The Mengers versus Mises on matters methodological

References

• Blaug, M. 1980. The Methodology of Economics: Or How Economists Explain Cambridge: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Böhm-Bawerk, E. 1924. Gesammelte Schriften. Leipzig: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.
   Google Scholar
• Bowley, M. 1949. Nassau Senior and Classical Economics. New York, NY: Augustus M. Kelley.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, B. 1982. Beyond Positivism: Economic Methodology in the Twentieth Century. London: George Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, B. 1992. “Hayek the Falsificationist? A Refutation.” Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 10: 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Carnap, R. [1934] 2002. The Logical Syntax of Language. Chicago: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Düppe, T, and E. R. Weintraub. 2016. “Losing Equilibrium: On the Existence of Abraham Wald’s Fixed-Point Proof of 1935.” History of Political Economy 48 (4): 635–655. doi:10.1215/00182702-3687283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, D. [1994] 2020. The Philosophical Origins of Austrian Economics.” Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hoppe, H.-H. [1995] 2007. Economic Science and the Austrian Method. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, K, and S. Kolev. 2020. “Dispute on Method or Dispute on Institutional Context? Foreword to the Translation of Carl Menger’s Errors of Historicism.” Econ Journal Watch 17 (2): 442–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchison, T. W. 1938. The Significance and Basic Postulates of Economic Theory. London: Macmillan & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchison, T. W. 1981. The Politics and Philosophy of Economics: Marxians, Keynesians, and Austrians. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. 1795. Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch. Königsberg: F. Nicolovius.
   Google Scholar
• Klausinger, H. 2019. “The Nationalökonomische Gesellschaft from Its Foundation to the Postwar Period: Prosperity and Depression.” Empirica 46 (3): 487–503. doi:10.1007/s10663-019-09439-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeson, P, and P. Boettke. 2006. “Was Mises Right?” Review of Social Economy 64 (2): 247–265. doi:10.1080/00346760600721163.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, R. 2010. Von Neumann, Morgenstern, and the Creation of Game Theory. Cambridge: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, R. 2020. “Karl Menger’s Modernist Journey: Art, Mathematics and Mysticism, 1920–1955.” The Review of Austrian Economics 33 (1–2): 3–31. doi:10.1007/s11138-019-00495-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, J. [1689] 1997. “Letter concerning Toleration.” In Classics of Modern Political Theory, edited by Steven M. Cahn. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linsbichler, A. 2017. Was Ludwig von Mises a Conventionalist? A New Analysis of the Epistemology of the Austrian School of Economics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Linsbichler, A. 2021. “Austrian Economics without Extreme Apriorism: Construing the Fundamental Axiom of Praxeology as Analytic.” Synthese 198 (Suppl 14): 3359–3390. doi:10.1007/s11229-019-02150-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipski, J. 2021. “Austrian Economics without Extreme Apriorism: A Critical Reply.” Synthese 199 (3–4): 10331–10341. doi:10.1007/s11229-021-03249-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machlup, F. 1955. “The Problem of Verification in Economics.” Southern Economic Journal 22 (1): 1–21. doi:10.2307/1054005.
   Google Scholar
• Menger, C. [1871] 1994. “Grundsätze der Volkswirtschaftslehre. Braumüller: Vienna.” In Translated as Principles of Economics, Translated by J. Dingwall and B. Hoselitz. Grove City, PA: Libertarian Press.
   Google Scholar
• Menger, C. [1883] 1985. “Untersuchungen über die Methode der Socialwissenschaften und der Politischen Oekonomie Insbesondere. Duncker & Humblot: Leipzig.” In translated as Investigations into the Method of the Social Sciences with Special Reference to Economics, Translated by L. Schneider, edited by A. J. Nock. New York and London: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Menger, C. ([1884] 2020). Die Irrthumer des Historismus in der Deutschen Nationalokonomie. Translated as The Errors of Historicism in German Economics. (K. Horn and S. Kolev, Eds; Network for Constitutional Economics and Social Philosophy (NOUS), Trans.)
   Google Scholar
• Menger, K. [1930] 1979. “On Intuitionism.” In Selected Papers in Logic and Foundations, Didactics, Economics, Volume 10 of the Vienna Circle Collection, edited by Henk Mulder, 46–58. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Menger, K. [1934] 1974. Morality, Decision and Social Organization: Toward a Logic of Ethics, H. Mulder. Dordrecht: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Menger, K. [1936] 1979. “Remarks on the Law of Diminishing Returns: A Study in Meta-Economics.” In Selected Papers in Logic and Foundations, Didactics, Economics, In edited by H. L. Mulder, 279–302. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Menger, K. [1937] 1979. “The New Logic: Appendix.” In Selected Papers in Logic and Foundations, Didactics, Economics, Volume 10 of the Vienna Circle Collection, edited by Henk Mulder, 42–45. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Menger, K. 1938. “An Exact Theory of Social Groups and Relations.” American Journal of Sociology 43 (5): 790–798. doi:10.1086/217841.
   Google Scholar
• Menger, K. 1973. “Austrian Marginalism and Mathematical Economics.” In Carl Menger and the Austrian School of Economics, edited by J. R. Hicks and W. Weber, 38–60. Oxford: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Menger, K. 1979. “Logical Tolerance in the Vienna Circle.” In Selected Papers in Logic and Foundations, Didactics, Economics, Volume 10 of the Vienna Circle Collection, edited by Henk Mulder, 11–16. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Menger, K. 1994. Reminiscences of the Vienna Circle and the Mathematical Colloquium (L. Golland, B. McGuinness, and A. Sklar, Eds.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, J. S. [1859] 1998. On Liberty and Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford World Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Mises, L. [1933] 2003. Epistemological Problems of Economics. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Mises, L. [1949] 1998. Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Mises, L. 2013. Notes and Recollections (B. Bien Greaves, Ed.) Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Nozick, R. 1977. “On Austrian Methodology.” Synthese 36 (3): 353–392. doi:10.1007/BF00486025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punzo, L. 1994. Preface to Karl Menger’s Reminiscences of the Vienna Circle and the Mathematical Colloquium. Dordrecht: Kluver Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rothbard, M. N. 1976. “Praxeology: The Methodology of Austrian Economics.” In The Foundations of Modern Austrian Economics, edited by E. G. Dolan, 19–39. Kansas City: Sheed Andrews.
   Google Scholar
• Scheall, S. 2015. “Hayek the Apriorist?” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 37 (1): 87–110. doi:10.1017/S1053837214000765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheall, S. 2017a. “Review of Alexander Linsbichler’s Was Ludwig von Mises a Conventionalist? A New Analysis of the Epistemology of the Austrian School of Economics.” Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 10 (2): 110–115. doi:10.23941/ejpe.v10i2.312.
   Google Scholar
• Scheall, S. 2017b. “What is Extreme about Mises’s Extreme Apriorism?” Journal of Economic Methodology 24 (3): 226–249. doi:10.1080/1350178X.2017.1356439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheall, S. 2020. F. A. Hayek and the Epistemology of Politics: The Curious Task of Economics. London, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scheall, S, and R. Schumacher. 2018. “Karl Menger as the Son of Carl Menger.” History of Political Economy 50 (4): 649–678. doi:10.1215/00182702-7202512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigmund, K. 2017. Exact Thinking in Demented Times: The Vienna Circle and the Epic Quest for the Foundations of Science. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Zanotti, G, and N. Cachanosky. 2015. “Implications of Machlup’s Interpretation of Mises’s Epistemology.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 37 (1): 111–138. doi:10.1017/S1053837214000777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar