3,158
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Current issues

The false narrative about personal budgets in England: smoke and mirrors?

&
Pages 1132-1137 | Received 20 Jul 2016, Accepted 31 Aug 2016, Published online: 05 Oct 2016

References

  • Commission for Social Care Inspections. 2004. Direct Payments, What Are the Barriers. London: CSCI.
  • NASCIS. 2016. https://nascis.hscic.gov.uk last accessed July.
  • National Audit Office. 2016. Personalised Commissioning in Social Care. London: HMSO.
  • Personal Social Services Research Unit. 2015. Assessment of the Impact of the Care Act 2014 Eligibility Regulations. University of Kent.
  • Series, L., and L. Clements. 2013. “Putting the Cart before the Horse: Resource Allocation Systems and Community Care.” Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 35 (2): 207–226.10.1080/09649069.2013.800288
  • Skills for Care. 2015. The Size and Structure of the Adult Social Care Sector and Workforce in England, 2015. Leeds: Skills for Care.
  • Slasberg, C., and P. Beresford. 2015. “Building on the Original Strengths of Direct Payments to Create a Better Future for Social Care.” Disability & Society 30 (3): 479–483.
  • Slasberg, C., P. Beresford, and P. Schofield. 2012. “How Self-Directed Support is failing to Deliver Personal Budgets and Personalisation.” Research, Policy and Planning 29 (3): 161–177.
  • Slasberg, C., P. Beresford, and P. Schofield. 2013. “The Increasing Evidence of How Self Directed Support is failing to Deliver Personal Budgets and Personalisation Research.” Policy and Planning (2013) 30 (2): 91–105.
  • Slasberg, C., P. Beresford, and P. Schofield. 2015. “Further Lessons from the Continuing Failure of Personal Budgets.” Research Policy and Planning 31 (1): 43–53.
  • UK Parliament Public Accounts Committee. 2016. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmpubacc/74/7402.htm last accessed July 2016.
  • Woolham, J., and C. Benton. 2013. “The Costs and Benefits of Personal Budgets for Older People: Evidence from a Single Local Authority.” British Journal of Social Work 43 (8): 1472–1491.10.1093/bjsw/bcs086

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.