Between risk and autonomy: producing subjects in group homes and supervised workshops for people with intellectual disabilities

References

• Altermark, N. 2017. “The Post-Institutional Era: Visions of History in Research on Intellectual Disability.” Disability & Society 32 (9): 1315–1332. doi:10.1080/09687599.2017.1322497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altermark, N. 2018. Citizenship Inclusion and Intellectual Disability: biopolitics Post-Institutionalisation. Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• ASA. 2011. Ethical Guidelines for good research practice. http://www.theasa.org/ethics.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Bigby, C., M. Knox, J. Beadle-Brown, and E. Bould. 2014. “Identifying Good Group Homes: Qualitative Indicators Using a Quality of Life Framework.” Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 52 (5): 348–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradl, C. 1996. “Vom Heim Zur Assistenz. Strukturelle Grenzen Von "Selbstbestimmt Leben" im Heim. [from Asylum to Assistance. Structural Boarders of "Self-Determent Living" in an Asylum].” In Mehr Selbstbestimmung Durch Enthospitalisierung: kritische Analysen Und Neue Orientierungen Für Die Arbeit Mit Geistig Behinderten Menschen [More Self-Determination Though Dehospitalization: critical Analysis and New Orientations in the Work with People with Intellectual Disabilities.], edited by C. Bradl and I. Steinhart, 178–203. Bonn: Psychiatrie Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2005. “Affirming the Affirmative: On Nomadic Affectivity.” Rhizomes, 11/12. http://www.rhizomes.net/issue11/braidotti.html.
   Google Scholar
• Bröckling, U., S. Krasmann, and T. Lemke. 2013. Governmentality: Current Issues and Future Challenges. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, F. K. 2009. Contours of Ableism: The Production of Disability and Abledness. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, F. K. 2012. “Stalking Ableism: Using Disability to Expose ‘Abled’ Narcissism.” In Disability and Social Theory: New Developments and Directions, edited by D. Goodley, B. Hughes, and L. J. Davis, 212–232. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Candea, M. 2010. “Anonymous Introductions: Identity and Belonging in Corsica.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 16 (1): 119–137. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9655.2009.01600.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castel, R. 1988. The Regulation of Madness: The Origins of Incarceration in France. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. E. 2005. Situational Analysis: grounded Theory after the Postmodern Turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, J. 1992. “Traveling Cultures.” In Cultural Studies, edited by L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, and P. Treichler, 96–116. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Comaroff, J., and J. Comaroff. 2001. “On Personhood: An Anthropological Perspective from Africa.” Social Identities 7 (2): 267–283. doi:10.1080/13504630120065310.
   Google Scholar
• DeWalt, K. M., and B. R. DeWalt. 2011. Participant Observation: A Guide for Fieldworkers. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, J. 2016. “Balancing Risk and Recovery in Mental Health. An Analysis of the Way in Which Policy Objectives around Risk and Recovery Affect Professional Practice in England.” In Medicine, Risk, Discourse and Power, edited by J. M. Chamberlain, 120–140. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Donchin, A. 2001. “Understanding Autonomy Relationally: Toward a Reconfiguration of Bioethical Principles.” The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (4): 365–386. doi:10.1076/jmep.26.4.365.3012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, R. M., R. I. Fretz, and L. L. Shaw. 2011. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, T. H. 2001. Small Places, Large Issues: An Introduction to Social and Cultural Anthropology. London; Sterling: Pluto Press. http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=3386545.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, J. 2013. “Declarations of Dependence: Labour, Personhood, and Welfare in Southern Africa.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 19 (2): 223–242. doi:10.1111/1467-9655.12023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fluehr-Lobban, C. 2000. “Ethics.” In Handbook of Methods in Cultural Anthropology, edited by H. R. Bernard, 173–202. Walnut Creek; Lanham; Oxford: Altamira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1982. “The Subject and Power.” Critical Inquiry 8 (4): 777–795. doi:10.1086/448181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2009. Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fritsch, K. 2015. “Desiring Disability Differently: Neoliberalism, Heterotopic Imagination and Intracorporeal Reconfigurations.” Foucault Studies 19: 43–66. doi:10.22439/fs.v0i19.4824.
   Google Scholar
• Fritsch, K., and A. McGuire. 2019. “Risk and the Spectral Politics of Disability.” Body & Society 25 (4): 29–54. doi:10.1177/1357034X19857138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fylkesnes, I. 2020. “Institutional Talk and Practices: A Journey into Small Group-Homes for Intellectually Disabled Children.” Disability and Society 36 (6): 999–1020. 
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gappmayer, G. 2019. “Exploring Neoliberalism in Care for People with Intellectual Disabilities: A Practice Theory Approach.” Journal of Occupational Science 26 (2): 258–274. doi:10.1080/14427591.2019.1596830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1985). The constitution of society: outline of structuration. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E., and W. B. Helmreich. 2017. Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. New York. Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D., K. Liddiard, and K. Runswick-Cole. 2018. “Feeling Disability: Theories of Affect and Critical Disability Studies.” Disability & Society 33 (2): 197–217. doi:10.1080/09687599.2017.1402752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gowan, T., S. Whetstone, and T. Andic. 2012. “Addiction, Agency, and the Politics of Self-Control: Doing Harm Reduction in a Heroin Users’ Group.” Social Science & Medicine (1982) 74 (8): 1251–1260. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. 2007. “Kinds of People: Moving Targets.” British Academy Lecture. British Academy 151: 285–318.
   Google Scholar
• Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. 2005. “Autonomy and Relatedness in Cultural Context.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 36 (4): 403–422. doi:10.1177/0022022105275959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirmayer, L. J. 2007. “Psychotherapy and the Cultural Concept of the Person.” Transcultural Psychiatry 44 (2): 232–257. doi:10.1177/1363461506070794.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kittay, E. F. 2009. “The Personal is Philosophical is Political: A Philosopher and Mother of a Cognitively Disabled Person Sneds Notes Grom the Battlefield.” In Cognitive Disability and Its Challenge to Moral Philosophy, edited by L. Carlson and E. F. Kittay, 393–413. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kittay, E. F. 2013. “Caring for the Long Haul: Long-Term Care Needs and the (Moral) Failure to Acknowledge Them.” Ijfab: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 6 (2): 66–88. doi:10.3138/ijfab.6.2.66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kittay, E. F. 2015. “Centering Justice on Dependency and Recovering Freedom.” Hypatia 30 (1): 285–291. doi:10.1111/hypa.12131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb, S. 2014. “Permanent Personhood or Meaningful Decline? Toward a Critical Anthropology of Successful Aging.” Journal of Aging Studies 29: 41–52. doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2013.12.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, T., S. Krasmann, and U. Bröckling. 2000. “Gouvernementalität, Neoliberalismus Und Selbsttechnologien. eine Einleitung [Governmentality, Neoliberalism and Technologies of the Self. An Introduction].” In Gouvernementalität Der Gegenwart: Studien Zur Ökonomisierung Des Sozialen [Governmentality in the Presence: Studies of the Economisation of the Social], edited by U. Bröckling, S. Krasmann, and T. Lemke, 7–40. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, L. 2003. “Belonging to Country a Philosophical Anthropology.” Journal of Australian Studies 27 (76): 215–223. doi:10.1080/14443050309387839.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. 2008. The Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Novas, C., and N. Rose. 2000. “Genetic Risk and the Birth of the Somatic Individual.” Economy and Society 29 (4): 485–513. doi:10.1080/03085140050174750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peacock, M., P. Bissell, and J. Owen. 2014. “Dependency Denied: Health Inequalities in the Neo-Liberal Era.” Social Science & Medicine (1982) 118: 173–180. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.08.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pols, J., B. Althoff, and E. Bransen. 2017. “The Limits of Autonomy: Ideals in Care for People with Learning Disabilities.” Medical Anthropology 36 (8): 772–785. doi:10.1080/01459740.2017.1367776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. 2008. Subjekt. Bielefeld.
   Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. 2010. Das Hybride Subjekt: Eine Theorie Der Subjektkulturen Von Der Bürgerlichen Moderne Zur Postmoderne [the Hybrid Subject: A Theorie of Subject Cultures from the Bourgeois Modern to the Postmodern]. Weilerswist: Velbrück Wiss.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. 2000. “Government and Control.” British Journal of Criminology 40 (2): 321–339. doi:10.1093/bjc/40.2.321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N. 2001. “The Politics of Life Itself.” Theory, Culture and Society 18 (6): 1–30. doi:10.1177/02632760122052020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanmiquel-Molinero, L., and J. Pujol-Tarrés. 2020. “Putting Emotions to Work: The Role of Affective Disablism and Ableism in the Constitution of the Dis/Abled Subject.” Disability & Society 35 (4): 542–569. doi:10.1080/09687599.2019.1650719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schäfers, M., A. Waldschmidt, S. Arnade, H. Borner, R. Buschmann-Steinhage, K. Grüber, T. Hinz, et al. 2015. Gründungserklärung. Aktionsbündnis Teilhabeforschung – für ein neues Forschungsprogramm zu Lebenslagen und Partizipation von Menschen mit Behinderungen [Foundational Declaration. Alliance of Participation Research - a new research program on circumstances and participation of people with disabilities]. Retrieved from https://teilhabeforschung.bifos.org/index.php/ueber-uns/gruendungserklaerung
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. 2002. The Site of the Social: A Philosophical account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. 2010. “Materiality and Social Life.” Nature and Culture 5 (2): 123–149. doi:10.3167/nc.2010.050202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. 2012. Soziologie Der Praktiken: Konzeptionelle Studien Und Empirische Analysen [Sociology of Practices: conceptual Studies and Empirical Analysis ]. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E., M. Pantzar, and M. Watson. 2012. The Dynamics of Social Practice Everyday Life and How It Changes. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sökefeld, M. 1999. “Debating Self, Identity and Culture in Anthropology.” Current Anthropology 40 (4): 417–448. doi:10.1086/200042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strathern, M. 1988. The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., and J. M. Corbin. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Strübing, J. 2008. “ Pragmatismus Als Epistemische Praxis. Der Beitrag Der Grounded Theory Zur Empirie-Theorie-Frage. [Pragmatism as Epistemological Practice. A Contribution of Grounded Theory to the Empiricism-Theory-Question].” In Theoretische Empirie: zur Relevanz Qualitativer Forschung, edited by H. Kalthoff, S. Hirschauer, and G. Lindemann, 279–311. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Svanelöv, E. 2020. “An Observation Study of Power Practices and Participation in Group Homes for People with Intellectual Disability.” Disability & Society 35 (9): 1419–1440. doi:10.1080/09687599.2019.1691978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talman, L., J. Stier, C. Gustafsson, J. Wilder, J. Wilder, and J. Stier. 2019. “Staff Members and Managers Views of the Conditions for the Participation of Adults with Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities.” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities : JARID 32 (1): 143–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tronto, J. C. 1993. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Twigg, J. 2004. “The Body, Gender and Age: Feminist Insights in Social Gerontology.” Journal of Aging Studies 18 (1): 59–73. doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2003.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UnitedNations. 2020. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. United Nations Publications. Retrieved October 2020 from https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities-2.html
   Google Scholar
• VertretungsNetz. 2018. Sachwalterschaft [legal guardianship]. Retrieved May 27, 2018 from https://www.vertretungsnetz.at/sachwalterschaft/erwschg/
   Google Scholar
• Waldschmidt, A. 2012. Selbstbestimmung Als Konstruktion: Alltagstheorien Behinderter Frauen Und Männer [Self-Determination as Construction: Everyday Life Theories of Women and Men with Disabilities]. 2nd ed. Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften_Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, Wiesbaden.
   Google Scholar
• Waldschmidt, A., and M. Sépulchre. 2019. “Citizenship: Reflections on a Relevant but Ambivalent Concept for Persons with Disabilities.” Disability & Society 34 (3): 421–448. doi:10.1080/09687599.2018.1543580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolbring, G. 2018. “Teaching about Ability Expectation and Its Governance. The Issue of STEM.” In Education and New Technologies: perils and Promises for Learners, edited by K. Sheehy and A. Holliman, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yuval-Davis, N. 2006. “Belonging and the Politics of Belonging.” Patterns of Prejudice 40 (3): 197–214. doi:10.1080/00313220600769331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar