History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences, edited by H.-K. Chao, S.-T. Chen, 61–81. Dordrecht: Springer Nether lands.
   Google Scholar
• Dekker, Erwin. 2021. Tinbergen and the Rise of Economic Expertise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dimand, Robert W. 1988. “Early Mathematical Theories of Business Cycles.” In Perspectives on the History of Economic Thought. Vol. 4, edited by D. E. Moggridge. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Dimand, Robert W, and William Veloce. 2007. “Charles F. Roos, Harold T. Davis and the Quantitative Approach to Business Cycle Analysis at the Cowles Commission in the 1930s and Early 1940s.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 14 (3): 519–542. doi:10.1080/09672560701570377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duarte, Pedro Garcia 2009. “The Growing of Ramsey’s Growth Model.” History of Political Economy 41 (Suppl_1): 161–181. doi:10.1215/00182702-2009-022.
   Google Scholar
• Duarte, Pedro Garcia. 2016. “A Path through the Wilderness: Time Discounting in Growth Models.” History of Political Economy 48 (2): 265–306. doi:10.1215/00182702-3494132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupont-Kieffer, Ariane. 2003. “Ragnar Frisch et l’économétrie: L’invention de Modèles et d’instruments à Des Fins Normatives.” Thesis/dissertation, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne.
   Google Scholar
• Dupont-Kieffer, Ariane. 2012. “The Accelerator Principle at the Core of Frisch’s 1933 Rocking Horse Model: Tracing Back the Influences: American Institutionalism and Norwegian Investment Cycles Theories.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 34 (4): 447–473. doi:10.1017/S1053837212000478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, R. J. 1987. A History of Econometrics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Griffith C. 1922. “A Simple Theory of Competition.” The American Mathematical Monthly 29 (10): 371–380. doi:10.1080/00029890.1922.11986178.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Griffith C. 1924. “The Dynamics of Monopoly.” The American Mathematical Monthly 31 (2): 77–83. doi:10.1080/00029890.1924.11986301.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Griffith C. 1925a. “The Mathematical Theory of Economics.” The American Mathematical Monthly 32 (3): 104–110. doi:10.1080/00029890.1925.11986424.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Griffith C. 1925b. “Economics and the Calculus of Variations.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 11 (1): 90–95. doi:10.1073/pnas.11.1.90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Evans, Griffith C. 1931. “A Simple Theory of Economic Crises.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 26 (173): 61–68. doi:10.2307/2277596.
   Google Scholar
• Ezekiel, Mordecai. 1938. “The Cobweb Theorem.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 52 (2): 255–280. doi:10.2307/1881734.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Irving. 1923. “The Business Cycle Largely a ‘Dance of the Dollar’.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 18 (144): 1024–1028. doi:10.1080/01621459.1923.10502134.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Irving. 1925. “Our Unstable Dollar and the so-Called Business Cycle.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 20 (150): 179–202. doi:10.1080/01621459.1925.10502140.
   Google Scholar
• Frisch, Ragnar. 1926. “Kvantitativ Formulering Av Den Teoretiske Økonomikks Lover.” Statsøkonomisk Tidsskrift 40: 299–334.
   Google Scholar
• Frisch, Ragnar. 1929. “Statikk Og Dynamikk i Den Økonomiske Teori.” Nationaløkonomisk Tidsskrift 67: 321–379.
   Google Scholar
• Frisch, Ragnar. 1933. “Propagation Problems and Impulse Problems in Dynamic Economics.” In Economic Essays in Honour of Gustav Cassel, edited by Gustav Cassel, 171–205. London: Frank Cass & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Frisch, Ragnar. 1992. “Statics and Dynamics in Economic Theory.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 3 (2): 391–401. doi:10.1016/0954-349X(92)90015-X.
   Google Scholar
• Frisch, Ragnar. 1995[1933]. “Monopole - Polypole - La notion de force dans l'économie.” In Foundations of Modern Econometrics. Vol. 1, edited by O. Bjerkholt, 346–359. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Frisch, Ragnar. 2009. Problems and Methods of Econometrics: The Poincaré Lectures of Ragnar Frisch 1933. Edited by O. Bjerkholt and A. Dupont-Kieffer. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hanau, Arthur. 1928. “Die Prognose Der Schweinepreise.” Vierteljahreshefte Zur Konjunkturforschung 7: 5–41.
   Google Scholar
• Hands, D. Wade. 2012. “The Rise and Fall of Walrasian Microeconomics: The Keynesian Effect.” In Microfoundations Reconsidered, edited by P. G. Duarte and G. T. Lima. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover, Kevin D. 2004. “Lost Causes.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 26 (2): 149–164. doi:10.1080/1042771042000219000.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover, Kevin D. 2012. “Microfoundational Programs.” In Microfoundations Reconsidered: The Relationship of Micro and Macroeconomics in Historical Perspective, edited by P. G. Duarte and G. T. Lima, 19–61. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hotelling, Harold. 1925. “A General Mathematical Theory of Depreciation.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 20 (151): 340–353. doi:10.1080/01621459.1925.10503499.
   Google Scholar
• Hotelling, Harold. 1931. “The Economics of Exhaustible Resources.” Journal of Political Economy 39 (2): 137–175. doi:10.1086/254195.
   Google Scholar
• Kaldor, Nicholas. 1934. “A Classificatory Note on the Determinateness of Equilibrium.” The Review of Economic Studies 1 (2): 122–136. doi:10.2307/2967618.
   Google Scholar
• Kalecki, M. 1935. “A Macrodynamic Theory of Business Cycles.” Econometrica 3 (3): 327–344. doi:10.2307/1905325.
   Google Scholar
• Lachmann, L. M. 1936. “Commodity Stocks and Equilibrium.” The Review of Economic Studies 3 (3): 230–234. doi:10.2307/2967631.
   Google Scholar
• Lendjel, Emeric. 1998. L’origine statistique du diagramme du cobweb. HAL: halshs-00268370.
   Google Scholar
• Louçã, Francisco. 2007. The Years of High Econometrics: A Short History of the Generation That Reinvented Economics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lutfalla, Georges. 1936. “Compte rendu des travaux de la Ve réunion européenne de la société internationale d’économétrie. (Namur, 23-26 Septembre 1935.).” Revue d’Économie Politique 50 (2): 529–542.
   Google Scholar
• Marschak, Jakob. 1934. “The Meetings of the Econometric Society in Leyden, September-October, 1933.” Econometrica 2 (2): 187–203.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, Henry Ludwell. 1925. “A Moving Equilibrium of Demand and Supply.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 39 (3): 357–371. doi:10.2307/1882433.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, Henry Ludwell. 1929. Synthetic Economics. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, Mary S. 1990. The History of Econometric Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pomini, Mario. 2018. “Economic Dynamics and the Calculus of Variations in the Interwar Period.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 40 (1): 57–79. doi:10.1017/S1053837217000116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomini, Mario, and Gianfranco Tusset. 2009. “Habits and Expectations: Dynamic General Equilibrium in the Italian Paretian School.” History of Political Economy 41 (2): 311–342. doi:10.1215/00182702-2009-005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsey, F. P. 1928. “A Mathematical Theory of Saving.” The Economic Journal 38 (152): 543–559. doi:10.2307/2224098.
   Google Scholar
• Ricci, Umberto. 1930. “Die ‘Synthetische Ökonomie’ von Henry Ludwell Moore.” Zeitschrift Für Nationalökonomie 1 (5): 649–668. doi:10.1007/BF01318499.
   Google Scholar
• Roos, C. F. 1925. “A Mathematical Theory of Competition.” American Journal of Mathematics 47 (3): 163–175. doi:10.2307/2370550.
   Google Scholar
• Roos, C. F. 1927a. “A Dynamical Theory of Economics.” Journal of Political Economy 35 (5): 632–656. doi:10.1086/253888.
   Google Scholar
• Roos, C. F. 1927b. “A Dynamical Theory of Economic Equilibrium.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 13 (5): 280–285. doi:10.1073/pnas.13.5.280.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roos, C. F. 1928a. “A Mathematical Theory of Depreciation and Replacement.” American Journal of Mathematics 50 (1): 147–157. doi:10.2307/2370855.
   Google Scholar
• Roos, C. F. 1928b. “The Problem of Depreciation in the Calculus of Variations.” Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 34 (2): 218–229. doi:10.1090/S0002-9904-1928-04517-2.
   Google Scholar
• Roos, C. F. 1930. “A Mathematical Theory of Price and Production Fluctuations and Economic Crises.” Journal of Political Economy 38 (5): 501–522. doi:10.1086/254137.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, Henry. 1927. “Mathematical Economics and the Quantitative Method.” Journal of Political Economy 35 (5): 702–706. doi:10.1086/253891.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, Henry. 1930. “Der Sinn Der Statistischen Nachfragekurven.” Veröffentlichungen Der Frankfurter Gesellschaft Für Konjunkturforschung 10: 1–99.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, Henry. 1931. “A Simple Theory of Economic Crises: Discussion.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 26 (173): 68–72. doi:10.2307/2277597.
   Google Scholar
• Tinbergen, Jan. 1929a. “Minimumproblemen in de Natuurkunde en de Ekonomie.” PhD thesis, Erasmus University, Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Tinbergen, Jan. 1929b. “Konjunkturforschung Und Variationsrechung.” Archiv Für Sozialwissenschaft Und Sozialpolitik 61 (3): 533–541.
   Google Scholar
• Tinbergen, Jan. 1930. “Bestimmung Und Deutung von Angebotskurven Ein Beispiel.” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 1 (5): 669–679. doi:10.1007/BF01318500.
   Google Scholar
• Tinbergen, Jan. 1931a. “Ein Problem Der Dynamik.” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 3 (2): 169–184. doi:10.1007/BF01322552.
   Google Scholar
• Tinbergen, Jan. 1931b. “Ein Schiffbauzyklus?” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 34: 152–164.
   Google Scholar
• Tinbergen, Jan. 1933a. “L’utilisation des équations fonctionnelles et des nombres complexes dans les recherches économiques.” Econometrica 1 (1): 36–51. doi:10.2307/1912229.
   Google Scholar
• Tinbergen, Jan. 1933b. “The Notions of Horizon and Expectancy in Dynamic Economics.” Econometrica 1 (3): 247–264. doi:10.2307/1907039.
   Google Scholar
• Tinbergen, Jan. 1934. “Der Einfluß Der Kaufkraftregulierung Auf Den Konjunkturverlauf.” Zeitschrift Für Nationalökonomie 5 (3): 289–319. doi:10.1007/BF01322842.
   Google Scholar
• Tinbergen, Jan. 1935. “Annual Survey: Suggestions on Quantitative Business Cycle Theory.” Econometrica 3 (3): 241–308. doi:10.2307/1905323.
   Google Scholar
• Tinbergen, Jan. 1936. “Über den Wert mathematischer Kunjunkturtheorien.” In Beiträge zur Konjunkturlehre: Festschrift zum zehnjährigen Bestehen des Instituts für Konjunkturforschung, edited by Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, 198–224. Hamburg: Hanseatische Verlagsanstalt.
   Google Scholar
• Weintraub, E. Roy. 2002. How Economics Became a Mathematical Science. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar