Provocations for Critical Disability Studies

References

• Ahmed, S. 2004. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. 2007/2008. “The Happiness Turn.” New Formations 63 (8): 7–14.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. 2010. “Killing Joy: Feminism and the History of Happiness.” Signs 35 (3): 571–94. doi:10.1086/648513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan, J., and D. Youdell. 2017. “Ghostings, Materialisations and Flows in Britain's Special Educational Needs and Disability Assemblage.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 38 (1): 70–82. doi:10.1080/01596306.2015.1104853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apostolidou, S., and J. Sturm. 2016. “Weighing Posthumanism: Fatness and Contested Humanity.” Social Inclusion 4 (4):150–9. doi:10.17645/si.v4i4.705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, L. 2012b. The Social Construction of the Savant. Paper Presented at Disability Studies Conference. Lancaster University, Lancaster, 12 September.
   Google Scholar
• Autscape. 2013. Finding a voice. Available at: http://www.autscape.org/ (accessed 24 July 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Baggs, A. 2007. In my language. Available at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnylM1hI2jc (accessed 19 October 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, C. 1991. Disabled People in Britain. London: Hurst and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, C. 1996. “Disability and the Myth of the Independent Researcher.” Disability and Society 11 (1):107–10. doi:10.1080/09687599650023362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, C., and G. Mercer (Eds). 1997. Exploring the Divide. Leeds: Disability Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, C., and G. Mercer. 2003. Disability: Key Concepts. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, C., G. Mercer, and T. Shakespeare. 1999. Exploring Disability. London: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, C., and A. Sheldon. 2010. “Disability, Politics and Poverty in a Majority World Context.” Disability and Society 25 (7): 771–82. doi:10.1080/09687599.2010.520889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, K., D. Goodley, and K. Runswick-Cole. 2017. “Precarious Lives and Resistant Possibilities: The Labour of People with Learning Disabilities in Times of Austerity.” Disability and Society 32 (2):160–75. doi:10.1080/09687599.2017.1281105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, C. 2006. “Introducing White Disability Studies: A Modest Proposal.” In L. J. Davis (Ed) The Disability Studies Reader. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Moshe, L., C. Chapman, and A. Carey. 2014. Disability Incarcerated: Imprisonment and Disability in the United States and Canada. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, S., Meek, A. and Davies, A. 2016. “Supported work experience and its impact on young people with intellectual disabilities, their families and employers.” Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities 10 (3), 207–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlant, L. 2007. “Slow Death: Sovereignty, Obesity, Lateral Agency.” Critical Inquiry 33 (4): 754–80. doi:10.1086/521568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billington T (2017) "Educational inclusion and critical neuroscience: friends or foes?" International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21 (8), 866–880. doi:10.1080/13603116.2017.1283717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, T., and W. Booth. 1994. Parenting under Pressure: Mothers and Fathers with Learning Difficulties. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, T., and W. Booth. 1998. Growing up with Parents Who Have Learning Dif Culties. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boxall, K., and P. Beresford. 2013. “Service User Research in Social Work and Disability Studies in the UK.” Disability and Society 28 (5): 587–600. doi:10.1080/09687599.2012.717876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2005. “Affirming the Affirmative: On Nomadic Affectivity.” Rhizomes Issue 11/12 (Fall 2005/Spring 2006)
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2006. “Posthuman, All Too Human: Towards a New Process Ontology.” Theory Culture Society 23 (7–8): 197–208. doi:10.1177/0263276406069232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2013. The Posthuman. London: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2018. “Posthuman Critical Theory.” In R. Braidotti, and M. Hlavajova (Eds). Posthuman Glossary, 339–42. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R., and M. Hlavajova. 2018. “Introduction.” In R. Braidotti, and M. Hlavajova (Eds). Posthuman Glossary, 1–13. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Burman, E. 2008. Developments: Child, Image, Nation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, F. K. 2009. Contours of Ableism: The Production of Disability and Abledness, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Castrodale, M. A. 2015. “Mad Matters: A Critical Reader in Canadian Mad Studies.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 17 (3): 284–6. doi:10.1080/15017419.2014.895415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chataika, T. (2018) (Ed). The Routledge Handbook of Disability in Southern Africa. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Charlton, J. 2006. “The Dimensions of Disability Oppression.” In L. Davis (Ed). The Disability Studies Reader, 2nd ed, 217–29. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clare, E. 2010. “Resisting Shame: Making Our Bodies Home.” Seattle Journal for Social Justice 8 (2): 455–65.
   Google Scholar
• Corker, M., and S. French. 1999. Disability Discourse, Buckingham: OpenUniversity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corker, M., and T. Shakespeare (eds). 2002. Disability/Postmodernity: Embodying Disability Theory. London: Continuum;
   Google Scholar
• Crow, L. 2011. “Comment from the Field: Resistance on the Plinth: The Why of It.” Journal of Cultural and Literary Disability Studies 5 (1): 113–20. doi:10.3828/jlcds.2011.8.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. 1991. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review 43 (6): 1241–99. doi:10.2307/1229039.
   Google Scholar
• Danermark, B. 2002. “Interdisciplinary Research and Critical Realism: The Example of Disability Research.” Journal of Critical Realism 5 (1): 56–64. doi:10.1558/aleth.v5i1.56.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, L. J. 1995. Enforcing Normalcy: Disability, Deafness, and the Body. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, L.J. (Ed). 2013. Disablity Studies Reader. 4th ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davy, Z. 2010. “A Psycho-social Exploration of (Trans) Gender, Sexual Citizenship and Disability: A Case Study.” In R. Shuttleworth, and T. Sanders (eds). Sex and Disability: Politics, Identity, and Access. Leeds: The Disability Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Durst, D., S. M. South, and M. Bluechardt. 2006. “Urban First Nations People with Disabilities Speak Out.” Journal of Aboriginal Health 3 (1): 34–43.
   Google Scholar
• Eales, L., and D. Peers. 2016. “Moving Adapted Physical Activity: The Possibilities of Arts-Based Research.” Quest 68 (1): 55–68. doi:10.1080/00336297.2015.1116999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erevelles, N. 2012. Disability and Difference in Global Contexts: Towards a Transformative Body Politic. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Feely, M. 2016. “Disability Studies after the Ontological Turn: A Return to the Material World and Material Bodies without a Return to Essentialism.” Disability & Society 31 (7):863–83. doi:10.1080/09687599.2016.1208603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenney Salkeld, D. 2016. “Sustainable Lifestyles for All? Disability Equality, Sustainability and the Limitations of Current UK Policy.” Disability & Society 31 (4): 447–64. doi:10.1080/09687599.2016.1182011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, S. 2017. “Engaging with Materialism and Material Reality: Critical Disability Studies and Economic Recession.” Disability & Society 32 (2): 143–59. doi:10.1080/09687599.2017.1284650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, N., and P. Alldred. 2015. “New Materialist Social Inquiry: designs, methods and the Research-Assemblage.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 18 (4): 399–414. doi:10.1080/13645579.2014.921458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galis, V. 2011. “Enacting Disability: How Can Science and Technology Studies Inform Disability Studies?” Disability & Society 26 (7): 825–38. doi:10.1080/09687599.2011.618737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garland Thomson, R. 1997. Extraordinary Bodies: Figuring Physical Disability in American Literature and Culture. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garland Thomson, R. 2011. “Misfits: A Feminist Materialist Disability Concept.” Hypatia 26 (3): 591–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gati, C. 2014. “The Question of Disability in the Post-human Debate.” Critical Remarks Cuadernos de Bioetica: revista Oficial de la Asociacion Espanola de Bioetica y Etica Medica 25 (85): 445–56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ghai, A. 2006. (Dis)embodied Form: Issues of Disabled Women. Delhi: Shakti Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, B. E. 2016. Rehabilitation; A Critical Approach. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gleeson, B. 1999. Geographies of Disability. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. 2012. “Dis/entangling Critical Disability Studies.” Disability & Society 27 (6): 631–44. doi:10.1080/09687599.2012.717884.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. 2014. Dis/ability Studies: Theorising Disablism and Ableism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. 2016. Disability Studies: An Interdisciplinary Introduction. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. 2018a. “The Dis/ability Complex.” DiGeSt. Journal of Diversity and Gender Studies 5 (1):5–22.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. 2018b. “Understanding Disability: Biopsychology, Biopolitics and an in-between-al Attitude.” Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly 35 (3): 308–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodley, D., R. Lawthom, and K. Runswick-Cole. 2014a. “Posthuman Disability Studies.” Subjectivity 7 (4): 342–61. doi:10.1057/sub.2014.15.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D., R. Lawthom, and K. Runswick-Cole. 2014b. “Dis/ability and Austerity: Beyond Work and Slow Death.” Disability & Society 29 (6):980–4. doi:10.1080/09687599.2014.920125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodley, D., R. Lawthom, K. Liddiard, and K. Runswick-Cole. 2018. “Posthuman Disability and DisHuman studies.” In R. Braidotti, and M. Hlavajova (Eds). Posthuman Glossary, 342–5. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, G., P. Ramcharan, M. Flynn, and M. Richardson. 2010. Learning Disability: A Life Cycle Approach. Maidenhead: Open University Press and McGraw Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Grech, S. 2011. “Recolonising Debates or Perpetuated Coloniality? Decentring the Spaces of Disability, development and Community in the Global South.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 15 (1): 87–100. doi:10.1080/13603116.2010.496198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grech, S., and D. Goodley. 2012. “Doing Disability Research in the Majority World: An Alternative Framework and the Quest for Decolonising Methods.” Journal of Human Development, Disability, and Social Change 192 (2012): 43–55.
   Google Scholar
• Grech, S. 2015a. Disability and Poverty in the Global South: Renegotiating Development in Guatemala. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Grech, S. 2015b. “De-colonising Eurocentric Disability Studies: Why Colonialism Matters in the Disability and Global South Debate.” Journal for Study of Race, Nation and Culture 21: 6–21. Online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13504630.2014.995347 accessed on 15th February, 2018. doi:10.1080/13504630.2014.995347.
   Google Scholar
• Groce, N. E. (2000). “Guest editorial: Framing disability issues in local concepts and beliefs.” Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal. 10(1), 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Grech, S., and K. Soldatic. 2016. Disability in the Global South: The Critical Handbook. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, M. 2016. The Bioethics of Enhancement: Transhumanism, Disability, and Biopolitics. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, B. 2014. Invalidation: Conceptualizing Disability History. Keynote presentation to the 2014 Disability Studies Conference, University of Lancaster, 9–11th September, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, B., and K. Paterson. 1997. “The Social Model of Disability and the Disappearing Body: Towards a Sociology of Impairment.” Disability & Society 12 (3): 325–40. doi:10.1080/09687599727209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollinsworth, D. 2013. “Decolonizing Indigenous Disability in Australia.” Disability & Society 28 (5): 601–15. doi:10.1080/09687599.2012.717879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayasooria, D., and G. Ooi. 1994. “Disabled People Movement in Malaysia.” Disability and Society 9 (1): 97–100. doi:10.1080/09687599466780101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S. 2018. Persistent Precarity: The making of a generation. Retrieved 2nd May 2018. https://www.thenation.com/article/persistent-precarity/
   Google Scholar
• LeFrançois, F., R. Menzies, and G. Reaume. 2013. Mad Matters: A Critical Reader in Canadian Mad Studies. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liddiard, K. 2018. The Intimate Lives of Disabled People. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Liasidou, A. 2014. “Critical Disability Studies and Socially Just Change in Higher Education.” British Journal of Special Education 41 (2): 120–35. doi:10.1111/1467-8578.12063.
   Google Scholar
• Mallett, R., and K. Runswick-Cole. 2014. Approaching Disability: Critical Issues and Perspectives. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, D. 1999a. Disability: Controversial Debates and Psychosocial Perspectives. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, D. 1999b. “Dimensions of Oppression: Theorizing the Embodied Subject.” Disability & Society 14 (5): 611–26. doi:10.1080/09687599925975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, K, BE. Gibson, and A. Leplege (Eds). 2015. Rethinking Rehabilitation Theory and Practice. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• McRuer, R. 2006. Crip Theory: Cultural Signs of Queerness and Disability. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meekosha, H., and R. Shuttleworth. 2009. “What’s so ‘critical’ about Critical Disability Studies?” Australian Journal of Human Rights 15 (1): 47–75. doi:10.1080/1323238X.2009.11910861.
   Google Scholar
• Meekosha, H. 2011. “Decolonising Disability: Thinking and Acting Globally.” Disability & Society 26 (6): 667–82. doi:10.1080/09687599.2011.602860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalko, R. 2018. Personal Communication. 13th April 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. 2007. International Strategies for Disability-Related Work in Developing Countries: Historical, Modern and Critical Reflections. http://www.independentliving.org/docs7/miles200701.html accessed 1st January 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, A., A. Nishida, and Anjali Forber-Pratt. 2017. An Open Letter to White Disability Studies and Ableist Institutions of Higher Education, 37 (3), DSQ. http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/5997.
   Google Scholar
• Milton, D. 2012a. “Embodied Sociality and the Conditioned Rela-tivism of Dispositional Diversity.” Theorising Normalcy 2012. Chester: University of Chester.
   Google Scholar
• Milton, D. 2012b. “On the Ontological Status of Autism: The Double Empathy Problem.” Disability and Society 27 (6): 883–7. doi:10.1080/09687599.2012.710008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milton, D. 2012c. So What Exactly Is Autism? London: Autism Education Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Milton, D. 2014. “Autistic Expertise: A Critical Reflection on the Production of Knowledge in Autism Studies.” Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice 18 (7): 794–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. and Snyder, S. (2006). Narrative prosthesis and the materiality of metaphor. In L. Davis. (Ed). The Disability Studies Reader. Second Edition. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D., and S. Snyder. 2000. Narrative Prosthesis: Disability and the Dependencies of Discourse. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D., S. L. Snyder, and L. Ware. 2014. “[Every] Child Left Behind”: Curricular Cripistemologies and the Crip/Queer Art of Failure.” Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies 8 (3): 295–313. doi:10.3828/jlcds.2014.24.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D., and S. Snyder. 2015. The Biopolitics of Disability: Neoliberalism, Ablenationalism, and Peripheral Embodiment. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mladenov, T. 2015. Disability and Postsocialism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moeller, M. 2015. “Pushing Boundaries of Normalcy: Employing Criticaldisability Studies in Analysing Medical Advocacy Websites.” Communication Design Quarterly Review 2 (4): 52–80. doi:10.1145/2721874.2721877.
   Google Scholar
• Moodley, J., and L. Graham. 2015. “The Importance of Intersectionality in Disability and Gender Studies.” Agenda 29 (2): 24–33. doi:10.1080/10130950.2015.1041802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mog, A., and A. Lock-Swarr. 2008. “Threads of Commonality in Transgender and Disability Studies.” Disability Studies Quarterly, 28 (4): 20.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, J. (Ed.). 1996. Encounters with Strangers: Feminism and Disability. London: The Women's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Munsaka, E., and H. Charnley. 2013. “We Do Not Have Chiefs Who Are Disabled: Disability, Development and Culture in a Continuing Complex Emergency.” Disability and Society 28 (6): 756–69. doi:10.1080/09687599.2013.802221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 1990. The Politics of Disablement. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M., and C. Barnes. 2012. The New Politics of Disablement. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, C. J. 2013. “Disclosing Our Relationships to Disabilities: An Invitation for Disability Studies Scholars.” Disability Studies Quarterly 33 (2): 5.
   Google Scholar
• Peers, D., N. Spencer-Cavaliere, and L. Eales. 2014. “Say What You Mean: Rethinking Disability Language in Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly.” Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly 31 (3): 265–82. doi:10.1123/apaq.2013-0091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peers, D. 2017. “Cramping Our Style: Critical Disability Studies as Axiological Affinities.” Disability Studies Quarterly 37 (3).
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, D. 2017. ‘Shared Perspectives: The Embodiment of Disabled Children and Young People’s Voices about Participating in Recreational Activities.’ Chapter 9. In K. Runswick-Cole, T. Curran, and K. Liddiard (eds), The Palgrave Handbook of Disabled Children’s Childhood Studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Puar, J. K. 2009. “Prognosis time: Towards a geopolitics of affect, debility and capacity, Women & Performance.” A Journal of Feminist Theory, 19 (2), 161–172. Retrieved 5th June 2013 http://www.socialtextjournal.org/periscope/2010/11/ecologies-of-sex-sensation-and-slow-death.php. doi:10.1080/07407700903034147.
   Google Scholar
• Puar, J. K. 2017. The Right to Maim: Debility, Capacity, Disability. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Puar, J. K. (2012). Precarity Talk: A Virtual Roundtable with Lauren Berlant, Judith Butler, Bojana Cvejic, Isabell Lorey, Jasbir Puar, and Ana Vujanovic, TDR: The Drama Review 56 (4), 163- 177.
   Google Scholar
• Puar, J. K. (2011). “Coda: The Cost of Getting Better: Suicide, Sensation, Switchpoints.” GLQ, 18 (1), 149–58.
   Google Scholar
• Puar, J. K.. (2010). Ecologies of Sex, Sensation, and Slow Death. Periscope, 22nd November 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, D. 2012. “Cyborgs, Cripples and iCrip: Reflections on the Contribution of Haraway to Disability Studies.” In D. Goodley, B. Hughes, and L. J. Davis (eds). Disability and Social Theory: New Developments and Directions, 91–111. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Reindall, S. M. 1999. “Independence, Dependence, Interdependence: Some Reflections on the Subject and Personal Autonomy.” Disability & Society 14 (3): 353–67. doi:10.1080/09687599926190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, C., E. Chandler, E. Harrison, K. Liddiard, and J. Rinaldi. 2017. “Pedagogical Possibilities for Unruly Bodies.” Gender and Education.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. 2013. Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shildrick, M. 2012. “Critical Disability Studies: Rethinking the Conventions for the Age of Postmodernity.” In N. Watson, A. Roulstone, and C. Thomas (Eds). Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies, 30–41. London: Routledge. 9781138787711 pub: 2014-02-27
   Google Scholar
• Shildrick, M. 2004. “Queering Performativity: Disability after Deleuze.” SCAN: Journal of Media Arts Culture 1 (3): 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Shildrick, M. 2007. “Dangerous Discourse. Anxiety, desire and Disability.” Studies in Gender & Sexuality 8 (3): 221–44. doi:10.1080/15240650701226490.
   Google Scholar
• Shildrick, M. 2015. “Death, debility and Disability.” Feminism and Psychology 25 (1): 155–60. doi:10.1177/0959353514562816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shildrick, M. (2009). Dangerous discourses of disability, subjectivity and sexuality. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, J. 2015. Youth and Disability: A Challenge to Mr Reasonable. Burlington: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, J., C. Jones, and L. Procter. 2017. “Troubling School Toilets: Resisting Discourses of ‘development’ through a Critical Disability Studies and Critical Psychology Lens.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education [online first]. doi:10.1080/01596306.2017.1316237.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Slater, J., and L. Liddiard. 2018. “Why Disability Studies Scholars Must Challenge Transmisogyny and Transphobia.” Canadian Journal of Disability Studies 7 (2): 83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Slee, R. 2018. Inclusive Education Isn't Dead, it Just Smells Funny. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Soldatic, K., and K. Johnson. 2017. Disability and Rurality: Identity, Gender and Belonging. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stoddard Holmes, M. 2015. “Embodied Storytellers: Disability Studies and Medical Humanities.” Hastings Center Report 45 (2): 11–5. doi:10.1002/hast.426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. 2011. “Beasts of Burden: Disability Studies and Animal Rights.” Qui Parle: Critical Humanities and Social Sciences 19 (2): 191–22.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. 2017. Beasts of Burden: Animal and Disability Liberation. New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. 1999. Female Forms: Experiencing and Understanding Disability. Buckingham: The Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. 2007. Sociologies of Disability, ‘Impairment,’ and Chronic Illness: Ideas in Disability Studies and Medical Sociology. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Titchkosky, T. 2015. “Life with Dead Metaphors: Impairment Rhetoric in Social Justice Praxis.” Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies 9 (1): 1–18. doi:10.3828/jlcds.2015.1.
   Google Scholar
• Tuhiwai Smith, L. 1999. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and indigenous Peoples. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trigt, P. W., A. vanSchippers, and J. Kool. 2016. “Humanity as a Contested Concept: Relations between Disability and 'Being Human.” Social Inclusion 4 (4): 125–8. doi:10.17645/si.v4i4.754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2017. Concluding Observations on the Initial Report of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. 3rd October 2017. Retreived on 26th April 2018 http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CRPD%2fC%2fGBR%2fCO%2f1&Lang=en.
   Google Scholar
• Vehmas, S., and N. Watson. 2014. “Moral Wrongs, Disadvantages, and Disability: A Critique of Critical Disability Studies.” Disability & Society 29 (4): 638–50. doi:10.1080/09687599.2013.831751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandekinderen, C., and G. Roets. 2016. “The Post(hu)man Always Rings Twice: Theorising the Difference of Im-pairment in the Lives of People with ‘mental Health Problems.” Disability & Society 31 (1): 33–46. doi:10.1080/09687599.2015.1119037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderkinderen, C., G. Roets, and G. Van Hove. 2014. “The Researcher and the Beast: Uncovering Processes of Othering and Becoming Animal in Research Ventures in the Field of Critical Disability Studies.” Qualitative Inquiry 20 (3): 296–316. doi:10.1177/1077800413489267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watermeyer, B. 2013. Towards a Contextual Psychology of Disablism. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh-Gallagher, D. 2009. The Lived Experiences of Women with Disabilities facing the Challenges of Pregnancy, Childbirth and Motherhood (2009): An Interpretative Phenomenological Study.’
   Google Scholar
• Wan Arnidawati, W. A. (2013). Supported employment: Persons with learning disabilities in Malaysia. (PhD Thesis), University of Warwick, UK. http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap/57458.
   Google Scholar
• Watermeyer, B. 2012. Towards a Contextual Psychology of Disablism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, N., A. Roulstone, and C. Thomas (Eds). 2012. The Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wendell, S. 1996. The Rejected Body: Feminist Philosophical Reflections on Disability. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, S. R., and B. Ingstad (Eds). 1995. Disability and Culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, T. R., B. Smith, and A. Papathomas. 2018. “Physical Activity Promotion for People with Spinal Cord Injury: Physiotherapists’ Beliefs and Actions.” Disability and Rehabilitation 40 (1): 52–61. doi:10.1080/09638288.2016.1242176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winance, M. 2016. “Rethinking Disability: Lessons from the past, questions for the Future. Contributions and Limits of the Social Model, the Sociology of Science and Technology, and the Ethics of Care.” Alter, European Journal of Disability Research 10 (2): 99–110. doi:10.1016/j.alter.2016.02.005.
   Google Scholar
• Wolbring, G. 2009. “What Next for the Human Species? Human Performance Enhancement, Ableism and Pluralism.” Development Dialogue 54: 141–63.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization and The World Bank. 2011. World Report on Disability. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. Accessed 21 Nov 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshida, K. K., A. Li, and M. S. W. Odette. 1999. “Cross-Cultural Views of Disability and Sexuality: Experiences of a Group of Ethno-Racial Women with Physical Disabilities.” Sexuality and Disability 17 (4): 321–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar