Unsettling research versus activism: how might critical disability studies disrupt traditional research boundaries?

References

• Association of Victims of Agent Orange 2018. Mid-term report of the Steering Committee, A Luoi district (2015-2020) (Document 06/Bc-HDC) [CrossRef
   Google Scholar
• Belone, Lorenda, Julie E. Lucero, Bonnie Duran, Greg Tafoya, Elizabeth A. Baker, Domin Chan, Charlotte Chang, Ella Greene-Moton, Michele A. Kelley, and Nina Wallerstein. 2016. “Community-Based Participatory Research Conceptual Model.” Qualitative Health Research 26(1): 117–35. doi: 10.1177/1049732314557084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clare, E. 2017. Brilliant Imperfection: Grappling with Cure. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. 2007. Southern Theory: The Global Dynamics of Knowledge in Social Science. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Dingo, Rebecca. 2008. “Making the “Unfit, Fit”: The Rhetoric of Mainstreaming in the World Bank's Commitment to Gender Equality and Disability Rights.” Wagadu: Intersecting Gender and Disability Perspectives in Rethinking Postcolonial Identities, 4: 116–131.
   Google Scholar
• Dolmage, J. T. 2017. Academic Ableism: Disability and Higher Education. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galer, D. 2018. Working towards Equity: Disability Rights, Activism, and Employment in Late Twentieth Century Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gammeltoft, T. M. 2014. Haunting Images: A Cultural account of Selective Reproduction in Vietnam. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaventa, John, and Gregory Barrett. 2012. “Mapping the Outcomes of Citizen Engagement.” World Development 40(12): 2399–410. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.05.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. 2013. “Dis/Entangling Critical Disability Studies.” Disability & Society 28(5): 631–44. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2012.717884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodley, D., and M. Moore. 2000. “Doing Disability Research: Activist Lives and the Academy.” Disability and Society 15(6): 861–82. doi: 10.1080/713662013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodley, D., and K. Runswick-Cole. 2012. “Decolonizing methodology: Disabled children as research managers and participant ethnographers.” In Inclusive Communities: A Critical Reader, edited by A. Azzopardi and S. Grech, 215–32. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D., and R. Lawthom. 2012. “Disability and Empire: Making Sense of Disability in Changing Economic Times.” In Creating a Society, edited by A. Matsui, O. Nagase, A. Sheldon, D. Goodley and Y. Sawada, 31–9. Leeds, UK: The Disability Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D., L. Rebecca, L. Kirsty, and K. Runswick-Cole. 2019. “Provocations for Critical Disability Studies.” Disability & Society 1: 1–26. Available at https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09687599.2019.1566889?needAccess=true doi: 10.1080/09687599.2019.1566889.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D., and L. Swartz. 2016. “The Place of Disability.” In Disability in the Global South, edited by S. Grech and K. Soldatic, 69–83. Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Grech, S. 2015. “Decolonising Eurocentric Disability Studies: Why Colonialism Matters in the Disability and Global South Debate.” Social Identities 21(1): 6–21. doi: 10.1080/13504630.2014.995347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraldsdottir, F. 2013. “Simply Children. In Disabled Children's Childhood Studies: Critical Approaches in a Global Context, edited by T. Curran and K. Runswick-Cole, 13–21. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, E. 2017. Curative Violence: Rehabilitating Disability, Gender, and Sexuality in Modern Korea. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirby, S. L., L. Greaves, and C. Reid. 2006. Experience Research Social Change: Methods beyond the Mainstream. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knodel, J., Vu Manh Loi, Rukmalie Jayakody, and Vu Tuan Huy. 2004. Gender Roles in the Family: Change and Staibility in Vietnam. Michigan: University of Michigan, Population Studies Center at the Institute for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Lynellyn, Long. 2000. Le Ngoc Hung, Allison Truitt, Le Thi Phuong Mai, and Dang Nguyen Anh. Changing Gender Relations in Vietnam's Post Doi Moi Era. Washington DC: doi:World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Michael F. 2009. “Vietnamese Victims of Agent Orange and US-Vietnam Relations.” Congressional Research Service. Retrieved from https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL34761.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C., N. de Lange, and R. Moletsane. 2017. “Project Design: Beginning with the End in Mind.” In Participatory Visual Methodologies: Social Change, Community and Policy, edited by C. Mitchell, N. de Lange and R. Moletsane, 19–45. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty, C. 1988. “Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses.” Feminist Review 30: 49–74.
   Google Scholar
• Morgenbesser, L., and M. L. Weiss. 2018. “Survive and Thrive: Field Research in Authoritarian Southeast Asia.” Asian Studies Review 42: 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, X. T. 2015. The Journey to Inclusion. Rotterdam/Boston/Taipei: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, X. T. 2016. “Girls with Disabilities in the Global South: Rethinking the Politics of Engagement.” Girlhood Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal 9: 53–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, X. T. 2018. “Critical Disability Studies at the Edge of Global Development: Why Do we Need to Engage with Southern Theory?” Canadian Journal of Disability Studies 7(1): 1–25. doi: 10.15353/cjds.v7i1.400.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, X. T., forthcoming. Unsettling “inclusion” in the global South: A post-colonial and intersectional approach to disability, gender, and education. In Schuelk, M. J., C. Johnstone, G. Thomas, & A. Artiles (Eds.). Handbook of Inclusion and Diversity in Education. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, X. T., and P. Johnson. 2016. “Transnational Conversations in the Context of Disability Rights: building the Potential for Global Activism.” Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal 1(3): 396–410. doi: 10.1080/23802014.2016.1248232.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, X. T., C. Mitchell, N. de Lange, and K. Fritsch. 2015. “Engaging Girls with Disabilities in Vietnam: making Their Voices Count.” Disability and Society 30(5): 773–87. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2015.1051515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishida, A. 2018. “Critical Disability Praxis.” In Manifestos for the Future of Critical Disability Studies, 239–247. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pham, D. N. 2005. “Confucianism and the Conception of the Law in Vietnam.” Asian Socialism and Legal Change: The Dynamics of Vietnamese and Chinese Reform :76–90.
   Google Scholar
• Rioux, M. H., P. C. Pinto, and G. Parekh. 2015. Advancing Rights: Politics of Disability, Monitoring and Social Change. Toronto, ON: Canadian Scholars' Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodo-de-Zarate, Maria, and M. Baylina. 2018. “Intersectionality in Feminist Geographies.” Gender, Place & Culture 25(4): 547–53. doi: 10.1080/0966369X.2018.1453489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan, A. 1980. Michel Foucault: The Will to Truth. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. T. 1999. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. New York, NY: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Socialist Republic of Vietnam 2003. The Comprehensive Poverty Reduction and Growth Strategy. Socialist Republic of Vietnam. Retrieved from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTVIETNAM/Overview/20270134/cprgs_finalreport_Nov03.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Socialist Republic of Vietnam (SRV). 2010. Law on Persons with Disabilities (51/2010/Qh12). Hanoi, Vietnam: Labour and Society Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Stienstra, D., and X. T. Nguyen, forthcoming. “Opening to the Possible: Girls and Women with Disabilities Engaging in Vietnam.” In Creating Spaces for Engagement, edited by S. M. Wiebe and L. Levac. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swarr, A. L. and R. Nagar, eds. 2012. Critical Transnational Feminist Praxis. New York: Sunny Press.
   Google Scholar
• Takamine, Y. 2004. "Disability Issues in East Asia: Review and Ways Forward." Working Paper, World Bank. Paper No. 2004
   Google Scholar
• Tuck, E., and K. W. Yang. 2012. “Decolonization Is Not a Metaphor.” Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education and Society 1: 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2012. “Thematic study on the issue of violence against women and girls and disability.” http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Disability/ThematicStudyViolenceAgainstWomenGirls.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2017. Situation of Women and Girls with Disabilities and the Status of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the Optional Protocol Thereto. https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/news/dspd/women-and-girls-with-disabilities-crpd.html
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. n.d. Indigenous Peoples at the UN. Available at https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/about-us.html
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. 2002. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wells-Dang, A. 2011. Informal Pathbreakers: Civil Society Networks in China and Vietnam. Doctoral thesis, University of Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Wiebe, S. M., and L. Levac. Forthcoming. Creating Spaces of Engagement: Expanding Ideas and Practices of Deliberative Democracy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press
   Google Scholar