Settling outside the WTO: the case of the Indonesia-US kretek cigarette trade dispute, 2010–2014

References

• Acharya, Amitav. 2014. “Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds.” International Studies Quarterly 58 (4): 647–659. doi:10.1111/isqu.12171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchard, Emily, and Shushanik Hakobyan. 2015. “The US Generalised System of Preferences in Principle and Practice.” The World Economy 38 (3): 399–424. doi:10.1111/twec.12216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bown, Chad P. 2004. “Developing Countries as Plaintiffs and Defendants in GATT/WTO Trade Disputes.” The World Economy 27 (1): 59–80. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9701.2004.00588.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brimeyer, Benjamin L. 2001. “Bananas, Beed, and Compliance in the World Trade Organization: The Inability of the WTO Dispute Settlement Process to Achieve Compliance from Superpower Nations.” Minnesota Journal of Global Trade 10: 133–168.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, Gordon A., and Alexander L. George. 1995. Force and Statecraft: Diplomatic Problems of our Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daoudy, Marwa. 2009. “Asymmetric Power: Negotiating Water in the Euphrates and Tigris.” International Negotiation 14 (2): 361–391. doi:10.1163/157180609X432860.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Christina L., and Sarah B. Bermeo. 2009. “Who Files? Developing Country Participation in GATT/WTO Adjudication.” The Journal of Politics 71 (3): 1033–1049. doi:10.1017/S0022381609090860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewo, Patricius. 2018. “Komponen elektronik akan menjadi yang paling banyak terima manfaat GSP [Electronic Components will be the Beneficiaries of GSP the Most].” kontan.co.id, July 24, 2018, sec. industri. http://industri.kontan.co.id/news/komponen-elektronik-akan-menjadi-yang-paling-banyak-terima-manfaat-gsp.
   Google Scholar
• Dür, Andreas, and Manfred Elsig. 2011. “Principals, Agents, and the European Union’s Foreign Economic Policies.” Journal of European Public Policy 18 (3): 323–338. doi:10.1080/13501763.2011.551066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsig, Manfred. 2011. “Principal–Agent Theory and the World Trade Organization: Complex Agency and ‘Missing Delegation.” European Journal of International Relations 17 (3): 495–517. doi:10.1177/1354066109351078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitriani, Evi. 2017. “Yudhoyono’s Foreign Policy: Is Indonesia a Rising Power?” In The Yudhoyono Presidency: Indonesia’s Decade of Stability and Stagnation, edited by Edward E. Aspinall, Marcus Mietzner, and Dirk Tomsa, 73–90. Singapore: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hartzell, Caroline A. 1999. “Explaining the Stability of Negotiated Settlements to Intrastate Wars.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 43 (1): 3–22. doi:10.1177/0022002799043001001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, Darren G., David A. Lake, Daniel L. Nielson, and Michael J. Tierney. 2006. “Introduction.” In Delegation and Agency in International Organizations, edited by Darren G. Hawkins, David A. Lake, Daniel L. Nielson, and Michael J. Tierney, 1–2. London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hellmann, Gunther, and Reinhard Wolf. 1993. “Neorealism, Neoliberal Institutionalism, and the Future of NATO.” Security Studies 3 (1): 3–43. doi:10.1080/09636419309347537.
   Google Scholar
• Horlick, Gary, and Katherine Fennell. 2011. Law and Development Perspective on International Trade Law, edited by Yong-Shik Lee, Gary Horlick, Wong-Mog Choi, and Toumer Broude, 161–178. London and New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iida, Keisuke. 2004. “Is WTO Dispute Settlement Effective?” Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 10 (2): 207–225. doi:10.1163/19426720-01002006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismail, Achmad. 2019. “Indonesia and United States General System of Preference (US-GSP): Eligibility of Indonesia as a Beneficiary Country.” Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional 21 (2): 155–175. doi:10.7454/global.v21i2.401.
   Google Scholar
• Karim, Moch Faisal. 2018. “Middle Power, Status-Seeking and Role Conceptions: The Cases of Indonesia and South Korea.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 72 (4): 343–363. doi:10.1080/10357718.2018.1443428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karim, Moch Faisal. 2020. “When Trade and Foreign Policy Collide: Indonesia in Doha Development Round.” The Pacific Review. doi:10.1080/09512748.2020.1724189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karim, Moch Faisal, and Tangguh Chairil. 2016. “Waiting for Hard Balancing? Explaining Southeast Asia’s Balancing Behaviour Towards China.” European Journal of East Asian Studies 15 (1): 34–61. doi:10.1163/15700615-01501002.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert O., Andrew Moravcsik, and Anne-Marie Slaughter. 2000. “Legalized Dispute Resolution: Interstate and Transnational.” International Organization 54 (3): 457–488. doi:10.1162/002081800551299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korobkin, Russell. 2014. Negotiation: Theory and Strategy. New York: Wolters Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Laksmana, Evan A. 2011. “Indonesia’s Rising Regional and Global Profile: Does Size Really Matter?” Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs 33 (2): 157–182.
   Google Scholar
• Lopes, Jacqueline S. 2019. “Dispute Settlement System of the WTO: A Powerful Weapon for Developing Countries.” In The WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism: A Developing Country Perspective, edited by Alberto do Amaral Júnior, Lucia Marea de Oliveira Sá Pires, and C. Lucena Carneiro, 43–53. Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-03263-0_4.
   Google Scholar
• McRae, Donald. 2004. “What is the Future of WTO Dispute Settlement?” Journal of International Economic Law 7 (1): 3–21. doi:10.1093/jiel/7.1.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Industry. 2014. Gambaran Umum Industri Rokok Kretek [Overview of Kretek Cigarette Industry]. Ministry of Industry, Republic of Indonesia.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Industry. 2016, January 10. Peran Ekspor Subsektor Industri Pengolahan Tembakau Terhadap Total Ekspor Hasil Industri [The Role of Tobacco Processing Industry Subsector Exports to the Total Exports of Industrial Products] [Statistics]. https://kemenperin.go.id/statistik/peran_subsektor.php?ekspor=1&kode=202012.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Industry. 2019. Kemenperin: Industri Hasil Tembakau Tercatat Serap 5,98 Juta Tenaga Kerja [Ministry of Industry: Tobacco Products Industry Recorded 5.98 Million Workers]. https://kemenperin.go.id/artikel/20475/Industri-Hasil-Tembakau-Tercatat-Serap-5,98-Juta-Tenaga-Kerja.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Trade. 2019. “FTA/PTA/CEPA Indonesia.” Kemendag.Go.Id. March 19, 2019. http://ditjenppi.kemendag.go.id/index.php/bilateral/fta-pta-cepa.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, Anne Marie. 2010. “US Rapprochement with Indonesia: From Problem State to Partner.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 32 (3): 362–387.
   Google Scholar
• Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich. 2018. “Between ‘Member-Driven’ WTO Governance and ‘Constitutional Justice’: Judicial Dilemmas in GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement.” Journal of International Economic Law 21 (1): 103–122. doi:10.1093/jiel/jgy004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picciotto, Sol. 2005. “The WTO’s Appellate Body: Legal Formalism as a Legitimation of Global Governance.” Governance 18 (3): 477–503. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2005.00285.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, Christopher B., Ahmad D. Habir, and Leonard C. Sebastian, eds. 2015. Indonesia’s Ascent: Power, Leadership, and the Regional Order. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Rosyidin, Mohamad. 2017. “Foreign Policy in Changing Global Politics: Indonesia’s Foreign Policy and the Quest for Major Power Status in the Asian Century.” South East Asia Research 25 (2): 175–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santikajaya, A. 2016. “Walking the Middle Path: The Characteristics of Indonesia’s Rise.” International Journal: Canada’s Journal of Global Policy Analysis 71 (4): 563–586. doi:10.1177/0020702016686381.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, Gregory C., and Ricardo Meléndez-Ortiz, eds. 2010. Dispute Settlement at the WTO: The Developing Country Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sibanda, O. 2017. “The Ramifications of the Appellate Body Ruling in United States – Measures Affecting the Production and Sale of Clove Cigarettes on Consumer Protection Measures at International Trade Level.” De Jure 50 (1): 156–174. doi:10.17159/2225-7160/2017/v50n1a9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, James. 2004. “Inequality in International Trade? Developing Countries and Institutional Change in WTO Dispute Settlement.” Review of International Political Economy 11 (3): 542–573. doi:10.1080/0969229042000252891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syarip, Rakhmat. 2020. “Defending Foreign Policy at Home: Indonesia and the ASEAN-Based Free Trade Agreements.” Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, doi:10.1177/1868103420935556.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, Paige Johnson. 2007. “Navigating a Turbulent Ocean: Indonesia’s Worldview and Foreign Policy.” Asian Perspective 31 (3): 147–181.
   Google Scholar
• United States Trade Representative. 2013. United States – Measures Affecting the Production and Sale Of Clove Cigarettes: Recourse to DSU Article 22.6 (DS406). ustr.gov. https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/DS406.US_.Sub1_.Public_0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• United States Trade Representative. 2014. Memorandum of Understanding between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Republic Of Indonesia. https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/US%20Indo%20MOU.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vaubel, Roland. 2006. “Principal–Agent Problems in International Organizations.” The Review of International Organizations 1 (2): 125–138. doi:10.1007/s11558-006-8340-z.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, Oliver. E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Workman, Daniel. 2020. “Indonesia’s Top 10 Exports.” World’s Top Export, October 4, 2020. http://www.worldstopexports.com/indonesias-top-10-exports/.
   Google Scholar
• WTO (World Trade Organization). 2011. United States – Measures Affecting the Production and Sale of Clove Cigarettes – Joint request by Indonesia and the United States for a Decision by the DSB. https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=Q:/WT/DS/406-5.pdf&Open=True.
   Google Scholar
• WTO (World Trade Organization). 2012. United States – Measures Affecting the Production and Sale of Clove Cigarettes – Ab-2012-1—Report of the Appellate Body. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/406abr_e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• WTO (World Trade Organization). 2014. United States – Measures Affecting the Production and Sale of Clove Cigarettes – Notification of a mutually agreed solution. https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/DS/406-17.pdf&Open=True.
   Google Scholar
• WTO (World Trade Organization). 2016. United States- Measures Affecting the Production and Sale of Clove Cigarettes.
   Google Scholar
• WTO (World Trade Organization). 2017. A Handbook on the WTO Dispute Settlement System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yuniarti, S. 2018, March 7. Indonesia Improves Ranking on Global Intellectual Property Index. Jakarta Globe. https://jakartaglobe.id/business/indonesia-improves-ranking-on-global-intellectual-property-index.
   Google Scholar