Vaginal lactobacilli: self- and co-aggregating ability

References

• Hammes W, Weiss N, Holzapfel W. In: Balows A, Trüper H, Dworkin M, Harder W, Schleifer KH, eds. The Genera Lactobacillus and Carnobacterium, Procaryotes. A handbook on the biology of bacteria: ecophysiology, isolation, applications. Vol. 2, 2nd edit. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1995: 1536.
   Google Scholar
• McGoarty J. Probiotic use of lactobacilli in the human female urogenital tract. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 1993; 6: 251.
   Google Scholar
• Reid G. The scientific basis for probiotics strains of Lactobacillus. Appl Environ Microbiol 1999; 65: 3739.
   Google Scholar
• Maggi L, Mastromarino P, Macchia S et al. Technological and biological evaluation of tablets containing different strains of lactobacilli for vaginal administration. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2000; 50: 389.
   Google Scholar
• Redondo-López V, Cook RL, Sobel JD. Emerging role of lactobacilli in the control and maintenance of the vaginal bacterial microflora. Rev Infect Dis 1990; 12: 856.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh PD, Bradshaw DJ. Dental plaque as biofilm. J Indust Microbiol 1995; 15: 169.
   Google Scholar
• Boris S, Suarez JE, Barbés C. Characterization of the aggregation promoting factor from Lactobacillus gasseri, a vaginal isolate. J Appl Microbiol 1997; 83: 413.
   Google Scholar
• An Y, Friedman R. Mechanism of bacterial adhesion and pathogenesis of implant and tissue infections. In: An Y, Friedman R, eds. Handbook of bacterial adhesion. Principles, methods and applications. Totowa, New Jersey: Humana Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Kolenbrander P. Coaggregation among oral bacteria. Methods Enzymol 1995; AUTHOR< ? VOLUME) 253.
   Google Scholar
• Kolembrader PE, London J. Ecological significance of coaggregation among oral bacteria. In: Marshal KC, ed. Advances in Microbial Ecology. New York: Plenum Press, 1993: 183.
   Google Scholar
• Barbeau J, Gauthier C, Payment P. Biofilms, infectious agents, and dental unit waterlines: a review. Can J Microbiol 1998; 44: 1019.
   Google Scholar
• Huis in’t Veld JHJ, Havenaar R, Marteau P. Establishing a scientific basis for probiotics. R&D Tibtech 1994; 12: 6.
   Google Scholar
• Morelli L, Alander M, Lehto E et al. Role of cell aggregation protein in adhesion in vitro and in vivo. Paper presented at the Functional foods: designer foods for the future meeting, Cork, Ireland, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Kmet V, Lucchini F. Aggregation-promoting factor in human vaginal Lactobacillus strain. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 1997; 19: 111.
   Google Scholar
• Reid G, McGoarty JA, Angotti R, Cook RL. Lactobacillus inhibitor production against Escherichia coli and coaggregation ability with uropathogens. Can J Microbiol 1988; 34: 344.
   Google Scholar
• Ocaña VS, Bru E, Ruiz Holgado AP, Nader-Macías ME. Surface characteristics of lactobacilli isolated from human vagina. J Gen Appl Microbiol 1999; 45: 203.
   Google Scholar
• Raibaud P, Galpin JV, Ducluzeau R, Mocqout G, Oliver G. Le genre Lactobacillus dans le tube digestive du rat. II. Characteres des souches heterofermentaires isolees de rats holo and gnotoxeniques. Ann Microbiol (Ann Inst Pasteur) 1963; 124A: 2223.
   Google Scholar
• Vandervoorde L, Christiaens H, Verstraete W. Prevalence of coaggregation among chicken lactobacilli. J Appl Bacteriol 1992; 72: 214.
   Google Scholar
• Ma JK-C, Kelly CG. Prevention of bacterial colonization at mucosal surfaces-new technologies. Culture 2001; 22: 2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Kmet, V., Luccheti, F. Aggregation of saw lactobacilli with diarrheogenic Escherichia coli. J Vet Med 1999; 46: 683.
   Google Scholar
• Cesena C, Morelli L, Alander M et al. Lactobacillus crispatus and its non-aggregating mutant in human colonization trials. J Dairy Sci 2001; 5: 1001.
   Google Scholar
• Morelli L. In vitro selection of probiotic lactobacilli: a critical appraisal. Curr Issues Intest Microbiol 2000 ; 1: 59.
   Google Scholar
• Handley PS, Harty DWS, Wyatt JE, Brown CR, Doran JR, Gibbs ACC. A comparison of the adhesion, co-aggregation and cell surface hydrophobicity properties of fibrillar and fimbriate strains of Streptococcus salivarius. J Gen Microbiol 1087; 133: 3207.
   Google Scholar
• Raniero R, Cocconcelli P, Bottazi V, Morelli L. High frequency of conjugation in Lactobacillus mediated by an aggregation-promoting factor. J Gen Microbiol 1992; 138: 763.
   Google Scholar
• Bersing BA, Dunny GM. Cloning and molecular analysis of genes affecting expression of binding substances, the recipient encoded receptor(s) mediating mating aggregation formation in Enterococcus faecalis. J Bacteriol 1993; 175: 7421.
   Google Scholar
• Andrup L, Damgaard JM, Wassermann K. Mobilization of small plasmids in Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israeliensis is accompanied by specific aggregation. J Bacteriol 1993; 175: 6530.
   Google Scholar
• Gasson MJ, Swindel SR, Maeda S, Dodd HM. Molecular rearrangement of lactosa plasmid DNA associated with highfrequency transfer and cell aggregation in Lactococcus lactis 712. Mol Microbiol 1992; 6: 3213.
   Google Scholar
• Ross S. Adhesion and autoaggregation of Lactobacillus reuteri and description of new species with mucus binding proteins, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Clewell DB, Weaver KE. Sex pheromones and plasmid transfer in Enterococcus faecalis. Plasmid 1989; 21: 174.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenfeld EE, Kessler RE, Clewell DB. Identification of pheromone-induced surface proteins in Streptococcus faecalis and evidence of a role for lipoteichoic acid in formation of mating aggregates. J Bacteriol 1986; 168: 6.
   Google Scholar
• Rose RK. The role of calcium in oral streptococcal aggregation and the implications for biofilm formation and retention. Biochem Biophys Acta 2000; 1475, 76.
   Google Scholar
• Fidel PL, Jr, Sobel JD. Immunopathogenesis of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. Clin Microbiol Rev 1996; 9: 335.
   Google Scholar
• Fidel PL, Jr, Lynch ME, Sobel JD. Candida-specific cell-mediated immunity is demonstrable in mice with experimental vaginal candidiasis. Infect Immun 1993; 61: 1990.
   Google Scholar
• De Bernardis F, Bocanera M, Adriani D, Spreghini E, Santoni G, Cassone A. Protective role of antimannan and anti-aspartyl proteinase antibodies in an experimental model of Candida albicans in rats. Infect Immun 1997; 65: 3399.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons RJ, Nygaard M. Interbacterial aggregation of plaque bacteria. Arch Oral Biol 1970; 15: 1397.
   Google Scholar
• Kolenbrander PE, Williams BL. Lactose reversible co-aggregation between oral Actinomycetes and Streptococcus sanguis. Infect Immun 1981; 33: 95.
   Google Scholar
• Kolenbrander PE, Williams BL. Prevalence of viridans streptococci exhibiting lactosa-inhibitable co-aggregation with oral actynomicetes. Infect Immun 1083; 41: 449.
   Google Scholar
• Wadströn T, Andersson K, Sydow M, Axelsson L, Lindgren S, Gullmar B. Surface properties of lactobacilli isolated from the small intestine of pigs. J Appl Bacteriol 1087; 62: 513.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Mei HC, Free RH, Elving GJ, Van Weissenbruch R, Albers FW, Busscher HJ. Effect of probiotic bacteria on prevalence of yeast in oropharyngeal biofilms on silicone rubber voice prostheses in vitro. J Med Microbiol 2000; 49: 713.
   Google Scholar
• Ocaña V, Ruiz Holgado A, Nader-Macias ME. Selection of vaginal H202-generating Lactobacillus species for probiotic use. Curr Microbiol 1999; 38: 279.
   Google Scholar
• Ocaña V, Ruiz Holgado A, Nader-Macías ME. Characterization of a bacteriocin-like substance produced by a vaginal Lactobacillus salivarius strain. Appl Environ Microbiol 1999; 65: 5631.
   Google Scholar