Misfitting and social practice theory: incorporating disability into the performance and (re)enactment of social practices

References

• Alkemeyer, T., and N. Buschmann. 2017. “Learning in and across Practices: Enablement as Subjectivation.” In The Nexus of Practices: Connections, Constellations, Practitioners, edited by A. Hui, T. Schatzki and E. Shove, 8–23. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Antaki, C. 2012. “What Actions Mean, to Whom, and When.” Discourse Studies 14 (4): 493–498. doi:10.1177/1461445611433959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antaki, C., W. Finlay, C. Walton, and L. Pate. 2008. “Offering Choices to People with Intellectual Disabilities: An Interactional Study.” Journal of Intellectual Disability Research: JIDR 52 (12): 1165–1175. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01101.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antaki, C., and J. Webb. 2019. “When the Larger Objective Matters More: Support Workers’ Epistemic and Deontic Authority over Adult Service-Users.” Sociology of Health & Illness 41 (8): 1549–1566. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.12964.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, C., and S. Murray. 2010. “Disabling Postcolonialism Global Disability Cultures and Democratic Criticism.” Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies 4 (3): 219–236. doi:10.3828/jlcds.2010.20.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, B. 2001. “Practice as Collective Action.” In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, edited by T. Schatski, K. K. Cetina, and E. Von Savigny, 25–36. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, C. 2003. “What a Difference a Decade Makes: Reflections on Doing ‘Emancipatory’ Disability Research.” Disability & Society 18 (1): 3–17. doi:10.1080/713662197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bournemouth Symphony Orchestra (BSO). 2018. “A Year of BBC Resound - BBC Relaxed Prom Blog: 27 August 2018.” Accessed 14 June 2021. https://bsolive.com/news/a-year-of-bso-resound/
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2013. Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). 2020. “BBC Music Day: The South West Open Youth Orchestra at the Colston Hall in Bristol (2016).” Accessed 14 June 2021. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p03z4pgm
   Google Scholar
• Davis, L. 2017. “Introduction: Disability, Normality and Power.” In The Disability Studies Reader, edited by L. Davis, 5th ed., 1–16. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Schauwer, E., S. Daelman, H. Vandenbussche, S. Sergeant, I. Van de Putte, and B. Davies. 2021. “Desiring and Critiquing Humanity/Ability/Personhood: Disrupting the Ability/Disability Binary.” Disability & Society 36 (2): 286–305. doi:10.1080/09687599.2020.1735306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling, S., V. Williams, J. Webb, M. Gall, and D. Worrall. 2019. “Managing Relational Autonomy in Interactions: People with Intellectual Disabilities.” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities: JARID 32 (5): 1058–1066. doi:10.1111/jar.12595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Equality Act. 2010. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents
   Google Scholar
• Forget-me-Not Research Group. 2019. Dementia Talk: Communication Training Videos. Bristol: University of Bristol. Accessed 14 June 2021. http://www.bristol.ac.uk/sps/gettingthingschanged/
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1982. “The Subject and Power.” Critical Inquiry 8 (4): 777–795. doi:10.1086/448181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gall, M. forthcoming. “Technology and Change: Open Orchestras for Young People with Special Educational Needs/Disabilities.”
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Malden: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garland-Thomson, R. 2011. “Misfits: A Feminist Materialist Disability Concept.” Hypatia 26 (3): 591–609. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01206.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, S. 2000. Universal Design. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. 2017. Disability Studies: An Interdisciplinary Introduction. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D., and K. Runswick-Cole. 2016. “Becoming Dishuman: Thinking about the Human through Dis/Ability.” Discourse: studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 37 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1080/01596306.2014.930021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, T. 2011. “Practice-Ing Behaviour Change: Applying Social Practice Theory to Pro-Environmental Behaviour Change.” Journal of Consumer Culture 11 (1): 79–99. doi:10.1177/1469540510390500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedge, N., and A. MacKenzie. 2012. “Putting Nussbaum’s Capability Approach to Work: Re-Visiting Inclusion.” Cambridge Journal of Education 42 (3): 327–344. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2012.706252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., and S. Clayman. 2010. Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities and Institutions. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Heslop, P., S. Read, and F. Dunwoodie Stirton. 2018. “The Provision of Reasonable Adjustments for People with Learning Disabilities Using Hospital Services: Findings from Freedom of Information Requests to Clinical Commissioning Groups and Hospital Trusts.” British Journal of Learning Disabilities 46 (4): 258–267. doi:10.1111/bld.12244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui, A., T. Schatzki, and E. Shove, eds. 2017. The Nexus of Practices: Connections, Constellations, Practitioners. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mental Capacity Act. 2005. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2005/9/contents
   Google Scholar
• Merchant, W., V. Mason-Angelow, S. D’Evelyn, S. Read, S. Trahar, and S. Porter. 2018. “Changing Academia: Disabled Students and Staff in Universities.” In Getting Things Changed Team, Final Report, Chapter 6, 28–31. Accessed 14 June 2021. http://www.bristol.ac.uk/media-library/sites/sps/images/gettingthingschanged/Final%20GTC%20report_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Merchant, W., S. Read, S. D’Evelyn, C. Miles, and V. Williams. 2020. “The Insider View: Tackling Disabling Practices in Higher Education Institutions.” Higher Education 80 (2): 273–287. doi:10.1007/s10734-019-00479-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misfits Theatre Company. 2018. “A Good Match.” Accessed 14 June 2021. www.bristol.ac.uk/sps/gettingthingschanged/videos/
   Google Scholar
• Morris, J. 2004. “Independent Living and Community Care: A Disempowering Framework.” Disability & Society 19 (5): 427–442. doi:10.1080/0968759042000235280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nind, M., and H. Vinha. 2014. “Doing Research Inclusively: Bridges to Multiple Possibilities in Inclusive Research.” British Journal of Learning Disabilities 42 (2): 102–109. doi:10.1111/bld.12013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, M., and C. Barnes. 2012. The New Politics of Disablement. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Open Up Music. 2020. “Open Orchestras.” Accessed 14 June 2021. https://www.openorchestras.org/
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, M., M. Ball, F. Whittington, and C. Hollingsworth. 2012. “Relational Autonomy in Assisted Living: A Focus on Diverse Care Settings for Older Adults.” Journal of Aging Studies 26 (2): 214–225. doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2012.01.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read, S., P. Heslop, S. Turner, V. Mason-Angelow, N. Tilbury, C. Miles, and C. Hatton. 2018. “Disabled People’s Experiences of Accessing Reasonable Adjustments in Hospitals: A Qualitative Study.” BMC Health Services Research 18 (1): 931. doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3757-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read, S., V. Williams, P. Heslop, V. Mason-Angelow, and C. Miles. 2018. “Being a Disabled Patient: Negotiating the Social Practices of Hospitals in England.” Social Inclusion 6 (2): 74–2803. doi:10.17645/si.v6i2.1308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. 2002. “Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing.” European Journal of Social Theory 5 (2): 243–263. doi:10.1177/13684310222225432.
   Google Scholar
• Rinkinen, J., M. Jalas, and E. Shove. 2015. “Object Relations in Accounts of Everyday Life.” Sociology 49 (5): 870–885. doi:10.1177/0038038515577910.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. 2014. “Overall Structural Organisation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, edited by J. Sidnell and T. Stivers, 257–280. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. 2015. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 3rd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. 1996. Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. 2001. “Introduction: Practice Theory.” In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, edited by T. Schatzki, K. K. Cetina, and E. Von Savigny, 1–14. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. 2017. “Sayings, Texts and Discursive Formations.” In The Nexus of Practices: Connections, Constellations, Practitioners, edited by A. Hui, T. Schatzki, and E. Shove, 126–140. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. 2006. Disability Rights and Wrongs. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T., and N. Watson. 2001. “The Social Model of Disability: An Outdated Ideology?” In Exploring Theories and Expanding Methodologies: Where We Are and Where We Need to Go, edited by S. Barnatt and B. Altman, 9–28. Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E. 2014. “Putting Practice into Policy: Reconfiguring Questions of Consumption and Climate Change.” Contemporary Social Science 9 (4): 415–429. doi:10.1080/21582041.2012.692484.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E., M. Pantzar, and M. Watson. 2012. The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How It Changes. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J. and T. Stivers, eds. 2014. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Tarleton, B., and D. Turney. 2020. “Understanding ‘Successful Practice/s’ with Parents with Learning Difficulties When There Are Concerns about Child Neglect: The Contribution of Social Practice Theory.” Child Indicators Research 13 (2): 387–409. doi:10.1007/s12187-019-09682-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, A., and L. Shallish. 2019. “The Logic of Bio-Meritocracy in the Promotion of Higher Education Equity.” Disability & Society 34 (7-8): 1200–1223. doi:10.1080/09687599.2019.1613962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. 2004. “How is Disability Understood? An Examination of Sociological Approaches.” Disability & Society 19 (6): 569–583. doi:10.1080/0968759042000252506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titchkosky, T. 2008. “To Pee or Not to Pee?’ Ordinary Talk about Extraordinary Exclusions in a University Environment.” Canadian Journal of Sociology 33 (1): 37–60. doi:10.29173/cjs1526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vehmas, S., and N. Watson. 2014. “Moral Wrongs, Disadvantages, and Disability: A Critique of Critical Disability Studies.” Disability & Society 29 (4): 638–650. doi:10.1080/09687599.2013.831751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, N. 2003. “Daily Denials: The Routinisation of Oppression and Resistance.” In Disability, Culture and Identity, edited by S. Riddell and N. Watson, 34–52. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, J. in press. “Social Quizzes for People Living with Dementia: How Enactment Impacts on Interaction.” In Interaction and Dementia: From Diagnosis to Daily Discourse, edited by P. Muntigl, D. Jones, and C. Plejert. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, J., C. Lindholm, and V. Williams. 2020. “Interactional Strategies for Progressing through Quizzes in Dementia Settings.” Discourse Studies 22 (4): 503–522. doi:10.1177/1461445620914673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, J., and B. Tarleton. 2018. “Getting Things Changed: Social Practices Booklet.” Accessed 14 June 2021. http://www.bristol.ac.uk/media-ibrary/sites/sps/images/gettingthingschanged/SPT%20booklet_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Webb, J., V. Williams, S. Dowling, and M. Gall. 2020. “Misfitting the Research Process: Shaping Qualitative Research ‘in the Field’ to Fit People Living with Dementia.” International Journal of Qualitative Research Methods 19: 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, V. 2011. Disability and Discourse: Analysing Inclusive Conversation with People with Intellectual Disabilities. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, V., B. Tarleton, P. Heslop, S. Porter, B. Sass, S. Blue, W. Merchant, and V. Mason-Angelow. 2018. “Understanding Disabling Barriers: A Fruitful Partnership between Disability Studies and Social Practices?” Disability & Society 33 (2): 157–174. doi:10.1080/09687599.2017.1401527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, V., J. Webb, S. Dowling, and M. Gall. 2019. “Direct and Indirect Ways of Managing Epistemic Asymmetries in Questions Designed to Elicit Memories.” Discourse Studies 21 (2): 199–215. doi:10.1177/1461445618802657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, V., J. Webb, S. Read, R. James, and H. Davis. 2020. “Future Lived Experience: Inclusive Research with People Living with Dementia.” Qualitative Research 20 (5): 721–740. doi:10.1177/1468794119893608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar