Fighting for sheltered workshops or for inclusive workplaces? Trade unions pursuing disability rights in Belgium

References

• Aucante, Y., and P.-Y. Baudot. 2018. “Introduction: Implementing Disability Rights in National Contexts: Norms, Diffusion, and Conflicts.” Social Policy and Society 17 (1): 87–100. doi:10.1017/S1474746417000379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagenstos, S. 2009. Law and Contradictions of Disability Rights Movement. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, C., and G. Mercer. 2005. “Disability, Work, and Welfare: Challenging the Social Exclusion of Disabled People.” Work, Employment, and Society 19 (3): 527–545. doi:10.1177/0950017005055669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsseon, S. 2000. “A Truly European Type of Disability Struggle: Disability Policy in Denmark and the EU in the 1990s.” Journal of European Social Security 2 (4): 363–377.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, G. 1988. “What Did Unions Do in Nineteenth-Century Britain?” The Journal of Economic History 48 (2): 319–332. doi:10.1017/S0022050700004939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, T. 2004. “The European Union and the Diffusion of Disability Rights.” In Translating Policy-Making in an Age of Austerity: Diversity and Drift, edited by M. Levin and M. Shapiro, 158–176. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chappe, V.-A. 2013. “Dénoncer en Justice Les Discriminations Syndicales: Contribution à Une Sociologie Des Appuis Conventionnels de L’action Judiciaire.” Sociologie du Travail 55 (3): 302–321. doi:10.1016/j.soctra.2013.07.005.
   Google Scholar
• Charlton, J. 2000. Nothing about Us without Us. Disability Oppression and Empowerment. Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Veirman, S. 2015. “Deaf and Disabled? (Un)Employment of Deaf People in Belgium: A Comparison of Eighteenth-Century and Nineteenth-Century Cohorts.” Disability & Society 30 (3): 460–474. doi:10.1080/09687599.2015.1014087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Berhoumi, M., and I. Hachez. 2015. “Lorsque L’inclusion se Décrète: Le Décret de la Commission Communautaire Française du 17 Janvier 2014 Relatif à L’inclusion de la Personne Handicapée.” Revue Interdisciplinaire D’études Juridiques 74: 55–89.
   Google Scholar
• Emmenuelidis, S. 2004. “Objectifs Sociaux et Impératifs de Rentabilité Économique Dans Les Entreprises de Travail Adapté.” Reflets et Perspectives de la Vie Économique 3: 87–95.
   Google Scholar
• Frymer, P. 2007. Black and Blue: African Americans, the Labor Movement, and the Decline of the Democratic Party. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guillaume, C. 2015. “Understanding the Variations of Unions’ Litigation Strategies to Promote Equal Pay: Reflection on the British Case.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 39 (2): 363–379. doi:10.1093/cje/bev004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hachez, I., and J. Vrielink. 2020. Les Grands Arrêts en Matière de Handicap. Brussels: Larcier.
   Google Scholar
• Heyer, K. 2015. Rights Enabled. The Disability Revolution from the U.S. to Germany and Japan, to the United Nations. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, B., and K. Paterson. 1997. “The Social Model of Disability and the Disappearing Body: Towards a Sociology of Impairment.” Disability & Society 12 (3): 325–340. doi:10.1080/09687599727209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, J. 1998. “Self-Organise and Survive: Disabled People in the British Trade Union Movement.” Disability & Society 13 (4): 587–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyman, R. 1975. Industrial Relations. A Marxist Introduction. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D. R., and L. Vanhala. 2010. “The Shift to the Rights Model of Disability in the EU and Canada.” Regional & Federal Studies 20 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1080/13597560903174766.
   Google Scholar
• Lejeune, A., J. Hubin, J. Ringelheim, S. Robin-Olivier, F. Schoenaers, and H. Yazdanpanah. 2017. Handicap et aménagements raisonnables au travail. Importation et usages d’une catégorie juridique en France et en Belgique. Mission de recherche Droit et Justice. http://www.gip-recherche-justice.fr/publication/amenagements-raisonnables-au-travail-importation-et-usages-dune-categorie-juridique-en-france-et-en-belgique/
   Google Scholar
• Lejeune, A., and J. Ringelheim. 2019. “Workers with Disabilities between Legal Changes and Persisting Exclusion: How Contradictory Rights Shape Legal Mobilization.” Law & Society Review 53 (4): 983–1015. doi:10.1111/lasr.12439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lejeune, A., and H. Yazdanpanah. 2017. “Face au Handicap: Action Syndicale et Cadrages Juridiques.” Politix 118: 55–76.
   Google Scholar
• Marquis, N. 2015. “Le Handicap, Révélateur Des Tensions de L’autonomie.” Revue Interdisciplinaire D’études Juridiques 73 (1): 109–130. doi:10.3917/riej.074.0109.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, P., K. Celis, and H. Huysentruyt. 2016. “Mainstreaming Disability in Policies: The Flemish Experience.” Disability & Society 31 (9): 1190–1204. doi:10.1080/09687599.2016.1244043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mor, S. 2005. “Between Charity, Welfare, and Warfare: A Disability Legal Studies Analysis of Privilege and Neglect in Israeli Disability Policy.” Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 18 (2): 63–136.
   Google Scholar
• Moses, J. 2018. The First Modern Risk: Workplace Accidents and the Origins of European Social States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piore, M., and S. Safford. 2006. “Changing Regimes of Workplace Governance: Shifting Axes of Social Mobilization, and the Challenge to Industrial Relations Theory.” Industrial Relations 45 (3): 299–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poirier, J. 2001. “Intergovernmental Aspects of Disability Policies in Belgium.” In Disability and Federalism: Comparing Different Approaches to Full Participation, edited by D. Cameron & V. Fraser. Montréal, Kingston and London: McGill-Queen’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Revillard, A. 2017. “Social Movements and the Politics of Bureaucratic Rights Enforcement : Insights from the Allocation of Disability Rights in France.” Law & Social Inquiry 42 (02): 450–478. doi:10.1111/lsi.12174.
   Google Scholar
• Rimmerman, A., and S. Herr. 2004. “The Power of the Powerless: A Study of the Israeli Disability Strike of 1999.” Journal of Disability Policy Studies 15 (1): 12–18. doi:10.1177/10442073040150010301.
   Google Scholar
• Ringelheim, J. 2018. “La Réception en Droit Belge de L’obligation D’aménagement Raisonnable en Faveur Des Travailleurs Handicapés.” Journal Des Tribunaux 6726: 309–319.
   Google Scholar
• Schurman, S., D. Weil, P. Landsbergis, and B. Israël. 1998. “The Role of Unions and Collective Bargaining in Preventing Work-Related Disability.” In New Approaches to Disability in the Workplace, edited by T. Thomason, J. Burton, & D. Hyatt. Madison: Industrial Relations Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. 2006. Disability Rights and Wrongs. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderstraeten, M. 2015. “Définir, C’est Exclure : Le Cas du Handicap.” Revue Interdisciplinaire D’études Juridiques 73 (1): 91–108. doi:10.3917/riej.074.0091.
   Google Scholar
• Vanhala, L. 2006. “Fighting Discrimination through Litigation in the UK: The Social Model of Disability and the EU anti-Discrimination Directive.” Disability & Society 21 (5): 551–565. doi:10.1080/09687590600786801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanhala, L. 2011. Making Rights a Reality? Disability Rights Activists and Legal Mobilization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Visser, J. 2016. Database on Institutional Characteristics of Trade Unions, Wage Setting, State Intervention and Social Pacts in 34 countries between 1960 and 2007. Amsterdam University Press. http://www.uva-aias.net/en/ictwss
   Google Scholar