Recognising the agency of people with dementia

References

• Acton, G., S. Yauk, B. Hopkins, and P. Mayhew. 2007. “Increasing Social Communication in Persons with Dementia.” Research and Theory for Nursing Practice: An International Journal 21 (1): 32–44.10.1891/rtnpij-v21i1a005
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Allardt, E. 1993. “Having, Loving, Being: An Alternative to the Swedish Model of Welfare Research.” In The Quality of Life, edited by M. Nussbaum and A. Sen, 88–94. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0198287976.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, D. 2002. “The Politics of Self-advocacy and People with Learning Disability.” Policy & Politics 30: 333–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, G. 2013a. “She’s Usually Quicker than the Calculator’: Financial Management and Decision-Making in Couples Living with Dementia.” Health and Social Care in the Community 21 (5): 554–562.10.1111/hsc.2013.21.issue-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, G. 2013b. “Facilitating Decision-making by People with Dementia: Is Spousal Support Gendered?” Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 35 (2): 227–243.
   Google Scholar
• Brock, D. 1993. Life and Death: Philosophical Essays in Biomedical Ethics. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511625350
   Google Scholar
• Brooker, D., and C. Surr. 2006. “Dementia Care Mapping: Initial Validation of DCM8 in UK Field Trials.” International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 21: 1018–1025.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchardt, T. 2004. “Capabilities and Disability: The Capabilities Framework and the Social Model of Disability.” Disability & Society 19 (7): 735–751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkitt, I. 2008. Social Selves. Theories of Self and Society. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Burkitt, I. 2012. “Emotional Reflexivity: Feeling, Emotion and Imagination in Reflexive Dialogues.” Sociology 46: 458–472.10.1177/0038038511422587
   Google Scholar
• Caddell, L. S., and L. Clare. 2010. “The Impact of Dementia on Self and Identity: A Systematic Review.” Clinical Psychology Review 30: 113–126.10.1016/j.cpr.2009.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clare, L., J. M. Rowlands, and R. Quin. 2008. “Collective Strength. the Impact of Developing a Shared Social Identity in Early-stage Dementia.” Dementia 7 (1): 9–30.10.1177/1471301207085365
   Google Scholar
• Cleaver, F. 2007. “Understanding Agency in Collective Action.” Journal of Human Development 8 (2): 223–244.10.1080/14649880701371067
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, S., and J. Greene. 2005. “The Clinical Assessment of the Patient with Early Dementia.” Journal of Neurological and Neurosurgical Psychiatry 76 (suppl_5): 15–24.10.1136/jnnp.2005.081133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covinsky, K., and K. Yaffe. 2004. “Dementia, Prognosis and the Needs of Patients and Caregivers.” Annals of Internal Medicine 140 (7): 573–574.10.7326/0003-4819-140-7-200404060-00019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, J. 2011. “Preserving the ‘Us Identity’ through Marriage Commitment While Living with Early-stage Dementia.” Dementia 10 (2): 217–234.10.1177/1471301211398991
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. 1970. The Research Act in Sociology. a Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. London: Butterworth.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Constitutional Affairs. 2007. Mental Capacity Act 2005. Code of Practice. London: Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. 2009. Living Well with Dementia. a National Dementia Strategy. London: DOH.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, S. 2011. “Personal Life, Pragmatism and Bricolage.” Sociological Research Online 16: 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M., and A. Mische. 1998. “What is Agency?” American Journal of Sociology. 103 (4): 962–1023.10.1086/ajs.1998.103.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. 1996. The U.K. Civil Rights Campaign and the Disability Discrimination Act. http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/evans/ADLWIEN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Finkel, S. 2000. “Introduction to Behavioural and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (BPSD).” International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 15 (S1): S2–S4.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1166
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. 2000. Self-Advocacy in the Lives of People with Learning Difficulties. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D., and M. Rapley. 2002. “Changing the Subject: Postmodernity and People with ‘Learning Difficulties’.” In Embodying Disability Theory, edited by M. Corker and T. Shakespeare, 127–142. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Götell, E., S. Brown, and S. Ekman. 2002. “Caregiver Singing and Background Music in Dementia Care.” Western Journal of Nursing Research 24 (2): 195–216.10.1177/01939450222045833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grove, N., K. Bunning, J. Porter, and C. Olsson. 1999. “See What I Mean: Interpreting the Meaning of Communication by People with Severe and Profound Intellectual Disabilities.” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 12 (3): 190–203.10.1111/(ISSN)1468-3148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, D. 2002. “Talking about Pictures: A Case for Photo Elicitation.” Visual Studies 17 (1): 13–26.10.1080/14725860220137345
   Google Scholar
• Hemmings, C., and A. Treacher Kabesh. 2013. “The Feminist Subject of Agency: Recognition and Affect in Encounters with the ‘Other’.” In Gender, Agency and Coercion, edited by S. Madhok, A. Phillips and K. Wilson, 29–46. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kitwood, T., and K. Bredin. 1992. “Towards a Theory of Dementia Care: Personhood and Well-Being.” Ageing and Society 12 (03): 269–287.10.1017/S0144686X0000502X
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kontos, P. 2004. “Ethnographic Reflections on Selfhood, Embodiment and Alzheimer’s Disease.” Ageing & Society 24 (6): 829–849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madhok, S. 2013. “Action, Agency, Coercion: Reformatting Agency for Oppressive Contexts.” In Gender, Agency and Coercion, edited by S. Madhok, A. Phillips and K. Wilson, 102–121. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137295613
   Google Scholar
• Madhok, S., A. Phillips, and K. Wilson. 2013. “Introduction.” In Gender, Agency and Coercion, edited by S. Madhok, A. Phillips and K. Wilson, 1–13. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137295613
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J. 1996. Qualitative Researching. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mayhew, P., G. Acton, S. Yauk, and B. Hopkins. 2001. “Communication from Individuals with Advanced DAT: Can It Provide Clues to Their Sense of Self-awareness and Well-Being?” Geriatric Nursing 22 (2): 106–110.10.1067/mgn.2001.115198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayo, A., and M. Wallhagen. 2009. “Considerations of Informed Consent and Decision-Making Competence in Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment.” Research in Gerontological Nursing 2 (2): 103–111.10.3928/19404921-20090401-08
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell, J. 1979. “Virtue and Reason.” Monist 62: 331–350.10.5840/monist197962319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKillop, J., and H. Wilkinson. 2004. “Make It Easy on Yourself! Advice to Researchers from Someone with Dementia on Being Interviewed.” Dementia 3 (2): 117–125.10.1177/1471301204042332
   Google Scholar
• Mental Capacity Act. 2005. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Miesen, B., and G. Jones 2004. “The Alzheimer Cafe Concept: A Response to the Trauma, Drama and Tragedy of Dementia” In Caregiving in Dementia: Research and Applications, Vol. 3, edited by G. Jones and B. Miesen, 307–333. Hove: Brunner Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, J. 2005. Citizenship and Disabled People. Report to the Disability Rights Commission. http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/morris/Citizenship_and_disabled_people_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Audit Office. 2007. Improving Services and Support for People with Dementia. London: NAO.
   Google Scholar
• Nystrom, K., and S. Lauritzen. 2005. “Expressive Bodies: Demented Persons Communication in a Dance Therapy Context.” Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine 9 (3): 297–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Cathain, A. 2010. “Mixed Methods Involving Qualitative Research.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Methods in Health Research, edited by I. Bourgeault, R. Dingwall and R. de Vries, 575–588. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446268247
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 1996. Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M., and C. Barnes. 2012. The New Politics of Disablement. 2nd ed. London: Palgrave and Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Orulv, L. 2012. “Reframing Dementia in Swedish Self-help Group Conversations: Constructing Citizenship.” International Journal of Self-Help & Self-Care 6 (1): 9–41.
   Google Scholar
• Ragneskog, H., L. Gerdner, K. Josefsson, and M. Kihlgren. 1998. “Probable Reasons for Expressed Agitation in Persons with Dementia.” Clinical Nursing Research 7 (2): 189–206.10.1177/105477389800700207
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reader, S. 2007. “The Other Side of Agency.” Philosophy 82: 579–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, L., L. Clare, and K. Evans. 2005. “Making Sense of Dementia and Adjusting to Loss: Psychological Reactions to a Diagnosis of Dementia in Couples.” Aging & Mental Health 9 (4): 337–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, G., and H. Russell Bernard. 2003. “Data Management and Analysis Methods.” In Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials. 2nd ed, edited by N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln, 769–802. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, S., and M. Priestley. 2011. Disability and Social Change. Private Lives and Public Policies. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T., and N. Watson. 1997. “Defending the Social Model.” Disability and Society 12 (2): 293–300.10.1080/09687599727380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shilling, C. 1999. “Towards an Embodied Understanding of the Structure/Agency Relationship.” British Journal of Sociology 50 (4): 543–562.10.1080/000713199358527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefan, S. 1993. “Silencing the Different Voice: Competence, Feminist Theory and the Law.” University of Miami Law Review 47 (3): 763–815.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sullivan, P. 2012. Qualitative Data Analysis. Using a Dialogical Approach. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tronto, J. C. 1993. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Velleman, D. 2000. The Possibility of Practical Reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verdonk, P., H. Seesing, and A. de Rijk. 2010. “Doing Masculinity, Not Doing Health? A Qualitative Study among Dutch Male Employees about Health Beliefs and Workplace Physical Activity.” BMC Public Health 10: 712.10.1186/1471-2458-10-712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, G. 2001. “Theorizing Disability.” In Handbook of Disability Studies, edited by G. Albrecht, K. Seelman and M. Bury, 123–144. London: Sage.10.4135/9781412976251
   Google Scholar
• Williams, G. 2003. “The Determinants of Health: Structure, Context and Agency.” Sociology of Health and Illness 25: 131–154.10.1111/shil.2003.25.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanetti, O., B. Vallotti, G. Frisoni, C. Geroldi, A. Bianchetti, P. Pasqualetti, and M. Trabucchi. 1999. “Insight in Dementia: When Does It Occur? Evidence for a Nonlinear Relationship between Insight and Cognitive Status.” Journal of Gerontology Series B 54B (2): P100–P106.10.1093/geronb/54B.2.P100
   Google Scholar