Social media and disability advocacy organizations: caught between hopes and realities

References

• Allan, S. 2009. “Histories of Citizen Journalism.” In Citizen Journalism, edited by S. Allan and E. Thorsen, 17–31. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Almog-Bar, M., and H. Schmid. 2014. “Advocacy Activities of Nonprofit Human Service Organizations: A Critical Review.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 43 (1): 11–35. doi:10.1177/0899764013483212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, K. T., and B. Edwards. 2004. “Advocacy Organizations in the U.S. political Process.” Annual Review of Sociology 30 (1): 479–506. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bail, C. 2016. “Combining Natural Language Processing and Network Analysis to Examine How Advocacy Organizations Stimulate Conversation on Social Media.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113 (42): 11823–11828. doi:10.1073/pnas.1607151113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakshy, E., S. Messing, and L. A. Adamic. 2015. “Political Science. Exposure to Ideologically Diverse News and Opinion on Facebook.” Science (New York, N.Y.) 348 (6239): 1130–1132. doi:10.1126/science.aaa1160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, C. 2007. “Disability Activism and the Struggle for Change.” Education, Citizenship and Social Justice 2 (3): 203–221. doi:10.1177/1746197907081259.
   Google Scholar
• Baumann, A. E. 2014. “Non-Governmental Organizations as Key Partners in Mental Health in Europe.” Die Psychiatrie 11 (1): 27–34. doi:10.1055/s-0038-1670733.
   Google Scholar
• Block, E. S., and L. Erskine. 2012. “Interviewing by Telephone: Specific Considerations, Opportunities, and Challenges.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 11 (4): 428–445. doi:10.1177/160940691201100409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgström, Å., K. Daneback, and M. Molin. 2019. “Young People with Intellectual Disabilities and Social Media: A Literature Review and Thematic Analysis.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 21 (1): 129–140. doi:10.16993/sjdr.549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. 2000. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Vol.1: The Rise of the Network Society. (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. 2013. The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, C., and C. Fullwood. 2018. “An Online Life like Any Other: Identity, Self-Determination, and Social Networking among Adults with Intellectual Disabilities.” Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking 21 (1): 56–64. doi:10.1089/cyber.2016.0689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cocq, C., and K. Ljuslinder. 2020. “Self-Representations on Social Media. Reproducing and Challenging Discourses on Disability.” Alter - European Journal of Disability Research 14 (2): 71–84. doi:10.1016/j.alter.2020.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Codex. 2011. Etiska regler och riktlinjer för forskning. [Ethical Rules and Guidelines for Research]. Vetenskapsrådet, Uppsala University. Accessed Nov 2 2016. http://www.codex.vr.se/.
   Google Scholar
• Dobransky, K., and E. Hargittai. 2006. “The Disability Divide in Internet Access and Use.” Information, Communication, and Society 9 (3): 313–334. doi:10.1080/13691180600751298.
   Google Scholar
• Dobransky, K., and E. Hargittai. 2016. “Unrealized Potential: Exploring the Digital Disability Divide.” Poetics 58: 18–28. doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2016.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, K., and M. Kent. 2011. Disability and New Media. London: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, M., and F. Macleod. 2011. Involving Disabled People in Social Research: Guidance by the Office for Disability Issues. Office for Disability Issues HM Government. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/321254/involving-disabled-people-in-social-research.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Goggin, G., and T. Noonan. 2006. “Blogging Disability: The Interface between New Cultural Movements and Interne Technology.” In Uses of Blogs, edited by A. Bruns and J. Jacobs. pp. 161-172. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, I., and D. Saxton. 2018. “Speaking and Being Heard: How Nonprofit Advocacy Organizations Gain Attention on Social Media.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 47 (1): 5–26. doi:10.1177/0899764017713724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hestres, L. E. 2017. “Tools beyond Control: Social Media and the Work of Advocacy Organizations.” Social Media + Society 3 (2): 1–11. doi:10.1177/2056305117714237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjarvard, S. 2013. The Mediatization of Culture and Society. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hilbert, M. 2011. “The End Justifies the Definition: The Manifold Outlooks on Thedigital Divide and Their Practical Usefulness for Policy-Making.” Telecommunications Policy 35 (8): 715–736. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2011.06.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilbert, M. 2014. “Technological Information Inequality as an Incessantly Moving Target: The Redistribution of Information and Communication Capacities between 1986 and 2010.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 65 (4): 821–835. doi:10.1002/asi.23020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, P. N., A. Duffy, D. Freelon, M. M. Hussain, W. Mari, and M. Maziad. 2011. Opening Closed Regimes: What Was the Role of Social Media During the Arab Spring? https://ssrn.com/abstract=2595096 or doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2595096.
   Google Scholar
• Hugemark, A., and C. Roman. 2007. “Diversity and Divisions in the Swedish Disability Movement: Disability, Gender and Social Justice.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 9 (1): 26–46. doi:10.1080/15017410600979553.
   Google Scholar
• Ineland, J., S. Gelfgren, and C. Cocq. 2019. “Negotiating Authority: Disability, Interactions and Power Relations on Twitter.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 21 (1): 238–249. doi:10.16993/sjdr.591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, S. 2019. “Design for Participation and Inclusion Will Follow: disabled People and the Digital Society.” PhD thesis (Doctoral thesis) Dissertation. KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Khondker, H. 2011. “Role of the New Media in the Arab Spring.” Globalization 8 (5): 675–679. doi:10.1080/14747731.2011.621287
   Google Scholar
• Kreiss, D., and S. C. McGregor. 2018. “Technology Firms Shape Political Communication: The Work of Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter, and Google with Campaigns during the 2016  U.S. Presidential Cycle.” Political Communication 35 (2): 155–177. doi:10.1080/10584609.2017.1364814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgren, S., and C. Cocq. 2017. “Turning the inside out: Social Media and the Broadcasting of Indigenous Discourse.” European Journal of Communication 32 (2): 131–150. doi:10.1177/0267323116674112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfgren-Mårtenson, L. 2008. “Love in Cyberspace: Swedish Young People with Intellectual Disabilities and the Internet”. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 10 (2): 125–138. doi:10.1080/15017410701758005
   Google Scholar
• Lovejoy, K., R. Waters, and G. Saxton. 2012. “Engaging Stakeholders through Twitter: How Nonprofit Organizations Are Getting More out of 140 Characters or Less.” Public Relations Review 38 (2): 313–318. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundby, K. 2014. “Mediatized Stories in Mediatized Worlds.” In Mediatized Worlds, edited by A. Hepp and F. Krotz. pp. 19-37. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Markström, U., M. Karlsson. 2013. “Towards Hybridization: The Roles of Swedish Non-Profit Organizations within Mental Health.” VOLUNTAS - International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 24 (4): 917–934. doi:10.1007/s11266-012-9287-8.
   Google Scholar
• Molin, M., E. Sorbring, and L. Löfgren-Mårtenson. 2015. “ Teachers' and Parents' Views on the Internet and Social Media Usage by Pupils with Intellectual Disabilities.” Journal of Intellectual Disabilities 19 (1): 22–33. doi:10.1177/1744629514563558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näslund, H., U. Markström, S. Sjöström. 2018. “Participatory spaces of mental health service user organizations in the post-deinstitutional era: mapping roles and challenges”. VOLUNTAS - International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 29 (1): 190–200. doi:10.1007/s11266-017-9906-5
   Google Scholar
• Nirje, B. 1969. “The Normalization Principle and Its Human Management Implications.” In Changing Patterns in Residential Services for the Mentally Retarded, edited by R. Kugel and W. Wolfensberger. pp. 179-195. Washington, D.C.: President‘s Committee on Mental Retardation.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. 2001. Digital Divide? Civic Engagement, Information Poverty and the Internet in Democratic Societies. NY: Cambridge Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Novick, G. 2008. “Is There a Bias against Telephone Interviews in Qualitative Research?” Research in Nursing & Health 31 (4): 391–398. doi:10.1002/nur.20259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obar, J., P. Zube, and C. Lampe. 2012. “Advocacy 2.0: An Analysis of How Advocacy Groups in the United States Perceive and Use Social Media as Tools for Facilitating Civic Engagement and Collective Action.” Journal of Information Policy 2: 1–25. doi:10.5325/jinfopoli.2.2012.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Palfrey, J., and U. Gasser. 2008. Born Digital: Understanding the First Generation of Digital Natives. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Persson Bergvall, I., & Sjöberg, M. 2012. Åratal - ur handikapphistorien. Johanneshov: Handikapphistoriska föreningen HHF.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, C., and F. Trevisan. 2015. “Disability Activism in the New Media Ecology: Campaigning Strategies in the Digital Era.” Disability & Society 30 (6): 924–940. doi:10.1080/09687599.2015.1051516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Rainie, L., and B. Wellman. 2012. Networked: The New Social Operating System. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, F., B. Yalcin, and M. Priestley. 2017. “Internet Access for Disabled People: Understanding Socio-Relational Factors in Europe.” Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 11 (1). doi:10.5817/CP2017-1-4.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, D. V. 2016. “Conversation is the Soul of Democracy: Expression Effects, Communication Mediation, and Digital Media.” Communication and the Public 1 (1): 12–18. doi:10.1177/2057047316628310.
   Google Scholar
• Trevisan, F. 2014. “Scottish Disability Organizations and Online Media: A Path to Empowerment or ‘Business as Usual?” Disability Studies Quarterly 34 (3). http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/3359/3648. doi:10.18061/dsq.v34i3.3359.
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, S. 2011. Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Vicente, M., and A. Lopez. 2010. “A Multidimensional Analysis of the Disability Digital Divide: Some Evidence for Internet Use.” The Information Society 26 (1): 48–64. doi:10.1080/01615440903423245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar