Theorising disability: a practical and representative ontology of learning disability

References

• Areheart, B. 2008. “When Disability Isn’t ‘Just Right’: The Entrenchment of the Medical Model of Disability and the Goldilocks Dilemma.” Indiana Law Journal 83(1): 181–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K., 2003. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3): 801–831. doi:10.1086/345321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigby, C. and M. Knox, 2009. “I Want to See the Queen”: Experiences of Service Use by Ageing People with an Intellectual Disability. Australian Social Work, 62(2): 216–231. doi:10.1080/03124070902748910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigby, C. 2010. “A Five‐Country Comparative Review of Accommodation Support Policies for Older People with Intellectual Disability.” Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities 7(1): 3–15. doi:10.1111/j.1741-1130.2010.00242.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigwood, C. 1991. “Renaturalising the Body (with a Little Help from Merleau-Ponty).” Hypatia 6(3): 54–73. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1991.tb00255.x.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2012. “Nomadic Ethics.” In The Cambridge Companion to Deleuze, edited by D. W. Smith and H. Somers-Hall, 170–197. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burkitt, I. 1999. Bodies of Thought, Embodiment, Identity and Modernity. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, M., and C. Kagan. 2006. “Decoding Valuing People.” Disability & Society 21(4): 299–313. doi:10.1080/09687590600679899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 1993. Bodies That Matter. On the Discursive Limits of Sex. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, L. 2001. The Faces of Intellectual Disability, Philosophical Reflections. Bloomington: Indiana Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, J., E. Murphy, and K. Almack. 2017. “Liberal Individualism and Deluzian Rationality in Intellectual Disability.” Philosophy, Psychiatry and Psychology 24(4): 359–372. doi:10.1353/ppp.2017.0053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cluley, V. 2018. From “Learning Disability to Intellectual Disability”—Perceptions of the Increasing Use of the Term “Intellectual Disability” in Learning Disability Policy, Research and Practice. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46(1): 24–32. doi:10.1111/bld.12209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cluley, V. 2019. Becoming-care: Reframing Care Work as Flesh Work not Body Work. Culture and Organization, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman-Fountain, E., and J. McLaughlin. 2013. “The Interactions of Disability and Impairment.” Social Theory & Health 11(2): 133–150. doi:10.1057/sth.2012.21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corker, M. 1998. “Disability Discourse in a Post Modern World.” In Disability Reader, Social Science Perspectives, edited by T. Shakespeare. London: Continuum. p.221–233.
   Google Scholar
• Cumella, S. 2008. “New Public Management and Public Services for People with and Intellectual Disability: A Review of the Implementation of Valuing People in England.” Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities 5(3): 178–186. doi:10.1111/j.1741-1130.2008.00171.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. 1994. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. London: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. 1971. Better services for the mentally handicapped. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office. doi:10.1080/14759551.2019.1601724.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health & Social Care. 2018. “Care Act Statutory Guidance.” Updated February 12 2018. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/care-act-statutory-guidance/care-and-support-statutory-guidance
   Google Scholar
• Department of Work and Pensions. 2018. “Family Resources Survey 2016/17.” https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/692771/family-resources-survey-2016-17.pdf (Accessed November 2018)
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. 2001. Valuing People. A new strategy for learning disability for the 21st century. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. 2009. Valuing People Now. A new three year strategy for learning disabilities. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Descartes, R. (1640) 1968. Discourse on Method and the Meditations. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, S. 1998. “The Body as Object versus the Body as Subject: The Case of Disability.” Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy 1(1): 47–56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• EHRC/Equality and Human Rights Commission. 2017. Being Disabled in Britain: A Journey Less Equal. London: EHRC.
   Google Scholar
• Fyson, R. and L. Fox. 2014. Inclusion or Outcomes? Tensions in the Involvement of People with Learning Disabilities in Strategic Planning. Disability & Society, 29(2): 239–254. doi:10.1080/09687599.2013.776491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feely, M. 2016. “Disability Studies after the Ontological Turn: A Return to the Material World and Material Bodies without a Return to Essentialism.” Disability & Society 31(7): 863–883. doi:10.1080/09687599.2016.1208603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, C., and P. Withers. 2013. “‘I Don’t Know What a Proper Woman Means’: What Women with Intellectual Disability Think about Sex, Sexuality and Themselves.” British Journal of Learning Disabilities 41(1): 5–12. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3156.2011.00715.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2001. Madness and Civilisation: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason. London: Routledge Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Garland-Thompson, R. 2003. “Integrating Disability, Transforming Feminist Theory.” NWSA Journal 14(3): 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. 2007. “Becoming Rhizomatic Parents: Deleuze, Guattari and Disabled Babies.” Disability & Society 22(2): 145–60. doi:10.1080/09687590601141576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. 2011a. Disability Studies: An Interdisciplinary Introduction. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. 2011b. Self-Advocacy in the Lives of People with Learning Disabilities. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. 2014. Dis/Ability Studies. Theorising Disableism and Ableism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, A., 2014. Intellectual Disability or Learning Disability? Let's Talk Some More. Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 1(2): 142–147. doi:10.1080/23297018.2014.961527.
   Google Scholar
• Haigh, A., D. Lee, C. Shaw, M. Hawthorne, S. Chamberlain, D. W. Newman, Z. Clarke, and N. Beail. 2013. “What Things Make People with a Learning Disability Happy and Satisfied with Their Lives: An Inclusive Research Project.” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 26(1): 26–33. doi:10.1111/jar.12012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Her Majesty's Stationary Office (HMSO). 2005. Mental Capacity Act 2005, London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Her Majesty’s Stationary Office (HMSO). 2014. The Care Act 2014. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Her Majesty’s Stationary Office (HMSO). 2017. “Care and Support Statutory Guidance (Online).” Accessed December 2017. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/care-act-statutory-guidance/care-and-support-statutory-guidance
   Google Scholar
• Heywood, P. 2017. “The Ontological Turn.” Cambridge Encyclopaedia of Anthropology. http://www.anthroencyclopedia.com/entry/ontological-turn (Accessed November 2018)
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, B. 2004. “Disability and the Body.” In Disabling Barriers—Enabling Environments, edited by J. Swain. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, B., and K. Paterson. 1997. “The Social Model of Disability and the Disappearing Body: Towards a Sociology of Impairment.” Disability & Society 12(3): 325–340. doi:10.1080/09687599727209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leder, D. 1990. The Absent Body. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, J., and D. Goodley. 2008. “Seeking and Rejecting Certainty: Exposing the Sophisticated Lifeworlds of Parents of Disabled Babies.” Sociology 42(2): 317–335. doi:10.1177/0038038507087356.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. 1964. The Primacy of Perception. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mladenov, T. 2014. Critical Theory and Disability. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, A. 2008. Being Human: Reflections on Mental Distress in Society. Ross-on-Wye, UK: PCCS Books.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, J. 1997. “Care or Empowerment? A Disability Rights Perspective.” Social Policy & Administration 3(1): 54–60. doi:10.1111/1467-9515.00037.
   Google Scholar
• Nail, T. 2017. “What Is an Assemblage?” SubStance 46(1): 21–37. doi:10.3368/ss.46.1.21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nettleton, S., and J. Watson. 1998. The Body in Everyday Life. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 1990. The Politics of Disablement. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Palecek, M., and M. Risjord. 2012. “Relativism and the Ontological Turn within Anthropology.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43(1): 2–23. doi:10.1177/0048393112463335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilnick, A., J. Clegg, E. Murphy and K. Almack, 2010. Questioning the Answer: Questioning Style, Choice and Self-Determination in Interactions with Young People with Intellectual Disabilities. Sociology of health & illness, 32(3): 415–436. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01223.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Povee, K., B. J. Bishop, and L. D. Roberts. 2014. “The Uses of Photovoice with People with Intellectual Disabilities: Reflections, Challenges and Opportunities.” Disability & Society 29(6): 893–907. doi:10.1080/09687599.2013.874331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcal, C., K. R. Fisher, and C. Laragy. 2014. “Analysing Choice in Australian Individual Funding Disability Policies.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 73(1): 88–102. doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapley, M. 2004. The Social Construction of Intellectual Disability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Redley, M., and D. Weinberg. 2007. “Learning Disability and the Limits of Liberal Citizenship: Interactional Impediments to Political Empowerment.” Sociology of Health & Illness 29(5): 767–786. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01015.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. 2014. Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shildrick, M. 2015. ““Why Should Our Bodies End at the Skin?”: Embodiment, Boundaries and Somatechnics.” Hypatia 30(1): 13–29. doi:10.1111/hypa.12114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. 2004. “Disability and Impairment.” In Disabling Barriers—Enabling Environments, edited by J. Swain. London: Sage. 9-16.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, B. 2008. The Body & Society. 3rd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Walmsley, J. 2001. Normalisation, Emancipatory Research and Inclusive Research in Learning Disability. Disability & Society, 16(2): 187–205. doi:10.1080/09687590120035807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walmsley, J., and K. Johnson. 2003. Inclusive Research with People with Learning Disabilities. Past, Present and Futures. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, N. and S. Cunningham-Burley, eds. 2001. Reframing the Body. Hampshire: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Wendell, S. 1996. The Rejected Body. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Werner, S. 2012. “Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities: A Review of the Literature on Decision-Making since the Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities (CRPD).” Public Health Reviews 34(2): 1–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams, S. J., and G. Bendelow. 1998. The Lived Body. Sociological Themes, Embodied Issues. London: Routeledge.
   Google Scholar