The Capabilities Approach to Inclusive Education: re-envisioning the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act’s Least Restrictive Environment

References

• Anderson, E. 2010. “Justifying the Capabilities Approach to Justice.” In Measuring Justice: Primary Goods and Capabilities, edited by H. Brighouse & I. Robeyns, 81–100. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Artiles, A. J., N. Harris-Murri, and D. Rostenberg. 2006. “Inclusion as Social Justice: Critical Notes on Discourses, Assumptions, and the Road Ahead.” Theory into Practice 45(3):260–268. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4503_8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artiles, A. J., E. B. Kozleski, S. Dorn, and C. Christensen. 2006. “Chapter 3: Learning in Inclusive Education Research: Re-Mediating Theory and Methods with a Transformative Agenda.” Review of Research in Education 30(1):65–108. doi:10.3102/0091732X030001065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avramidis, E., and B. Norwich. 2002. “Teachers' Attitudes towards Integration/Inclusion: A Review of the Literature.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 17(2):129–147. doi:10.1080/08856250210129056.
   Google Scholar
• Baglieri, S., J. W. Valle, D. J. Connor, and D. J. Gallagher. 2011. “Disability Studies in Education: The Need for a Plurality of Perspectives on Disability.” Remedial and Special Education 32(4):267–278. doi:10.1177/0741932510362200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begon, J. 2015. “What Are Adaptive Preferences? Exclusion and Disability in the Capability Approach.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 32(3):241–257. doi:10.1111/japp.12102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson School District v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Brighouse, H., and E. Unterhalter. 2010. “Education for Primary Goods or for Capabilities?.” In Measuring Justice: Primary Goods and Capabilities, edited by H. Brighouse & I. Robeyns, 193–214. Cambridge, UK.: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, J. L., and J. F. Trani. 2009. “Extending the Capability Paradigm to Address the Complexity of Disability.” Alter 3(3):192–218. doi:10.1016/j.alter.2009.04.003.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Register Vol. 71, No. 156, 2006. Rules and Regulations 46585
   Google Scholar
• Florian, L., J. Hollenweger, R. J. Simeonsson, K. Wedell, S. Riddell, L. Terzi, and A. Holland. 2006. “Cross-Cultural Perspectives on the Classification of Children with Disabilities: Part I. Issues in the Classification of Children with Disabilities.” The Journal of Special Education 40(1):36–45. doi:10.1177/00224669060400010401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabel, S., and S. Peters. 2004. “Presage of a Paradigm Shift? Beyond the Social Model of Disability toward Resistance Theories of Disability.” Disability & Society 19(6):585–600. doi:10.1080/0968759042000252515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, C. 2009. “Justice for the Disabled: A Contractualist Approach.” Journal of Social Philosophy 40(1):17–36. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.2009.01436.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 34 C.F.R. § 300.114 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 34 C.F.R. § 300.115 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 34 C.F.R. § 300.116 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 34 C.F.R. § 300.117 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, E. 2010. “Equal Opportunity, Unequal Capability.” In Measuring Justice: Primary Goods and Capabilities, edited by H. Brighouse & I. Robeyns, 61–80. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Light, R., December 2000. “Disability Theory: Social Model or Unsociable Muddle?” Disability Tribune 2000:10–13. 1999/January
   Google Scholar
• Macleod, C. 2010. “Primary Goods, Capabilities, and Children.” In Measuring Justice: Primary Goods and Capabilities, edited by H. Brighouse & I. Robeyns, 174–192. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Minow, M. 1990. Making all the Difference: Inclusion, Exclusion, and American Law. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Minow, M. 1985. “Learning to Live with the Dilemma of Difference: Bilingual and Special Education.” Law and Contemporary Problems 48(2):157–211. doi:10.2307/1191571.
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, R. A., and C. A. Torres. 1995. Social Theory And Education: A Critique Of Theories Of Social And Cultural Reproduction. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norwich, B. 2014. “How Does the Capability Approach Address Current Issues in Special Educational Needs, Disability and Inclusive Education Field?.” Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs 14(1):16–21. doi:10.1111/1471-3802.12012.
   Google Scholar
• Norwich, B. 2008. “Dilemmas of Difference, Inclusion and Disability: International Perspectives on Placement.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 23(4):287–304. doi:10.1080/08856250802387166.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. 2011. Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. 2009. “The Capabilities of People with Cognitive Disabilities.”Metaphilosophy 40(3-4):331–351. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01606.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. 2006. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, Martha. 2003. “Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements: Sen and Social Justice.” Feminist Economics 9(2–3):33–59. doi:10.1080/1354570022000077926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 1983. Social Work with Disabled People. Basingstoke, U.K.: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 1996. Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice. Basingstoke, U.K.: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Palley, E. 2006. “Challenges of Rights-Based Law: Implementing the Least Restrictive Environment Mandate.” Journal of Disability Policy Studies 16(4):229–235. doi:10.1177/10442073060160040401.
   Google Scholar
• Pogge, T. 2010. “A Critique of the Capability Approach.” In Measuring Justice: Primary Goods And Capabilities, edited by H. Brighouse & I. Robeyns, 17–60. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ravitch, D. 2013. Reign of Error: The Hoax of the Privatization Movement and the Danger To America's Public Schools. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Reindal, S. M. 2016. “Discussing Inclusive Education: An Inquiry into Different Interpretations and a Search for Ethical Aspects of Inclusion Using the Capabilities Approach.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 31(1):1–12. doi:10.1080/08856257.2015.1087123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reindal, S. M. 2010. “What Is the Purpose? Reflections on Inclusion and Special Education from a Capability Perspective.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 25(1):1–12. doi:10.1080/08856250903450806.
   Google Scholar
• Reindal, S. M. 2008. “A Social Relational Model of Disability: A Theoretical Framework for Special Needs Education?.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 23(2):135–146. doi:10.1080/08856250801947812.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. 1999. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. 1996. Political Liberalism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saito, M. 2003. “Amartya Sen's Capability Approach to Education: A Critical Exploration.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 37(1):17–33. doi:10.1111/1467-9752.3701002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 2009. The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 2005. “Human Rights and Capabilities.” Journal of Human Development 6(2):151–166. doi:10.1080/14649880500120491.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 1999. Development as Freedom. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 1992. Inequality Reexamined. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skrtic, T. M., and J. R. Kent. 2013. “Rights, Needs, and Capabilities: Institutional and Political Barriers to Justice for Disabled People.” In Righting Educational Wrongs: Disability Studies in Law and Education, edited by A. Kanter & B. Ferri. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. J. 2004. “Caught in the Continuum: A Critical Analysis of the Principle of the Least Restrictive Environment.” Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities 29(4):218–230. doi:10.2511/rpsd.29.4.218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terzi, L. 2014. “Reframing Inclusive Education: Educational Equality as Capability Equality.” Cambridge Journal of Education 44(4):479–493. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2014.960911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terzi, L. 2010. “What Metric of Justice for Disabled People? Capability and Disability.” In Measuring Justice: Primary Goods and Capabilities, edited by H. Brighouse & I. Robeyns, 150–173. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Terzi, L. 2008. Justice and Equality in Education: A Capability Perspective on Disability and Special Educational Needs. London, UK: A&C Black.
   Google Scholar
• Terzi, L. 2007. “Capability and Educational Equality: The Just Distribution of Resources to Students with Disabilities and Special Educational Needs.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 41(4):757–773. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9752.2007.00589.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terzi, L. 2005a. “A Capability Perspective on Impairment, Disability and Special Needs: Towards Social Justice in Education.” Theory and Research in Education 3(2):197–223. doi:10.1177/1477878505053301.
   Google Scholar
• Terzi, L. 2005. “Beyond the Dilemma of Difference: The Capability Approach to Disability and Special Educational Needs.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 39(3):443–459. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9752.2005.00447.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terzi, L. 2004. “The Social Model of Disability: A Philosophical Critique.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 21(2):141–157. doi:10.1111/j.0264-3758.2004.00269.x.
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull, H. R., A. P. Turnbull, and B. L. Wilcox. 2007. Family Interests and Positive Behavior Support: Opportunities under the Individuals with Disabilities Act. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2006. Available from: http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Unterhalter, E. 2003. “The Capabilities Approach and Gendered Education: An Examination of South African Complexities.” Theory and Research in Education 1(1):7–22. doi:10.1177/1477878503001001002.
   Google Scholar
• Warnock, M., and B. Norwich. 2010. Special Educational Needs: A New Look. London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Zigmond, N., A. Kloo, and V. Volonino. 2009. “What, Where, and How? Special Education in the Climate of Full Inclusion.” Exceptionality 17(4):189–204. doi:10.1080/09362830903231986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fed. Reg. 46585
   Google Scholar
• Fed. Reg. 46587
   Google Scholar