‘It is like being put through a blender’: inclusive research in practice in an Australian university

References

• Banks, Sarah, Andrea Armstrong, Kathleen Carter, Helen Graham, Peter Hayward, Alex Henry, Tessa Holland, Claire Holmes, Amelia Lee, Ann McNulty, et al. 2013. “Everyday Ethics in Community-Based Participatory Research.” Contemporary Social Science 8 (3):263–277. doi:10.1080/21582041.2013.769618.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, L. 2010. “Response.” British Journal of Sociology Education 31 (5):642–650. doi:10.1080/01425692.2010.500095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigby, C., P. Frawley, and P. Ramcharan. 2014. “Conceptualizing Inclusive Research with People with Intellectual Disability.” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 27 (1):3–12. doi:10.1111/jar.12083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, R., J. Amernic, and D. Tourish. 2014. “Perverse Audit Culture and Accountabiliyt of the Modern Public University.” Financial Accountability & Management 20 (1):1–24. doi:10.1111/faam.12025.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, E., and C. Vaughan. 2018. "Social action for social change" In Ethics in Participatory Research for Health and Social Well-Being, Cases and Commentaries. edited by S. Banks and M. Brydon-Miller, 181–206. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, J. 1998. “Feminist Solidarity, Reflective Solidarity.” Women & Politics 18 (4):1–26. doi:10.1300/J014v18n04_01.
   Google Scholar
• Durell, S. 2016. “Welcome to the Real World” Inclusive Research with People with Learning Disabilities: A Doctoral Journey.” The Qualitative Report 21 (12):2308–2330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, R. 2016. “Achieving and Evidencing Research ‘Impact’? Tensions and Dilemmas from an Ethic of Care Perspective.” Area 48 (2):213–221. doi:10.1111/area.12256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, M. 2012. “Resuscitating Critical Psychology for “Revolting” Times.” Journal of Social Issues 68 (2):416–438. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2012.01756.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, A. 2005. “What Is Dialogical Research, and Why Should we Do It?” Qualitative Health Research 15 (7):964–974. doi:10.1177/1049732305279078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, M. 2016. “Placing Photovoice under Erasure: A Critical and Complicit Engagement with What It Theoretically Is (Not).” QSE. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 29 (5):670–685. doi:10.1080/09518398.2016.1145276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janes, J. 2016. “Democratic Encounters? Epistemic Privilege, Power, and Community-Based Participatory Action Research.” Action Research 14 (1):72–87. doi:10.1177/1476750315579129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liasidou, A. 2014. “Critical Disability Studies and Socially Just Change in Higher Education.” British Journal of Special Education 41 (2):120–135. doi:10.1111/1467-8578.12063.
   Google Scholar
• Lorde, A. 1982. "Learning from the 60s." In Sister Outsider: Essays & Speeches by Audre Lorde,. edited by A Lorde. Berkeley: California Crossing Press.
   Google Scholar
• May, R., D. Peetz, and G. Strachan. 2013. “The Casual Academic Workforce and Labour Market Segmentation in Australia.” Labour & Industry 23 (3):258–275. doi:10.1080/10301763.2013.839085.
   Google Scholar
• Nind, M. 2014. What Is Inclusive Research? [Electronic Resource]. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 1992. “Changing the Social Relations of Research Production?” Disability, Handicap & Society 7 (2):101–114. doi:10.1080/02674649266780141.
   Google Scholar
• Pain, R. 2014. “Impact: striking a Blow or Walking Together.” ACME: An International e-Journal for Critical Geographies 13 (1):19–23.
   Google Scholar
• Pitman, T. 2018. Higher education policy in 2018: Culture wars reignite, but in the end it's all about the money. The Conversation (Australia) sourced from https://theconversation.com/higher-education-policy-in-2018-culture-wars-reignite-but-in-the-end-its-all-about-the-money-109080
   Google Scholar
• Prainsack, B., and A. Buyx. 2017. "What is Solidarity?" In Solidarity in Biomedicine and Beyond. edited by B. Prainsack and A. Buyx, 43–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M., L. Waddington, and C. Bessozi. 2010. “Towards an Agenda for Disability Research in Europe: Learning from Disabled People's Organisations.” Disability & Society 25 (6):731–746. doi:10.1080/09687599.2010.505749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymaker, D. 2017. “Reflections of a Community-Based Participatory Researcher from the Intersection of Disability Advocacy, Engineering, and the Academy.” Action Research 15 (3):258–275. doi:10.1177/1476750316636669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, A., J. Brown, J. Smith, A. Cope, and S. Jamieson. 2018. “Ethical Dilemmas and Reflexivity in Qualitative Research.” Perspectives on Medical Education 7 (2):69–75. doi:10.1007/s40037-018-0412-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, V. 2013. “"Leaning in" as Imperfect Allies in Community Work.” Narrative and Conflict: Explorations in Theory and Practice 1 (1):53–75.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M., and J. Barroso. 2002. “Finding the Findings in Qualitative Studies.” Journal of Nursing Scholarship 34 (3):213–20. doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2002.00213.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholz, S. 2007. “Political Solidarity and Violent Resistance.” Journal of Social Philosophy 38 (1):38–52. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.2007.00365.x.
   Google Scholar
• Stack, E., and K. McDonald. 2018. " “We Are Both in Charde, the Academics and Self-Advocates": Empowerment in Community-Based Participatory Research.” Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities 15 (1):80–89. doi:10.1111/jppi.12236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tregaskis, C., and D. Goodley. 2005. “Disability Research by Disabled and Non-Disabled People: Towards a Relational Methodology of Research Production.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8 (5):363–374. doi:10.1080/13645570500402439.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan, C., Edmonds, T. S. Baker, M. Marco, J. Zayas, A. Devine, L. Gill-Atkinson, M. MarellaGarcia, J. J. Salgado, and C. Sobritchea. 2015. “W-DARE: A Three-Year Program of Participatory Action Research to Improve the Sexual and Reproductive Health of Women with Disabilities in the Philippines.” BMC Public Health 15 (984):1–7. doi:10.1186/s12889-015-2308-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vaughan, C. 2014. "Participatory Research". In Qualitative Research in Clinical and Health Psychology., edited by Rohleder P. and A. Lyons, 257–278. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan, C., J. Zayas, M. Marella, T. Edmonds, J. Garcia, K. Bisda, J. Salgadao, and M. J. Marco. 2014. “Doing’ Action Research: Perspectives on Rationale, Rhetoric, Reality and Results.” Development Bulletin 76:22–26.
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, N., and B. Duran. 2008. The Theoretical, Historical, and Practice Roots of CBPR. In Community-Based Participatory Research for Health: From Process to Outcomes. edited by Minker M. and N. Wallerstein, 25–46. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Walmsley, J., and K. Johnson. 2003. Inclusive Research with People with Learning Disabilities. [Electronic Resource]: past, Present, and Futures. Philadelphia, PA; London: J. Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Warr, D., H. Dickinson, S. Olney, J. Hargrave, A. Karanikolas V. Kasidis, G. Katsikis, J. Ozge, D. Peters, J. Wheeler, and M. Wilcox. 2017. Choice, Control and the NDIS: service Users' Perspectives on Having Choice and Control in the New National Disability Insurance Scheme. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, G. 2012. “The Disciplining Effects of Impact Evaluation Practices: negotiating the Pressures of Impact within an ESRC-DFID Project.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 37 (4):489–495. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00494.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarb, G. 1992. “On the Road to Damascus: first Steps towards Changing the Relations of Disability Research Production.” Disability, Handicap & Society 7 (2):125–138. doi:10.1080/02674649266780161.
   Google Scholar