South East Asian Area Studies beyond Anglo-America: geopolitical transitions, the neoliberal academy and spatialized regimes of knowledgeFootnote^*

* A draft version of this paper was posted online as: Peter A. Jackson (2015), ‘Spatialities of Knowledge in the Neoliberal World Academy: Theory, Practice and 21st Legacies of Area Studies’, Crossroads Asia Working Paper Series, No. 25.

References

• Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism. Revised ed. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. 2014. “Confessions of an Academic in the Developing World.” Higher Education Network, The Guardian, May 26. Accessed May 28, 2014. www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/blog.
   Google Scholar
• Blainey, Geoffrey. 1983. The Tyranny of Distance: How Distance Shaped Australia’s History. Melbourne: Sun Books.
   Google Scholar
• Boatcã, Manuela. 2012. “Catching Up with the (New) West: The German ‘Excellence Initiative’, Area Studies and the Re-Production of Inequality.” Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge X (1): 17–30.
   Google Scholar
• Chun, Allen. 2008. “The Postcolonial Alien in Us All: Identity in the Global Division of Intellectual Labor.” Positions 16 (3): 689–709. doi: 10.1215/10679847-2008-018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Erik, Scott A. Cohen, and Victor T. King. 2016. “The Global Permutations of the Western Publication Regime.” Current Issues in Tourism. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/13683500.2016.1272556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhawan, Nikita. 2013. “The Empire Prays Back: Religion, Secularity, and Queer Critique.” Boundary 2 40 (1): 191–222. doi: 10.1215/01903659-2072918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirlik, Arif. 1994. “The Postcolonial Aura: Third World Criticism in the Age of Global Capitalism.” Critical Inquiry 20: 328–56. doi: 10.1086/448714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirlik, Arif. 2005. “Asia Pacific Studies in an Age of Global Modernity.” Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 6 (2): 158–170. doi: 10.1080/14649370500065870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Desouky, Ayman. 2014. “Disturbing Crossings: The Unhomely, the Unworldly and the Question of Method in Approaches to World Literature.” In Disturbing Conventions: Decentering Thai Literary Studies, edited by Rachel V. Harrison, 239–245. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Harootunian, Harry. 2012. “‘Memories of Underdevelopment’ After Area Studies.” Positions 20 (1): 8–35. doi: 10.1215/10679847-1471363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, Rachel V., and Peter A. Jackson, eds. 2010. The Ambiguous Allure of the West: Traces of the Colonial in Thailand. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press & Cornell University Southeast Asia Program.
   Google Scholar
• Heryanto, Ariel. 2007. “Can There Be Southeast Asians in Southeast Asian Studies.” In Knowing Southeast Asian Subjects, edited by Laurie J. Sears, 75–108. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Houben, Vincent. 2013. The New Area Studies and Southeast Asian History. Göttingen: DORISEA Working Paper No. 4.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, Peter A. 2003a. “Space, Theory and Hegemony: The Dual Crises of Asian Area Studies and Cultural Studies.” Sojourn: Social Issues in Southeast Asia 18 (1): 1–41. doi: 10.1355/SJ18-1A
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, Peter A. 2003b. “Mapping Poststructuralism’s Borders: The Case for Poststructuralist Area Studies.” Sojourn: Social Issues in Southeast Asia 18 (1): 42–88. doi: 10.1355/SJ18-1B
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, Peter A. 2008. “Thai Semicolonial Hybridities: Bhabha and García Canclini in Dialogue on Power and Cultural Blending.” Asian Studies Review 32 (2): 147–170. doi: 10.1080/10357820802061324
   Google Scholar
• Masao, Miyoshi, and Harry Harootunian. 2002. Learning Places: The Afterlives of Area Studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mielke, Katja, and Anna-Katharina Hornidge. 2014. Crossroads Studies: From Spatial Containers to Interactions in Differentiated Spatialities: ‘Area Studies’ Discussion Paper of the Research Network Crossroads Asia. Bonn: Crossroads Asia Working Paper Series No. 15.
   Google Scholar
• Mignolo, Walter D. 2002a. “The Enduring Enchantment: (Or the Epistemic Privilege of Modernity and Where to Go from Here).” The South Atlantic Quarterly 101 (4): 927–954. doi: 10.1215/00382876-101-4-927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mignolo, Walter D. 2002b. “The Geopolitics of Knowledge and the Colonial Difference.” The South Atlantic Quarterly 101 (1): 57–95. doi: 10.1215/00382876-101-1-57
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyoshi, Masao, & Harry Harootunian. 2002. Learning Places: The Afterlives of Area Studies. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• NTEU La Trobe Branch Discussion Paper. 2011. The Research Rating System in FSTE (Faculty of Science and Technology): Another Pseudoscientific Use of the Impact Factor. November. Bundoora: NTEU La Trobe University Branch.
   Google Scholar
• Oswald, Andrew J. 2007. “An Examination of the Reliability of Prestigious Scholarly Journals: Evidence and Implications for Decision-Makers.” Economica 74: 21–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0335.2006.00575.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakai, Naoki. 2012. “Positions and Positionalities: After Two Decades.” Positions 20 (1): 67–94. doi: 10.1215/10679847-1471385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seth, Sanjay. 2013. “‘Once Was Blind but Now Can See’: Modernity and the Social Sciences.” International Political Sociology 7: 136–151. doi: 10.1111/ips.12014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spivak, Gayatri. 2003. Death of a Discipline. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waters, Malcolm. 1995. Globalization. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Winichakul, Thongchai. 2014. “Foreword: Decentering Thai Studies.” In Disturbing Conventions: Decentering Thai Literary Studies, edited by Rachel V. Harrison, xiii–xix. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Young, Suzanne, David Peetz, and Magalie Marais. 2001. “The Impact of Journal Ranking Fetishism on Australian Policy-Related Research.” Australian Universities Review 53 (2): 77–87.
   Google Scholar