I am not your metaphor: frames and counter-frames in the representation of disability

References

• Allan, J. 2008. Rethinking Inclusive Education: The Philosophers of Difference in Practice. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. 1976. The Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by J. A. K. Thomson. Notes and Appendices by H. Tredennick. Introduction and Bibliography by J. Barnes. Rev. ed. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, F. C. 1932. Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2013. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clogston, J. S. 1990. Disability Coverage in 16 Newspapers. Louisville: Avocado Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clogston, J. S. 1994. “Disability Coverage in American Newspapers.” In The Disabled, the Media and the Information Age, edited by J. A. Nelson, 45–53. Westport: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cumberbatch, G., and R. Negrine. 1992. Images of Disability on Television. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B. 2014. Listening to Children: Being and Becoming. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, K., and G. Goggin. 2015. Disability and the Media. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. 1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flybjerg, B. 2004. “Phronetic Planning Research: Theoretical and Methodological Reflections.” Planning Theory & Practice 5 (3): 283–306. doi:10.1080/1464935042000250195.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A., and A. Modigliani. 1989. “Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach.” American Journal of Sociology 95 (1): 1–37. doi:10.1086/229213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goethals, T., D. Mortelmans, and G. Van Hove. 2018. “Toward a More Balanced Representation of Disability? a Content Analysis of Disability Coverage in the Flemish Print Media.” Journal of Human Development, Disability, and Social Change 24 (1): 109–120.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D., and K. Runswick-Cole. 2016. “Becoming DisHuman: Thinking about the Human through Dis/Ability.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 37 (1): 1–15. doi:10.80/01596306.2014.930021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, S. 1997. Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Haller, B. 1998. “Crawling toward Civil Rights: News Media Coverage of Disability Activism.” In Cultural Diversity and the USA Media, edited by Y. Kamalipour and T. Carilli. New York: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haller, B. 2010. Representing Disability in an Ableist World: Essays on Mass Media. Louisville: Advocado Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harnett, A. 2000. “Escaping the ‘Evil Avenger’ and the ‘Supercrip’: Images of Disability in Popular Television.” Irish Communications Review 8: 21–29.
   Google Scholar
• Kittay, E. F., and L. Carlson. 2009. “Introduction: Rethinking Philosophical Presumptions in the Light of Cognitive Disabled Person Send Notes from the Battlefield.” Metaphilosophy 40 (3–4): 606–627. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01600.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthes, J., and M. Kohring. 2008. “The Content Analysis of Media Frames: Toward Improving Reliability and Validity.” Journal of Communication 58 (2): 258–279. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00384.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nietzsche, F. 1969. On the Genealogy of Morals. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pointin, A., and C. Davies. 1997. Framed: Interrogating Disability in the Media. London: British Film Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Reese, S. D. 2001. “Introduction.” In Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World, edited by S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy and A. E. Grant, 1–31. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, C. 2005. Disability and the Media: Prescriptions for Change. Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England.
   Google Scholar
• Shildrick, M. 2002. Embodying the Monster. Encounters with the Vulnerable Self. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Klift, E., and Kunc, N. 1994. “Hell-bent on helping: Benevolence, friendship, and the politics of help.” In Creativity and collaborative learning: A practical guide to empowering students and teachers, edited by J. S.Thousand, R. A. Villa and A. I. Nevin, 391–401. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gorp, B. 2007. “Bringing Culture Back in: The Constructionist Approach to Framing.” Journal of Communication 57 (1): 60–78. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00329.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gorp, B. 2010. “Strategies to Take Subjectivity out of Framing Analysis.” In Doing News Framing Analysis: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives, edited by P. D’Angelo and J. Kuypers, 84–109. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gorp, B., and T. Vercruysse. 2012. “Frames and Counter-Frames Giving Meaning to Dementia: A Framing Analysis of Media Content.” Social Science & Medicine (1982) 74 (8): 1274–1281. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.12.045,
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vissers, S., and M. Hooghe. 2010. Onzichtbare Burgers. Personen Met Een Handicap in Het Televisienieuws Bij VRT en VTM, 2007–2009. [Invisible Citizens. Persons with Disabilities in the Television News at VRT and VTM, 2007–2009]. Leuven/Antwerpen: Elektronisch Nieuwsarchief).
   Google Scholar
• Young, S. 2012. “We’re Not Here for Your Inspiration.” Ramp Up, 2 July. http://www.abc.net.au/rampup/articles/2012/07/02/3537035.htm.
   Google Scholar