Sociometric methods and difference: a force for good – or yet more harm

References

• Arnot, M., and D. Reay. 2007. “A sociology of pedagogic voice. Power, inequality and pupil consultation.” Discourse: Studies in the cultural politics of education 28(3): 311–325.
   Google Scholar
• Asher, R., R. A. Markall, and S. Hymel. 1981. “Identifying children at risk in peer relations: A critique of the rate-of-interaction approach to assessment.” Child Development 52: 1239–1245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asher, S. R., L. C. Singleton, B. R. Tinsley, and S. Hymel. 1979. “A reliable sociometric measure for preschool children.” Developmental Psychology 15: 443–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avramidis, E. 2010. “Social relationships of pupils with special educational needs in the mainstream primary class: Peer group membership and peer-assessed social behaviour.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 25: 413–429.
   Google Scholar
• Avramidis, E., and A. Wilde. 2009. “Evaluating the social impacts of inclusion through a multi-method research design.” Education 3–13(37): 323–334.
   Google Scholar
• Barrera, M., and F. Schulte. 2009. “A group social skills intervention program for survivors of childhood brain tumours.” Journal of Paediatric Psychology 34: 1108–1118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, L. 1988. The politics of special educational needs. East Lewes: The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell-Dolan, D. J., S. L. Foster, and D. M. Sikora. 1989. “Effects of sociometric testing on children’s behavior and loneliness in school.” Developmental Psychology 25: 306–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairns, R.B., J-L. Gariepy, T. Kindermann, and M-C. Leung. 1997. Identifying social clusters in natural setting. Unpublished manuscript. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, Centre for Developmental Science.
   Google Scholar
• Child, S. In progress. The social experiences of children who experience social and emotional difficulties in education. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Southampton.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, G. 2004. Threatening space. (Physical) education and homophobic body work. In Body knowledge and control. Studies in the sociology of physical education and health, ed. J. Evans, B. Davies, and J. Wright, 191–204. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, P., and L. Barton. 1995. Making difficulties. Research and the construction of SEN. London: Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Coie, J. D., K. A. Dodge, and J. B. Kupersmidt. 1991. “Peer group behavior and social status.” In Peer rejection in childhood, edited by S. R. Asher and J. D. Coie, 17–59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connors, C., and K. Stalker. 2007. “Children’s experiences of disability: Pointers to a social model of childhood disability.” Disability & Society 22(1): 19–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotterell, J. 1996. Social networks and social influences in adolescence. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J., and M. Hill. 2006. “Introduction.” In Children, young people and social inclusion: Participation for what?, edited by E. Tisdall, M. Kay, J. Davis, A. Prout and M. Hill, 1–22. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J., and N. Watson. 2001. “Where are the children’s experiences? Analysing social and cultural exclusion in ‘special’ and ‘mainstream’ schools.” Disability & Society 16: 671–687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Monchy, M., S. J. Pijl, and T. Zandberg. 2004. “Discrepancies in judging social inclusion and bullying of pupils with behavioural problems.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 19: 317–330.
   Google Scholar
• Emond, R. 2005. Ethnographic research methods with children and young people. Researching children’s experience. In Approaches and methods, ed. S. Greene and D. Hogan, 123–75. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, T. W., and E. M. Z. Farmer. 1996. “Social relationships of students with exceptionalities in mainstream classrooms: Social networks and homophily.” Exceptional Children 62: 431–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, S. L., and W. L. Ritchey. 1979. “Issues in the assessment of social competence in children.” Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis 12: 625–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, S., and J. Swain. 2004. “Controlling inclusion in education: Young disabled people’s perspectives.” In Disabling barriers – Enabling environments, edited by J. Swain, S. French, C. Barnes and C. Thomas, 169–175. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Frosh, S., and M. Callias. 1980. “Social skills training in an infant school setting.” Behavioural Psychotherapy 8: 69–79.
   Google Scholar
• Gergen, K. 2001. The saturated self: Dilemmas of identity in contemporary life. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gest, S. D., T. W. Farmer, B. D. Cairns, and X. Hongling. 2003. “Identifying children’s peer social networks in school classrooms: Links between peer reports and observed interactions.” Social Development 12: 513–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayvren, M., and S. Hymel. 1984. “Ethical issues in sociometric testing: Impact of sociometric measures on interaction behaviour.” Developmental Psychology 20: 844–849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iverson, A. M., and G. I. Iverson. 1996. “Children’s long-term reactions to participating in sociometric assessment.” Psychology in the Schools 33: 103–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, J., A. Iantaffi, and I. Sinka. 2003. “Inclusion in mainstream classrooms: Experiences of deaf pupils.” In Inclusive education: Diverse perspectives, edited by M. Nind, J. Rix, K. Sheehy and K. Simmons, 206–218. London: David Fulton.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D. 2001. Sociometry in team and organisation development. http://grouptalkweb.org/socioart/socioteamdev.pdf (accessed November 15, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Koster, M., S. Pijl, E. Houten, and H. Nakken. 2007. “The social position and development of pupils with SEN in mainstream Dutch primary schools.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 22: 31–46.
   Google Scholar
• Llewellyn, A., and K. Hogan. 2000. “The use and abuse of models of disability.” Disability & Society 15: 157–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mand, J. 2007. “Social position of special needs pupils in the classroom: A comparison between German special schools for pupils with learning difficulties and integrated primary school classes.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 22: 7–14.
   Google Scholar
• McCandless, B. R., and H. R. Marshall. 1957. “A picture sociometrics technique for preschool children and its relation to teacher judgments of friendship.” Child Development 28: 139–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMaugh, A. 2011. “En/countering disablement in school life in Australia: Children talk about peer relations and living with illness and disability.” Disability & Society 26(7): 853–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, J. L. 1934. Who shall survive? A new approach to the problem of human interrelations. Washington, DC: Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, J. 1999. Hurtling into a void: Transition to adulthood for young disabled people with ‘complex health and support needs’. Brighton: Pavilion.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, J. 2001. “Social exclusion and young disabled people with high levels of support needs.” Critical Social Policy 21: 161–183.
   Google Scholar
• Nind, M., G. Boorman, and G. Clarke. 2012. “Creating spaces to belong: Listening to the voice of girls with behavioural, emotional and social difficulties through digital visual and narrative methods.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 16: 643–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieser, R. 2001. “The struggle for inclusion: The growth of a movement.” In Disability politics and the struggle for change, edited by L. Barton, 132–148. London: David Fulton.
   Google Scholar
• Sameroff, A. 1991. “The social context of development.” In Becoming a person, edited by M. Woodhead, R. Carr and P. Light, 167–189. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sandstrom, M. J., and A. H. Cillessen. 2003. “Sociometric status and children’s peer experiences: Use of the daily diary method.” Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 49: 427–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheepstra, A. J. M., H. Nakken, and S. J. Pijl. 1999. “Contacts with classmates: The social position of pupils with Down’s syndrome in Dutch mainstream education.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 14: 212–220.
   Google Scholar
• Schoon, I. 2009. Measuring social competencies. http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=1447882 (accessed September 10, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Söder, M. 1990. “Prejudice or ambivalence? Attitudes towards persons with disabilities.” Disability, Handicap & Society 5: 227–241.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, J., and S. French. 2000. “Towards an affirmation model of disability.” Disability and Society 15: 569–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, P., and H. Gunter. 2006. “From ‘consulting pupils’ to ‘pupils as researchers’: A situated case narrative.” British Educational Research Journal 32(6): 839–856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasa, S. F., J. W. Maag, G. K. Torrey, and J. J. Kramer. 1994. “Teachers’ use and perceptions of sociometric techniques.” Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 12: 135–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warden, D., and S. Mackinnon. 2003. “Prosocial children, bullies and victims: An investigation of their sociometric status, empathy and social problem-solving strategies.” British Journal of Developmental Psychology 21: 367–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L., and M. Nind. 1999. “Insiders or outsiders: Normalisation and women with learning difficulties.” Disability and Society 14: 659–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, C., D. Weekes, and A. McGlaughlin. 2000. Race, class and gender in exclusion from school. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar