The post(hu)man always rings twice: theorising the difference of impairment in the lives of people with ‘mental health problems’

References

• Aubrecht, K. 2012. “Disability Studies and the Language of Mental Illness.” The Review of Disability Studies: An International Journal 8 (2): 31–44.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. 2010. “Re-examining Relationships between Experience, Knowledge, Ideas and Research: A Key Role for Recipients of State Welfare and Their Movements.” Social Work & Society 8 (1): 6–21.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 1991. Patterns of Dissonance: A Study of Women in Contemporary Philosophy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2000. “Teratologies.” In Deleuze and Feminist Theory, edited by I. Buchanan and C. Colebrook, 156–172. Edinburgh: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2003. “Becoming Woman: Or Sexual Difference Revisited.” Theory, Culture & Society 20 (3): 43–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2006. “Posthuman, All Too Human: Towards a New Process Ontology.” Theory, Culture & Society 23 (7–8): 197–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2011. Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory. New York/Chichester, West Sussex: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2013. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2014. “Critical Theory beyond Negativity: The Ethics, Politics and Aesthetics of Affirmation.” Summerschool Utrecht, August 18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Burstow, B., B. A. LeFrançois, and S. Diamond. 2014. Psychiatry Disrupted: Theorizing Resistance and Crafting the (R)Evolution. Montréal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2004. Undoing Gender. London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, F. K. 2005. “Legislating Disability: Negative Ontologies and the Government of Legal Identities.” In Foucault and the Government of Disability, edited by S. Tremain, 108–132. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, T. W. H. 2010. “Governing Educational Difference: Towards a Genealogy of Dyslexia.” PhD diss., University of Leeds.
   Google Scholar
• Canguilhem, G. 1989. The Normal and the Pathological. London/Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. 1986. Foucault. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. ([1980] 1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Translated by B. Massumi. Reprint, London/Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N., and Y. S. Lincoln. 2003. The Landscape of Qualitative Research: Theories and Issues. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dolphijn, R., and I. Van der Tuin. 2012. New Materialism: Interviews and Cartographies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Library: Open Humanities Press.10.3998/ohp.11515701.0001.001
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1975. Surveiller Et Punir. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1978. The History of Sexuality. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Garland-Thomson, R. 2005. “Feminist Disability Studies.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 30 (2): 1557–1587. 10.1086/signs.2005.30.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. 2011. Disability Studies: An Interdisciplinary Introduction. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. 2013. “Dis/entangling Critical Disability Studies.” Disability and Society 28 (5): 631–644.10.1080/09687599.2012.717884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodley, D., B. Hughes, and L. Davis, eds. 2012. Disability and Social Theory: New Developments and Directions. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D., and G. Roets. 2008. “The (Be)comings and Goings of Developmental Disabilities: The Cultural Politics of 'Impairment'.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 29 (2): 239–255.
   Google Scholar
• Grosz, E. 1994. Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grosz, E. 2005. Time Travels: Feminism, Nature, Power. London: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822386551
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London: Free Association Books.
   Google Scholar
• Herndl, D. P. 2002. “Reconstructing the Posthuman Feminist Body Twenty Years after Audre Lorde’s Cancer Journals.” In Disability Studies: Enabling the Humanities, edited by S. L. Brueggemann and B. J. Garland-Thomson, 144–155. New York: The modern language association of America.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H. F., and S. E. Shannon. 2005. “Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis.” Qualitative Health Research 15 (9): 1277–1288.10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, B. 2007. “Being Disabled: Towards a Critical Social Ontology for Disability Studies.” Disability & Society 22 (7): 673–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, A., and L. Mazzei. 2012. Thinking with Theory in Qualitative Research: Viewing Data among Multiple Perspectives. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kristiansen, K. 2004. “Madness, Badness and Sadness Revisited: Ontology Control in ‘Mental Health Land’.” In Gender and Disability Research in the Nordic Countries, edited by K. Kristiansen and R. Traustadóttir, 365–393. Lund: Studentliteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. 1991. Getting Smart: Feminist Research and Pedagogy with/in the Postmodern. New York/London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• LeFrançois, B. A., and S. Diamond. 2014. “Queering the Sociology of Diagnosis: Children and the Constituting of ‘Mentally Ill’ Subjects.” CAOS: The Journal of Critical Anti-Oppressive Social Inquiry 1: 39–61.
   Google Scholar
• Meekosha, H., and R. Shuttleworth. 2009. “What’s So ‘Critical’ about Critical Disability Studies?” Australian Journal of Human Rights 15 (1): 47–75.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer, D. 2002. “The Philosophical Foundations of Disability Studies.” Disability Studies Quarterly 22 (2): 3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Price, J., and M. Shildrick. 1999. Feminist Theory and the Body: A Reader, Edited with Janet Price. Edinburgh/New York: Edinburgh University Press/ Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, B. 2002. Biographical Research. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roets, G., and R. Braidotti. 2012. “Theorizing the Unity of Bodies and Minds: Nomadology and Subjectivity in Disability Studies.” In Disability and Social Theory: New Developments and Directions, edited by D. Goodley, B. Hughes, and L. Davis, 161–176. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Roets, G., K. Kristiansen, G. Van Hove, and W. Vanderplasschen. 2007. “Living through Exposure to Toxic Psychiatric Orthodoxies: Exploring Narratives of People with ‘Mental Health Problems’ Who Are Looking for Employment on the Open Labour Market.” Disability & Society 22 (3): 267–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roets, G., R. Roose, L. Claes, C. Vandekinderen, G. Van Hove, and W. Vanderplasschen. 2012. “Reinventing the Employable Citizen: A Perspective for Social Work.” British Journal of Social Work 42 (1): 94–110.10.1093/bjsw/bcr037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N. 1989. Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self. 2nd ed. London: Free Association.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. 2006. Disability Rights and Wrongs. London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T., and N. Watson. 2002. “The Social Model of Disability: An Outdated Ideology?” Research in Social Science and Disability 2: 9–28.
   Google Scholar
• Shildrick, M. 2009. Dangerous Discourses: Subjectivity, Sexuality and Disability. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230244641
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, S. L., and D. T. Mitchell. 2001. “Re-engaging the Body: Disability Studies and the Resistance to Embodiment.” Public Culture 13 (3): 367–390.10.1215/08992363-13-3-367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, A. 2005. “Towards a Genealogical Feminism: A Reading of Judith Butler’s Political Thought.” Contemporary Political Theory 4: 4–24.10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300135
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. 2007. Sociologies of Disability, ‘Impairment’, and Chronic Illness: Ideas in Disability Studies and Medical Sociology. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Titchkosky, T., and K. Aubrecht. 2009. “The Anguish of Power: Re-Mapping Mental Diversity with an Anti-Colonial Compass.” In Breaching the Colonial Contract: Anti-Colonialism in the US and Canada, edited by A. Kempf, 179–199. New York: Springer Press.10.1007/978-1-4020-9944-1
   Google Scholar
• Titchkosky, T., and R. Michalko, eds. 2012. Rethinking Normalcy. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tremain, S. 2005. “Foucault, Governmentality, and Critical Disability Theory: An Introduction.” In Foucault and the Government of Disability, edited by S. Tremain, 1–24. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, B. S. 2003. “Biology, Vulnerability and Politics.” In Debating Biology: Sociological Reflections on Health Medicine and Society, edited by S. Williams, L. Birke, and G. Bendelow, 271–282. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vandekinderen, C., G. Roets, and G. Van Hove. 2014a. “The Researcher and the Beast: Uncovering Processes of Othering and Becoming Animal in Research Ventures.” Qualitative Inquiry 20 (3): 296–316.10.1177/1077800413489267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandekinderen, C., G. Roets, and G. Van Hove. 2014b. “Untangling the Non-Recyclable Citizen: A Critical Reconceptualization of Responsibility in Recovery.” Qualitative Health Research 24 (10): 1418–1430.10.1177/1049732314547707
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandekinderen, C., G. Roets, M. Vandenbroeck, W. Vanderplasschen, and G. Van Hove. 2012. “One Size Fits All? The Social Construction of Dis-Employ-Abled Women.” Disability & Society 27 (5): 703–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vehmas, S., and P. Mäkelä. 2008. “A Realist Account of the Ontology of Impairment.” Journal of Medical Ethics 34: 93–95.10.1136/jme.2006.019042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vehmas, S., and N. Watson. 2014. “Moral Wrongs, Disadvantages, and Disability: A Critique of Critical Disability Studies.” Disability & Society 29 (4): 638–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welchman, A. 2005. “Materialism.” In The Edinburgh Dictionary of Continental Philosophy, edited by J. Protevi, 388–391. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., and B. M. Wildemuth. 2009. “Qualitative Analysis of Content.” In Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science, edited by B. Wildemuth, 308–319. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar