The work of disabled identities in intimate relationships

References

• Barron, K. 1997. “The Bumpy Road to Womanhood.” Disability & Society 12(2): 223–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartky, S. L. 1990. Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, S., and C. Boyd. 2003. “Trolley Dolly or Skilled Emotion Manager? Moving on from Hochschild's Managed Heart.” Work, Employment & Society 17(2): 289–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, H. 1994. “‘An Ordinary Sexual Life?’:A Review of the Normalisation Principle as It Applies to the Sexual Options of People with Learning Disabilities.” Disability & Society 9(2): 123–144.
   Google Scholar
• Cacchioni, T. 2007. “Heterosexuality and 'the Labour of Love': A Contribution to Recent Debates on Female Sexual Dysfunction.” Sexualities 10(3): 299–320.
   Google Scholar
• Church, K., C. Frazee, M. Panitch, T. Luciani, and V. Bowman. 2007. Doing Disability at the Bank: Discovering the Work of Learning/Teaching done by Disabled Bank Employees Public Report. Toronto: Ryerson RBC Foundation Institute for Disability Studies Research and Education.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, H., and S. McKay. 2008. Exploring Disability, Family Formation and Break-Up: Reviewing the Evidence. Norwich: Department for Work and Pensions.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, D. 2000. “Sharing Our Stories, Empowering Our Lives: Don’t Dis Me!.” Sexuality and Disability 18(3): 179–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dei, G. J. S., and G. S. Johal. 2005. Critical Issues in Anti-Racist Research Methodologies. New York: Lang.
   Google Scholar
• DeVault, M. L. 1999. “Comfort and Struggle: Emotion Work in Family Life.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of political and Social Science 561(1): 52–63.
   Google Scholar
• Exley, C., and G. Letherby. 2001. “Managing a Disrupted Life course: Issues of Identity and Emotion Work.” Health 5(1): 112–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie-Sells, K., M. Hill, and B. Robbins. 1998. She Dances to Different Drums. London: King’s Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. 2010. Disability Studies: An Interdisciplinary Introduction. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. 2011. “Social Psychoanalytic Disability Studies.” Disability & Society 26(6): 715–728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassouneh-Phillips, D., and E. McNeff. 2005. ““I Thought I was Less Worthy”: Low Sexual and Body Esteem and Increased Vulnerability to Intimate Partner Abuse in Women with Physical Disabilities.” Sexuality and Disability 23(4): 227–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. R. 1979. “Emotion Work, Feeling Rules, and Social Structure.” The American Journal of Sociology 85(3): 551–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. R. 1983. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchen, R. 2000. “The Researched Opinions on Research: Disabled People and Disability Research’.” Disability and Society 15(1): 25–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korczynski, M. 2003. “Communities of Coping: Collective Emotional Labour in Service Work.” Organization 10(1): 55–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langellier, K. 2001. “‘You’re Marked’: Breast Cancer, Tattoo and the Narrative Performance of Identity.” In Narrative and Identity: Studies in Autobiography, Self, and Culture, edited by J. Brockmeier and D. Carbaugh, 145–184. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Leibowitz, R. Q. 2005. “Sexual Rehabilitation Services after Spinal Cord Injury: What Do Women Want?” Sexuality and Disability 23(2): 81–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, J. 1989. Able Lives: Women’s Experience of Paralysis. London: The Women’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 1990. The Politics of Disablement. Basingstoke: Macmillian.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 1992. “Changing the Social Relations of Research Production.” Disability and Society 7(2): 115–120.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 1997. “Emancipatory Research: Realistic goal or impossible dream?” In Doing Disability Research, edited by C. Barnes, G. and G, Mercer, 15–31. Leeds: The Disability Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, D. 2002. “Negotiating Psycho-emotional Dimensions of Disability and their Influence on Identity constructions.” Disability and Society 17(5): 493–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, D. 2004. “Psycho-emotional Dimensions of Disability and the Social Model.” In Implementing the Social Model of Disability: Theory and Research, edited by C. Barnes and G. Mercer, 83–100. Leeds: The Disability Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandahl, C. 2003. “Queering the Crip or Cripping the Queer? Intersections of Queer and Crip identities in Solo Autobiographical Performance.” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 9(1): 25–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. 1999. “The Sexual Politics of Disabled Masculinity.” Sex and Disability 17(1): 53–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T., K. Gillespie-Sells, and D. Davies. 1996. Untold Desires: The Sexual Politics of Disability. London and New York: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Sherry, M. 2004. “Overlaps and Contradictions Between Queer Theory and Disability Studies.” Disability & Society 19(7): 769–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shildrick, M. 2002. Embodying the Monster: Encounters with the Vulnerable Self. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Siebers, T. 2008. Disability Theory. Michigan, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strazdins, L. 2000. “Integrating Emotions: Multiple Role Measurement of Emotional Work.” Australian Journal of Psychology 52(1): 41–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. 2002. “Disability Theory: Key Ideas, Issues and Thinkers.” In Disability Studies Today, edited by C. Barnes, M. Oliver and L. Barton, 38–58. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. 2004. “Developing the Social Relational in the Social Model of Disability: A Theoretical Agenda.” In Implementing the Social Model of Disability: Theory and Research, edited by C. Barnes and G. Mercer, 32–47. Leeds: The Disability Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. 2006. “Disability and Gender: Reflections on Theory and Research.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 8(2–3): 177–185.
   Google Scholar
• Watermeyer, B. P. 2009. Conceptualising Psycho-Emotional Aspects of Disablist Discrimination And Impairment: Towards a Psychoanalytically Informed Disability Studies. PhD diss., Stellenbosch University.
   Google Scholar
• Wendell, S. 1996. The Rejected Body: Feminist Philosophical Reflections on Disability. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Whitaker, D. S., and L. Archer. 1994. “Partnership Research and Its Contributions to Learning and To Team-Building.” Social Work Education 13(3): 39–60.
   Google Scholar
• Wilton, R. D. 2008. “Workers with Disabilities and the Challenges of Emotional Labour.” Disability and Society 23(4): 361–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolkowitz, C. 2006. Bodies at Work. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, A. 2000. “The Work of Disabled Women Seeking Reproductive Health Care.” Sexuality and Disability 18(4): 301–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar