3,926
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Disability, socialism and autonomy in the 1970s: case studies from Denmark, Sweden and the United Kingdom

ORCID Icon
Pages 1637-1659 | Received 07 Nov 2017, Accepted 06 Apr 2019, Published online: 08 May 2019

Archival sources

  • LBA (Lone Barsøe’s Private Archive), Kolding, Denmark.
  • VEA (Vilhelm Ekensteen’s Private Archive), Lund, Sweden.

Interviews

Periodicals

References

  • Anti-Handikapp. 1969. “Arbetsgruppernas Sammansättning – AH:s Stormöte Den 23/9 1969.” Vilhelm Ekensteen’s Private Archive (VEA).
  • Bahner, Julia. 2012. “Legal Rights or Simply Wishes? The Struggle for Sexual Recognition of People with Physical Disabilities Using Personal Assistance in Sweden.” Sexuality and Disability 30 (3): 337–356. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-012-9268-2.
  • Bahner, Julia. 2015. “Sexual Professionalism: For Whom? the Case of Sexual Facilitation in Swedish Personal Assistance Services.” Disability & Society 30 (5): 788–801. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2015.1021761.
  • Bahner, Julia. 2016. “Risky Business? Organizing Sexual Facilitation in Swedish Personal Assistance Services.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 18 (2): 164–175. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15017419.2015.1063540.
  • Bahner, Julia. 2018. “Cripping Sex Education: Lessons Learned from a Programme Aimed at Young People with Mobility Impairments.” Sex Education 18 (6): 640–654. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2018.1456417.
  • Barnes, Colin. 1991. Disabled People in Britain and Discrimination: A Case for Anti-Discrimination Legislation. London: Hurst.
  • Barnes, Colin. 1999. “Disability Studies: New or Not So New Directions?” Disability & Society 14 (4): 577–580. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599926136.
  • Berg, Susanne. 2005. “Personal Assistance Reforms in Sweden: Breaking the Assumption of Dependency.” In The Social Model of Disability: Europe and the Majority World, edited by Colin Barnes and Geof Mercer, 32–48. Leeds: The Disability Press.
  • Berg, Susanne. 2007. DHR: 80 år av rörelse. Stockholm: DHR.
  • Briggs, Anna. 1979. “Disabled Women.” Spare Rib Magazine 80 (14–16): 28.
  • Campbell, Jane, and Mike Oliver. 1996. Disability Politics: Understanding Our Past, Changing Our Future. London: Routledge.
  • Dværgeforeningen. 2007. Landsforeningen for Vaeksthaemmede bliver til Dværgeforeningen. Press Release, 3 June. Accessed June 7, 2011. http://lfvdk.dk/wp-content/uploads/sites/5765/2015/01/Pressemeddelelse_DVF_juni_07.pdf.
  • Earle, Sarah. 1999. “Facilitated Sex and the Concept of Sexual Need: Disabled Students and Their Personal Assistants.” Disability & Society 14 (3): 309–323. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599926163.
  • Ekensteen, Vilhelm. 1968. Påfolkhemmets bakgård: En debattbok om de handikappades situation. Uppsala: Verdandi.
  • Ekensteen, Vilhelm. 1990. “Påfolkhemmets bakgård & Anti-Handikapp: Ett tjugoårsperspektiv.” In Den oändliga vandringen, edited by Bo Andersson, Claes Olsson, and Erik Ransemar, 103–113. Södertälje: Fingraf.
  • Enby, Gunnel. 1972. Vimåste få älska: En bok om handikappade. Stockholm: Prisma.
  • Enby, Gunnel. 1975. Let There be Love: Sex and the Handicapped. Translated from the Swedish by Irène D. Morris. London: Elek/Pemberton.
  • Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
  • Fritsch, Kelly, Robert Heynen, Amy Nicole Ross, and Emily van der Meulen. 2016. “Disability and Sex Work: Developing Affinities through Decriminalization.” Disability & Society 31 (1): 84–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2016.1139488.
  • Gleeson, B. J. 1997. “Disability Studies: A Historical Materialist View.” Disability & Society 12 (2): 179–202. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599727326.
  • Grönvik, Lars. 2007. Definitions of Disability in Social Sciences: Methodological Perspectives. Uppsala: Uppsala University. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-7803.
  • Guter, Bob, and John R. Killacky, eds. 2004. Queer Crips: Disabled Gay Men and Their Stories. New York: Harrington Park.
  • Holder, Harold D., ed. 1998. European Integration and Nordic Alcohol Policies: Changes in Alcohol Controls and Consequences in Finland, Norway and Sweden, 1980–1997. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
  • Hunt, Paul. 1966. “A Critical Condition.” In Stigma: The Experience of Disability, edited by Paul Hunt, 145–159. London: Geoffrey Chapman.
  • Jagose, Annamarie. 1996. Queer Theory: An Introduction. New York: New York University Press.
  • Kafer, Alison. 2013. Feminist, Queer, Crip. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Kirkebæk, Birgit. 2001. Normaliseringens periode: Danskåndssvageforsorg 1940–1970 med saerligt fokuspå forsorgschef N.E. Bank-Mikkelsen ogudviklingen af Statens Åndssvageforsorg 1959–1970. Copenhagen: SocPol.
  • Kirkebæk, Birgit. 2013. “Det historisk flyttelige handicapbegreb.” In Handicapforståelser: Mellem teori, erfaring og virkelighed, edited by Inge Storgaard Bonfils, Birgit Kirkebæk, Leif Olsen, and Susan Tetler, 17–33. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.
  • Kulick, Don. 2005. “Four Hundred Thousand Swedish Perverts.” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 11 (2): 205–235. doi:https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-11-2-205.
  • Kulick, Don. 2014. “Danes Call People with Down Syndrome'Mongol': Politically Incorrect Language and Ethical Engagement.” In Byen og blikkets lyst: Festskrift til Henning Bech, edited by Marie Bruvik Heinskou and Morten Emmerik Wøldike, 85–105. Copenhagen: Centrum for Seksualitetsforskning.
  • Kulick, Don, and Jens Rydström 2015. Loneliness and Its opposite: Sex, Disability, and the Ethics of Engagement. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Lennerhed, Lena. 2014. “Sexual Liberalism in Sweden.” In Sexual Revolutions, edited by Gert Hekma and Alain Giami, 25–45. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Lindholm, Margareta, and Arne Nilsson. 2002. En annan stad: Kvinnligt och manligt homoliv 1950–1980. Stockholm: Alfabeta/Anamma.
  • Linton, Simi. 1998a. Claiming Disability: Knowledge and Identity. New York: New York University Press.
  • Linton, Simi. 1998b. “Disability Studies/Not Disability Studies.” Disability & Society 13 (4): 525–540. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599826588.
  • LSS-utredningen. 2018. Översyn av insatser enligt LSS och assistansersättningen. Statens Offentliga Utredningar (SOU) 2018:88. Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik.
  • McRuer, Robert. 2006. Crip Theory: Cultural Signs of Queerness and Disability. New York: New York University Press.
  • McRuer, Robert, and Anna Mollow, eds. 2012. Sex and Disability. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Morris, Jenny. 1989. Able Lives: Women’s Experience of Paralysis. London: Women’s Press.
  • Nirje, Bengt. 1999. “How I Came to Formulate the Normalization Principle.” In A Quarter-Century of Normalization and Social Role Valorization: Evolution and Impact, edited by Robert J. Flynn and Raymond A. Lemay, 17–47. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
  • Nordiska Läkemedelsnämnden. 1989. Drug Monitoring in the Nordic Countries: An Evaluation of Similarities and Differences. Uppsala: NLM.
  • Oliver, Michael. 1990. The Politics of Disablement. London: Macmillan Education.
  • Owens, Tuppy. 1980. Take Me, I’m Yours! A Guide to Female Psychology. Edinburgh: Paul Harris Publishing.
  • Rydström, Jens. 2019. “Vanföreställningar: Moderniseringen av funktionshinder på 1950-talet.” In Det lyckliga 1950-talet, edited by Anders Burman and Bosse Holmqvist. Höör, Sweden: Symposion.
  • Sandahl, Carrie. 2003. “Queering the Crip or Cripping the Queer: Intersections of Queer and Crip Identities in Solo Autobiographical Performances.” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 9 (1-2): 25–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-9-1-2-25.
  • Sanders, Teela. 2007. “The Politics of Sexual Citizenship: Commercial Sex and Disability.” Disability & Society 22 (5): 439–455. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590701427479.
  • Shakespeare, Tom. 2000. “Disabled Sexuality: Towards Rights and Recognition.” Sexuality and Disability 18 (3): 159–166. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026409613684.
  • Shakespeare, Tom. 2013. Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.
  • Shakespeare, Tom, and Nicholas Watson. 1997. “Defending the Social Model.” Disability & Society 12 (2): 293–300. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599727380.
  • Shakespeare, Tom, Kath Gillespie-Sells, and Dominic Davies. 1996. The Sexual Politics of Disability: Untold Desires. London: Cassell.
  • Shildrick, Margrit. 2009. Dangerous Discourses of Disability, Subjectivity and Sexuality. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Shuttleworth, Russell, and Teela Sanders, eds. 2010. Sex & Disability: Politics, Identity and Access. Cambridge, UK: Disability Press.
  • Skilbrei, May-Len, and Charlotta Holmström. 2013. Prostitution Policy in the Nordic Region: Ambiguous Sympathies. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
  • Socialstyrelsen. 2007. “Socialstyrelsens Termbank. Definitions of ‘Disability’ (Funktionshinder) and ‘Impairment’ (Funktionsnedsättning).” Last decided upon in 2007. Accessed March 6, 2019. http://termbank.socialstyrelsen.se.
  • Söder, Mårten. 1980. Handikappbegreppet: En analys utifrån WHO:s begrepp och svensk debatt. Stockholm: Socialdepartementet.
  • Thunem, Judith. 1966. “The Invalid Mind.” In Stigma: The Experience of Disability, edited by Paul Hunt, 47–53. London: Geoffrey Chapman.
  • Tregaskis, Claire. 2002. “Social Model Theory: The Story so Far…” Disability & Society 17 (4): 457–470. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590220140377.
  • UPIAS. 1974. “Aims and Policy Statement.” Leeds Disability Archive. Accessed June 7, 2017. http://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/library/.
  • UPIAS. 1976. The Union of the Physically Impaired against Segregation and the Disability Alliance Discuss Fundamental Principles of Disability: Being a Summary of the Discussion Held on 22nd November, 1975, and Containing Commentaries from Each Organisation. London: Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation.
  • Vallgårda, Signild. 2003. Folkesundhed som politik: Danmark og Sverige fra 1930 til i dag. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
  • Vehmas, Simo. 2019. “Persons with Profound Intellectual Disability and Their Right to Sex.” Disability & Society. Published online January 16, 2019. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2018.1545110.
  • Wendell, Susan. 1996. The Rejected Body: Feminist Philosophical Reflections on Disability. New York: Routledge.