Distress or disability? Could a theoretical framework drawn from disability studies be a way forward when trying to understand experiences of oppression on the grounds of mental distress?

References

• Bentall, R. P., and C. Fernyhough. 2008. “Social Predictors of Psychotic Experiences: Specificity and Psychological Mechanisms.” Schizophrenia Bulletin 34 (6): 1012–1020. 10.1093/schbul/sbn103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. 2000. “What Have Madness and Psychiatric System Survivors Got to Do with Disability and Disability Studies?” Disability & Society 15 (1): 167–172. 10.1080/09687590025838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. 2005. ”Social Approaches to Madness and Distress. User Perspectives and User Knowledges.” In Social Perspectives in Mental Health. Developing Social Models to Understand and Work with Mental Distress, edited by J. Tew, 32–52. London, the UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. 2013. “Foreword.” In Mad Matters: A Critical Reader in Canadian Mad Studies, edited by B. A. LeFrancois, R. Menzies and G. Reaume, ix–xii. Toronto, Canada: Canadian Scholars’ Press Inc..
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P., M. Nettle, and R. Perring. 2010. Towards a Social Model of Madness and Distress? Exploring What Service Users Say. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, P. 1992. “Medicalization and Social Control.” Annual Review of Sociology 18: 209–232. 10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.001233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSwaan, A. 1990. The Management of Normality. London, the UK: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Dixon-Woods, M. 2011. “Using Framework-Based Synthesis for Conducting Reviews of Qualitative Studies.” BMC Medicine 9 (39): 1–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, N. and T. Kelly. 2015. ”Inconvenient Complications: On the Heterogenities of Madness and Their Relationship to Disability.” In Madness, Distress and the Politics of Disablement, edited by H. Spandler, J. Anderson and B. Sapey, 43–56. Bristol, the UK: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. 2012. A Realist Approach for Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Menzies, R., B. A. LeFrancois, and G. Reaume. 2013. “Introducing Mad Studies.” In Mad Matters: A Critical Reader in Canadian Mad Studies, edited by B. A. LeFrancois, R. Menzies and G. Reaume, 1–22. Toronto, Canada: Canadian Scholars’ Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. 2014. “Sly Normality: Between Quiescence and Revolt.” In Psychiatry Disrupted, edited by B. Burstow, B. A. LeFrancois and S. Diamond, 208–224. Montreal, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, J. 2015. “Foreword.” In Madness, Distress and the Politics of Disablement, edited by H. Spandler, J. Anderson, and B. Sapey, xiii–xv. Bristol, the UK: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mulvany, J. 2000. “Disability, Impairment or Illness?” The Relevance of the Social Model of Disability to the Study of Mental Disorder, Sociology of Health and Illness 22 (5): 582–601.
   Google Scholar
• Nabbali, E. 2009. “A ‘Mad’ Critique of the Social Model of Disability.” International Journal of Diversity in Organisations, Communities and Nations 9 (4): 1–12. 10.18848/1447-9532/CGP.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 1996. Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice. London: Macmillan. 10.1007/978-1-349-24269-6.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 2010. "Preface." In Towards a Social Model of Madness and Distress? Exploring What Service Users Say, edited by P. Beresford, M. Nettle, and R. Peering, 5. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Pilgrim ,D. 2014. Understanding Mental Health: A Critical Realist Exploration. Abingdon, the UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Plumb, A. 1994. Distress or Disability? A Discussion Document. Greater Manchester Coalition of Disabled People. The UK: (GMCDP) Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Read, J., N. Haslam, L. Sayce, and E. Davies. 2006. “Prejudice and Schizophrenia: A Review of the 'mental Illness is an Illness like Any Other' Approach.” Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 114: 303–318. 10.1111/acp.2006.114.issue-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, D. 2012a. “Psycho-Emotional Disablism: The Missing Link?” In Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies, edited by Watson N. Roulstone, and C. Thomas, 78–92. Abingdon, the UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, D. 2012b. “Psycho-Emotional Disablism in the Lives of People Experiencing Mental Mistress.” In Distress or Disability? Proceedings of a Symposium Held at Lancaster University, 15–16 November 2011, edited by J. Anderson, B. Sapey and H. Spandler, 24–29. Lancaster, The UK: Published by Centre for Disability Research.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, D. 2015. "Psycho-Emotional Disablism in the Lives of People Experiencing Mental Distress." In Madness, Distress and the Politics of Disablement, edited by H. Spandler, J. Anderson and B. Sapey, 99–114. Bristol, the UK: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, J., and L. Spencer. 1994. “Qualitative Data Analysis for Applied Policy Research.” In Analyzing Qualitative Data, edited by A. Bryman and R. G. Burgess, 173–194. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203413081.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T., and N. Watson. 2001. “The Social Model of Disability: An Outdated Ideology?” In Exploring Theories and Expanding Methodologies: Where Are We and Where Do We Need to Go? (Research in Social Science and Disability volume 2), edited by S. Barnarrt and B. M. Altman, 9–28. Bingley, The UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. 10.1016/S1479-3547(01)80018-X.
   Google Scholar
• Spandler, H. 2012. “Setting the Scene.” In Distress or Disability? Proceedings of a Symposium Held at Lancaster University, 15–16 November 2011, edited by J. Anderson, B. Sapey and H. Spandler, 14–17. Lancaster, The UK: Published by Centre for Disability Research.
   Google Scholar
• Spandler, H., and J. Anderson. 2015. ”Unreasonable Adjustments? Applying Disability Policy to Madness and Distress.” In Madness, Distress and the Politics of Disablement, edited by H. Spandler, J. Anderson and B. Sapey, 13–26. Bristol, the UK: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spandler, H., and T. Calton. 2009. “Psychosis and Human Rights: Conflicts in Mental Health Policy and Practice.” Social Policy & Society 8 (02): 245–256. 10.1017/S1474746408004764
   Google Scholar
• Tew, J. 2005a. “Introduction.” In Social Perspectives in Mental Health. Developing Social Models to Understand and Work with Mental Distress, edited by J. Tew, 9–12. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Tew, J. 2005b. “Core Themes of Social Perspectives.” In Social Perspectives in Mental Health. Developing Social Models to Understand and Work with Mental Distress, edited by J. Tew, 13–31. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. 1999. Female Forms: Experiencing and Understanding Disability. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. 2007. Sociologies of Disability and Illness. Contested Ideas in Disability Studies and Medical Sociology. Basingstoke, The UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. 2010. “Medical Sociology and Disability Theory.” In New Directions in the Sociology of Chronic and Disabling Conditions, Assaults on the Lifeworld, edited by G. Scambler and S. Scambler, 37–56. The UK: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230297432.
   Google Scholar
• Timander, A.-C. 2015. The Reclaiming and (Re)Construction of Positive Identities in the Recovery Process by Women and Men with Experience of Long Term Mental Distress. a Comparative Study: Gothenburg, Sweden and Oxford, England PhD-thesis, Lancaster University, Lancaster, the UK.
   Google Scholar
• Timander, A.-C., A. Grinyer, and A. Möller. 2015. “The Study of Mental Distress and the (Re) Construction of Identities in Men and Women with Experience of Long Term Mental Distress.” Disability and Society 30 (3): 327–339. 10.1080/09687599.2014.999911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watermeyer, B., and Görgens, T. 2014. "Disability and Internalized Oppression." In Internalised Oppression. the Psychology of Marginalized Groups, edited by E. J. R.David, 253–280. New York: Springer Publishing Company, LCC.
   Google Scholar