A methodological reflection on investigating children’s voice in qualitative research involving children with severe speech and physical impairments

References

• Baxter, Susan, Pam Enderby, Philippa Evans, and Simon Judge. 2012. “Barriers and Facilitators to the Use of High-Technology Augmentative and Alternative Communication Devices: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Synthesis: AAC Barriers and Facilitators Review.” International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 47 (2): 115–129. doi:10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00090.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benton, Laura, and Hilary Johnson. 2015. “Widening Participation in Technology Design: A Review of the Involvement of Children with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities.” International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 3–4 (January): 23–40. doi:10.1016/j.ijcci.2015.07.001.
   Google Scholar
• Bezemer, J., and Gunther R. Kress. 2016. Multimodality, Learning and Communication: A Social Semiotic Frame. London ; New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Börjesson, Peter, Wolmet Barendregt, Eva Eriksson, and Olof Torgersson. 2015. “Designing Technology for and with Developmentally Diverse Children: A Systematic Literature Review.” In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 79–88. New York: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/2771839.2771848.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, Bryan, and Inmaculada Arnedillo-Sánchez. 2016. “Exploring the Role of Adults in Participatory Design for Children on the Autism Spectrum.” In Design, User Experience, and Usability: Design Thinking and Methods Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 209–218. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-40409-7_21.
   Google Scholar
• Bratteteig, Tone, and Ina Wagner. 2016. “Unpacking the Notion of Participation in Participatory Design.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 25 (6): 425–475. doi:10.1007/s10606-016-9259-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burawoy, Michael. 1998. “The Extended Case Method.” Sociological Theory 16 (1): 4–33. doi:10.1111/0735-2751.00040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, Stacy M., and Miles Little. 2007. “Justifying Knowledge, Justifying Method, Taking Action: Epistemologies, Methodologies, and Methods in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Health Research 17 (10): 1316–1328. doi:10.1177/1049732307306927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, Alison, and Peter Moss. 2011. Listening to Young Children: The Mosaic Approach. London: National Children’s Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, Michael, and Andrea Kirton. 2003. “Patterns of Interaction between Children with Physical Disabilities Using Augmentative and Alternative Communication Systems and Their Peers.” Child Language Teaching and Therapy 19 (2): 135–151. doi:10.1191/0265659003ct248oa.
   Google Scholar
• Connors, Clare, and Kirsten Stalker. 2007. “Children’s Experiences of Disability: Pointers to a Social Model of Childhood Disability.” Disability & Society 22 (1): 19–33. doi:10.1080/09687590601056162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crisp, Cheryl, Claire Burke Draucker, and Marsha L. Cirgin Ellett. 2014. “Barriers and Facilitators to children’s use of speech-generating devices: a descriptive qualitative study of mothers’ perspectives.” Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing 19 (3): 229–237. doi:10.1111/jspn.12074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dee-Price, Betty-Jean M., Lorna Hallahan, Diane Nelson Bryen, and Joanne M. Watson. 2021. “Every Voice Counts: Exploring Communication Accessible Research Methods.” Disability & Society 36 (2): 240–264. doi:10.1080/09687599.2020.1715924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durrant, Abigail, Jonathan Hook, Roisin McNaney, Keir Williams, Thomas Smith, Mathew Kipling, Tony Stockman, and Patrick Olivier. 2013. “Design to Support Interpersonal Communication in the Special Educational Needs Classroom.” In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 46–55. IDC ‘13. New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/2485760.2485778.
   Google Scholar
• Fauconnier, Jérôme, Heather O. Dickinson, Eva Beckung, Marco Marcelli, Vicki McManus, Susan I. Michelsen, Jackie Parkes, et al. 2009. “Participation in Life Situations of 8-12 Year Old Children with Cerebral Palsy: Cross Sectional European Study.” BMJ 338 (2): b1458. doi:10.1136/bmj.b1458.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flewitt, Rosie. 2005. “Using Multimodal Analysis to Unravel a Silent Child’s Learning.” Early Childhood Practice: The Journal for Multi-Professional Partnerships 7: 5–16. http://oro.open.ac.uk/2721/.
   Google Scholar
• Frauenberger, Christopher, Judith Good, and Wendy Keay-Bright. 2010. “Phenomenology, a Framework for Participatory Design.” in, 187. New York: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1900441.1900474.
   Google Scholar
• Gallacher, L.-A., and M. Gallagher. 2008. “Methodological Immaturity in Childhood Research?: Thinking through ‘Participatory Methods.” Childhood 15 (4): 499–516. doi:10.1177/0907568208091672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrero, Pablo Rodríguez, Dolores Izuzquiza Gasset, and Andrés Cabrera Garcia. 2021. “Inclusive Education at a Spanish University: The Voice of Students with Intellectual Disability.” Disability & Society 36 (3): 323–376. doi:10.1080/09687599.2020.1745758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornof, Anthony J. 2009. “Designing with Children with Severe Motor Impairments.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2177. New York: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1518701.1519032.
   Google Scholar
• Hynan, A., J. Murray, and J. Goldbart. 2014. “Happy and Excited”: Perceptions of Using Digital Technology and Social Media by Young People Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication.” Child Language Teaching and Therapy 30 (2): 175–186. doi:10.1177/0265659013519258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, Seray B., Asimina Vasalou, and Michael Clarke. 2018. “Design Opportunities for AAC and Children with Severe Speech and Physical Impairments.” In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 227:1–227:13. CHI ‘18. New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/3173574.3173801.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, Seray B., Asimina Vasalou, and Michael Clarke. 2020. “Can Design Documentaries Disrupt Design for Disability?.” In Proceedings of the Interaction Design and Children Conference, 96–107. IDC ‘20. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. doi:10.1145/3392063.3394403.
   Google Scholar
• James, Allison. 2007. “Giving Voice to Children’s Voices: Practices and Problems, Pitfalls and Potentials.” American Anthropologist 109 (2): 261–272. doi:10.1525/aa.2007.109.2.261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, Lisa, Mark A. Bellis, Sara Wood, Karen Hughes, Ellie McCoy, Lindsay Eckley, Geoff Bates, Christopher Mikton, Tom Shakespeare, and Alana Officer. 2012. “Prevalence and Risk of Violence against Children with Disabilities: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.” The Lancet 380 (9845): 899–907. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60692-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, Gunther R. 1997. Before Writing: Rethinking the Paths to Literacy. London ; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, Gunther R. 2010. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London ; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 1999. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, John. 2007. ‘Actor Network Theory and Material Semiotics’. http://www.heterogeneities.net/publications/Law2007ANTandMaterialSemiotics.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Letherby, Gayle. 2006. “Emancipatory Research.” In The SAGE Dictionary of Social Research Methods, edited by Victor Jupp. London: SAGE Publications, Ltd. http://srmo.sagepub.com/view/the-sage-dictionary-of-social-research-methods/n62.xml.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Yvonna S., and Egon G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mauthner, Natasha S., and Andrea Doucet. 2003. “Reflexive Accounts and Accounts of Reflexivity in Qualitative Data Analysis.” Sociology 37 (3): 413–431. doi:10.1177/00380385030373002.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, Jenny. 2003. “Including All Children: Finding out about the Experiences of Children with Communication and/or Cognitive Impairments.” Children & Society 17 (5): 337–348. doi:10.1002/chi.754.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, Ingunn. 2006. “Disability and the Promises of Technology: Technology, Subjectivity and Embodiment within an Order of the Normal.” Information, Communication & Society 9 (3): 373–395. doi:10.1080/13691180600751348.
   Google Scholar
• Nolas, Sevasti-Melissa, Vinnarasan Aruldoss, and Christos Varvantakis. 2019. “Learning to Listen: Exploring the Idioms of Childhood.” Sociological Research Online 24 (3): 394–413. doi:10.1177/1360780418811972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, Sarah, Nicola Yuill, Judith Good, and Mark Brosnan. 2020. “Whose Agenda? Who Knows Best? Whose Voice?” Co-Creating a Technology Research Roadmap with Autism Stakeholders.” Disability & Society 35 (2): 201–234. doi:10.1080/09687599.2019.1624152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, Michael Quinn. 2015. “Sampling, Qualitative (Purposeful).” In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, edited by George Ritzer. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. doi:10.1002/9781405165518.wbeoss012.pub2.
   Google Scholar
• Rabiee, Parvaneh, Patricia Sloper, and Bryony Beresford. 2005. “Doing Research with Children and Young People Who Do Not Use Speech for Communication.” Children & Society 19 (5): 385–396. doi:10.1002/chi.841.
   Google Scholar
• Raijmakers, Bas, William W. Gaver, and Jon Bishay. 2006. “Design Documentaries: Inspiring Design Research through Documentary Film.” In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, 229–238. DIS ‘06. New York, NY, USA: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1142405.1142441.
   Google Scholar
• Rode, Jennifer A. 2011. Reflexivity in Digital Anthropology, 123. New York: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1978942.1978961.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, Rachel. 2010. “Embedding Reflexivity within Experiential Qualitative Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 7 (3): 233–243. doi:10.1080/14780880802699092.
   Google Scholar
• Shenton, Andrew K. 2004. “Strategies for Ensuring Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research Projects.” Education for Information 22 (2): 63–75. doi:10.3233/EFI-2004-22201.
   Google Scholar
• Spyrou, Spyros. 2001. “Being One and More than One: Greek Cypriot Children and Ethnic Identity in the Flow of Everyday Life.” disClosure: A Journal of Social Theory 10: 8. doi:10.13023/DISCLOSURE.10.08.
   Google Scholar
• Spyrou, Spyros. 2011. “The Limits of Children’s Voices: From Authenticity to Critical, Reflexive Representation.” Childhood 18 (2): 151–165. doi:10.1177/0907568210387834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stebbins, Robert A. 2001. Exploratory Research in the Social Sciences. Qualitative Research Methods, vol. 48. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Vasalou, Asimina, Seray Ibrahim, Michael Clarke, and Yvonne Griffiths. 2021. “On Power and Participation: Reflections from Design with Developmentally Diverse Children.” International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 27 (March): 100241. doi:10.1016/j.ijcci.2020.100241.
   Google Scholar
• Vines, John, Rachel Clarke, Peter Wright, John McCarthy, and Patrick Olivier. 2013. “Configuring Participation: On How We Involve People in Design.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 429–438. CHI ‘13. New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/2470654.2470716.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, Amanda A., and Mark Carter. 2007. “Social Relationships and Friendships of Children with Developmental Disabilities: Implications for Inclusive Settings. A Systematic Review.” Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability 32 (3): 200–213. doi:10.1080/13668250701549443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickenden, Mary. 2011. “Talking to Teenagers: Using Anthropological Methods to Explore Identity and the Lifeworlds of Young People Who Use AAC.” Communication Disorders Quarterly 32 (3): 151–163. doi:10.1177/1525740109348792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolgar, Steve, ed. 1988. Knowledge and Reflexivity: New Frontiers in the Sociology of Knowledge. London ; Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar