‘Risky’ representation: the portrayal of women with mobility impairment in twenty-first-century advertising

References

• Barthes, Roland. 1964. Elements of Semiology. New York: Hill and Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, Roland. 1977. Image, Music, Text. New York: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Bê Pereira, Ana. 2012. “Feminism and Disability: A cartography of multiplicity.” In Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies, edited by Nick Watson, Alan Roulstone and Carol Thomas 363–375. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, Phillip, and Marko Millic. 2002. “Goffman’s Gender Advertisements revisited: combining content analysis with semiotic analysis.” Visual Communication 1 (2): 203–222. doi: 10.1177/147035720200100205.
   Google Scholar
• Bolt, David. 2014. “An advertising Aesthetic: Real Beauty and Visual Impairment.” British Journal of Visual Impairment 32 (1): 25–32. doi: 10.1177/0264619613512619.
   Google Scholar
• Bolt, David. 2014. The Metanarrative of Blindness. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolt, David. 2019. Cultural Disability Studies in Education. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bordo, Susan. 1990. “Reading the Slender Body.” In Media Studies: A Reader, edited by Sue Thornham, Caroline Bassett, and Paul Marris 330–341. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crow, Liz. 1996. “Including all of Our Lives: Renewing the Social Model of Disability.” In Encounters with Strangers: Feminism and Disability, edited by Jenny Morris. London: Women’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Lennard. 2013. The End of Normal. Ann Abor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, Elizabeth. 2003. “The Corpus of the Madwoman: Toward a Feminist Disability Studies Theory of Embodiment and Mental Illness.” NWSA Journal 14 (3): 99–119. doi: 10.2979/NWS.2002.14.3.99.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, Brooke E. 2010. “Empowerment through Endorsement? Polysemic Meaning in Dove’s User-Generated Advertising.” Communication, Culture and Critique 3: 26–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-9137.2009.01056.x.
   Google Scholar
• El-Murad, Jaafar, and Douglas West. 2003. “Risk and Creativity in Advertising.” Journal of Marketing Management 19 (5–6): 657–673. doi: 10.1080/0267257X.2003.9728230.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fannon, Tara. 2016. “Out of Sight, Still in Mind: Visually Impaired Women's Embodied Accounts of Ideal Femininity.” Disability Studies Quarterly 36 (1). doi:https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v36i1.4326.
   Google Scholar
• Ganahl, Dennis J., and Mark Arbuckle. 2001. “The Exclusion of Persons with Physical Disabilities from Prime Time Television Advertising: A Two Year Quantitative Analysis.” Disability Studies Quarterly 21 (2). doi: 10.18061/dsq.v21i2.278.
   Google Scholar
• Garland Thomson, Rosemarie. 1996. Freakery, Cultural Spectacles of the Extraordinary Body. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garland Thomson, Rosemarie. 1997. “Feminist Theory, the Body, and the Disabled Figure.” In The Disability Studies Reader, edited by Lennard Davis, 279–295. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Garland Thomson, Rosemarie. 2001. Re-shaping, Re-thinking, Re-defining: Feminist Disability Studies. Washington: Centre for Women’s Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Garland Thomson, Rosemarie. 2002. “The Politics of Staring: Visual Rhetorics of Disability in Popular Photography.” In Disability Studies: Enabling the Humanities, edited by Sharon Snyder, Brenda Jo Brueggemann and Rosemarie Garland Thomson, 56–75. New York: Modern Language Association.
   Google Scholar
• Garland Thomson, Rosemarie. 2009. Staring: How We Look. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garland Thomson, Rosemarie. 2011. “Integrating Disability, Transforming Feminist Theory.” In Feminist Disability Studies, edited by Kim Hall, 13–48. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garland Thomson, Rosemarie. 2014. “Feminist Disability Studies.” Signs 30 (2): 1557–1587. https://doi.org/10.1086/423352.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, Rosalind. 2007. Gender and the Media. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, Rosalind. 2008. “Empowerment/Sexism: Figuring Female Sexual Agency in Contemporary Advertising.” Feminism and Psychology 18 (1): 35–60. doi: 10.1177/0959353507084950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, Robert. 1992. Reading Ads Socially. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grue, Jan. 2009. “Critical Discourse Analysis, Topoi and Mystification: Disability Policy Documents from a Norwegian NGO.” Discourse & Society 11 (3): 305–328. doi: 10.1177/1461445609102446.
   Google Scholar
• Grue, Jan. 2011. “Discourse Analysis and Disability: Some Topics and Issues.” Discourse & Society 22 (5): 532–546. doi: 10.1177/0957926511405572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grue, Jan. 2015. Disability and Discourse Analysis. Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, Harlan. 1987. “Advertising the Acceptably Employable Image: Disability and Capitalism.” Policy Studies Journal 15 (3): 551–570. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1987.tb00729.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haller, Beth. 2010. Representing Disability in an Ableist World: Essays on Mass Media. Louisville, KY: The Advocado Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haller, Beth, and Sue Ralph. 2006. “Are Disability Images in Advertising Becoming Bold and Daring? An Analysis of Prominent Themes in US and UK Campaigns.” Disability Studies Quarterly 26 (3). doi: 10.18061/dsq.v26i3.716.
   Google Scholar
• Heiss, Sarah. 2011. “Locating the Bodies of Women and Disability in Definitons of Beauty: An Analysis of Dove’s Campaign for Real Beauty.” Disability Studies Quarterly 31 (1). doi:https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v31i1.1367.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, Ella. 2016. “‘Mabel is Unstable’: A Feminist Disability Studies Perspective on Early-Twentieth-Century Representations of Disabled Women in Advertisements.” Considering Disability 1(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.17774/cdj12014.6.20575874.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, Bill, Rachel Russell, and Kevin Paterson. 2005. “Nothing to be Had ‘Off The Peg’: Consumption, Identity and the Immobilization of Young Disabled People.” Disability & Society 20 (1): 3–17. doi: 10.1080/096875904200028360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohrs, Kirsten, and Rosalind Gill. 2018. “Confident Appearing: Revisiting ‘Gender Advertisements’ in Contemporary Culture.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language, Gender and Sexuality, edited by Judith Baxter and Jo Angouri. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leiss, William, Stephen Kline, Sut Jhally, and Jacqueline Botterill. 2005. Social Communication in Advertising: Consumption in the Mediated Marketplace, 3rd ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McKee, Alan. 2003. Textual Analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, David, and Sharon Snyder. 2000. Narrative Prosthesis: Disability and the Dependencies of Discourse. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, David, and Sharon Snyder. 2015. The Biopolitics of Disability. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, Jenny. 1991. Pride Against Prejudice. London: The Women’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, Jenny. 1992. “Personal and Political: A Feminist Perspective on Researching Physical Disability.” Disability, Handicap & Society 7 (2): 157–166. doi: 10.1080/02674649266780181.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, Jenny. 1993. “Feminism and Disability.” Feminist Review 43: 57–70. doi: 10.2307/1395069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, Jenny. 1996. Encounters with Strangers: Feminism and Disability. London: The Women’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paxson, Peyton. 2018. Mass Communications and Media Studies: An Introduction, 2nd ed. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, Donna. 2002. “Negotiating Psycho-Emotional Dimensions of Disability and their Influence on Identity Constructions.” Disability & Society 17 (5): 493–508. doi: 10.1080/09687590220148487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, Donna. 2006. “Towards a Psychology of Disability: The Emotional Effects of Living in a Disabling Society.” Disability and Psychology: Critical Introductions and Reflections, edited by Dan Goodley and Rebecca Lawthom, 94–107. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, Donna. 2014. “Psycho-emotional Disablism and Internalised Oppression.” Disabling Barriers – Enabling Environments, edited by John Swain, Sally French, Colin Barnes and Carol Thomas, 92–98. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ribbens, Jane, and Rosalind Edwards. 1998. “Introducing our Voices: Living on the Edges.” In Feminist Dilemmas in Qualitative Research, edited by Jane Ribbens and Rosalind Edwards, 1–23. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Riessman, Catherine K. 2003. “Narrative Analysis.” In The Sage Encyclopaedia of Social Science Research Methods, Vol 3, edited by Michael S. Lewis-Beck, Alan Bryman and Tim Futing Liao 705–9. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, Ellen. 2011. “Critical Divides: Judith Butler’s Body Theory and the Question of Disability.” In Feminist Disability Studies, edited by Kim Hall, 48–67. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, Linda. 1994. “Images in Advertising: The Need for a Theory of Visual Rhetoric”. Journal of Consumer Research 21 (2): 252–273. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/209396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, Tom. 1994. “Cultural Representations of Disabled People: Dustbins for Disavowal?” Disability & Society 9 (3): 283–299. doi: 10.1080/09687599466780341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, Tom, and Nick Watson. 2002. “Well, I Know this is Going to Sound Very Strange to You, but I Don't See Myself as a Disabled Person: Identity and disability” Disability & Society 17 (5): 509–527. doi: 10.1080/09687590220148496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheenan, Kim B. 2014. Controversies in Contemporary Advertising. California, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, Don. 1998. “Analysing Cultural Objects: Content Analysis and Semiotics.” In Researching Society and Culture, edited by Clive Seale 233–244. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sprague, Joey. 2018. Feminist Methodologies for Critical Researchers: Bridging Differences, 2nd ed. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Carol. 1997. “The Baby and the Bath Water: Disabled Women and Motherhood in Social Context.” Sociology of Health and Illness 19 (5): 622–643. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.1997.tb00423.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, Carol. 1999. Female Forms: Experiencing and Understanding Disability. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wendell, Susan. 1996. The Rejected Body. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wendell, Susan. 1997. “Toward a Feminist Theory of Disability.” In The Disability Studies Reader, edited by Lennard Davis, 260–279. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Westmarland, Nicole. 2001. “The Quantitative/Qualitative Debate and Feminist Research: A Subjective View of Objectivity.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 2 (1): 13–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-2.1.974.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, Judith. 1978. Decoding Advertisements. London: Marion Boyars. Yeshin, Tony. 2011. Advertising. Singapore: Seng Lee Press.
   Google Scholar