Critical cultural disability studies and mental health: a rhetorical perspective

References

• Baglieri, S., J. W. Valle, D. J. Connor, and D. J. Gallagher. 2011. “Disability Studies in Education: The Need for a Plurality of Perspectives on Disability.” Remedial and Special Education 32 (4): 267–278. doi:10.1177/0741932510362200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. 2000. “What Have Madness and Psychiatric System Survivors Got to Do with Disability and Disability Studies?” Disability & Society 15 (1): 167–172. doi:10.1080/09687590025838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. 2010. “Re-Examining Relationships between Experience, Knowledge, Ideas and Research: A Key Role for Recipients of State Welfare and Their Movements.” Social Work and Society International Online Journal 8 (1). Online publication. www.socwork.net/sws/article/view/19/56
   Google Scholar
• Bolam, B., and K. Chamberlain. 2003. “Professionalization and Reflexivity in Critical Health Psychology Practice.”Journal of Health Psychology 8 (2): 215–218. doi:10.1177/1359105303008002661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracken, P., and P. Thomas. 2005. Postpsychiatry: Mental Health in a Postmodern World. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, K. 1966. Language as Symbolic Action: Essays on Life, Literature and Method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, K. 1969. A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2000. “Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods.” In Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, edited by N. K. Denzin, and Y. S. Lincoln, 249–291. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cherney, J. L. 2011. “The Rhetoric of Ableism.” Disability Studies Quarterly 31 (3). Online publication. doi:10.18061/dsq.v31i3.1665.
   Google Scholar
• Chesler, P. 2005. Women and Madness. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Church, K. 1997. “Madness in Her Method: Creating a ‘Survivor Frame’ for Mental Health Research.”Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 4 (4): 307–308. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2850.1997.00076.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis, L. J., ed. 2006. The Disability Studies Reader. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dolmage, J. T. 2014. Disability Rhetoric. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dolmage, J., and C. Lewiecki-Wilson 2010. “Refiguring Rhetorica: Linking Feminist Rhetoric and Disability Studies.” In Rhetorica in Motion: Feminist Rhetorical Methods and Methodologies, edited by E. E. Schell, and K. Rawson, 23–38. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, J., and M. Yergeau. 2011. “Introduction.”Disability Studies Quarterly 31 (3). Online publication. doi:10.18061/dsq.v31i3.1682.
   Google Scholar
• Enoch, J. 2004. “Becoming Symbol-Wise: Kenneth Burke’s Pedagogy of Critical Reflection.” College Composition and Communication 56 (2): 272–296. doi:10.2307/4140650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner, A. 2017. “Survivor Research and Mad Studies: The Role and Value of Experiential Knowledge in Mental Health Research.” Disability & Society 32 (4): 500–520. doi:10.1080/09687599.2017.1302320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forney, E. 2012. Marbles: Mania, Depression, Michelangelo, and Me: A Graphic Memoir. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Gabel, S. L., ed. 2005. Disability Studies in Education: Readings in Theory and Method. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, D. J. 2004. “The Importance of Constructivism and Constructivist Pedagogy for Disability Studies in Education.” Disability Studies Quarterly 24 (2). Online publication. doi:10.18061/dsq.v24i2.489.
   Google Scholar
• Garland-Thomson, R. 1997. Extraordinary Bodies. Figuring Physical Disability in American Culture and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garland-Thomson, R. 2002. “Integrating Disability, Transforming Feminist Theory.” NWSA Journal 14 (3): 1–32. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4316922. doi:10.2979/NWS.2002.14.3.1.
   Google Scholar
• George, A. 2018. Kenneth Burke’s ‘Permanence and Change’: A Critical Companion. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goertzen, J. R. 2010. “Dialectical Pluralism: A Theoretical Conceptualization of Pluralism in Psychology.”New Ideas in Psychology 28 (2): 201–209. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.09.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. 2001. “Learning Difficulties, the Social Model of Disability and Impairment: Challenging Epistemologies.” Disability & Society 16 (2): 207–231. doi:10.1080/09687590120035816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. 2017. Disability Studies: An Interdisciplinary Introduction. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D., and R. Lawthom, eds. 2006. Disability and Psychology: Critical Introductions and Reflections. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D., and G. Roets. 2008. “The (Be)Comings and Goings of Developmental Disabilities: The Cultural Politics of ‘Impairment’.”Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 29 (2): 241–257. doi:10.1080/01596300801966971.
   Google Scholar
• Herndon, A. 2002. “Disparate but Disabled: Fat Embodiment and Disability Studies.” NWSA Journal 14 (3): 120–137. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4316927 doi:10.2979/NWS.2002.14.3.120.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. 2010. “The Skeleton on the Couch: The Eagleton Affair, Rhetorical Disability, and the Stigma of Mental Illness.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 40 (5): 459–478. doi:10.1080/02773945.2010.517234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewiecki-Wilson, C. 2003. “Rethinking Rhetoric through Mental Disabilities.” Rhetoric Review 22 (2): 156–167. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3093036.
   Google Scholar
• Lewiecki-Wilson, C., B. Brueggemann, and D. Jonhson. 2008. Disability and the Teaching of Writing: A Critical Sourcebook. Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. T., and S. L. Snyder. 2001. “Representation and Its Discontents: The Uneasy Home of Disability in Literature and Film.” In Handbook of Disability Studies, edited by G. L. Albrecht, K. D., Seelman, and M. Bury, 195–218. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 1990. The Politics of Disablement. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 1996. Understanding Disability. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pickersgill, M. 2012. “What is Psychiatry? Co-Producing Complexity in Mental Health.” Social Theory & Health 10 (4): 328–347. doi:10.1057/sth.2012.9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prendergast, C. 2001. “On the Rhetorics of Mental Disability.” In Embodied Rhetorics: Disability in Language and Culture, edited by J. C. Wilson, and C. Lewiecki-Wilson, 45–60. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Price, M. 2011. Mad at School: Rhetorics of Mental Disability and Academic Life. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Price, J., and M. Shildrick, 1998. “Uncertain Thoughts on the Dis/Abled Body.” In Vital Signs, edited by M. Shildrick, and J. Price, 224–249. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe, K. 2005. Rhetorical Listening: Identification, Gender, Whiteness. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, A. 1993. “The Audience, Subjectivity, Community, and the Ethics of Listening.” Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism 7 (2): 3–24. https://journals.ku.edu/jdtc/article/view/1864/1827
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, J. F. 2018. “A Short History of Mental Health Rhetoric Research (MHRR).” Rhetoric of Health & Medicine 1 (1–2): 1–18. doi:10.5744/rhm.2018.1003.
   Google Scholar
• Rich, A. 2003. “Notes towards a Politics of Location.” In Feminist Postcolonial Theory: A Reader, edited by R. Lewis, and S. Mills, 29–42. New York: Routlegde.
   Google Scholar
• Roets, G., and R. Braidotti. 2012. “Theorizing the Unity of Bodies and Minds: Nomadology in Disability Studies”. In Disability and Social Theory: New Developments and Directions, edited by D. Goodley, B. Hughes, and L. Davis, 161–176. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, D. 2017. “Service User/Survivor-Led Research in Mental Health: Epistemological Possibilities.”Disability & Society 32 (6): 773–789. doi:10.1080/09687599.2017.1320270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, D., and J. Kalathil. 2019. “Power, privilege and knowledge: The untenable promise of co-production in mental ‘health’” Frontiers in Sociology 4 (57). Online publication. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2019.00057.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. 1996. Inventing Our Selves: Psychology, Power and Personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rountree, C., and J. Rountree. 2015. “Burke’s Pentad as a Guide for Symbol-Using Citizens.” Studies in Philosophy and Education 34 (4): 349–362. doi:10.1007/s11217-014-9436-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo, J. 2012. “Survivor-Controlled Research: A New Foundation for Thinking about Psychiatry and Mental Health.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 13 (1). Online publication. http://nbnresolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs120187.
   Google Scholar
• Rutten, K., G. Roets, R. Soetaert, and R. Roose. 2012. “The Rhetoric of Disability: A Dramatistic-Narrative Analysis of One Flew over the Cuckoo’s Nest.” Critical Arts 26 (5): 631–647. doi:10.1080/02560046.2012.744720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuels, E. 2015. “Picturing Mental Disability in the Classroom: Review of Ellen Forney’s Marbles.”Disability Studies Quarterly 35 (2). Online publication. doi:10.18061/dsq.v35i2.4865.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Selznick, H. 2015. “Investigating Students’ Reception and Production of Normalizing Discourses in a Disability-Themed Advanced Composition Course.” Disability Studies Quarterly 35 (2). Online publication. doi:10.18061/dsq.v35i2.4626.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Snyder, S. L., and D. T. Mitchell 2006. Cultural Locations of Disability. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, S. N., K. Pitt, F. Shanouda, J. Voronka, J. Reid, and D. Landry 2019. “Unlearning through Mad Studies: Disruptive Pedagogical Praxis.”Curriculum Inquiry 49 (4): 485- 502. doi:10.1080/03626784.2019.1664254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney, A. 2013. “Sociology and Survivor Research: An Introduction.” In Mental Health Service Users in Research: Critical Sociological Perspectives, edited by P. Staddon, 1–10. Bristol: University of Bristol Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney, A. 2016. “Why Mad Studies Needs Survivor Research and Survivor Research Needs Mad Studies.”Intersectionalities: A Global Journal of Social Work Analysis, Research, Polity and Practice 5 (3): 36–61.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. 2007. Sociologies of Disability, ‘Impairment’, and Chronic Illness: Ideas in Disability Studies and Medical Sociology. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, S., and I. Tavory. 2012. “Theory Construction in Qualitative Research: From Grounded Theory to Abductive Analysis.” Sociological Theory 30 (3): 167–186. doi:10.1177/0735275112457914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandekinderen, C., and G. Roets. 2016. “The Post(hu)Man Always Rings Twice: Theorising the Difference of Impairment in the Lives of People with “Mental Health Problems.”Disability & Society 31 (1): 33–46. doi:10.1080/09687599.2015.1119037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. C., and C. Lewiecki-Wilson, eds. 2001. Embodied Rhetorics: Disability in Language and Culture. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar