Giving voice to the voices of legal practitioners with disabilities

References

• Ashby, Christine E. 2011. “Whose ‘Voice’ is It Anyway?: Giving Voice and Qualitative Research Involving Individuals That Type to Communicate.” Disability Studies Quarterly 31 (4): 1–22. doi:10.18061/dsq.v31i4.1723.
   Google Scholar
• Beckene, Tessy, Rachel Forrester-Jones, and Glynis H. Murphy. 2020. “Experiences of Going to Court: Witnesses with Intellectual Disabilities and Their Carers Speak Up.” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 33 (1): 67–78. doi:10.1111/jar.12334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedet, Janine, and Isabel Grant. 2012. “Taking the Stand : Access to Justice for Witnesses with Mental Disabilities in Sexual Assault Cases.” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 1 (1): 1–45.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, David R., and Janice C. Light. 2020. Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Supporting Children and Adults with Complex Communication Needs. 5th ed. Baltimore, Maryland: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bornman, Juan. 2017. “Preventing Abuse and Providing Access to Justice for Individuals with Complex Communication Needs: The Role of Augmentative and Alternative Communication.” Seminars in Speech and Language 38 (4): 321–331. doi:10.1055/s-0037-1604279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornman, Juan, Diane Nelson Bryen, Priscilla Kershaw, and Gloria Ledwaba. 2011. “Reducing the Risk of Being a Victim of Crime in South Africa: You Can Tell and Be Heard!.” Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, MD: 1985) 27 (2): 117–130. doi:10.3109/07434618.2011.566696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornman, Juan, Robyn White, Ensa Johnson, and Diane Nelson Bryen. 2016. “Identifying Barriers in the South African Criminal Justice System: Implications for Individuals with Severe Communication Disability.” Acta Criminologica: Southern African Journal of Criminology 29 (1): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Bowden, Chandra, and Sebastian Galindo-Gonzalez. 2015. “Interviewing When You’re Not Face-to-Face: The Use of Email Interviews in a Phenomenological Study.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 10: 079–092. doi:10.28945/2104.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, Natilene, and Keith Tuffin. 2004. “Using the Online Medium for Discursive Research about People with Disabilities.” Social Science Computer Review 22 (2): 228–241. doi:10.1177/0894439303262561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2020b. “Thematic Analysis – A Reflexive Approach.” 2020. https://www.psych.auckland.ac.nz/en/about/thematic-analysis.html#95c4b0bee0b9774eee5f7ba22cb91d53.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2019. “Reflecting on Reflexive Thematic Analysis.” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 11 (4): 589–597. doi:10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2020a. “One Size Fits All? What Counts as Quality Practice in (Reflexive) Thematic Analysis?” Qualitative Research in Psychology 18 (3): 325–328. doi:10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, John L., Charles Quincy, Jordan Osserman, and Ove K. Pedersen. 2013. “Coding in-Depth Semistructured Interviews.” Sociological Methods & Research 42 (3): 294–320. doi:10.1177/0049124113500475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celik, Elif. 2017. “The Role of CRPD in Rethinking the Subject of Human Rights.” The International Journal of Human Rights 21 (7): 933–955. doi:10.1080/13642987.2017.1313236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, Chia Fen, Ratna Sari Dewi, Yuh Jang, and Hsiu Lin Liu. 2018. “Workplace Accommodation for Workers with Intellectual or Psychiatric Disabilities.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 68 (May): 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2018.06.001.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, Stephen J., G. Mitu Gulati, and Eric A. Posner. 2010. “Professionals or Politicians: The Uncertain Empirical Case for an Elected Rather than Appointed Judiciary.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 26 (2): 290–336. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewn023.
   Google Scholar
• Cremin, Kevin M. 2016. “What Does Access to Justice Require?—Overcoming Barriers to Invoke the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.” Frontiers of Law in China 11 (2): 280–322. doi:10.3868/s050-005-016-0017-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, John W., and Vicki L. Plano Clark. 2018. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cusack, Alan. 2017. “Victims of Crime with Intellectual Disabilities and Ireland’s Adversarial Trial: Some Ontological, Procedural and Attitudinal Concerns.” Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 68 (4): 433–449. https://nilq.qub.ac.uk/index.php/nilq/article/view/57.
   Google Scholar
• D’Or, Melissa, Jennifer Kelly, and Anne-Louise McCawley. 2021. “The Lived Experience of Younger People with a Disability Living in Residential Aged Care Facilities in Australia.” Disability & Society 36 (4): 618–618. doi:10.1080/09687599.2020.1755235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degener, Theresia. 2016. “A Human Rights Model of Disability.” In Routledge Handbook of Disability Law and Human Rights, edited by Peter Blanck and Eilionóir Flynn. Abingdon: Routledge. 31–49. https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315612881.ch3.
   Google Scholar
• Doak, Jonathan, and Lauran Doak. 2017. “Non-Verbal Victims in the Adversarial Criminal Process: Communication, Competency, and Credibility.” Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 68 (4): 451–468. https://nilq.qub.ac.uk/index.php/nilq/article/view/59.
   Google Scholar
• Dorfman, Doron. 2016. “The Blind Justice Paradox: Judges with Visual Impairments and the Disability Metaphor.” Cambridge International Law Journal 5 (2): 272–305. doi:10.4337/cilj.2016.02.05.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, Claire, Gillian Harold, and Shane Kilcommins. 2012. “Access to Justice for People with Disabilities as Victims of Crime in Ireland.” https://cora.ucc.ie/bitstream/handle/10468/6966/Access_to_Justice_for_People_with_Disabilities_as_Victims_of_Crime_in_Ireland_2012.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
   Google Scholar
• Equality and Human Rights Commission. 2020. “Inclusive Justice: A System Designed For All.” https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/sites/default/files/ehrc_inclusive_justice_a_system_designed_for_all_june_2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, Martin, and Fraser Macleod. 2011. “Involving Disabled People in Social Research: Guidance by the Office for Disability Issues.” https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/321254/involving-disabled-people-in-social-research.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, Eilionoir, and Anna Lawson. 2013. “Disability and Access to Justice in the European Union: Implications of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.” European Yearbook of Disability Law 4. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/euydisl4&div=6&id=&page=.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, Eilionóir. 2016. Disabled Justice? Access to Justice and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. New York: Routledge:Taylor and Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, D., and N. Hirst. 2020. “Legally Disabled? The Career Experiences of Disabled People Working in the Legal Profession.” http://legallydisabled.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Legally-Disabled-full-report-FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fritz, Roschelle L., and Roxanne Vandermause. 2018. “Data Collection via in-Depth Email Interviewing: Lessons from the Field.” Qualitative Health Research 28 (10): 1640–1649. doi:10.1177/1049732316689067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, Rebecca D., and Kate Eugenis. 2019. “Do Voters Prefer Women Judges? Deconstructing the Competitive Advantage in State Supreme Court Elections.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 19 (4): 399–427. doi:10.1177/1532440019847771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Citizenship Commission. 2016. “The Universal Declaration of Human Rights in the 21st Century.” http://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/467/the-universal-declaration-of-human-rights-in-the-21st-century/11e3271f43944115ff51e15533442ee2.
   Google Scholar
• Gooding, Piers, Anna Arstein-Kerslake, Sarah Mercer, and Bernadette McSherry. 2017. “Supporting Accused Persons with Cognitive Disabilities to Participate in Criminal Proceedings in Australia: Avoiding the Pitfalls of Unfitness to Stand Trial Laws.” Law in Context: A Socio-Legal Journal 35: 64–84. doi:10.26826/law-in-context.v35i2.15.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Sarah A. 2013. “Including People with Intellectual Disabilities in Qualitative Research.” Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research 7: 128–142.
   Google Scholar
• Harpur, Paul. 2012. “Embracing the New Disability Rights Paradigm: The Importance of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.” Disability & Society 27 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1080/09687599.2012.631794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, Susan. 2007. “Missing out: Offenders with Learning Disabilities and the Criminal Justice System.” British Journal of Learning Disabilities 35 (3): 146–153. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3156.2007.00465.x.
   Google Scholar
• Hepner, Ilana, Mary N. Woodward, and Jeanette Stewart. 2015. “Giving the Vulnerable a Voice in the Criminal Justice System: The Use of Intermediaries with Individuals with Intellectual Disability.” Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 22 (3): 453–464. doi:10.1080/13218719.2014.960032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hershberger, Patricia E., and Karen Kavanaugh. 2017. “Comparing Appropriateness and Equivalence of Email Interviews to Phone Interviews in Qualitative Research on Reproductive Decisions.” Applied Nursing Research : ANR 37: 50–54. doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2017.07.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbert, Neil. 2017. “Human Rights and Social Justice.” Laws 6 (2): 7. doi:10.3390/laws6020007.
   Google Scholar
• Horan, John. 2011. “What Does in the Matter of Horan Tell Us about Judges and Barristers ?” Equal Opportunities Review 28 (213): 27–28. http://www.era-comm.eu/UNCRPD/kiosk/speakers_contributions/111DV69/Horan_judges_and_barristers.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hyun, Elly, Lyndsey Hahn, and David Mcconnell. 2014. “Experiences of People with Learning Disabilities in the Criminal Justice System.” British Journal of Learning Disabilities 42 (4): 308–314. doi:10.1111/bld.12076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iaryczower, Matias, Garrett Lewis, and Matthew Shum. 2013. “To Elect or to Appoint? Bias, Information, and Responsiveness of Bureaucrats and Politicians.” Journal of Public Economics 97 (1): 230–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.08.007.
   Google Scholar
• Imms, Christine, Mats Granlund, Peter H. Wilson, Bert Steenbergen, Peter L. Rosenbaum, and Andrew M. Gordon. 2017. “Participation, Both a Means and an End: A Conceptual Analysis of Processes and Outcomes in Childhood Disability.” Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 59 (1): 16–25. doi:10.1111/dmcn.13237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imms, Christine. 2020. “Participation in Diverse Life Situations for People with Disability: A Vision for the Future.” Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 62 (1): 5. doi:10.1111/dmcn.14399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, Jessica, and Penny Cooper. 2020. “Participation in Courts and Tribunals: Concepts, Realities and Aspirations.” In Participation in Courts and Tribunals, edited by Jessica Jacobson and Penny Cooper. Bristol: Bristol University Press. pg 1 - 186. doi:10.2307/j.ctv177thrh.
   Google Scholar
• James, Nalita. 2016. “Using Email Interviews in Qualitative Educational Research: Creating Space to Think and Time to Talk.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 29 (2): 150–163. doi:10.1080/09518398.2015.1017848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Eun Jung, Tina Skinner, and Susan L. Parish. 2020. “A Study on Intersectional Discrimination in Employment against Disabled Women in the UK.” Disability & Society 35 (5): 715–737. doi:10.1080/09687599.2019.1702506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuosmanen, Jari, and Mikaela Starke. 2015. “Access to Sweden’s Legal System of Crime Victims with Intellectual Disability Involved in Prostitution Activities.” Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities 12 (4): 255–265. doi:10.1111/jppi.12135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, David. 2014. “Access to Justice for Persons with Disabilities: An Emerging Strategy.” Laws 3 (2): 220–238. doi:10.3390/laws3020220.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, Sally, Victoria Osten, Mana Rezai, Sunny Bui, Sally Lindsay, Victoria Osten, Mana Rezai, and Sunny Bui Disclosure. 2021. “Disclosure and Workplace Accommodations for People with Autism : A Systematic Review.” Disability and Rehabilitation 43 (5): 514–597. doi:10.1080/09638288.2019.1635658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodovici, Manuela, and Nicola Orlando. 2017. “Discrimination and Access to Employment for Female Workers with Disabilities.” European Parliament. Vol. Directorat. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=IPOL_STU%282017%29602067.
   Google Scholar
• Lordan, Nuala. 2000. “Finding a Voice : Empowerment of People with Disabilities in Ireland.” Journal of Progressive Human Services 11 (1): 49–69. doi:10.1300/J059v11n01_04.
   Google Scholar
• Lumsden, Karen, and Alex Black. 2020. “Sorry, I’m Dead, It’s Too Late Now’: Barriers Faced by D/Deaf Citizens When Accessing Police Services.” Disability & Society: 1–20. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09687599.2020.1829555?journalCode=cdso20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinos, Voula, Dorothy Griffiths, Christina Fergus, Samantha Stromski, and Kelsey Rondeau. 2014. “Victims and Witnesses with Intellectual Disability in the Criminal Justice System.” Criminal Law Quarterly 61. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/clwqrty61&div=38&id=&page=.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, Caitlin, and Ellie Fossey. 2015. “Workplace Accommodations for People with Mental Illness: A Scoping Review.” Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 25 (1): 197–206. doi:10.1007/s10926-014-9512-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menton, Francis J. Jr. 2009. “In Defense of Judicial Elections.” Engage 12 (1): 130–132. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203876992.
   Google Scholar
• Nair, Prianka. 2009. “Giving Voice in Court: Cushioning Adversarialism for Witnesses with Intellectual Disabilities.” Current Issues in Criminal Justice 21 (3): 481–488. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10345329.2010.12035862.
   Google Scholar
• Nevala, Nina, Irmeli Pehkonen, Inka Koskela, Johanna Ruusuvuori, and Heidi Anttila. 2015. “Workplace Accommodation among Persons with Disabilities: A Systematic Review of Its Effectiveness and Barriers or Facilitators.” Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 25 (2): 432–448. doi:10.1007/s10926-014-9548-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowell, Lorelli S., Jill M. Norris, Deborah E. White, and Nancy J. Moules. 2017. “Thematic Analysis:Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 16 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1177/1609406917733847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Leary, Catherine, and Michael Feely. 2018. “Alignment of the Irish Legal System and Article 13.1 of the CRPD for Witnesses with Communication Difficulties.” Disability Studies Quarterly 38 (1): 1–22. doi:10.18061/dsq.v38i1.5587.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, Catherine. 2016. “Accommodations for Witnesses with Communication Difficulties in Irish Criminal Proceedings: An Examination in Relation to Article 13.1.” Trinity College Dublin. http://ir.obihiro.ac.jp/dspace/handle/10322/3933.
   Google Scholar
• O’Mahony, Brendan M. 2012. “Accused of Murder: Supporting the Communication Needs of a Vulnerable Defendant at Court and at the Police Station.” Journal of Learning Disabilities and Offending Behaviour 3 (2): 77–84. doi:10.1108/20420921211280060.
   Google Scholar
• Ortoleva, Stephanie. 2011. “Inaccessible Justice: Human Rights, Persons With Disabilities and the Legal System.” ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law 17 (2): 281–320. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/ilsajournal/vol17/iss2/1/
   Google Scholar
• Park, Sunggeun. 2020. “Beyond Patient-Centred Care: A Conceptual Framework of Co-Production Mechanisms with Vulnerable Groups in Health and Social Service Settings.” Public Management Review 22 (3): 452–474. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1601241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillay, Anthony L. 2012. “The Rape Survivor with an Intellectual Disability vs. The Court.” South African Journal of Psychology 42 (3): 312–322. doi:10.1177/008124631204200303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsten, Camilla, and Helena Blomberg. 2019. “Staff as Advocates, Moral Guardians and Enablers – Using ICT for Independence and Participation in Disability Services.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 21 (1): 271–281. doi:10.16993/sjdr.608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratislavová, Kateřina, and Jakub Ratislav. 2014. “Asynchronous Email Interview as a Qualitative Research Method in the Humanities.” Human Affairs 24 (4): 452–460. doi:10.2478/s13374-014-0240-y.
   Google Scholar
• Rix, Jonathan, Helena Garcia Carrizosa, Jane Seale, Kieron Sheehy, and Simon Hayhoe. 2020. “The While of Participation: A Systematic Review of Participatory Research Involving People with Sensory Impairments and/or Intellectual Impairments.” Disability & Society 35 (7): 1031–1057. doi:10.1080/09687599.2019.1669431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, John Paul. 2005. “Selecting Supreme Court Justices: A Dialogue.” Focus on Law Studies 20 (2): 1–22. http://users.polisci.umn.edu/∼trj/MyPapers/ABA2005.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Shrewsbury, Duncan. 2015. “Disability and Participation in the Professions: Examples from Higher and Medical Education.” Disability & Society 30 (1): 87–100. doi:10.1080/09687599.2014.982785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skaggs, Adam. 2010. “Buying Justice: The Impact of Citizens United on Judicial Elections.” https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/2019-08/Report_Buying-Justice.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Smits, Dirk Wouter, Karen Van Meeteren, Martijn Klem, Mattijs Alsem, and Marjolijn Ketelaar. 2020. “Designing a Tool to Support Patient and Public Involvement in Research Projects: The Involvement Matrix.” Research Involvement and Engagement 6 (1): 1–7. doi:10.1186/s40900-020-00188-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Talbot, Jenny. 2012. “Fair Access to Justice? Support for Vulnerable Defendants in the Criminal Courts.” http://www.prisonreformtrust.org.uk/Portals/0/Documents/FairAccesstoJustice.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Thill, Cate. 2015. “Listening for Policy Change: How the Voices of Disabled People Shaped Australia’s National Disability Insurance Scheme.” Disability & Society 30 (1): 15–28. doi:10.1080/09687599.2014.987220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, Tom R. 2008. “Procedural Justice and the Courts.” Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 44 (1/2): 25–31.
   Google Scholar
• United Kingdom Parliament. 2021. Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill. House of Commons. https://bills.parliament.uk/publications/41453/documents/192.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 1989. “The Convention on the Rights of the Child.” https://www.unicef.org/child-rights-convention/convention-text.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 1948. “Universal Declaration of Human Rights,” 8. https://www.ohchr.org/EN/UDHR/Documents/UDHR_Translations/eng.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 1988. “Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women.” Annual Review of Population Law 15 (September): 148.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2006. “Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.” Treaty Series 2515: 3. http://www.un.org/disabilities/.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2020. “International Principles and Guidelines on Access to Justice for Persons with Disabilities.” https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Disability/SR_Disability/GoodPractices/Access-to-Justice-EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2021. “Ratifications and Signatures of the CRPD.” 2021. https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-15&chapter=4&clang=_en.
   Google Scholar
• Viljoen, Erna. 2018. “Statement Taking by Police Officers from Persons with Complex Communication Needs Who Report Being a Victim of Crime.” Ph.D. thesis, University of Pretoria. https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/70534.
   Google Scholar
• White, Robyn, Juan Bornman, and Ensa Johnson. 2015. “Testifying in Court as a Victim of Crime for Persons with Little or No Functional Speech : Vocabulary Implications.” Child Abuse Research: A South African Journal 16 (1): 1–14. https://repository.up.ac.za/dspace/handle/2263/49693.
   Google Scholar
• White, Robyn, Juan Bornman, Ensa Johnson, and Dianah Msipa. 2020b. “Court Accommodations for Persons with Severe Communication Disabilities: A Legal Scoping Review.” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 27 (3): 399–420. doi:10.1037/law0000289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, Robyn, Juan Bornman, Ensa Johnson, Karen Tewson, and Joan van Niekerk. 2020a. “Transformative equality: Court accommodations for South African citizens with severe communication disabilities .” African Journal of Disability 9: 612–651. doi:10.4102/ajod.v9i0.651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Women Enabled International. 2019. “Access to Justice for Women and Girls with Disabilities.” https://womenenabled.org/wp-content/uploads/Women%20Enabled%20International%20Facts%20-%20Access%20to%20Justice%20for%20Women%20and%20Girls%20with%20Disabilities%20-%20English.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ziv, Neta. 2007. “Witnesses with Mental Disabilities: Accommodations and the Search for Truth.” Disability Studies Quarterly 27 (4): 1–24. doi:10.18061/dsq.v27i4.51.
   Google Scholar