Understanding disabling barriers: a fruitful partnership between Disability Studies and social practices?

References

• Abbott, D. 2013. “Nudge, Nudge, Wink, Wink: Love, Sex and Gay Men with Intellectual Disabilities – A Helping Hand or a Human Right?” Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 57 (II): 1079–1087.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alvesson, M. 2013. Understanding Organizational Culture. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, B. 2001. “Practice as Collective Action.” In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, edited by T. K. Schatzki, C. Knorr and E. Von Savigny, 25–36. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, C. 2003. “What a Difference a Decade Makes: Reflections on Doing ‘Emancipatory’ Disability Research.” Disability & Society 18 (1): 3–17.10.1080/713662197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, L. 2005. “Emancipatory Research and Disabled People: Some Observations and Questions.” Educational Review 57 (3): 317–327.10.1080/00131910500149325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R., and B. Danermark. 2006. “Metatheory, Interdisciplinarity and Disability Research: A Critical Realist Perspective.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 8 (4): 278–297.10.1080/15017410600914329
   Google Scholar
• Blue, S., and N. Spurling. 2017. “Qualities of Connective Tissue in Hospital Life: How Complexes of Practices Change.” Chapter 2 in The Nexus of Practices: Connections, Constellations, Practitioners, edited by A. Hui, T. Schatzki and E. Shove, 24–37. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blue, S., E. Shove, C. Carmona, and M. Kelly. 2016. “Theories of Practice and Public Health: Understanding (Un)Healthy Practices.” Critical Public Health 26 (1): 36–50.10.1080/09581596.2014.980396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boal, A. 1993. Theater of the Oppressed. New York: Theatre Communications Group.
   Google Scholar
• Bott, S. 2016. “DRUK on Tour: What People Are Saying at Our Events on UNCRPD.” Accessed December 19 2016. https://www.disabilityrightsuk.org/news/2016/october/what-people-are-saying-our-events-uncrpd
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1998. Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, D., and M. Harris. 2009. The Challenge of Co-Production: How Equal Partnerships between Professionals and the Public Are Crucial to Improving Public Services. London: National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Care Quality Commission. 2014. The State of Health Care and Adult Social Care in England 2013/14. Presented to Parliament pursuant to section 83(4)(a) of Part 1 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications
   Google Scholar
• Crow, L. 1996. “Including All Our Lives: Renewing the Social Model of Disability.” Chapter 4 in Exploring the Divide, edited by Colin Barnes and Geof Mercer, 55–72. Leeds: The Disability Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, R., and William Housley. 2015. “Membership Categorisation and Methodological Reasoning in Research Team Interaction.” Chapter 7 in Advances in Membership Categorisation Analysis, edited by R. Housley and W. Fitzgerald, 151–174. London: Sage.10.4135/9781473917873
   Google Scholar
• Garland-Thomson, R. 2011. “Misfits: A Feminist Materialist Disability Concept.” Hypatia 26 (3): 591–609.10.1111/hypa.2011.26.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garland-Thomson, R. 2014. “The Story of My Work: How I Became Disabled.” Disability Studies Quarterly 34 (2): doi:10.18061/dsq.v34i2.4254.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1988. “Goffman as a Systematic Social Theorist.” Chapter 9 in Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, edited by P. Drew and A. Wootton, 250–279. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Handy, C. 1993. Understanding Organizations. 4th ed. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Harwood, R. 2016. “Can International Human Rights Law Help Restore Access to Justice for Disabled Workers?” Laws 5 (17): 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, J. 2006. “Workplace Narratives, Professional Identity and Relational Practice.” Chapter 6 in Discourse and Identity, edited by A. De Fina, D. Schiffrin and M. Bamberg, 166–187. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511584459
   Google Scholar
• Hui, A. 2017. “Variation and the Intersection of Practices.” Chapter 4 in The Nexus of Practices: Connections, Constellations, Practitioners, edited by A. Hui, T. Schatzki and E. Shove, 52–67. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Liebling, A. 2001. “Whose Side Are We on? Theory, Practice and Allegiances in Prison Research.” British Journal of Criminology 41(3): 472–484.10.1093/bjc/41.3.472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. 1980. Street Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Moodley, J., and Lauren Graham. 2015. “The Importance of Intersectionality in Disability and Gender Studies.” Agenda 29 (2): 24–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 1990. The Politics of Disablement. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.10.1007/978-1-349-20895-1
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 2013. “The Social Model of Disability: Thirty Years on.” Disability & Society 28 (7): 1024–1026.10.1080/09687599.2013.818773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. 2002. “Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing.” European Journal of Social Theory 5 (2): 243–263.10.1177/13684310222225432
   Google Scholar
• Redley, M., E. Maina, A. Keeling, and P. Pattni. 2012. “The Voting Rights of Adults with Intellectual Disabilities: Reflections on the Arguments, and Situation in Kenya and England and Wales.” Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 56 (11): 1026–1035.10.1111/jir.2012.56.issue-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riddell, S., and N. Watson. 2011. “Equality and Human Rights in Britain: Principles and Challenges.” Social Policy & Society 10 (02): 193–203.10.1017/S1474746410000540
   Google Scholar
• Robillard, A. 1999. Meaning of a Disability: The Lived Experience of Paralysis. Philadelphia, PA: Temple Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. 1996. Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511527470
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. 2001. “Introduction: Practice Theory.” In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, edited by T. Schatzki, K. Cetina, and E. von Savigny, 10–23. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. 2017. “Sayings, Texts and Discursive Formations.” Chapter 9 in The Nexus of Practices: Connections, Constellations, Practitioners, edited by A. Hui, T. Schatzki and E. Shove, 126–140. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scourfield, P. 2015. “Implementing Co-Production in Adult Social Care: An Example of Meta-Governance Failure?” Social Policy and Society 14 (04): 541–554.10.1017/S1474746414000438
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. 2006. Disability Rights and Wrongs. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E. 2010. “Beyond the ABC: Climate Change Policy and Theories of Social Change.” Environment & Planning a 42 (6): 1273–1285.10.1068/a42282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E. 2014. “Putting Practice into Policy: Reconfiguring Questions of Consumption and Climate Change.” Contemporary Social Science 9 (4): 415–429.10.1080/21582041.2012.692484
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E., and M. Pantzar. 2007. “Recruitment and Reproduction: The Careers and Carriers of Digital Photography and Floorball.” Human Affairs 17 (1): 154–167.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E., M. Pantzar, and M. Watson. 2012. The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How It Changes. London: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781446250655
   Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J., and T. Stivers. 2012. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. 1999. Female Forms: Experiencing and Understanding Disability. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. 2004. “How is Disability Understood? An Examination of Sociological Approaches.” Disability and Society 19 (6): 569–583.10.1080/0968759042000252506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trahar, S. 2013. Contextualising Narrative Inquiry: Developing Methodological Approaches for Local Contexts. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2007. UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2016. Inquiry concerning the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Carried out by the Committee under Article 6 of the Optional Protocol to the Convention. CRPD/C/15/R.2/Rev.1. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/CRPD/Pages/InquiryProcedure.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Watson, N. 2003. “Daily Denials: The Routinisation of Oppression and Resistance.” Chapter 3 in Disability, Culture and Identity, edited by S. Riddell and N. Watson, 34–52. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, V. 2011. Disability and Discourse: Analysing Inclusive Conversation with People with Intellectual Disabilities. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9780470977934
   Google Scholar
• Williams, V., P. St Quintin and S. Hoadley. 2006. “‘Take Your Partners’: Reflections on a Partnership Project in Learning Disability Research.” Action Research 4 (3): 295–314.10.1177/1476750306066803
   Google Scholar