Advanced search
Publication Cover
Disability & Society Volume 31, 2016 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
9,515
Views
28
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Exploring normativity in disability studies

Simo VehmasDisability Studies, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandCorrespondence[email protected]
&
Nick WatsonDisability Studies, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
Pages 1-16 | Received 04 May 2015, Accepted 12 Nov 2015, Published online: 08 Jan 2016

References

  • Arpaly, N. 2005. “How is It Not ‘Just like Diabetes’: Mental Disorders and the Moral Psychologist.” Philosophical Issues 15 (1): 282–298.10.1111/phis.2005.15.issue-1
  • Baert, P., and F. Carreira da Silva. 2010. Social Theory in the Twentieth Century and beyond. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Baron, M. 1997. “Kantian Ethics.” In Three Methods of Ethics: A Debate, edited by M. W. Baron, P. Pettit and M. Slote, 3–91. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Blume, S. 2012. “What Can the Study of Science and Technology Tell Us about Disability?” In Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies, edited by N. Watson, A. Roulstone, and C. Thomas, 348–359. London: Routledge.
  • Braidotti, R. 2013. The Posthuman. London: Polity.
  • Colver, A., M. Rapp, N. Eisemann, V. Ehlinger, U. Thyen, H. O. Dickinson, J. Parkes, et al. 2015. “Self-Reported Quality of Life of Adolescents with Cerebral Palsy: A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analysis.” The Lancet 385 (9969): 705–716.10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61229-0
  • Connell, R. 2012. “Gender, Health and Theory: Conceptualizing the Issue, in Local and World Perspective.” Social Science & Medicine 74 (11): 1675–1683.
  • Curtis, B. L., and S. Vehmas. 2014. “Moral worth and Severe Intellectual Disability – A Hybrid View.” In Disability and the Good Human Life, edited by J. Bickenbach, F. Felder, and B. Schmitz, 19–49. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Curtis, B. L., and S. Vehmas. 2016. “A Moorean Argument for the Full Moral Status of Those with Profound Intellectual Disability.” Journal of Medical Ethics 42: 41–45. doi:10.1136/medethics-2015-102938.
  • Daly, C. 2010. An Introduction to Philosophical Methods. Peterborough: Broadview Press.
  • Dolmage, J. 2014. Disability Rhetoric. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
  • Eshleman, A. 2009. “Moral Responsibility.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta, Stanford: The Metaphysics Research Lab. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-responsibility.
  • Enoch, D. 2011. Taking Morality Seriously: A Defence of Robust Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579969.001.0001
  • Finlay, S. 2010. “Recent Work on Normativity.” Analysis 70 (2): 331–346.10.1093/analys/anq002
  • Fischer, J. M., and M. Ravizza. 1998. Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511814594
  • Frankena, W. K. 1973. Ethics. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
  • Fraser, N. 1981. “Foucault on Modern Power: Empirical Insights and Normative Confusions.” Praxis International 3: 272–287.
  • Fraser, N. 1996. “False Anti-Thesis: A Response to Seyla Benhabib and Judith Butler.” In Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on ‘Postsocialist’ Condition, edited by N. Fraser, 207–224. London: Routledge.
  • Fraser, N. 2013. Fortunes of Feminism: From State-Managed Capitalism to Neoliberal Crisis. New York: Verso.
  • Garland-Thomson, R. 2013. “Integrating Disability, Transforming Feminist Theory.” In The Disability Studies Reader. 4th ed., edited by L. J. Davis, 333–353. New York: Routledge.
  • Goodley, D. 2014. Dis/Ability Studies: Theorising Disablism and Ableism. London: Routledge.
  • Goodley, D., R. Lawthom, and K. Runswick-Cole. 2014. “Posthuman Disability Studies.” Subjectivity 7 (4): 342–361.10.1057/sub.2014.15
  • Goodley, D., and M. Rapley. 2002. “Changing the Subject: Postmodernity and People with ‘Learning Difficulties’.” In Disability/Postmodernity: Embodying Disability Theory, edited by M. Corker and T. Shakespeare, 127–142. London: Continuum.
  • Goodley, D., and K. Runswick-Cole. 2015. “‘Big Society? Disabled People with the Label of Learning Disabilities and the Queer(Y)Ing of Civil Society.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 17 (1): 1–13.10.1080/15017419.2014.941924
  • Hare, R. M. 1963. Freedom and Reason. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Harris, J. 2001. “One Principle and Three Fallacies of Disability Studies.” Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (6): 383–387.10.1136/jme.27.6.383
  • Häyry, M. 1994. Liberal Utilitarianism and Applied Ethics. London: Routledge.
  • Koch, T. 2011. “Eugenics and the Genetic Challenge, Again: All Dressed up and Just Everywhere to Go.” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (2): 191–203.10.1017/S0963180110000848
  • Kuhse, H., and P. Singer. 1985. Should the Baby Live? The Problem of Handicapped Infants. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Lundblad, M. 2011. “Consider the Dragonfly: Cary Wolfe’s Posthumanism.” Substance 40 (3): 146–153.
  • MacIntyre, A. 1999. Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues. London: Duckworth.
  • Mäkelä, P. 2013. Collective Responsibility: Against Collectivism. Philosophical Studies from the University of Helsinki 40. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
  • McMahan, J. 2002. The Ethics of Killing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0195079981.001.0001
  • McRuer, R. 2013. “Compulsory Able-Bodiedness and Queer/Disabled Existence.” In The Disability Studies Reader. 4th ed., edited by L. J. Davis, 369–378. New York: Routledge.
  • Nagel, T. 1986. The View from Nowhere. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Nayar, P. K. 2013. Posthumanism. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Nussbaum, M. 2006. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • O’Neill, O. 1996. “Introduction.” In The Sources of Normativity, edited by C. Korsgaard, xi–xv. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Oliver, M. 1992. “Changing the Social Relations of Research Production?” Disability, Handicap & Society 7 (2): 101–114.
  • Oliver, M. 2007. “Disability Rights and Wrongs?” Disability & Society 22 (2): 230–234.
  • Pettit, P. 1997. “The Consequentialist Perspective.” In Three Methods of Ethics: A Debate, edited by M.W. Baron, P. Pettit, and M. Slote, 92–174. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Rachels, J. 1986. The End of Life: Euthanasia and Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Sapontzis, S. F. 1980. “Are Animals Moral Beings?” American Philosophical Quarterly 17 (1): 45–52.
  • Sayer, A. 2011. Why Things Matter to People: Social Science, Values and Ethical Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511734779
  • Sayre-McCord, Geoff. 2014. “Metaethics.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy ( Summer 2014 Edition), edited by N. Edward Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/metaethics/
  • Scanlon, M. 2000. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Schöne-Seifert, B., and K.-P. Rippe. 1991. “Silencing the Singer: Antibioethics in Germany.” Hastings Center Report 21 (6): 20–27.10.2307/3562359
  • Shakespeare, T. 2014. Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
  • Shakespeare, T., and N. Watson. 2001. “The Social Model of Disability: An Outdated Ideology?” Research in Social Science and Disability 2: 9–28.10.1016/S1479-3547(01)80018-X
  • Shildrick, M. 2012. “Critical Disability Studies: Rethinking the Conventions for the Age of Postmodernity.” In Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies, edited by N. Watson, A. Roulstone and C. Thomas, 30–41. London: Routledge.
  • Silvers, A. 1998. “Formal Justice.” In Disability, Difference, Discrimination: Perspectives on Justice in Bioethics and Public Policy, by A. Silvers, D. Wasserman, and M. Mahowald, 1–145. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
  • Singer, P. 1993. Practical Ethics. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Slote, M. 1997. “Virtue Ethics.” In Three Methods of Ethics: A Debate, edited by M.W. Baron, P. Pettit, and M. Slote, 175–238. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Smith, Phil. 2004. “Whiteness, Normal Theory, and Disability Studies.” Disability Studies Quarterly 24 (2). http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/491/668
  • Thomas, C. 1999. Female Forms: Experiencing and Understanding Disability. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Timmons, M. 2002. Moral Theory: An Introduction. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
  • Tooley, M. 1983. Abortion and Infanticide. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Turner, S. P. 2010. Explaining the Normative. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Vehmas, S. 1999. “Newborn Infants and the Moral Significance of Intellectual Disabilities.” Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps 24 (2): 111–121.10.2511/rpsd.24.2.111
  • Vehmas, S. 2004. “Ethical Analysis of the Concept of Disability.” Mental Retardation 42 (3): 209–222.10.1352/0047-6765(2004)42<209:EAOTCO>2.0.CO;2
  • Vehmas, S. 2012. “What Can Philosophy Tell Us about Disability?” In Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies, edited by N. Watson, A. Roulstone and C. Thomas, 298–309. London: Routledge.
  • Vehmas, S., and N. Watson. 2014. “Moral Wrongs, Disadvantages, and Disability: A Critique of Critical Disability Studies.” Disability & Society 29 (4): 638–650.
  • Walton, D. 2006. Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Williams, B. 2006. Philosophy as a Humanistic Discipline. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Wolbring, G. 2008. “The Politics of Ableism.” Development 51 (2): 252–258.10.1057/dev.2008.17
  • Wolfe, C. 2010. What is Posthumanism? Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.