Doing it differently: emancipatory autism studies within a neurodiverse academic space

References

• Arnold, L. 2016. The Application of Video in the Education of Autistic Adults (Doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham).
   Google Scholar
• Barton, L. 2005. “Emancipatory Research and Disabled People: some Observations and Questions.” Educational Review 57 (3):317–327. doi:10.1080/00131910500149325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bone, K. M. 2017. “Trapped Behind the Glass: Crip Theory and Disability Identity.” Disability & Society 32 (9):1297–1314. doi:10.1080/09687599.2017.1313722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branfield, F. 1998. “What Are You Doing Here?” a Response to Robert F Drake.” Disability & Society 13 (1):143–144. doi:10.1080/09687599826966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branfield, F. 1999. “The Disability Movement: A Movement of Disabled People: A Response to Paul S Duckett.” Disability & Society 14 (3):399–403. doi:10.1080/09687599926226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratton, K. A., and L. P. Ray. 2002. “Descriptive Representation, Policy Outcomes, and Municipal Day-Care Coverage in Norway.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (2):428–437. doi:10.2307/3088386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, E., and C. L. Selfe. 2014. “Creating a Culture of Access in Composition Studies.” Composition Studies 422:151–154.
   Google Scholar
• Cargo, M., & Mercer, S. L. 2008. “The Value and Challenges of Participatory Research: Strengthening its Practice.” Annu. Rev. Public Health, 29, 325–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celis, K., and S. Childs. 2008. “Introduction: The Descriptive and Substantive Representation of Women: New Directions.” Parliamentary Affairs 61 (3):419–425. doi:10.1093/pa/gsn006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celis, K., S. Childs, J. Kantola, and M. L. Krook. 2008. “Rethinking Women's Substantive Representation.” Representation 44 (2):99–110. doi:10.1080/00344890802079573.
   Google Scholar
• Chaloupka, E. 2015. “Imagining Cognitive Disability: Recursive Reading and Viewing Processes in Henry H. Goddard’s the Kallikak Family: A Study in the Heredity of Feeblemindedness.” CEA Critic 77 (3):269–277. doi:10.1353/cea.2015.0026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childs, S., and J. Lovenduski. 2013. “Political representation.” In The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics, edited by Georgina Waylen, Karen Celis, Johanna Kantola, and S. Laurel Weldon
   Google Scholar
• Chown, N., J. Robinson, L. Beardon, J. Downing, L. Hughes, J. Leatherland, … D. MacGregor 2017. “Improving Research About Us, With Us: A Draft Framework for Inclusive Autism Research.” Disability & Society 32 (5):720–734. doi:10.1080/09687599.2017.1320273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cilliers, F., and H. Greyvenstein. 2012. “The Impact of Silo Mentality on Team Identity: An Organisational Case Study.” SA Journal of Industrial Psychology 38 (2):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Cooks, L., and J. T. Warren. 2011. “SomeBodies(') in School: Introduction.” Text and Performance Quarterly 31 (3):211–216. doi:10.1080/10462937.2011.573183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danieli, A., and C. Woodhams. 2005. “Emancipatory Research Methodology and Disability: A Critique.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8 (4):281–296. doi:10.1080/1364557042000232853.
   Google Scholar
• Dinishak, J. 2016. “The Deficit View and Its Critics.” Disability Studies Quarterly 36 (4).
   Google Scholar
• Duckett, P. 1998. “What Are You Doing Here?”’Non Disabled; People and the Disability Movement: A Response to Fran Branfield.” Disability & Society 13 (4):625–628. doi:10.1080/09687599826641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher-Watson, S., Adams, J., Brook, K., Charman, T., Crane, L., Cusack, J., Leekam, S., Milton, D., Parr, J. R., and Pellicano, E. 2018. Making the future together: Shaping autism research through meaningful participation. Autism, 1–11. doi:10.1177/1362361318786721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. [1976] 1979. The History of Sexuality Volume 1: An Introduction. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel, and Jay Miskowiec. 1986. “Of Other Spaces.” Diacritics 16 (1):22–27. doi:10.2307/464648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garland Thomson, R. 1996. Freakery: Cultural Spectacles of the Extraordinary Body. New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garland Thomson, R. 1997. Extraordinary Bodies: Figuring Physical Disability in American Culture and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, L. 2014. “With’ Not ‘About’ – Emerging Paradigms for Research in a Cross-Cultural Space.” International Journal of Research & Method in Education 37 (4):376–389. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2014.909401.
   Google Scholar
• Halperin, D. M. 1995. Saint Foucault: Towards a Gay Hagiography. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Happé, F. G. 1993. “Communicative Competence and Theory of Mind in Autism: A Test of Relevance Theory.” Cognition 48 (2):101–119. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(93)90026-R.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Happé, F., U. Frith, and J. Briskman. 2001. “Exploring the Cognitive Phenotype of Autism: Weak “Central Coherence” In Parents and Siblings of Children with Autism: I. Experimental Tests.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 42 (3):299–307. doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee. 2013. IACC/OARC Autism Spectrum Disorder Publications Analysis: The Global Landscape of Autism Research. Washington, DC: Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee, US Department of Health and Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• Jivraj, J.,. Sacrey, L.-A. A. NewtonNicholas, D., and L. Zwaigenbaum. 2014. “Assessing the Influence of Researcher–Partner Involvement on the Process and Outcomes of Participatory Research in Autism Spectrum Disorder and Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Scoping Review.” Autism 18 (7):782–793. doi:10.1177/1362361314539858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorde, A. 2012. Sister outsider: Essays and speeches. Crossing Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod, A. G., A. Lewis, and C. Robertson. 2014. “CHARLIE: PLEASE RESPOND!’ Using a Participatory Methodology with Individuals on the Autism Spectrum.” International Journal of Research & Method in Education 37 (4):407–420. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2013.776528.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, P., and E. Lombardo. 2010. “Towards a New Theory on the Symbolic Representation of Women.” Paper Presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, September, 2–5
   Google Scholar
• Milton, D. E. M. 2012. “On the Ontological Status of Autism: The ‘Double Empathy Problem.” Disability & Society 27 (6):883–887. doi:10.1080/09687599.2012.710008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milton, D., and M. Bracher. 2013. “Autistics Speak but Are They Heard?” Medical Sociology Online 7 (2):61–69.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C. J., and L. Kedan. 2012. Access All Areas: Live Art and Disability. London: Live Art Development Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, D., M. Lesser, and W. Lawson. 2005. “Attention, Monotropism and the Diagnostic Criteria for Autism.” Autism 9 (2):139–56. doi:10.1177/1362361305051398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. 2013. Practice as Research in the Arts. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, L. H. 1993. Epistemological Communities. In Alcoff, L. and Potter, E. (eds) Feminist Epistemologies. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• O'Dell, L., H. Bertilsdotter Rosqvist, C. Brownlow, F. Ortega, and M. Orsini. 2016. “Critical Autism Studies: exploring Epistemic Dialogues and Intersections, Challenging Dominant Understandings of Autism.” Disability & Society 31 (2):166–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odenstedt, A. 2005. “Gadamer on the Limits of Reflection.” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 36 (1):39–54. doi:10.1080/00071773.2005.11007463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 1992. “Changing the Social Relations of Research Production?” Disability, Handicap & Society 7 (2):101–114. doi:10.1080/02674649266780141.
   Google Scholar
• Pellicano, E., L. Crane, and K. Gaudion. 2017. Participatory Autism Research: A Starter Pack. London: UCL Institute of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Pellicano, L. 2014. “A Future Made Together: new Directions in the Ethics of Autism Research.” Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs 14 (3):200–204. doi:10.1111/1471-3802.12070_5.
   Google Scholar
• Pellicano, L., W. Mandy, S. Bölte., A. Stahmer, J. Lounds Taylor, and D. S. Mandell. 2018. “A New Era for Autism Research, and for Our Journal.” Autism : The International Journal of Research and Practice 22 (2):82–83. doi:10.1177/1362361317748556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymaker, D., and C. Nicolaidis. 2013. “Participatory Research With Autistic Communities.” In Worlds of Autism: Across the Spectrum of Neurological Difference., edited by J. Davidson and M. Orsini, 169–188. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Samek, A. A., and T. A. Donofrio. 2013. “Academic Drag’ and the Performance of the Critical Personae: An Exchange on Sexuality, Politics, and Identity in the Academy.” Women's Studies in Communication 36 (1):28–55. doi:10.1080/07491409.2012.754388.
   Google Scholar
• Seale, J., M. Nind, E. Tilley, and R. Chapman. 2015. “Negotiating a Third Space for Participatory Research with People with Learning Disabilities: An Examination of Boundaries and Spatial Practices.” European Journal of Social Science Research 28 (4):483–497. doi:10.1080/13511610.2015.1081558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silfver, E., M. Jacobsson, L. Arnell, H. Bertilsdotter-Rosqvist, M. Härgestam, M. Sjöberg, and U. Widding. 2019. “Classroom Bodies: Affect, Body Language, and Discourse When Schoolchildren Encounter National Tests in Mathematics.” Gender and Education 14 (1):139–155.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, J. 2010. “Cultural Commentary: Being Autistic Together.” Disability Studies Quarterly 30 (1).
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. J., P. Flowers, and M. Larkin. 2009. Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. London: Sage Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. 2010. This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 35 (5):601–617. doi:10.1177/0162243910377624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinbock, A. J. 1997. “Back to the Things Themselves. Introduction.” Human Studies 20 (2):127–135. doi:10.1023/A:1005350727295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, E., and M. Priestley. 1996. “Parasites, Pawns and Partners: disability Research and the Role of Non-Disabled Researchers.” British Journal of Sociology 47 (4):699–716. doi:10.2307/591081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltz, M. 2009. “Participatory and Emancipatory Autism Research: What’s the Problem?” Presented at Autism 2006 Virtual Conference. http://www.awares.org/conferences/print_paper.asp?section=000100010001&conferenceCode=000200020009&id=82
   Google Scholar
• Warner, M. 1993. “Introduction.” In Fear of a Queer Planet: Queer Politics and Social Theory., pp vii–xxxi, edited by M. Warner. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, R., D. Milton, L. Arnold, and S. Graby. 2018. “Redefining Critical Autism Studies: A More Inclusive Interpretation.” Disability & Society 33 (6):974–979. doi:10.1080/09687599.2018.1454380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarb, G. 1992. “On the Road to Damascus: First Steps towards Changing the Relations of Disability Research Production.” Disability, Handicap & Society 7 (2):125–138. doi:10.1080/02674649266780161.
   Google Scholar