‘He sees patients as lesser people’: exploring mental health service users’ critiques and appraisals of psychiatrists in Canada

References

• Adame, A. L., and L. M. Leitner. 2008. “Breaking out of the Mainstream: The Evolution of Peer Support Alternatives to the Mental Health System.” Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry 10(3):146–162.
   Google Scholar
• Ashcraft, L., and W. Anthony. 2008. “Eliminating Seclusion and Restraint in Recovery Oriented Crisis Services.” Psychiatric Services 59(10):1198–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. 2000. “What Have Madness and Psychiatric System Survivors Got to Do with Disability and Disability Studies?” Disability & Society 15:167–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. 2013. “Foreword.” In Mad Matters: A Critical Reader in Canadian Mad Studies, edited by B. A. LeFrançois, R. Menzies, and G. Reaume, ix–xii. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P., M. Nettle, and R. Perring. 2010. Towards a Social Model of Madness and Distress? Exploring What Service Users Say. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Burch, L. 2017. “A World without Down’s Syndrome? Online Resistance on Twitter: #Worldwithoutdowns and #Justaboutcoping.” Disability & Society 32:1085–1089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burstow, B. 2016. Psychiatry Interrogated: An Institutional Ethnography Anthology. (ed.). Burstow Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. 2009. “Methods.” In Handbook of Service User Involvement in Research, edited by J. Wallcraft, B. Schrank and M. Amering, 113–138. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, C., J. Azevedo, R. Ballen, and J. Poole. 2016. “A Kind of Collective Freezing Out: How Helping Professionals’ Regulatory Bodies Create ‘Incompetence’ and Increase Distress.” In Psychiatry Interrogated: An Institutional Ethnography Anthology, edited by B. Burstow, 41–62. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Coles, S., S. Keenan, and B. Diamond. 2013. Madness Contested: Power and Practice. Ross-on-Wye: PCCS Books.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• El Enany, N., G. Currie, and A. Lockett. 2013. “A Paradox in Healthcare Service Development: Professionalization of Service Users.” Social Science & Medicine 80:24–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner, A. 2017. “Survivor Research and Mad Studies: The Role and Value of Experiential Knowledge in Mental Health Research.” Disability & Society 32: 500–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, J., and G. Combs. 1996. Narrative Therapy: The Social Construction of Preferred Realities. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company. doi:10.1086/ahr/44.2.318.
   Google Scholar
• Garde-Hansen, J., and K. Gorton. 2013. Emotion Online: Theorizing Affect on the Internet. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gatson, S. 2011. “The Methods, Politics, and Ethics of Representation in Online Ethnography.” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln, 513–528. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Glasby, J., and P. Beresford. 2006. “Who Knows Best? Evidence-Based Practice and the Service User Contribution.” Critical Social Policy 26(1): 268–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1961. Asylums: Essays on the Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. New York, NY: Anchor Books, Doubleday and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14(3): 575–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, S. 1993. “Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What is ‘Strong Objectivity?”. In Feminist Epistemologies., edited by L. Alcoff and E. Potter, 49–82. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. 2004. “Introduction: Standpoint Theory as a Site of Political, Philosophic, and Scientific Debate.” In The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies., edited by S. Harding, 1–16. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hartsock, N. C. 2004. “The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism.” In The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies., edited by S. Harding, 35–53. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hine, C. 2008. “Virtual Ethnography: Modes, Varieties, Affordances.” In The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods, edited by N. Fielding, R. M. Lee, and G. Blank, 257–270. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, D. 2014. The Compleat Social Worker. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H. F., and S. Shannon. 2005. “Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis.” Qualitative Health Research 15(9): 1277–1288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, M. S., and J. M. Kilty. 2014. “Power, Control and Coercion: Exploring Hyper-Masculine Performativity by Private Guards in a Psychiatric Ward Setting.” In Power and the Psychiatric Apparatus: Repression, Transformation and Assistance., edited by D. Holmes, J. D. Jacob, and A Perron, 61–90. Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, M. S., and J. M. Kilty. 2016. “It’s for Their Own Good’: Techniques of Neutralization and Security Guard Violence against Psychiatric Patients.” Punishment & Society 18: 177–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, N., and T. Kelly. 2015. “Inconvenient Complications: On the Heterogeneities of Madness and Their Relationship to Disabilities.” In Madness, Distress and the Politics of Disablement., edited by H. Spandler, J. Anderson, and B. Sapey, 43–56. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, A. 2016. Embodied and Emotional Knowledge of Oppression: Positive Contributions of a Relational Feminist Standpoint Theory. Master’s Thesis: Carleton University.
   Google Scholar
• Kirmayer, L. 2000. “Broken Narratives: Clinical Encounters and the Poetics of Illness Experience.” In Narrative and the Cultural Construction of Illness and Healing, edited by C. Mattingly and L. Garro, 153–180. California: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kokushkin, M. 2014. “Standpoint Theory Is Dead, Long Live Standpoint Theory! Why Standpoint Thinking Should Be Embraced by Scholars Who Do Not Identify as Feminists?” Journal of Arts and Humanities 3: 8–20.
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. 2015. Netnography: Redefined. (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Landry, D. 2017. “Survivor Research in Canada: ‘Talking’ Recovery, Resisting Psychiatry, and Reclaiming Madness.” Disability & Society 32: 1437–1457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeFrançois, B. A., P. Beresford, and J. Russo. 2016. “Editorial: Destination Mad Studies.” Intersectionalities 5: 1–10. doi:10.1080/09687599.2016.1145380.
   Google Scholar
• LeFrançois, B. A., R. Menzies, and G. Reaume. 2013. Mad Matters: A Critical Reader in Canadian Mad Studies. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, S. J., A. Charnock, and J. Scutt. 2018. “Marketing ‘Madness’: Conceptualising Service User/Survivor Biographies in a Period of Deinstitutionalisation (1975–2014).” Disability & Society 33: 849–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montenegro, C. R. 2018. “Beyond Participation: Politics, Incommensurability and the Emergence of Mental Health Service Users’ Activism in Chile.” Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry 42(3): 605–626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, J., and P. A. Field. 1995. Qualitative Research Methods for Health Professionals. 2nd ed. London: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Muir-Cochrane, E., and A. Gerace. 2014. “Containment Practices in Psychiatric Care.” In Power and the Psychiatric Apparatus: Repression, Transformation and Assistance, edited by D. Holmes, J. D. Jacob, and A. Perron, 91–116. Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Mulvany, J. 2000. “Disability, Impairment or Illness? The Relevance of the Social Model of Disability to the Study of Mental Disorder.” Sociology of Health and Illness 22(5):582–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilgrim, D. 2005. “Protest and Co-option: The Voice of Mental Health Service Users.” In Beyond the Water Towers: The Unfinished Revolution in Mental Health Services, 1985-2005, edited by A. Bell and P. Lindley, 17–26. London: Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health.
   Google Scholar
• Pilgrim, D. 2014. Understanding Mental Health: A Critical Realist Exploration. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S, et al. 2015. Digital Ethnography: Principles and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, D. 2009. “Survivor-Produced Knowledge.” In This Is Survivor Research., edited by A. Sweeney, P. Beresford, A. Faulkner, M. Nettle, and D. Rose, 38–43. Ross-on-Wye: PCCS Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, D. 2017. “Service User/Survivor-Led Research in Mental Health: Epistemological Possibilities.” Disability & Society 32: 773–789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, D., S. Carr, and P. Beresford. 2018. “Widening Cross-Disciplinary Research for Mental Health: What is Missing from the Research Councils UK Mental Health Agenda?” Disability & Society 33:476–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N. 2005. “In Search of Certainty: Risk Management in a Biological Age.” Journal of Public Mental Health 4(3): 14–21.
   Google Scholar
• Ruch, G. 2010. Relationship-Based Practice: Getting to the Heart of Practice. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Russo, J., and P. Beresford. 2015. “Between Exclusion and Colonisation: Seeking a Place for Mad People’s Knowledge in Academia.” Disability & Society 30: 153–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, A., and C. Doughty. 2012. “Care, Empowerment and Self-Determination in the Practice of Peer Support.” Disability and Society 27(7): 1011–1024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spandler, H., and J. Anderson. 2015. “Unreasonable Adjustments? Applying Disability Policy to Madness and Distress.” In Madness, Distress and the Politics of Disablement, edited by H. Spandler, J. Anderson, and B. Sapey, 13–26. Bristol, the UK: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. C. 1988. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, edited by C. Nelson, 271–313. London: MacMillan Education.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, M., and R. Kokanovic. 2016. “Halfway towards Recovery: Rehabilitating the Relational Self in Narratives of Postnatal Depression.” Social Science & Medicine 163: 98–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szasz, T. 1993. “Foreword”. In Madness, Heresy, and the Rumor of Angels: The Revolt against the Mental Health System., edited by S. Farber, xi–v. Chicago, IL: Open Court Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Tew, J. 2005. “Core Themes of Social Perspectives.” In Social Perspectives in Mental Health. Developing Social Models to Understand and Work with Mental Distress., edited by J. Tew, 13–31. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Tew, J., S. Ramon, M. Slade, V. Bird, J. Melton, and C. Le Boutillier. 2012. “Social Factors and Recovery from Mental Health Difficulties: A Review of the Evidence.” The British Journal of Social Work 42(3): 443–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theodorou, E., and K. Mavrou. 2017. “iConstruct: Virtual Disabilities in Online Settings.” Disability & Society 32:542–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoits, P. A. 1985. “Self-Labeling Processes in Mental Illness: The Role of Emotional Deviance.” American Journal of Sociology 91(2):221–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoits, P. A. 2011. “Resisting the Stigma of Mental Illness.” Social Psychology Quarterly 74(1): 6–28. doi:10.1177/0190272511398019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoits, P. A., and B. Link. 2016. “Stigma Resistance and Well-Being among People in Treatment for Psychosis.” Society and Mental Health 6(1): 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timander, A. C., and A. Möller. 2016. “Distress or Disability? Could a Theoretical Framework Drawn from Disability Studies Be a Way Forward When Trying to Understand Experiences of Oppression on the Grounds of Mental Distress?” Disability & Society 31: 1275–1287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosh, J., and S. Golightley. 2016. “The Caring Professions, Not So Caring? An Analysis of Bullying and Emotional Distress in the Academy.” In Psychiatry Interrogated: An Institutional Ethnography Anthology, edited by B. Burstow, 143–160. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Unwin, P. 2009. “Modernisation and the Role of Agency Social Work.” In Modernising Social Work – Critical Considerations, edited by J. Harris and V. White, 51–64. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Unwin, P., M. Rooney, N. Osborne, and C. Cole. 2017. “Are Perceptions of Disability Changed by Involving Service Users and Carers in Qualifying Health and Social Work Training?” Disability & Society 32: 1387–1399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakefield, J. C. 2016. “Diagnostic Issues and Controversies in DSM-5: Return of the False Positives.” The Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 12(1): 105–132.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walsh, P. E., S. S. McMillan, V. Stewart, and A. J. Wheeler. 2018. “Understanding Paid Peer Support in Mental Health.” Disability & Society 33: 579–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watermeyer, B., and T. Görgens. 2014. “Disability and Internalized Oppression.” In Internalised Oppression. the Psychology of Marginalized Groups., edited by E. J. R. David, 253–280. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Whitaker, R., and L. Cosgrove. 2015. Psychiatry under the Influence: Institutional Corruption, Social Injury, and Prescriptions for Reform. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. 2001. “Black Women and Mental Health: Working towards Inclusive Mental Health Services.” Feminist Review 68(1): 34–51.
   Google Scholar