From monologue to dialogue in mental health care research: reflections on a collaborative research process

References

• Bakhtin, M. 1984. Problems on Dostoevsky's Poetics. Translated and edited by C. Emersion. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Edited by M. Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. 2005. “Developing the Theoretical Basis for Service User/Survivor-Led Research and Equal Involvement in Research.” Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 14(1): 4–9. doi:10.1017/S1121189X0000186X.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boevink, W. 2018. Professionalisering van ervaringsdeskundigen in de ggz: Kans of risico? Tijdschrift voor Gezondheidswetenschappen 96(8): 312–313. doi:10.1007/s12508-018-0188-0.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, S. 2019. “‘I Am Not Your Nutter’: A Personal Reflection on Commodification and Comradeship in Service User and Survivor Research.” Disability & Society : 1–14. doi:10.1080/09687599.2019.1608424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, V., and V. Braun. 2014. “Thematic Analysis.” In Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, edited by A. C. Michalos, 6626–6628. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, L., J. Voronka, D. Landry, J. Reid, B. Mcfarlane, D. Reville, and K. Church. 2012. “‘Recovering Our Stories’: A Small Act of Resistance.” Studies in Social Justice 6(1): 85–101. doi:10.26522/ssj.v6i1.1070.
   Google Scholar
• Crepaz-Keay, D. 2016. “Can We Co-Produce Reality, Normality, and a World That Has Meaning for All?” Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology 23(3): 313–321. doi:10.1353/ppp.2016.0037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, L., M. Borg, I. Marin, A. Topor, R. Mezzina, and D. Sells. 2005. “Processes of Recovery in Serious Mental Illness: Findings From a Multinational Study.” American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation 8(3): 177–201. doi:10.1080/15487760500339360.
   Google Scholar
• De Ruysscher, C., P. Tomlinson, S. Vanheule, and S. Vandevelde. 2018. “Questioning the Professionalization of Recovery: A Collaborative Exploration of a Recovery Process.” Disability & Society 34(5): 797–818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Ruysscher, C., S. Vandevelde, W. Vanderplasschen, J. De Maeyer, and S. Vanheule. 2017. “The Concept of Recovery as Experienced by Persons With Dual Diagnosis: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Research From a First-Person Perspective.” Journal of Dual Diagnosis 13(4): 264–279. doi:10.1080/15504263.2017.1349977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Ruysscher, C., S. Vanheule, and S. Vandevelde. 2017. “A Place to Be (Me)’: A Qualitative Study on an Alternative Approach to Treatment for Persons With Dual Diagnosis.” Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy 26(1): 1–10. doi:10.1080/09687637.2017.1375461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., and Y. S. Lincoln. 2011. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, C. 2013. “Being Realistic by Demanding the Impossible: Beginning the Bricolage.” Enquire 1(8): 14–36.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, A. 2017. “Survivor Research and Mad Studies: The Role and Value of Experiential Knowledge in Mental Health Research.” Disability & Society 32(4): 500–520. doi:10.1080/09687599.2017.1302320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, A. W. 2002. “Why Study People's Stories? The Dialogical Ethics of Narrative Analysis.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 1(1): 109–117. doi:10.1177/160940690200100102.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, A. W. 2005. “What Is Dialogical Research, and Why Should We Do It?.” Qualitative Health Research 15(7): 964–974. doi:10.1177/1049732305279078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frølunde, L. 2013. “Dialogical Ethics and Reflections on Unfinalizability: An Analysis of Dissenting Voices in a Film Contest Study.” In Knowledge and Power in Collaborative Research: A Reflexive Approach, edited by L. Phillips, M. Kristiansen, M. Vehviläinen, and E. Gunnarsson, 171–191. New York: Routlegde.
   Google Scholar
• Granek, L. 2013. “Putting Ourselves on the Line: The Epistemology of the Hyphen, Intersubjectivity and Social Responsibility in Qualitative Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 26(2): 178–197. doi:10.1080/09518398.2011.614645.
   Google Scholar
• Grey, F. 2016. “Benevolent Othering: Speaking Positively About Mental Health Service Users.” Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology 23(3): 241–251. doi:10.1353/ppp.2016.0025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, N., and R. Brown. 2013. “The Absence of Psychiatric C/S/X Perspectives in Academic Discourse: Consequences and Implications.” Disability Studies Quarterly 33(1): 1–10. doi:10.18061/dsq.v33i1.3433.
   Google Scholar
• Kincheloe, J. L. 2001. “Describing the Bricolage: Conceptualizing a New Rigor in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 7(6): 679–692. doi:10.1177/107780040100700601.
   Google Scholar
• Kincheloe, J. L. 2005. “On to the Next Level: Continuing the Conceptualization of the Bricolage.” Qualitative Inquiry 11(3): 323–350. doi:10.1177/1077800405275056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kincheloe, J. L., P. McLaren, and S. R. Steinberg. 2011. “Critical Pedagogy and Qualitative Research: Moving to the Bricolage.” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N.K. Denzin, and Y.S. Lincoln, 163–177. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Leamy, M., V. Bird, C. Le Boutillier, J. Williams, and M. Slade. 2011. “Conceptual Framework for Personal Recovery in Mental Health: Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.” British Journal of Psychiatry 199(6): 445–452. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.110.083733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leblanc, S., and E. A. Kinsella. 2016. “Toward Epistemic Justice: A Critically Reflexive Examination of ‘Sanism’ and Implications for Knowledge Generation.” Studies in Social Justice 10(1): 59–78. doi:10.26522/ssj.v10i1.1324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong, T. W., P. Wright, F. Vetere, and S. Howard. 2010. “Understanding Experience Using Dialogical Methods: The Case of Serendipity.” In Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction.
   Google Scholar
• Lévi-Strauss, C. 1968. The Savage Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liegghio, M. 2013. “A Denial of Being: Psychiatrization as Epistemic Violence.” In Mad Matters: A Critical Reader in Canadian Mad Studies, edited by B. LeFrançois, R. Menzies, and G. Reaume, 122–129. Toronto: Canadian Scholars' Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• McWade, B. 2016. “Recovery-as-Policy as a Form of Neoliberal State Making.” Intersectionalities: A Global Journal of Social Work Analysis Research, Polity, and Practice 5(3): 62–81.
   Google Scholar
• Naert, J., Schiltz, J., & De Ruysscher, C. Truth or dare? The ethical imperative to confront one's personal discomfort in research with persons in vulnerable situations. European Conference on Qualitative Inquiry (ECQI), Leuven (Belgium), 8 February 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Pattadath, B. 2016. “Experience as ‘Expert’ Knowledge: A Critical Understanding of Survivor Research in Mental Health.” Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology 23(3): 203–205. doi:10.1353/ppp.2016.0018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, L. 2011. The Promise of Dialogue: The Dialogic Turn in the Production and Communication of Knowledge. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pilgrim, D. 2009. “Recovery from Mental Health Problems: Scratching the Surface Without Ethnography.” Journal of Social Work Practice 23(4): 475–487. doi:10.1080/02650530903375033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price-Robertson, R., Obradovic, A., & Morgan, B. 2017. Relational recovery: Beyond individualism in the recovery approach. Advances in Mental Health 15(2): 108–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, M. 2012. “Contextualizing Theories and Practices of Bricolage Research.” The Qualitative Report 17(48): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, D. 2017. “Service User/Survivor-Led Research in Mental Health: Epistemological Possibilities.” Disability & Society 32(6): 773–789. doi:10.1080/09687599.2017.1320270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo, J. 2012. “Survivor-Controlled Research: A New Foundation for Thinking About Psychiatry and Mental Health.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 13(1): 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Russo, J. 2016. “In Dialogue With Conventional Narrative Research in Psychiatry and Mental Health.” Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology 23(3): 215–228. doi:10.1353/ppp.2016.0021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo, J., and P. Beresford. 2015. “Between Exclusion and Colonisation: Seeking a Place for Mad People’s Knowledge in Academia.” Disability & Society 30(1): 153–157. doi:10.1080/09687599.2014.957925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slade, M., and M. Hayward. 2007. “Recovery, Psychosis and Psychiatry: Research Is Better Than Rhetoric.” Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 116(2): 81–83. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2007.01047.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smythe, W. E., and M. J. Murray. 2000. “Owning the Story: Ethical Considerations in Narrative Research.” Ethics & Behavior 10(4): 311–336. doi:10.1207/S15327019EB1004_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanhope, V., and P. Solomon. 2007. “Getting to the Heart of Recovery: Methods for Studying Recovery and Their Implications for Evidence-Based Practice.” British Journal of Social Work 38(5): 885–899. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcl377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swerdfager, T. 2016. “Theorizing Resistance: Foucault, Cross-Cultural Psychiatry, and the User/Survivor Movement.” Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology 23(3): 289–299. doi:10.1353/ppp.2016.0033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hove, G., E. De Schauwer, and A. Platel. 2017. “An Alternating Combination of Art and Science: The Legacy of Eric Broekaert Illuminated in the Honorary Doctorate for Alain Platel.” Therapeutic Communities: The International Journal of Therapeutic Communities 38(3): 177–186. doi:10.1108/TC-04-2017-0013.
   Google Scholar
• Vandevelde, S., J. De Maeyer, C. De Ruysscher, D. Bryssinck, D. Meesen, J. Vanderstraeten, and E. Broekaert. 2015. “Villa Voortman: Carte Blanche or Not?” Therapeutic Communities: The International Journal of Therapeutic Communities 36(2): 62–73. doi:10.1108/TC-12-2013-0035.
   Google Scholar
• Velpry, L. 2008. “The Patient’s View: Issues of Theory and Practice.” Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry 32(2): 238–258. doi:10.1007/s11013-008-9086-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voronka, J. 2016. “The Politics of ‘People With Lived Experience’: Experiential Authority and the Risks of Strategic Essentialism.” Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology 23(3): 189–201. doi:10.1353/ppp.2016.0017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar