‘It takes two to tango …’ revisited: a qualitative study on integration and participation of people living with spinal cord injury in Switzerland

References

• Arnstein, S. R. 1969. “A ladder of citizen participation.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35(4): 216–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Trans. R. Nice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkers, M. 2006. “It takes two to do the twist, two to tango, but the tango requires interaction between partners: Comments on van de Ven et al.” Disability & Society 21(1): 93–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkers, M. 1998. Community integration: Conceptual issues and measurement approaches in rehabilitation research. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation 4, no. 1: 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkers, M.P. 2010. Issues in the conceptualization and measurement of participation: An overview. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 91, no. 9 (Suppl): S5–16.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., and A. L. Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1963. Stigma. Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1984, 1987a [1981]. The theory of communicative action. 2 vols. Boston: Beacon Press. Original edition: Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. 2 vols. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Hadley, R., and H. Wilkinson. 1995. “Integration and its future: A case study of primary education and physical disability.” Disability & Society 10(3): 309–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häggström, A., and M.L. Lund. 2008. The complexity of participation in daily life: A qualitative study of the experiences of persons with acquired brain injury. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 40, no. 2: 89–95.
   Google Scholar
• Hammel, J., S. Magasi, A. Heinemann, G. Whiteneck, J. Bogner, and E. Rodriguez. 2008. What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation 30, no. 19: 1445–60.
   Google Scholar
• Isaac, R., B. W. Dharma Raja, and M. P. Ravanan. 2010. “Integrating people with disabilities: Their right – our responsibility.” Disability & Society 25(5): 627–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, E. E., and V. A. Harris. 1967. “The attribution of attitudes.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 3(1): 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. 1997. Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. 2 vols. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Mars, M. J., G. Kempen, I. Mesters, I. M. Proot, and J. van Eijk. 2008. “Characteristics of social participation as defined by older adults with a chronic physical illness.” Disability and Rehabilitation 30(17): 1298–1308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McColl, M.A., P. Carlson, J. Johnston, P. Minnes, K. Shue, D. Davies, and T. Karlovits. 1998. The definition of community integration: Perspectives of people with brain injuries. Brain Injury 12, no. 1: 15–30.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, G.H. 1934. Mind, self and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Ed. with intro. C.W. Morris. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Michailakis, D. 1997. “When opportunity is the thing to be equalised.” Disability & Society 12(1): 17–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michailakis, D. 2003. “The systems theory concept of disability: One is not born a disabled person, one is observed to be one.” Disability & Society 18(2): 209–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. 1965. “Full citizenship for the Negro American?” A sociological problem. Daedalus 94(4): 1009–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravaud, J.F., and H.-J. Stiker. 2001. Inclusion/exclusion: An analysis of historical and cultural meanings. In Handbook of disability, ed. G. Albrecht, K.D. Seelman, and M. Bury, 490–514. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, S. 2006. “It takes two to tango … but what if one can’t dance and the other doesn’t want to: A response to van de Ven et al.” Disability & Society 21(1): 91–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, J., and S. French. 2000. “Towards an affirmation model of disability.” Disability & Society 15(4): 569–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2006. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. New York: UN.
   Google Scholar
• van de Velde, D., P. Bracke, G. Van Hove, S. Josephsson, and G. Vanderstraeten. 2010. Perceived participation, experiences from persons with spinal cord injury in their transition period from hospital to home. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 33, no. 4: 346–55.
   Google Scholar
• van de Ven, L., M. Post, L. de Witte, and W. van den Heuvel. 2005. “It takes two to tango: The integration of people with disabilities into society.” Disability & Society 20(3): 311–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Ven, L., M. Post, L. de Witte, and W. van den Heuvel. 2008. “Strategies for autonomy used by people with cervical spinal cord injury: A qualitative study.” Disability & Rehabilitation 30(4): 249–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Ven, L., L. de Witte, M. Post, and W. van den Heuvel. 2006. “Integration a complex dance. A response to the comments made by Ryan and Dijkers on this article.” Disability & Society 21(1): 97–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware, N. C., K. Hopper, T. Tugenberg, B. Dickey, and D. Fisher. 2007. “Connectedness and citizenship: Redefining social integration.” Psychiatric Services 58(4): 469–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2001. ICF – International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar