Disability studies after the ontological turn: a return to the material world and material bodies without a return to essentialism

References

• Abel, M. 2007. Violent Affect: Literature, Cinema, and Critique after Representation. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822388128
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, C. 2012. “Understanding the Social Model: Past, Present and Future.” In The Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies, edited by N. Watson, A. Roulstone, and C. Thomas, 12–29. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bayliss, P. 2009. “Against Interpretosis: Deleuze, Disability, and Difference.” Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies 3 (3): 281–294.
   Google Scholar
• Blaise, M. 2013. “Activating Micropolitical Practices in the Early Years: (Re)Assembling Bodies and Participant Observations.” In Deleuze and Research Methodologies, edited by R. Coleman, and J. Ringrose, 184–200. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonta, M., and J. Protevi. 2004. Deleuze and Geophilosophy: A Guide and Glossary. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2008. “The Politics of Life as Bios/Zoe.” In Bits of Life: Feminism at the Intersection of Media, Bioscience and Technology, edited by A. Smelik and N. Lykke, 177–192. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2011. Nomadic Theory: The Portable Rossi Braidotti. New York: Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Bray, A. 2003. Definitions of Intellectual Disability. Wellington: Donald Beasley.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 1993. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, R., and J. Ringrose. 2013. “Introduction: Deleuze and Research Methodologies.” In Deleuze and Research Methodologies, edited by R. Coleman and J. Ringrose, 1–22. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corker, M. 1999. “Differences, Conflations and Foundations: The Limits to ‘Accurate’ Theoretical Representation of Disabled People's Experience?” Disability & Society 14 (5): 627–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danermark, B. 2002. “Interdisciplinary Research and Critical Realism: The Example of Disability Research.” Journal of Critical Realism 5 (1): 56–64.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, L. 2010. “Constructing Normalcy: The Bell Curve, the Novel, and the Invention of the Disabled Body in the Nineteenth Century.” In The Disability Studies Reader, edited by L. Davis, 3–16. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• DeLanda, M. 2006. A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. 1999. Foucault. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. 2005. Francis Bacon. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. 2012. Value for Money and Policy Review of Disability Services in Ireland. Dublin: Department of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Ereshefsky, M. 2007. “Philosophy of Biological Classification.” In Handbook of Plant Science, edited by K. Roberts, 8–10. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Feely, M. 2015. “IQ, Speciation and Sexuality: How Suspicions of Sexual Abuse Are Produced within a Contemporary Intellectual Disability Service.” Somatechnics 5 (2): 174–196.10.3366/soma.2015.0160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlay, W., and E. Lyons. 2005. “Rejecting the Label: A Social Constructionist Analysis.” Mental Retardation 43 (2): 120–134.10.1352/0047-6765(2005)43<120:RTLASC>2.0.CO;2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1980. “The Confession of the Flesh.” In Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, edited by C. Gordon, 194–228. New York: Parthenon.
   Google Scholar
• Futuyma, D. 2009. Evolution. Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. 2007. “Towards Socially Just Pedagogies: Deleuzoguattarian Critical Disability Studies.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 11 (3): 317–334.10.1080/13603110701238769
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. 2011. Disability Studies: An Interdisciplinary Introduction. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Grosz, E. 1994. Volatile Bodies: Towards a Corporeal Feminism. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haggerty, K., and R. Ericson. 2000. “The Surveillant Assemblage.” British Journal of Sociology 51 (4): 605–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey-Moody, A., and P. Malins. 2007. “Introduction: Gilles Deleuze and Four Movements in Social Thought.” In Deleuzian Encounters: Studies in Contemporary Social Issues, edited by A. Hickey-Moody and P. Malins, 1–26. Palgrave McMillan: Basingstoke.
   Google Scholar
• Hickey-Moody, A., and D. Woods. 2008. “Imagining Otherwise: Deleuze, Disability & Second Life.” Power and Place Conference: Refereed Proceedings, July 21. https://www.massey.ac.nz/massey/fms/Colleges/College%20of%20Business/Communication%20and%20Journalism/ANZCA%202008/Refereed%20Papers/HickeyMoody_Wood_ANZCA08.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jaarsma, P., and S. Welin. 2012. “Autism as a Natural Human Variation: Reflections on the Claims of the Neurodiversity Movement.” Health Care Analysis 20 (1): 20–30.10.1007/s10728-011-0169-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, A., and L. Mazzei. 2012. Thinking with Theory: Viewing Data across Multiple Perspectives. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kafer, A. 2013. Feminist, Crip, Queer. Indiana, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• May, T. 2005. Gilles Deleuze: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165419
   Google Scholar
• McRuer, R. 2006. Crip Theory: Cultural Signs of Queerness and Disability. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Overboe, J. 2009. “Affirming and Impersonal Life: A Different Register for Disability Studies.” Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies 3 (3): 241–256.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, P. 1994. “MetamorphoLogic: Bodies and Powers.” In A Thousand Plateaus Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 25 (2): 157–169.10.1080/00071773.1994.11007058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, P. 2007. “Preface.” In Deleuzian Encounters: Studies in Contemporary Social Issues, edited by A. Hickey-Moody and P. Malins, ix–x. Palgrave McMillan: Basingstoke.
   Google Scholar
• Protevi, J. 2009. Political Affect: Connecting the Social and the Somatic. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinow, P. 1984. “Introduction.” In The Foucault Reader, edited by P. Rabinow, 3–30. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Roets, G. 2009. “Unravelling Mr President‘s Nomad Lands: Travelling to Interdisciplinary Frontiers of Knowledge in Disability Studies.” Disability & Society 24 (6): 689–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runswick-Cole, K. 2014. “‘Us’ and ‘Them’: The Limits and Possibilities of ‘a Politics of Neurodiversity’ in Neoliberal times.” Disability & Society 29 (7): 1117–1129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, J. 1998. “God, Mind, and Artificial Intelligence: An Interview with John Searle.” Free Enquiry 18 (4): 38–41.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. 2006. Disability Right and Wrongs. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. 2014. Disability Right and Wrongs Revisited. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shildrick, M. 2009. Dangerous Discourses of Disability, Subjectivity and Sexuality. Basingstoke: Palgrave-MacMillan.10.1057/9780230244641
   Google Scholar
• Shildrick, M. 2015. “‘Why Should Our Bodies End at the Skin?’ Embodiment, Boundaries, and Somatechnics.” Hypatia 30 (1): 13–29.10.1111/hypa.2015.30.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebers, T. 2008. Disability Theory. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.309723
   Google Scholar
• Silverstein, C. 2009. “The Implications of Removing Homosexuality from the DSM as a Mental Disorder.” Archive of Sexual Behaviour 38: 161–163.10.1007/s10508-008-9442-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, B., T. Blackmore, and P. Bayliss. 2008. “Postmodern Synergistic Knowledge Creation: Extending the Boundaries of Disability Studies.” Disability & Society 23 (7): 733–745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokal, A. 1996. “A Physicist Experiments with Cultural Studies.” Lingua Franca. May/June
   Google Scholar
• Srnicek, N. 2007. Assemblage Theory, Complexity and Contentious Politics, thesis: University of Western Ontario. Accessed July 21, 2015.www.academia.edu/178031/Assemblage_Theory_Complexity_The_Political_Ontology_of_Gilles_Deleuze
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. 2013. “Mobile Sections and Flowing Matter in Participant-Generated Video.” In Deleuze and Research Methodologies, edited by R. Coleman and J. Ringrose, 42–60. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thejournal.ie. 2014. “Science Changes Lives: The Musician Who Composes in the Blink of an Eye.” Thejournal.ie, August 24th 2014. Accessed July 21, 2015.http://www.thejournal.ie/cillian-mcsweeney-1631009-Aug2014/
   Google Scholar
• Tremain, S. 2002. “On the Subject of Impairment.” In Disability/Postmodernity: Embodying Disability Theory, edited by M. Corker and T. Shakespeare, 32–47. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Tremain, S. 2005. “Foucault, Governmentality and Critical Disability Theory.” In Foucault and the Government of Disability, edited by S. Tremain, 1–26. Michigan: University of Michigan Press..10.3998/mpub.12678
   Google Scholar
• Vehmas, S., and N. Watson. 2014. “Moral Wrongs, Disadvantages, and Disability: A Critique of Critical Disability Studies.” Disability & Society 29 (4): 638–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendell, S. 1996. The Rejected Body: Feminist Philosophical Reflections on Disability. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M. 2012. Affect and Emotion: A New Social Science Understanding. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446250945
   Google Scholar
• Youdell, D. 2011. School Trouble: Identity. Power and Politics in Education, Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar